meson with g12 and CLAS12 - Thomas Jefferson National ... · BESIII (2.13 +- 0.09(stat) +-...

Post on 20-Jul-2020

6 views 0 download

Transcript of meson with g12 and CLAS12 - Thomas Jefferson National ... · BESIII (2.13 +- 0.09(stat) +-...

Mem

ber o

f the

Hel

mho

ltz A

ssoc

iatio

n

Towards the Electromagnetic Transition Form Factor of the η' meson with g12 and CLAS12

22 October 2015 Hadron Spectroscopy Working Group

Michael C. Kunkel Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH

IKP-1

Mem

ber o

f the

Hel

mho

ltz A

ssoc

iatio

n

Motivation: • Transition form factors provides insight into the meson charge

radius, . • Ratio of η/η’ form factors provides information on η/η’ mixing angle. • For ω there is a discrepancy between the measurement and the

VMD model. • The η form factor is needed to interpret the muon g-2 experiment.

2

hri

Transition Form Factors Michaela Schever, Michael C. Kunkel, Susan Schadmand, Jim Ritman;

Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich

CLAS collaboration meeting - HSWG

Mem

ber o

f the

Hel

mho

ltz A

ssoc

iatio

n

Towards(Measuring(the(Electromagne5c(Structure(of(eta‘(Mesons(with(CLAS((

•  accessible(via(invariant(mass(distribu0on(of(dilepton(•  feasibility(study(using((

•  CLAS(g12(data(on((η‘(→(γ(e+(e?(•  background(simula0ons((cocktail(plot)((

2/19/15(master(thesis(Michaela(Schever((Jülich/

Aachen)( 1(

both%smooth%and%in,peak%background%important%

→%simula6ons%underway%

3

η, ω, η’ Yield

η→e+e-γ

η'→e+e-γ

ω→e+e-Χ

PRELIMINARY

CLAS data yield from γp→pX with |M2x(pe+e-)|<0.018 GeV2

ME(pe+e-)>0.075 GeV and electron/positron ID

Counts

Goal: Measuring transition form factors

CLAS collaboration meeting - HSWG

Mem

ber o

f the

Hel

mho

ltz A

ssoc

iatio

n

4

ω Transition Form Factor

d�!!l+l�⇡0

dq2d�!!⇡0�=

3⇡q2

✓1 +

q2

m2! �m2

⇡0

◆2

� 4m2!q

2

m2! �m2

⇡0

! 32 ✓

1� 4m2l

q2

◆1/2✓1 +

2m2l

q2

◆|Q.E.D

d�!!l+l�⇡0

dq2d�!!⇡0�|measured =

d�!!l+l�⇡0

dq2d�!!⇡0�|Q.E.D

��F (q2)��2

PRELIMINARY

Recent results the ω transition form factor. Image Source: Conference Proceedings

CLAS data yield from γp→pX with M2x(pe+e-) = M2π0±0.01 GeV2

PRELIMINARY

CLAS data yield from γp→pe+e-X with Mx(p) = Mω ±0.031 GeV

π0

CLAS collaboration meeting - HSWG

Mem

ber o

f the

Hel

mho

ltz A

ssoc

iatio

n

Current BESIII and CLAS data sets do not have enough statistics to determine which theoretical model fits the η′→ charge radius

Number of events

BESIII (η′→γe+e−) 1.60 ± 0.17(stat) ± 0.08(sys) GeV-2 [1]

864

CELLO (η′→γµ+µ−) 1.7 ± 0.4 GeV-2 [2] 75

CLAS (η′→γe+e−) TBD 89

Dispersion 1.53+0.15-0.08 GeV-2

ChPT 1.6 GeV-2

VMD 1.45 GeV-2

5

Status of η’ charge radius

hri

[1]M. Ablikim et al., Phys.Rev. D92 (2015) 012001 [2]R. I. Dzhelyadi et al., Phys. Lett. B 88, 379 (1979)

Current statistical error cannot discern the correct theoretical model

CLAS collaboration meeting - HSWG

Mitg

lied

in d

er H

elm

holtz

-Gem

eins

chaf

t

CLAS collaboration meeting - HSWG

η′→γee : analysis

6

• lepton skim MK: IsLepG7_g12.root • cuts:

• g12 fiducial cuts • event efficiency • q-factor signal extraction

evaluate smooth background event-by-event

➢ 359 event candidates ➢ 82 events (signal weight) full g12 beam energy range

(1) pip_IsLepG7==1 && pim_IsLepG7==-1 ..................................... g7 leptons (CC&EC cut) (2) NProt==1 ................................................................................... final state proton (3) abs(pip_Beta -1.)<0.05 && abs(pim_Beta -1.)<0.05 ................. ToF electron candidates (4) MM2P>=0.75 && MM2P<=1. .................................................... MMp : eta‘ mass window (5) MM2PEpEm<0.01 && MM2PEpEm>-0.01 ................................ MMpee : massless or no missing

particle (6) MEPEpEm>0.2 ........................................................................... MEpee : missing particle (has energy) (7) abs(pip_vx*pip_vx+pip_vy*pip_vy)<4. ..................................... vertex cut for positron (8) abs(pim_vx*pim_vx+pim_vy*pim_vy)<4. ................................. vertex cut for electron

solid: all data filled: background weighted

CLAS collaboration meeting - HSWG

PRELIMINARY

Mitg

lied

in d

er H

elm

holtz

-Gem

eins

chaf

t

Su.

fit to data, range (0.,0.1) FCN=0.298654 FROM MIGRAD STATUS=CONVERGED 34 CALLS 35 TOTAL EDM=3.39438e-020 STRATEGY= 1 ERROR MATRIX ACCURATE

EXT PARAMETER STEP FIRST NO. NAME VALUE ERROR SIZE DERIVATIVE 1 p0 9.90865e+003 4.62091e+003 1.92653e+000 4.30050e-014 2 p1 3.77484e+005 6.29736e+004 3.20771e+000 4.02354e-015

rel BR = p0/p1 = 0.0262492 +- 0.013001 (fit errors)

BESIII (2.13 +- 0.09(stat) +- 0.07(sys)) x 1e-2

η′→γee : Mee distribution

7

symbols: data (signal weight) filled: η′→γee simulation dotted: η′→γγ simulation solid: summed simulations

next step: kinematic fit improved missing mass cuts will affect large-mass end

evaluate in-peak background via invariant mass distribution

sole background candidate: external conversion in the target

full g12 beam energy range

CLAS collaboration meeting - HSWG

PRELIMINARY

Mitg

lied

in d

er H

elm

holtz

-Gem

eins

chaf

t

Su.

fit to data, range (0.,0.1) FCN=0.130833 FROM MIGRAD STATUS=CONVERGED 34 CALLS 35 TOTAL EDM=7.68571e-019 STRATEGY= 1 ERROR MATRIX ACCURATE

EXT PARAMETER STEP FIRST NO. NAME VALUE ERROR SIZE DERIVATIVE 1 p0 9.24417e+003 4.60182e+003 1.79231e+000 -2.07859e-013 2 p1 3.45819e+005 6.21834e+004 2.99290e+000 -1.93127e-014

rel BR = p0/p1 = 0.0267312 +- 0.0141485 (fit errors)

BESIII (2.13 +- 0.09(stat) +- 0.07(sys)) x 1e-2

η′→γee : Mee distribution

8

symbols: data (signal weight) filled: η′→γee simulation dotted: η′→γγ simulation solid: summed simulations

next step: kinematic fit improved missing mass cuts will affect large-mass end

evaluate in-peak background via invariant mass distribution

sole background candidate: external conversion in the target

g11 beam energy range

CLAS collaboration meeting - HSWG

PRELIMINARY

Mitg

lied

in d

er H

elm

holtz

-Gem

eins

chaf

t

CLAS collaboration meeting - HSWG

cross check: angular distribution

9

signal events -> cross section dsigma/dcosthcm in limited beam energy range compare to g11

.... not yet

Mem

ber o

f the

Hel

mho

ltz A

ssoc

iatio

n

10

CLAS12 e+e- pair physics

Electromagnetic structure of mesons and baryons. Currently we are benchmarking the η′→γe+e− decay

Here is a list of initial physics to be studied

Meson Baryon

η′→γe+e− (Δ→Νe+e−)

