Université Laval · 2017-07-17 · Dumbbells in the literature Spectral analysis on dumbbells is...

Spectral analysis of a Neumannbiharmonic operator on a planar

dumbbell domain

Francesco Ferraresso(based on a joint work with J.M. Arrieta and P.D. Lamberti)

Workshop on geometric spectral theoryNeuchatel - 22.06.2017

The dumbbell

(a) Dumbbell domain.

(b) Limit domain.

2 of 19

The dumbbell

(a) Dumbbell domain.

(b) Limit domain.

2 of 19

Dumbbells in the literature

Spectral analysis on dumbbells is important in:

Geometric spectral theory→ Cheeger’s constant;

Parabolic reaction-diffusion equations→ Matano’scounterexample;

Spectral stability problems→ classical counterexample tospectral continuity of Neumann Laplacian eigenvalues.

Many contributions in the case of the Laplace operator:

Dirichlet boundary conditions: Abatangelo-Felli-Terracini,Davies, Taylor, ...

Neumann boundary conditions: Arrieta et al., Jimbo,Sanchez-Palencia, Morini-Slastikov,...

...and many others.

3 of 19

...and many others.

3 of 19

...and many others.

3 of 19

...and many others.

3 of 19

...and many others.

3 of 19

...and many others.

3 of 19

...and many others.

3 of 19

Motivations: eigenvalues and perturbations

Let Ω be a bounded smooth open set of RN. Given a nonnegativeself-adjoint elliptic operator H on L2(Ω) with compact resolvent, itsspectrum is discrete λ1[Ω] ≤ λ2[Ω] ≤ · · · ≤ λn[Ω] ≤ . . . .

Problem: Provide (necessary and) sufficient conditions on Ωε , Ωand on the perturbation Ω 7→ Ωε in order to have the continuity ofthe maps ε 7→ λn[Ωε ] at ε = 0, for all n ∈ N.

There are many cases of quite regular perturbations providingcounterexamples

Aim: better understanding of this “pathological” cases.

3 of 19

Let Ω be a bounded smooth open set of RN.

Given a nonnegativeself-adjoint elliptic operator H on L2(Ω) with compact resolvent, itsspectrum is discrete λ1[Ω] ≤ λ2[Ω] ≤ · · · ≤ λn[Ω] ≤ . . . .

3 of 19

Let Ω be a bounded smooth open set of RN. Given a nonnegativeself-adjoint elliptic operator H on L2(Ω)

with compact resolvent, itsspectrum is discrete λ1[Ω] ≤ λ2[Ω] ≤ · · · ≤ λn[Ω] ≤ . . . .

3 of 19

Let Ω be a bounded smooth open set of RN. Given a nonnegativeself-adjoint elliptic operator H on L2(Ω) with compact resolvent,

itsspectrum is discrete λ1[Ω] ≤ λ2[Ω] ≤ · · · ≤ λn[Ω] ≤ . . . .

3 of 19

Let Ω be a bounded smooth open set of RN. Given a nonnegativeself-adjoint elliptic operator H on L2(Ω) with compact resolvent, itsspectrum is discrete

λ1[Ω] ≤ λ2[Ω] ≤ · · · ≤ λn[Ω] ≤ . . . .

3 of 19

Problem: Provide (necessary and) sufficient conditions on Ωε , Ωand on the perturbation Ω 7→ Ωε

in order to have the continuity ofthe maps ε 7→ λn[Ωε ] at ε = 0, for all n ∈ N.

3 of 19

The dumbbell problem

The dumbbell domains Ωε ⊂ R2 are perturbations of a fixed

bounded open set Ω with two (or more) connected components.

Ω := ΩL ∪ ΩR Ωε := Ω ∪ Rε ,

Rε = (x, y) ∈ R2 : 0 < x < 1, 0 < y < εg(x), g ∈ C2([0, 1]).

εg(0) Rεεg(1)

4 of 19

The dumbbell problemThe dumbbell domains Ωε ⊂ R

2 are perturbations of a fixedbounded open set Ω with two (or more) connected components.

Ω := ΩL ∪ ΩR Ωε := Ω ∪ Rε ,

Rε = (x, y) ∈ R2 : 0 < x < 1, 0 < y < εg(x), g ∈ C2([0, 1]).

