Measurement of W p and Z Production in pp Collisions at s · Introduction Signal De nition ATLAS...

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

KinematicDistributions

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Measurement of Wγ and Zγ Production inpp Collisions at

√s = 7 TeV with the

ATLAS Detector

Andrea BocciOn behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration

Duke University

DIS 2011, April 14th, 2011

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Outline

1 IntroductionSignal Definition

2 ATLAS Detectore and γ IDγ Isolation

3 Data AnalysisEvent SelectionKinematic DistributionsSignal Yield

4 Cross SectionsCalculationResults

5 Conclusions

6 Backup

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Introduction

The Wγ and Zγ productions are direct test of thenon-Abelian nature of the Electroweak theory

Probing the WWγ triple gauge boson coupling (TGC)

Probing the presence of ZZγ and Zγγ TGC forbidden(at the tree level) in the Standard Model

Highest cross sections among all diboson processes

Amplitude interferences between u− and t−channelsuppresses the Wγ production w.r.t. Zγ production

WWγ TGCq̄ γ

ISR Production (u− and t−channel)

ν̄(l)q

W (Z)l

ν̄(l)

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Introduction

WWγ TGCq̄ γ

ν̄(l)q

W (Z)l

ν̄(l)

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Introduction

WWγ TGCq̄ γ

ν̄(l)q

W (Z)l

ν̄(l)

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Introduction

WWγ TGCq̄ γ

ν̄(l)q

W (Z)l

ν̄(l)

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Introduction

WWγ TGCq̄ γ

ν̄(l)q

W (Z)l

ν̄(l)

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Signal Definition: lνγ and llγ final states

The experimental signature of these processes are thelνγ+X and llγ+X final states.

Besides the TGC and ISR contributions they include also:

QED FSR from W(Z) inclusive production

Dominating for EγT . 40 GeV

High order O(ααS) contributions (NLO corrections)

Photons from fragmentation of jets produced inassociation with a W or a Z boson (W (Z)+jet events)

WWγ TGCq̄ γ

ν̄(l)q

W (Z)l

ν̄(l)

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Signal Definition: lνγ and llγ final states

The experimental signature of these processes are thelνγ+X and llγ+X final states.

QED FSR from W(Z) inclusive production

Dominating for EγT . 40 GeV

WWγ TGCq̄ γ

ν̄(l)q

W (Z)l

ν̄(l)

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Signal Definition: lνγ and llγ final statesThe experimental signature of these processes are the

lνγ+X and llγ+X final states.

QED FSR from W(Z) inclusive productionDominating for EγT . 40 GeV

QED FSR

W (Z) l

ν̄(l)q

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

QED FSR

W (Z) l

ν̄(l)q

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

QED FSR

W (Z) l

ν̄(l)q

“Fragmentation” Photon Production

Dg/γ(z,Q2)

Dq/γ(z, Q2)

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Fragmentation Photon ContributionPhotons from fragmentation of jets produced in association with a W ora Z boson (W (Z)+jet events)

Only the sum of the prompt and fragmentation components isphysically well defined ⇒ Part of the signal

Strongly suppressed by the photon identification and isolationrequirements, but still significantly contributing

Because of collinear divergences the measurements are restrictedto events with ΣEhadT < 0.5 · EγTExperimentally challenging because of large uncertainties inestimating its contribution in data, and because of a very differentidentification efficiency w.r.t. “prompt” photons

Dg/γ(z,Q2)

Dq/γ(z, Q2)

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Dg/γ(z,Q2)

Dq/γ(z, Q2)

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Dg/γ(z,Q2)

Dq/γ(z, Q2)

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Because of collinear divergences the measurements are restrictedto events with ΣEhadT < 0.5 · EγT

Experimentally challenging because of large uncertainties inestimating its contribution in data, and because of a very differentidentification efficiency w.r.t. “prompt” photons

Dg/γ(z,Q2)

Dq/γ(z, Q2)

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Dg/γ(z,Q2)

Dq/γ(z, Q2)

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

A ToroidaL LHC ApparatuS

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

The Inner Detector

Pixel Tracker3 Barrel, 2×3 Endcap LayersResolution: 10µm (Rφ)60M Channels

SCT Tracker4 Barrel, 2×8 Endcap LayersDouble Stereo SidesResolution: 17µm (Rφ)6.3M Channels

TRT Tracker73, 2×160 LayersAbout 30 hits/trackResolution: 130µm (Rφ)PID Capability∼ 0.3M Channels