ω→π0e+e− Λ→ne+e−

Λ(1520)→Λe+e−

J/ψ→π0e+e− Σ0→Λe+e−

Σ+→pe+e−

CLAS ξ(e+e−)/ξ(π+π−) can be range 105 - 1011 CLAS e+e− efficiency (ε) range 1 - 10-2

CLAS collaboration meeting - HSWG

Mem

ber o

f the

Hel

mho

ltz A

ssoc

iatio

n

11

CLAS12 η’ Measurement

Fully Exclusive γp→η′p→ γe+e−p

Inclusive γp→η′(p)→ γe+e−(p)

M(e+e��)[GeV ] M(e+e��)[GeV ]

PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY

Counts

Counts

570K events generated 570K events generated

CLAS collaboration meeting - HSWG

Using CLAS12 simulation and reconstruction software (GEMC & coatjava-1.0)

Mem

ber o

f the

Hel

mho

ltz A

ssoc

iatio

n

) [GeV]-e+M(e0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Accept

ance /

0.02 G

eV

0.002

0.004

0.006

0.008

0.01

0.012

pγ-e+ e→ p γExclusive pγ-e+ e→ p γExclusive

) [GeV]-e+M(e0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Accept

ance /

0.02 G

eV

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

0.04

0.045

0.05

(p) with ECγ-e+ e→ p γInclusive (p) with ECγ-e+ e→ p γInclusive

12

CLAS12 η’ Acceptance

e+e- Acceptance

PRELIMINARY

PRELIMINARY

CLAS collaboration meeting - HSWG

Mem

ber o

f the

Hel

mho

ltz A

ssoc

iatio

n

) [GeV]-e+M(e0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Count per

100 days

/ 0.02 GeV

10

210

310

pγ-e+ e→ p γExclusive

pγ-e+ e→' p η → p γ

CLAS12 ExpectationsVMD ModelQEDN = 21836 / 100 days

pγ-e+ e→ p γExclusive

) [GeV]-e+M(e0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Count per

100 days

/ 0.02 GeV

10

210

310

p with ECγ-e+ e→ p γExclusive

pγ-e+ e→' p η → p γ

CLAS12 ExpectationsVMD ModelQEDN = 2426 / 100 days

p with ECγ-e+ e→ p γExclusive

) [GeV]-e+M(e0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Count per

100 days

/ 0.02 GeV

210

310

410

(p)γ-e+ e→ p γInclusive

(p)γ-e+ e→' (p) η → p γ

CLAS12 ExpectationsVMD ModelQEDN = 53040 / 100 days

(p)γ-e+ e→ p γInclusive

) [GeV]-e+M(e0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Count per

100 days

/ 0.02 GeV

10

210

310

(p) with ECγ-e+ e→ p γInclusive

(p)γ-e+ e→' (p) η → p γ

CLAS12 ExpectationsVMD ModelQEDN = 5893 / 100 days

(p) with ECγ-e+ e→ p γInclusive

13

CLAS12 η’ Rates

PRELIMINARY

PRELIMINARY

Within 100 days of beam-time CLAS12 can measure the η’ transition form factor with a statistical uncertainty ~1%

CLAS collaboration meeting - HSWG

Mem

ber o

f the

Hel

mho

ltz A

ssoc

iatio

n

14

Summary

• Current statistics of CLAS data enables measurements of transition form factor for ω but not η’

• The η’ branching ratio measurement is consistent with recent BESIII result

• Cross check of angular distribution underway

• Future CLAS12 data:

• Hadron transition form factors.

• Branching ratios of meson conversion decays.

• Fundamental properties of hadrons

• Currently seeking applicant for PhD for η transition form factor measurement

CLAS collaboration meeting - HSWG

Mem

ber o

f the

Hel

mho

ltz A

ssoc

iatio

n

15

END

Mitg

lied

in d

er H

elm

holtz

-Gem

eins

chaf

t

CLAS collaboration meeting - HSWG

ηʹ′→γee  :  MMp  distribution

21. Oktober 2015 16

MMp

solid  line:  data  signal  filled  histo:  simu  par(0)*gee+par(1)*gg