Proposal for a high- brightness Proposal for a high ... · Compton scattering / Beam dynamics...

Post on 12-Sep-2020

1 views 0 download

Transcript of Proposal for a high- brightness Proposal for a high ... · Compton scattering / Beam dynamics...

Created on: 13.01.2009Strictly confidential — For project use only !

page 1ELI Workpackage 8-9 (Communication) – Kick-off meetingCreated by: Patrizio Antici

Proposal for a high-brightness γ source for the

ELI-NP facility

P. Antici, on behalf of the INFN/Uni. Roma „Sapienza“ team

Proposal for a high-brightness γ source for the

ELI-NP facility

P. Antici

Layout, organization, costs and management

General Layout

Gun Sec 1+2 Sec 3+4 Sec 5+6

Sec 1+2Quadrupole

Dipole

Accelerating section

Beam dump

Interaction region

Sec 7+8 S 9+10 S 11+12

1.20.8 3.0 0.7 3.0 0.7 3.0 0.8

~20°

7.5 1 5 5 7.51 1 3.0 0.7 3.0 0.7 3.0 0.70.7

14 m 28 m 14 m

2.5 m

Gun Sec 1+2 Sec 3+4 Sec 5+6

Sec 1+2Quadrupole

Dipole

Accelerating section

Beam dump

Interaction region

Sec 7+8 S 9+10 S 11+12Sec 7+8 S 9+10 S 11+12

1.20.8 3.0 0.7 3.0 0.7 3.0 0.8

~20°

7.5 1 5 5 7.51 1 3.0 0.7 3.0 0.7 3.0 0.70.7

14 m 28 m 14 m

2.5 m

The layout is divided in 3 regions:1) Booster (up to 360 MeV)2) Chicane and first interaction region3) Second Linac, up to 720 MeV 4) Second interaction region

(1)

(2)

Linac (injector)

(1)

(2)

Linac (injector)

Infrastructure requirements

The accelerator fitsvery confortablyin the allocated spaces

Some modifications:1) Move the wall

(separate second accelerator)

2) Increase size forrecovery ring linac (size

very small and inconvenient use of space) DAFNE is 15 x 15 and isvery limited

Updates

1. Add an X-band section at the end of the LINAC in order to linearize the phase-space and with that improve the electron beam characteristics and consequently the photon beam fluence

2. Insert a electron recovery ring, already foreseen by the infrastructure (bottom left)

3. Increase laser energy of interaction laser and pulse duration

• Only 1.5 % of the produced electrons scatters and produces photons, and only few of these produces high energy photons.

• Electrons that loose energy will be automatically eliminated in the recirculation

Strategy

The Lisbon Strategy (2000)

•Increase European R & D

•Innovation

•Generate synergies between RI

•Develop a European Research Area

(ERA)

Industry

AcademiaResearch Laboratory

Amplitude (F)Thales (F)

Scandinova (S)

University of Rome„Sapienza“

INFN

Our Approach

No cash-and-carry solution

Triangle of knowledge

Cohesion and excellence(integrate ELI-NP in the landscape of EU-RI)

EU 27

Overview

• TDR• Implementation• Staffing• Training• Scheduling• Costs• Cash-flow• Integration in the landscape of RI

1st Step: TDR

a) Thomson scattering simulations and beam dynamics (Luca Serafini, Massimo Ferrario)

b) Photoinjector laser (Giancarlo Gatti, Andrea Ghigo)

c) LINAC and accelerator structure (Cristina Vaccarezza)

d) Gun, Vacuum and RF-power (Davide Alesini) e) Control system and diagnostics (Giancarlo Di

Pirro) f) Power and magnets (Roberto Boni)g) Infrastructure and CAD (Sandro Tomassini) h) Radiation safety (Adolfo Esposito)i) X-band Upgrade (Bruno Spataro)j) Electron recovery ring (tbd)k) Organization, Financing and Project

Management (Luigi Palumbo, Patrizio Antici)

•Consolidate scientific, technical choices•Finalize organisation and costs•Peer review•Basis for operations

Implementation

• Full-time and part-time personnel working dedicatedly on the project (hands-on experience)

• Use the C-band LINAC @ SPARC as test-bed/training (hands-on) for ELI-NP

• No preassembling (short time, expensive), joint FAT and/or testing at INFN, installation directly on site

• Personnel from Magurele joining the team during the entire lifecycle of the project

