Diagonalization Chapter 5 { Diagonalization Diagonalization Characteristic...
Transcript of Diagonalization Chapter 5 { Diagonalization Diagonalization Characteristic...
Chapter 5 – Diagonalization
Per-Olof [email protected]
Department of MathematicsUniversity of California, Berkeley
Math 110 Linear Algebra
Diagonalization
Definition
A linear operator T on a finite-dimensional vector space V isdiagonalizable if there is an ordered basis β for V such that [T]β isa diagonal matrix. A square matrix A is diagonalizable if LA isdiagonalizable.
Definition
Let T be a linear operator on a vector space V. A nonzero vectorv ∈ V is an eigenvector of T is there exists a scalar eigenvalue λcorresponding to the eigenvector v such that T(v) = λv.Let A ∈ Mn×n(F ). A nonzero vector v ∈ Fn is an eigenvector of Aif v is an eigenvector of LA; that is, if Av = λv for some scalareigenvalue λ of A corresponding to the eigenvector v.
Diagonalization
Theorem 5.1
A linear operator T on a finite-dimensional vector space V isdiagonalizable if and only if there exists an ordered basis β for Vconsisting of eigenvectors of T. If T is diagonalizable,β = {v1, . . . , vn} is an ordered basis of eigenvectors of T, andD = [T]β, then D is a diagonal matrix and Djj is the eigenvaluecorresponding to vj for 1 ≤ j ≤ n.
To diagonalize a matrix or a linear operator is to find a basis ofeigenvectors and the corresponding eigenvalues.
Characteristic Polynomial
Theorem 5.2
Let A ∈ Mn×n(F ). Then a scalar λ is an eigenvalue of A if andonly if det(A− λIn) = 0.
Definition
Let A ∈ Mn×n(F ). The polynomial f(t) = det(A− tIn) is calledthe characteristic polynomial of A.
Definition
Let T be a linear operator on an n-dimensional vector space Vwith ordered basis β. We define the characteristic polynomial f(t)of T to be the characteristic polynomial of A = [T]β:f(t) = det(A− tIn).
Properties
Theorem 5.3
Let A ∈ Mn×n(F ).
(a) The characteristic polynomial of A is a polynomial of degree nwith leading coefficient (−1)n.
(b) A has at most n distinct eigenvalues.
Theorem 5.4
Let T be a linear operator on a vector space V, and let λ be aneigenvalue of T. A vector v ∈ V is an eigenvector of Tcorresponding to λ if and only if v 6= 0 and v ∈ N(T− λI).
Diagonalizability
Theorem 5.5
Let T be a linear operator on a vector space V, and let λ1, . . . , λkbe distinct eigenvalues of T. If v1, . . . , vk are the correspondingeigenvectors, then {v1, . . . , vk} is linearly independent.
Corollary
Let T be a linear operator on an n-dimensional vector space V. IfT has n distinct eigenvalues, then T is diagonalizable.
Definition
A polynomial f(t) in P(F ) splits over F if there are scalarsc, a1, . . . , an in F such that f(t) = c(t− a1)(t− a2) · · · (t− an).
Theorem 5.6
The characteristic polynomial of any diagonalizable operator splits.
Multiplicity
Definition
Let λ be an eigenvalue of a linear operator or matrix withcharacteristic polynomial f(t). The (algebraic) multiplicity of λ isthe largest positive integer k for which (t− λ)k is a factor of f(t).
Definition
Let T be a linear operator on a vector space V, and let λ be aneigenvalue of T. Define Eλ = {x ∈ V : T(x) = λx} = N(T− λIV).The set Eλ is the eigenspace of T corresponding to the eigenvalueλ. The eigenspace of a square matrix A is the eigenspace of LA.
Theorem 5.7
Let T be a linear operator on a finite-dimensional vector space V,and let λ be an eigenvalue of T having multiplicity m. Then1 ≤ dim(Eλ) ≤ m.
Diagonalizability
Lemma
Let T be a linear operator, and let λ1, . . . , λk be distincteigenvalues of T. For i = 1, . . . , k, let vi ∈ Eλi . If
v1 + v2 + · · ·+ vk = 0,
then vi = 0 for all i.
Theorem 5.8
Let T be a linear operator on a vector space V, and let λ1, . . . , λkbe distinct eigenvalues of T. For i = 1, . . . , k, let Si be a finitelinearly independent subset of the eigenspace Eλi . ThenS = S1 ∪ S2 ∪ · · · ∪ Sk is a linearly independent subset of V.
Diagonalizability
Theorem 5.9
Let T be a linear operator on a finite-dimensional vector space Vsuch that the characteristic polynomial of T splits. Let λ1, . . . , λkbe the distinct eigenvalues of T. Then
(a) T is diagonalizable if and only if the multiplicity of λi is equalto dim(Eλi) for all i.