εg(0) Rεεg(1)

4 of 19

Ω := ΩL ∪ ΩR

Ωε := Ω ∪ Rε ,

Rε = (x, y) ∈ R2 : 0 < x < 1, 0 < y < εg(x), g ∈ C2([0, 1]).

εg(0) Rεεg(1)

4 of 19

Ω := ΩL ∪ ΩR Ωε := Ω ∪ Rε ,

Rε = (x, y) ∈ R2 : 0 < x < 1, 0 < y < εg(x), g ∈ C2([0, 1]).

εg(0) Rεεg(1)

4 of 19

Ω := ΩL ∪ ΩR Ωε := Ω ∪ Rε ,

Rε = (x, y) ∈ R2 : 0 < x < 1, 0 < y < εg(x), g ∈ C2([0, 1]).

εg(0) Rεεg(1)

4 of 19

Ω := ΩL ∪ ΩR Ωε := Ω ∪ Rε ,

Rε = (x, y) ∈ R2 : 0 < x < 1, 0 < y < εg(x), g ∈ C2([0, 1]).

εg(0) Rεεg(1)

4 of 19

A dumbbell-shaped free plate

On the dumbbell Ωε ⊂ R2 we consider a Neumann problem for ∆2

∆2u − τ∆u + u = λn(Ωε) u, in Ωε ,

(1 − σ)∂2u∂n2 + σ∆u = 0, on ∂Ωε ,

τ∂u∂n − (1 − σ) div∂Ωε (D

2u · n)∂Ωε −∂(∆u)∂n = 0, on ∂Ωε .

where σ ∈ (−1, 1), τ ≥ 0, and u ∈ H2(Ωε). The weak formulationis: find u ∈ H2(Ωε) such that, for all ψ ∈ H2(Ωε) there holds

∫Ωε

(1−σ)D2u : D2ψ+σ∆u∆ψ+τ∇u·∇ψ+uψ dx = λ(Ωε)

∫Ωε

uψ dx

We denote by (ϕεn, λn(Ωε)) the eigenpairs ∀n ∈ N.

5 of 19

∆2u − τ∆u + u = λn(Ωε) u, in Ωε ,

(1 − σ)∂2u∂n2 + σ∆u = 0, on ∂Ωε ,

2u · n)∂Ωε −∂(∆u)∂n = 0, on ∂Ωε .

∫Ωε

uψ dx

5 of 19

∆2u − τ∆u + u = λn(Ωε) u, in Ωε ,

(1 − σ)∂2u∂n2 + σ∆u = 0, on ∂Ωε ,

2u · n)∂Ωε −∂(∆u)∂n = 0, on ∂Ωε .

where σ ∈ (−1, 1), τ ≥ 0, and u ∈ H2(Ωε).

The weak formulationis: find u ∈ H2(Ωε) such that, for all ψ ∈ H2(Ωε) there holds

∫Ωε

uψ dx

5 of 19

∆2u − τ∆u + u = λn(Ωε) u, in Ωε ,

(1 − σ)∂2u∂n2 + σ∆u = 0, on ∂Ωε ,

2u · n)∂Ωε −∂(∆u)∂n = 0, on ∂Ωε .

where σ ∈ (−1, 1), τ ≥ 0, and u ∈ H2(Ωε). The weak formulationis:

find u ∈ H2(Ωε) such that, for all ψ ∈ H2(Ωε) there holds

∫Ωε

uψ dx

5 of 19

∆2u − τ∆u + u = λn(Ωε) u, in Ωε ,

(1 − σ)∂2u∂n2 + σ∆u = 0, on ∂Ωε ,

2u · n)∂Ωε −∂(∆u)∂n = 0, on ∂Ωε .

∫Ωε

uψ dx

5 of 19

∆2u − τ∆u + u = λn(Ωε) u, in Ωε ,

(1 − σ)∂2u∂n2 + σ∆u = 0, on ∂Ωε ,

2u · n)∂Ωε −∂(∆u)∂n = 0, on ∂Ωε .