• Proposal Personnel goes to Magurele for joint Commissioning and Supervision

Consider Full Lifecycle

TDR Commis-sioning

SKIP detuner

SKIP Input power

monitor

Accelerator structure Downstream Faraday cup

RF load for right hand side

Ion pump port

Power feed line

OperateOrdering Testing Installing HelpMantain

Staffing: Personnel figuresfor the project

Infrastructure / CAD / Radiation safety

Interaction laser

Gun and Photoinjector (laser)

Control system and diagnostics

Timing / Power and magnets

Vacuum and RF power

Compton scattering / Beam dynamics (sim/theory)

Scientific teams

Team Assistant

Procurement / Communication

Human resources / Legal

Head of administration

Technical Coordinator

Scientific Coordinator

Project Management

General Manager

Management

Teams:1 Designer (PhD Physics)1 Technical Designer (PhD Engineering)1 Technician

Example of Personnel profiles

Taken from HR WP of ESFRI Project

EuroFEL Expertise: How many resources ?

Heads  <Heads/RI> FTEs <FTEs/RI>Scientist 289 41.3 147.1 21.0Engineer 378 54.0 197.9 28.3Technician 122 17.4 51.95 7.4Other 7 1.0 1.58 0.2Total 796 113.7 398.5 56.9

Description Actual (2010)

7/7, 24h/24 ?

Training organized for ELI-NP

Accelerator Science & Physics (Module 1)• Introduction to accelerators • Relativity• Electro-magnetism • Particle optics • Transverse beam dynamics • Longitudinal beam dynamics • LINAC • Linear imperfection• Non-Linear effects• Space charge • Instabilities • Injection and extraction • Radiation production, synchrotron

radiation and Compton scattering

Technology & Applications (Module 2)• Introduction to accelerators• Vacuum systems • Radio-frequency engineering (RF)• Magnet design • Conventional and SC magnets • SC RF systems • Beam instrumentation • Particle sources • Accelerator control• Radiation & safety • Low energy electron accelerators • Therapeutic applications • Accelerators for industrial and medical

applications• Novel accelerating technologies

(plasma accelerators)

Integrating ELI-NP Personnel in common Accelerator Physics training (e.g. JUAS / CAS), including:

Timing (assumptions)

1. Legal requirements for tenders (6 Month) -> partnerships quicker ?

2. When able to install of the components on site (estimated June 2014 ?)

3. Arrival of funds/contracts (Mai 2012 ?)4. Contribution of people from Magurele (7-10 people ?)

Extracted fromELI Whitebook

Tentative schedule

Decision Signature

Costs

Major considered costs:1) C-Band Injector (including photocathode laser and Gun)2) C-Band accelerating Sections3) Magnets (Quadrupoles and Dipoles), including supports4) Diagnostics (BPM), vacuum equipment (pumps) and

Timing 5) Interaction laser (for the gamma production)6) Personnel Costs

Costs estimation method

For:1) C-Band Injector (including photocathode laser and Gun)2) C-Band accelerating Sections3) Magnets (Quadrupoles and Dipoles), including supports4) Diagnostics (BPM), vacuum equipment (pumps) and Timing5) Interaction laser

Orders from SPARCQuotations from companies/suppliersUse of Italian procurement lawVAT includedOverheadsExcl. contingency

Costs for Personnel, method

Senior Management and short time consultants/specialists Very experienced scientists (>10 years experience)Experienced scientists (5-10 years experience) Junior scientists (-5 years experience)

Teams of several peopleAligned to European salary gridsHigh personnel efficiency (stringent timeline)Expenses (15 %)Italian contract formLimited time contract

Total: 35-40 people (7-10 from Magurele)

Personnel classified in groups and considering different aspects:

Cash – Flow, assumption

• Personnel costs at T0 (2y (?)+2y contracts) • Procurement after TDR, so only after ~6 month

after project start (T0+6). • Adapted to companies requests (30 % + 30 %

(T+6M) + 30 % FAT + 10%)• Orders optimized with delivery time, pushing

expenses at later stage (12-18 M)• At T+48 the missing budget will be needed in

order to pay-off suppliers.