Silicon Pixel, Silicon Strips, TransitionRadiation Detectors

Coverage: |η| < 2.5 in 2T B-field

σ/p2T (GeV ) ∼ 3.8 · 10−4 ⊕ 0.015

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

The Inner Detector

Pixel Tracker3 Barrel, 2×3 Endcap LayersResolution: 10µm (Rφ)60M Channels

SCT Tracker4 Barrel, 2×8 Endcap LayersDouble Stereo SidesResolution: 17µm (Rφ)6.3M Channels

TRT Tracker73, 2×160 LayersAbout 30 hits/trackResolution: 130µm (Rφ)PID Capability∼ 0.3M Channels

e/π Separation in TRT

Transition radiation depending on thecharge particle Lorentz factor γ

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

The Electromagnetic Calorimeter

Liquid Argon and Lead with accordion geometryCoverage: |η| < 3.2 (with forward ECAL |η| < 4.9)

Three longitudinal samplings (plus a thin pre-sampler for |η| < 1.8)∆E/E ∼ 10%/

pE(GeV )

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

The Electromagnetic CalorimeterLiquid Argon and Lead with accordion geometry

Coverage: |η| < 3.2 (with forward ECAL |η| < 4.9)Three longitudinal samplings (plus a thin pre-sampler for |η| < 1.8)

∆E/E ∼ 10%/pE(GeV )

EM GranularityLongitudinal segmentation for maximum

background rejection

∆ϕ = 0.0245

∆η = 0.02537.5mm/8 = 4.69 mm ∆η = 0.0031

∆ϕ=0.0245x4 36.8mmx4 =147.3mm

Trigger Tower

TriggerTower∆ϕ = 0.0982

∆η = 0.1

η = 0

Strip cells in Layer 1

Square cells in Layer 2

Cells in Layer 3 ∆ϕ×�∆η = 0.0245×�0.05

Second layer collect most of the EM shower energy(cell ∆η × ∆φ = 0.025 × 0.025)

First (strip) later with high granularity

(event-by-event π0/γ discrimination)Third layer for tails of very high EM shower

Pre-sampler for energy loss corrections

π0/γ Discrimination

Single Photon

π0 Candidate

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Electron and Photon IdentificationEM object identification algorithm

fully exploits the longitudinal segmentation of the EM calorimeter, thetracking information and the TRT particle identification capability.

Identification DiscriminantsHadronic energy leakage

Middle layer energy and lateral width(Rφ, Rη)

Strip layer lateral shower

Strip layer first and second maximumenergy ratio

Track quality

Track/Calorimeter matching

First pixel layer hit

E/p ratio

Transition radiation probability

Three (Two) baseline set of identification cutsfor electrons (photons)

Optimized in ET and η binning for uniformefficiency. For photons optimized separately for

converted and unconverted photons

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Track quality

E/p ratio

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Track quality

E/p ratio

e: EM Fraction in Layer 1

e: EM Fraction in Layer 2

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Track quality

E/p ratio

γ unconverted: Rφ

γ converted: Rφ

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Photon Energy Isolation

Transverse energy in a cone with R = 0.4around the photon

Taken as a sum of uncalibrated cell energy

Central core 5× 7 not included

Corrections for out-of-core leakage

In principle sensitive to underlying event andpileup....

“Ambient” energy density measuredby looking at underlying event inadditional cones in the same event(method proposed by Cacciari,Salam, Sapeta, and Soyez)http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.4926

Photon energy isolation different fordirect photons and photon fromfragmentation

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Event Selection

Require an high ET photon on W(Z) candidate events

W Selection

One lepton with ET > 20GeV

|η| < 2.47 (e) or |η| < 2.4 (µ)

EmissT > 25 GeV

mWT > 40 GeV

Veto on a second lepton

Z Selection

Two leptons with ET > 20GeV

|η| < 2.47 (e) or |η| < 2.4 (µ)

Mll > 40 GeV

Photon Selection

One photon with ET > 15GeV and |η| < 2.37

∆R(l, γ) > 0.7

Isolation Energy EisoT < 5GeV

Number of Candidatesin 35 pb−1

Wγ: 19295 (eνγ) + 97 (µνγ)

Zγ: 4825 (e+−γ) + 23 (µ+µ−γ)

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Event Selection

W Selection

|η| < 2.47 (e) or |η| < 2.4 (µ)