∫Ωε

uψ dx

We denote by (ϕεn, λn(Ωε)) the eigenpairs ∀n ∈ N.5 of 19

Spectral convergence

Definition

Given the operator Tε on L2(Ωε), we say that Tε is spectrallyconverging to T0 on L2(Ω0), with Ω0 ⊂ Ωε for all ε > 0

λn[Ωε ]→ λn[Ω0] for all n ∈ N

The spectral projections PΩεa converge to PΩ0

a in L2 i.e., forfixed a ∈ R+ \ λj[Ω]∞j=0, λn[Ω] < a < λn+1[Ω] we define the

projections PΩεa from L2(RN) into L2(Ωε) by

PΩεa (ψ) =

∑ni=1(ui[Ωε ], ψ)L2(Ωε)ui[Ωε ] and we ask that

∥∥∥∥PΩεa (ψ) − PΩ0

a (ψ)∥∥∥∥

L2(Ω0)+

∥∥∥PΩεa (ψ)

∥∥∥L2(Ωε\Ω0)

→ 0,

where the sup is on all ψ ∈ L2(RN) with ‖ψ‖L2(RN) = 1.

6 of 19

Definition

Given the operator Tε on L2(Ωε), we say that Tε is spectrallyconverging to T0 on L2(Ω0), with Ω0 ⊂ Ωε for all ε > 0 if

PΩεa (ψ) =

∥∥∥∥PΩεa (ψ) − PΩ0

a (ψ)∥∥∥∥

L2(Ω0)+

∥∥∥L2(Ωε\Ω0)

→ 0,

6 of 19

Definition

a in L2

i.e., forfixed a ∈ R+ \ λj[Ω]∞j=0, λn[Ω] < a < λn+1[Ω] we define the

PΩεa (ψ) =

∥∥∥∥PΩεa (ψ) − PΩ0

a (ψ)∥∥∥∥

L2(Ω0)+

∥∥∥L2(Ωε\Ω0)

→ 0,

6 of 19

Definition

PΩεa (ψ) =

∑ni=1(ui[Ωε ], ψ)L2(Ωε)ui[Ωε ]

and we ask that

∥∥∥∥PΩεa (ψ) − PΩ0

a (ψ)∥∥∥∥

L2(Ω0)+

∥∥∥L2(Ωε\Ω0)

→ 0,

6 of 19

Definition

PΩεa (ψ) =

∥∥∥∥PΩεa (ψ) − PΩ0

a (ψ)∥∥∥∥

L2(Ω0)+

∥∥∥L2(Ωε\Ω0)

→ 0,

6 of 19

Definition

PΩεa (ψ) =

∥∥∥∥PΩεa (ψ) − PΩ0

a (ψ)∥∥∥∥

L2(Ω0)+

∥∥∥L2(Ωε\Ω0)

→ 0,

6 of 19

Spectral stability

We say that there is spectral stability

if the operator Tε := ∆2Ωε

associated with∆2u − τ∆u + u = λn(Ωε) u, in Ωε ,

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ωε

spectrally converges to the operator T0 := ∆2Ω associated with∆2u − τ∆u + u = λn(Ω) u, in Ω,

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ω

7 of 19

Spectral stability

We say that there is spectral stability if the operator Tε := ∆2Ωε

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ωε

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ω

7 of 19

Spectral stability

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ωε

spectrally converges to the operator T0 := ∆2Ω

associated with∆2u − τ∆u + u = λn(Ω) u, in Ω,

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ω

7 of 19

Spectral stability

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ωε

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ω

7 of 19

Characterization of the spectral stability

General condition for bounded open sets Ωε , Ω.

Arrieta’s condition:There exist uniformly Lipschitz open sets Kε ⊂ Ω ∩ Ωε such that

|Ω \ Kε | → 0, as ε → 0

If vε ∈ W2,2(Ωε) and supε>0‖vε‖W2,2(Ωε) < ∞ then

limε→0‖vε‖L2(Ωε\Kε) = 0

Arrieta’s condition⇒ Spectral convergence

8 of 19

Arrieta’s condition:

There exist uniformly Lipschitz open sets Kε ⊂ Ω ∩ Ωε such that

|Ω \ Kε | → 0, as ε → 0

8 of 19

|Ω \ Kε | → 0, as ε → 0

8 of 19

|Ω \ Kε | → 0, as ε → 0

8 of 19

|Ω \ Kε | → 0, as ε → 0

8 of 19

|Ω \ Kε | → 0, as ε → 0

8 of 19

Spectral stability II

In our case, Arrieta’s condition is related to the limit as ε → 0 of

τε = infφε ∈W2,2(Ωε)φε=0 in Ω

∫Ωε

(1 − σ)∣∣∣D2φε

∣∣∣2 + σ |∆φε |2 + τ |∇φε |

2 + |φε |2 dx

‖φε‖2L2(Rε)

Arrieta’s condition is equivalent to limε→0 τε = +∞.