But evidently: Negociations / Gentlementagreements are possible…

Synergies with ELI-DC

5

10

15

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Propagation axis (cm)

Pro

ton

ener

gy(M

eV)

0

2

4

6

x

y

Unn

orm

aliz

edem

ittan

ce(m

m.m

rad)

(a)

(c)

0

0.4

0.8

x

y

Nor

mal

ized

emitt

ance

(mm

.mra

d)

(b)

sourceDriftspace

Focusingsection

5

10

15

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Propagation axis (cm)

Pro

ton

ener

gy(M

eV)

0

2

4

6

x

y

Unn

orm

aliz

edem

ittan

ce(m

m.m

rad)

(a)

(c)

0

0.4

0.8

x

y

Nor

mal

ized

emitt

ance

(mm

.mra

d)

(b)

5

10

15

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Propagation axis (cm)0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Propagation axis (cm)

Pro

ton

ener

gy(M

eV)

0

2

4

6

x

y

Unn

orm

aliz

edem

ittan

ce(m

m.m

rad)

(a)

(c)

0

0.4

0.8

x

y

Nor

mal

ized

emitt

ance

(mm

.mra

d)

(b)

sourceDriftspace

Focusingsection

M. Nishiuchi et al Phys Rev STAB 13 071304 (2010), 5% spread, 10%

efficiency

K. Harres et al J. Phys Conf. Series 244 022036 (2010)

F. Nürnberg et al., PAC 2009

A. Almomani et al., Proceeding IPAC (2010)

Focalisation with Solenoids

Post-acc withmodified DTL

Transport with 1 Hz

V. Bagnoud et al., APB (2009)

8 T solenoidM. Schollmeier et al., PRL 101, 055004 (2008)

Focalisation using Quadrupoles

Logan, Caparasso, Roth, Cowan, Ruhlet al. (LBNL-LLNL-GSI-GA)Logan, Caparasso, Roth, Cowan, Ruhlet al. (LBNL-LLNL-GSI-GA)

Logan, Caparasso, Roth, Cowan, Ruhlet al. (LBNL-LLNL-GSI-GA) (2000)

Combined accelerator

P. Antici et al., Journal Appl. Phys 104, 124901 (2008)

First Start-to-end simulations

P. Antici et al., Phys. Plasmas 18, 073103 (2011)

Compact post-acceleratorfor medical purposes

5

10

15

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Propagation axis (cm)

Pro

ton

ener

gy(M

eV)

0

2

4

6

x

y

Unn

orm

aliz

edem

ittan

ce(m

m.m

rad)

(a)

(c)

0

0.4

0.8

x

y

Nor

mal

ized

emitt

ance

(mm

.mra

d)

(b)

sourceDriftspace

Focusingsection

5

10

15

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Propagation axis (cm)

Pro

ton

ener

gy(M

eV)

0

2

4

6

x

y

Unn

orm

aliz

edem

ittan

ce(m

m.m

rad)

(a)

(c)

0

0.4

0.8

x

y

Nor

mal

ized

emitt

ance

(mm

.mra

d)

(b)

5

10

15

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Propagation axis (cm)0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Propagation axis (cm)

Pro

ton

ener

gy(M

eV)

0

2

4

6

x

y

Unn

orm

aliz

edem

ittan

ce(m

m.m

rad)

(a)

(c)

0

0.4

0.8

x

y

Nor

mal

ized

emitt

ance

(mm

.mra

d)

(b)

sourceDriftspace

Focusingsection

M. Nishiuchi et al Phys Rev STAB 13 071304 (2010), 5% spread, 10%

efficiency

K. Harres et al J. Phys Conf. Series 244 022036 (2010)

F. Nürnberg et al., PAC 2009

A. Almomani et al., Proceeding IPAC (2010)

Focalisation with Solenoids

Post-acc withmodified DTL

Transport with 1 Hz

V. Bagnoud et al., APB (2009)

8 T solenoidM. Schollmeier et al., PRL 101, 055004 (2008)

Focalisation using Quadrupoles

Logan, Caparasso, Roth, Cowan, Ruhlet al. (LBNL-LLNL-GSI-GA)Logan, Caparasso, Roth, Cowan, Ruhlet al. (LBNL-LLNL-GSI-GA)

Logan, Caparasso, Roth, Cowan, Ruhlet al. (LBNL-LLNL-GSI-GA) (2000)

Combined accelerator

P. Antici et al., Journal Appl. Phys 104, 124901 (2008)

First Start-to-end simulations

P. Antici et al., Phys. Plasmas 18, 073103 (2011)

Compact post-acceleratorfor medical purposes

-Training (plasma physics)-Accelerator knowledge-RI Management expertise

Hosting countries

Official expression of intent to join the ELI‐DC, either by government or 

by funding agencies

Decision currently under review

No reply 

Integrating ELI-NP in EU Landscape

CRISPe.g.

Distributed, networked !

Collaborations are upcoming…

Initiative startedonly recently

More and morepartners joiningor expressinginterest

A.Crivelli

Christophe SIMON-BOISSON