(b) If T is diagonalizable and βi is an ordered basis for Eλi , foreach i, then β = β1 ∪ β2 ∪ · · · ∪ βk is an ordered basis for Vconsisting of eigenvectors of T.
Test for Diagonalization
Let T be a linear operator on an n-dimensional vector space V.Then T is diagonalizable if and only if both of the followingconditions hold.
The characteristic polynomial of T splits.
The multiplicity of each eigenvalue λ equals n− rank(T− λI).
Direct Sums
Definition
The sum of the subspaces W1, . . . ,Wk of a vector space is the setk∑
i=1
Wi = {v1 + · · ·+ vk : vi ∈Wi for 1 ≤ i ≤ k}.
Definition
A vector space V is the direct sum of subspaces W1, . . . ,Wk,denoted V = W1 ⊕ · · · ⊕Wk, if
V =
k∑
i=1
Wi and Wj ∩∑
i 6=jWi = {0} for each j (1 ≤ j ≤ k).
Direct Sums
Theorem 5.10
Let W1, . . . ,Wk be subspaces of finite-dimensional vector space V.The following are equivalent:
(a) V = W1 ⊕ · · · ⊕Wk.
(b) V =∑k
i=1 Wi and for any v1, . . . , vk s.t. vi ∈Wi (1 ≤ i ≤ k),if v1 + · · ·+ vk = 0, then vi = 0 for all i.
(c) Each v ∈ V can be uniquely written as v = v1 + · · ·+ vk,where vi ∈Wi.
(d) If γi is an ordered basis for Wi (1 ≤ i ≤ k), then γ1 ∪ · · · ∪ γkis an ordered basis for V.
(e) For each i = 1, . . . , k there exists an ordered basis γi for Wi
such that γ1 ∪ · · · ∪ γk is an ordered basis for V.
Theorem 5.11
A linear operator T on finite-dimensional vector space V isdiagonalizable ⇐⇒ V is the direct sum of the eigenspaces of T.
Matrix Limits
Definition
Let L,A1, A2, . . . be n× p matrices with complex entries. Thesequence A1, A2, . . . is said to converge to the limit L iflimm→∞(Am)ij = Lij for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n and 1 ≤ j ≤ p. If L is thelimit of the sequence, we write limm→∞Am = L.
Theorem 5.12
Let A1, A2, . . . be a sequence of n× p matrices with complexentries that converges to L. Then for any P ∈ Mr×n(C) andQ ∈ Mp×s(C),
limm→∞
PAm = PL and limm→∞
AmQ = LQ.
Corollary
Let A ∈ Mn×n(C) be such that limm→∞Am = L. Then for anyinvertible Q ∈ Mn×n(C),
limm→∞
(QAQ−1)m = QLQ−1.
Existence of Limits
Consider the set consisting of the complex number 1 and theinterior of the unit disk: S = {λ ∈ C : |λ| < 1 or λ = 1}.
Theorem 5.13
Let A be a square matrix with complex entries. Then limm→∞Am
exists ⇐⇒ both of the following hold:
(a) Every eigenvalue of A is contained in S.
(b) If 1 is an eigenvalues of A, then the dimension of theeigenspace corresponding to 1 equals the multiplicity of 1 asan eigenvalue of A.
Theorem 5.14
Let A ∈ Mn×n(C). limm→∞Am exists if:
(i) Every eigenvalue of A is contained in S.
(ii) A is diagonalizable.
Invariant Subspaces
Definition
Let T be a linear operator on a vector space V. A subspace W or Vis called a T-invariant subspace of V if T(W) ⊆W, that is, ifT(v) ∈W for all v ∈W.
For nonzero x ∈ V, the subspace
W = span({x,T(x),T2(x), . . .})
is called the T-cyclic subspace of V generated by x.
Invariant Subspaces
Theorem 5.21
Let T be a linear operator on finite-dimensional V, and let W be aT-invariant subspace of V. Then the characteristic polynomial ofTW divides the characteristic polynomial of T.
Theorem 5.22
Let T be a linear operator on finite-dimensional V, and let W bethe T-cyclic subspace of V generated by nonzero v ∈ V. Letk = dim(W). Then
(a) {v,T(v),T2(v), . . . ,Tk−1(v)} is a basis for W.
(b) If a0v + a1T(v) + · · ·+ ak−1Tk−1(v) + Tk(v) = 0, then thecharacteristic polynomial of TW isf(t) = (−1)k(a0 + a1t+ · · ·+ ak−1tk−1 + tk).
The Cayley-Hamilton Theorem
Theorem 5.23 (Cayley-Hamilton)
Let T be a linear operator on finite-dimensional V, and let f(t) bethe characteristic polynomial of T. Then f(T) = T0, the zerotransformation. That is, T “satisfies” its characteristic equation.
Corollary (Cayley-Hamilton Theorem for Matrices)
Let A be an n× n matrix, and let f(t) be the characteristicpolynomial of A. Then f(A) = O, the n× n zero matrix.