The dumbbell Ωε violates this condition!

9 of 19

∫Ωε

(1 − σ)∣∣∣D2φε

∣∣∣2 + σ |∆φε |2 + τ |∇φε |

2 + |φε |2 dx

‖φε‖2L2(Rε)

9 of 19

∫Ωε

(1 − σ)∣∣∣D2φε

∣∣∣2 + σ |∆φε |2 + τ |∇φε |

2 + |φε |2 dx

‖φε‖2L2(Rε)

9 of 19

Spectral instability

Recall that Rε is collapsing to a lower dimensional manifold asε → 0 (Rε is a thin domain). In the dumbbell there will be a

Concentration phenomenon: it appears when the eigenfunctionsuε have L2-norm that concentrates on Rε . More precisely:

‖uε‖H2(Ωε) ≤ C , ‖uε‖L2(Rε) → 1

or equivalently, τε < ∞.

Concentration phenomenon⇒ Spectral instability

There must be extra eigenvalues in the limit!

10 of 19

Concentration phenomenon:

it appears when the eigenfunctionsuε have L2-norm that concentrates on Rε . More precisely:

‖uε‖H2(Ωε) ≤ C , ‖uε‖L2(Rε) → 1

10 of 19

‖uε‖H2(Ωε) ≤ C , ‖uε‖L2(Rε) → 1

10 of 19

‖uε‖H2(Ωε) ≤ C , ‖uε‖L2(Rε) → 1

10 of 19

‖uε‖H2(Ωε) ≤ C , ‖uε‖L2(Rε) → 1

10 of 19

‖uε‖H2(Ωε) ≤ C , ‖uε‖L2(Rε) → 1

10 of 19

Main problem

Question: can we characterize these extra eigenvalues?

10 of 19

Two auxiliary problems

We introduce the eigenpairs (ϕΩk , ωk ) of∆2w − τ∆w + w = ωk w, in Ω

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ω,

and the eigenpairs (γεl , θεl ) of

∆2v − τ∆v + v = θεl v , in Rε

(1 − σ)∂2v∂n2 + σ∆v = 0, on Γε

τ∂v∂n − (1 − σ) divΓε (D

2v · n)Γε −∂(∆v)∂n = 0, on Γε ,

v = 0 = ∂v∂n , on Lε .

where Γε = (x, y) : 0 < x < 1, y = εg(x) ∪ (x, 0) : 0 < x < 1and Lε = ∂Rε \ Γε .

11 of 19

Two auxiliary problems

We introduce the eigenpairs (ϕΩk , ωk ) of∆2w − τ∆w + w = ωk w, in Ω

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ω,

and the eigenpairs (γεl , θεl ) of

(1 − σ)∂2v∂n2 + σ∆v = 0, on Γε

2v · n)Γε −∂(∆v)∂n = 0, on Γε ,

v = 0 = ∂v∂n , on Lε .

where Γε = (x, y) : 0 < x < 1, y = εg(x) ∪ (x, 0) : 0 < x < 1and Lε = ∂Rε \ Γε .

11 of 19

εg(0) εg(1)

11 of 19

An additional assumption

Note that the dumbbell Ωε is not smooth on the junctions, i.e., on∂Rε ∩ ∂Ω.

We need some condition to control the eigenfunctionsnear the junctions.This condition is usually called H-Condition:

εg(0) εg(1)

12 of 19

Note that the dumbbell Ωε is not smooth on the junctions, i.e., on∂Rε ∩ ∂Ω. We need some condition to control the eigenfunctionsnear the junctions.

This condition is usually called H-Condition:

εg(0) εg(1)

12 of 19

Note that the dumbbell Ωε is not smooth on the junctions, i.e., on∂Rε ∩ ∂Ω. We need some condition to control the eigenfunctionsnear the junctions.This condition is usually called H-Condition:

εg(0) εg(1)

12 of 19

Note that the dumbbell Ωε is not smooth on the junctions, i.e., on∂Rε ∩ ∂Ω. We need some condition to control the eigenfunctionsnear the junctions.This condition is usually called H-Condition:

εg(0) εg(1)

12 of 19

Asymptotic spectral decompositionRecall that λn(Ωε) are the eigenvalues of∆2u − τ∆u + u = λn(Ωε) u, in Ωε ,

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ωε

and that ωk and θεl are the eigenvalues of

∆2w − τ∆w + w = ωk w, in Ω

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ω

(NBC)σ, on Γε

v = 0 = ∂v∂n , on Lε

Define (λεn)n = (ωk )k ∪ (θεl )l . Assume that Rε satisfies theH-condition. Then

|λn(Ωε) − λεn | → 0, as ε → 0.

13 of 19

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ωε

∆2w − τ∆w + w = ωk w, in Ω

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ω

(NBC)σ, on Γε

v = 0 = ∂v∂n , on Lε

|λn(Ωε) − λεn | → 0, as ε → 0.

13 of 19

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ωε

∆2w − τ∆w + w = ωk w, in Ω

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ω

(NBC)σ, on Γε

v = 0 = ∂v∂n , on Lε

Define (λεn)n = (ωk )k ∪ (θεl )l .

Assume that Rε satisfies theH-condition. Then

|λn(Ωε) − λεn | → 0, as ε → 0.

13 of 19

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ωε

∆2w − τ∆w + w = ωk w, in Ω

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ω

(NBC)σ, on Γε

v = 0 = ∂v∂n , on Lε

Define (λεn)n = (ωk )k ∪ (θεl )l . Assume that Rε satisfies theH-condition.

|λn(Ωε) − λεn | → 0, as ε → 0.

13 of 19

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ωε

∆2w − τ∆w + w = ωk w, in Ω

(NBC)σ, on ∂Ω

(NBC)σ, on Γε

v = 0 = ∂v∂n , on Lε

|λn(Ωε) − λεn | → 0, as ε → 0.

13 of 19

A difficult problem

At this point we are interested in the convergence of θεl as ε → 0.

We would like to pass directly to the limit in the PDE problem∆2v − τ∆v + v = θεl v , in Rε

(1 − σ)∂2v∂n2 + σ∆v = 0, on Γε

2v · n)Γε −∂(∆v)∂n = 0, on Γε ,

v = 0 = ∂v∂n , on Lε .

but this seems a tough problem. We took a different path.

14 of 19

A difficult problem

At this point we are interested in the convergence of θεl as ε → 0.We would like to pass directly to the limit in the PDE problem

(1 − σ)∂2v∂n2 + σ∆v = 0, on Γε

2v · n)Γε −∂(∆v)∂n = 0, on Γε ,

v = 0 = ∂v∂n , on Lε .

14 of 19

A difficult problem

(1 − σ)∂2v∂n2 + σ∆v = 0, on Γε

2v · n)Γε −∂(∆v)∂n = 0, on Γε ,

v = 0 = ∂v∂n , on Lε .

but this seems a tough problem.

We took a different path.

14 of 19

A difficult problem

(1 − σ)∂2v∂n2 + σ∆v = 0, on Γε

2v · n)Γε −∂(∆v)∂n = 0, on Γε ,

v = 0 = ∂v∂n , on Lε .

14 of 19

Compact convergence approach

Proof of the convergence to a suitable one-dimensional problemvia:

Rescaling of the problem in Rε to a problem for a perturbeddifferential operator in the fixed domain R1;

Homogenization/thin domain techniques in order to find thelimiting differential problem in the segment [0,1];

Compact convergence of the resolvent operators associatedwith the rescaled problem to the resolvent operator of thelimiting problem;

Abstract result: compact convergence of resolvent operatorsimplies spectral convergence.

15 of 19

The limit problem

One can prove that∆2v − τ∆v + v = θεl v , in Rε

(NBC)σ, on Γε ,

v = 0 = ∂v∂n , on Lε .

compact converges to a suitable rescaling of1−σ2

g (gv′′)′′ − τg (gv′)′ + v = θlv , in (0, 1)

v(0) = v(1) = 0, v′(0) = v′(1) = 0

We denote by(hi , θi) the eigenpairs associated with this ODE.

16 of 19

The limit problem

(NBC)σ, on Γε ,

v = 0 = ∂v∂n , on Lε .

g (gv′′)′′ − τg (gv′)′ + v = θlv , in (0, 1)

v(0) = v(1) = 0, v′(0) = v′(1) = 0

16 of 19

The limit problem

(NBC)σ, on Γε ,

v = 0 = ∂v∂n , on Lε .

g (gv′′)′′ − τg (gv′)′ + v = θlv , in (0, 1)

v(0) = v(1) = 0, v′(0) = v′(1) = 0

16 of 19

Notation

Define the operator Eε : H2(0, 1)→ H2(Rε) by

Eεv(x, y) = v(x)

for all (x, y) ∈ Rε . Moreover let N(·) be the counting functiondefined by

N(x) = #λi : i ∈ N, λi ≤ x

17 of 19

Final convergence result

Theorem (Arrieta, F., Lamberti, 2016)

Let Ωε ⊂ R2 be a dumbbell domain satisfying the (H)-condition.

The eigenvalues λn(Ωε) converge either to ωk or to θl . Moreover, ifλn(Ωε)→ ωk for some k ∈ N, then

∥∥∥ϕεn |Ω∥∥∥L2(Ω)

→ 1, and∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥ϕεn |Ω −N(ωk )∑

(ϕεn, ϕΩi )L2(Ω)ϕ

∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥H2(Ω)

as ε → 0. Otherwise, if λn(Ωε)→ θl for some l ∈ N, then ϕεn |Ω → 0in L2(Ω) and∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥ϕεn −

N(θl)∑i=1

(ϕεn, ε−1/2Eεhi)L2(Rε)ε

−1/2Eεhi

∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥L2(Rε)

as ε → 0.

18 of 19

The eigenvalues λn(Ωε) converge either to ωk

or to θl . Moreover, ifλn(Ωε)→ ωk for some k ∈ N, then

∥∥∥ϕεn |Ω∥∥∥L2(Ω)

→ 1, and∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥ϕεn |Ω −N(ωk )∑

∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥H2(Ω)

N(θl)∑i=1

−1/2Eεhi

∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥L2(Rε)

as ε → 0.

18 of 19

The eigenvalues λn(Ωε) converge either to ωk or to θl .

Moreover, ifλn(Ωε)→ ωk for some k ∈ N, then

∥∥∥ϕεn |Ω∥∥∥L2(Ω)

→ 1, and∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥ϕεn |Ω −N(ωk )∑

∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥H2(Ω)

N(θl)∑i=1

−1/2Eεhi

∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥L2(Rε)

as ε → 0.

18 of 19

∥∥∥ϕεn |Ω∥∥∥L2(Ω)

→ 1,

and∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥ϕεn |Ω −N(ωk )∑

∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥H2(Ω)

N(θl)∑i=1

−1/2Eεhi

∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥L2(Rε)

as ε → 0.

18 of 19

∥∥∥ϕεn |Ω∥∥∥L2(Ω)

→ 1, and∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥ϕεn |Ω −N(ωk )∑

∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥H2(Ω)

as ε → 0.

Otherwise, if λn(Ωε)→ θl for some l ∈ N, then ϕεn |Ω → 0in L2(Ω) and∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥ϕεn −

N(θl)∑i=1

−1/2Eεhi

∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥L2(Rε)

as ε → 0.

18 of 19

∥∥∥ϕεn |Ω∥∥∥L2(Ω)

→ 1, and∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥ϕεn |Ω −N(ωk )∑

∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥H2(Ω)

as ε → 0. Otherwise, if λn(Ωε)→ θl for some l ∈ N, then ϕεn |Ω → 0in L2(Ω)

and∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥ϕεn −N(θl)∑i=1

−1/2Eεhi

∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥L2(Rε)

as ε → 0.

18 of 19

∥∥∥ϕεn |Ω∥∥∥L2(Ω)

→ 1, and∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥ϕεn |Ω −N(ωk )∑

∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥H2(Ω)

N(θl)∑i=1

−1/2Eεhi

∥∥∥∥∥∥∥∥L2(Rε)

as ε → 0.18 of 19

Principal references

S. Jimbo, “The singularly perturbed domain and the characterizationfor the eigenfunctions with Neumann boundary conditions”,J.Differential Equations, 77, 1989, 322-350.

J. M. Arrieta, “Neumann eigenvalue problems on exteriorperturbations of the domain”, J. Differential Equations, 117, 1995.

J. M. Arrieta, A. N. Carvalho, G. Losada-Cruz, “Dynamics indumbbell domains I. Continuity of the set of equilibria”,J. Differential Equations, 231 (2), 2006, 551-597.

J. M. Arrieta, F.F., P.D. Lamberti, “Spectral analysis of thebiharmonic operator subject to Neumann boundary conditions ondumbbell domains”, submitted, 2017

19 of 19

Thank youfor your attention

19 of 19

Open questions

1. Identification of the limit behavior of the eigenfunction ϕεn in[0, 1] when λn(Ωε)→ ωk .

2. Replacement of the L2(Rε) norm with a stronger Sobolevnorm in the final convergence result.

Partial results are available in the case σ = 0, the case σ , 0being open at the moment.

19 of 19

Open questions

19 of 19

Open questions

19 of 19

Université Laval · 2017-07-17 · Dumbbells in the literature Spectral analysis on dumbbells is...

Documents

Transcript of Université Laval · 2017-07-17 · Dumbbells in the literature Spectral analysis on dumbbells is...

CHAPTER (12) COMPRESSIBLE FLOW SOLVED … · 09/12/2010 Dr. Munzer Ebaid 4 9. Area Ratio in a Laval Nozzle: 10. Mass Flow Rate Through a Laval Nozzle: 11. 12. Critical Pressure Ratio

Spectral Behavior of Quasi Periodic Potentials*

Contrast enhanced spectral mammography

Brazed plate heat exchangers - ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ ΤΕΧΝΙΚΟΙdoc.texnikoi.gr/ylikadata/rtfs/laval3.pdf · brazed plate heat exchangers from Alfa Laval ensure the customer the most

SCALAR PARABOLIC PDE’S AND BRAIDSghrist/preprints/parabolic.pdfSCALAR PARABOLIC PDE’S AND BRAIDS R. W. Ghrist and R. C. Vandervorst Abstract. The comparison principle for scalar

FEM for parabolic problem

Spectral theory for magnetic Schrödinger operators and ...

Spectral problems for linear pencils

Spectral theory of automorphic forms

Parabolic Isometries and Homological Logic

L SOLVABILITY OF DIVERGENCE TYPE PARABOLIC AND ELLIPTIC ... · Lp SOLVABILITY OF DIVERGENCE TYPE PARABOLIC AND ELLIPTIC SYSTEMS WITH PARTIALLY BMO COEFFICIENTS HONGJIE DONG AND DOYOON

NUMERICAL METHODS FOR PARABOLIC …chenlong/226/ParabolicEquation.pdfNUMERICAL METHODS FOR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS LONG CHEN As a model problem of general parabolic equations, we shall

Spectral analysis of the subelliptic oblique derivative ...

Unadulterated spectral function of low-energy quasiparticles

Spectral functions in the 4-theory from the spectral DSE · 2020-06-18 · Spectral functions in the ˚4-theory from the spectral DSE Jan Horak,1 Jan M. Pawlowski,1,2 and Nicolas

Dft Spectral Analysis

Stable patterns for fourth order parabolic equationsjanbouwe/pub/para.pdf · parabolic equations J.B.van den Berg and R.C. Vandervorst Abstract. We consider fourth order parabolic

Improved Cheeger’s Inequality: Analysis of Spectral ...Improved Cheeger’s Inequality: Analysis of Spectral Partitioning Algorithms through Higher Order Spectral Gap Tsz Chiu Kwok

A TWO CITIES THEOREM FOR THE PARABOLIC ......A TWO CITIES THEOREM FOR THE PARABOLIC ANDERSON MODEL 3 In the present paper, we study the parabolic Anderson model with potential distributions

Spectral Analysis