EmissT > 25 GeV

mWT > 40 GeV

Z Selection

|η| < 2.47 (e) or |η| < 2.4 (µ)

Mll > 40 GeV

Photon Selection

∆R(l, γ) > 0.7

Wγ: 19295 (eνγ) + 97 (µνγ)

Zγ: 4825 (e+−γ) + 23 (µ+µ−γ)

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Event Selection

W Selection

|η| < 2.47 (e) or |η| < 2.4 (µ)

EmissT > 25 GeV

mWT > 40 GeV

Z Selection

|η| < 2.47 (e) or |η| < 2.4 (µ)

Mll > 40 GeV

Photon Selection

∆R(l, γ) > 0.7

Wγ: 19295 (eνγ) + 97 (µνγ)

Zγ: 4825 (e+−γ) + 23 (µ+µ−γ)

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Event Selection

W Selection

|η| < 2.47 (e) or |η| < 2.4 (µ)

EmissT > 25 GeV

mWT > 40 GeV

Z Selection

|η| < 2.47 (e) or |η| < 2.4 (µ)

Mll > 40 GeV

Photon Selection

∆R(l, γ) > 0.7

Wγ: 19295 (eνγ) + 97 (µνγ)

Zγ: 4825 (e+−γ) + 23 (µ+µ−γ)

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Candidate Event Kinematic Distributions

Wγ Candidates: Photon ET Distribution

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Wγ Candidates: ∆R(l, γ) Distribution

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Wγ Candidates: mT (l, γ) Distribution

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Wγ Candidates: mT (l, EmissT , γ) Distribution

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Zγ Candidates: ml,l,γ Distribution

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Zγ Candidates: ml,l,γ vs. ml,γ

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Signal Yield Extraction

A 2D-sideband method is used to extract the signal yielddirectly from Wγ and Zγ candidate eventsDiscriminating Variable: Isolation Energy

Isolation Energy Distributions

Wγ Events Zγ Events

Isolation background shape from data.Normalization from the tail of the isolation distribution.

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

A 2D-sideband method is used to extract the signal yielddirectly from Wγ and Zγ candidate eventsDiscriminating Variable: Isolation Energy

Isolation Energy Distributions

Wγ Events Zγ Events

Isolation background shape from data.Normalization from the tail of the isolation distribution.

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

To model the background isolation energy distribution:reverse some photon ID cuts

Photons are required to pass the ID cuts except the striplayers variables

Assuming no/little correlation between photon ID variablesand isolation

Strip variables fairly uncorrelated with isolation energy

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Method applied only to the Wγ analysis(very limited statistics on Zγ)

Corrections for signal presence in control region applied

Contributions from other processes (W → τν, tt̄, Z → ee,etc..) estimated from MC.

Systematics due to the assumptions of the method and thedefinition of the control regions carefully estimated.

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Results: signal purity in selected events ∼ 80%

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Cross Section Calculation

σpp→lνγ(l+l−γ) =N sigWγ(Zγ)

CWγ(Zγ) · LWγ(Zγ) ·AWγ(Zγ)

Nsig is the number of the extracted signal events

L is the the integrated luminosity

C summarizes the reconstruction and identification efficiency

A is the acceptance of the “total” cross section

Cross section measured in two phase-space regions:

Fiducial Phase-space where the measurement has been performed(defined by the cuts reported earlier in the “selection slide”)

Total Phase-space extended to regions outside experimentalacceptance:fiducial total extrapolation done with Monte Carlo“Total” phase-space definition:

EγT > 10 GeV, ∆R(l, γ) > 0.5, ΣEhadT < 0.5 · EγT

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Cross Section Calculation

σpp→lνγ(l+l−γ) =N sigWγ(Zγ)

CWγ(Zγ) · LWγ(Zγ) ·AWγ(Zγ)

Nsig is the number of the extracted signal events

L is the the integrated luminosity

C summarizes the reconstruction and identification efficiency

A is the acceptance of the “total” cross section

Cross section measured in two phase-space regions:

Fiducial Phase-space where the measurement has been performed(defined by the cuts reported earlier in the “selection slide”)

Total Phase-space extended to regions outside experimentalacceptance:fiducial total extrapolation done with Monte Carlo“Total” phase-space definition:

EγT > 10 GeV, ∆R(l, γ) > 0.5, ΣEhadT < 0.5 · EγT

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Efficiency Values and UncertaintiesCWγ (e channel) = 36% CWγ (µ channel) = 46%

CZγ (e channel) = 29% CZγ (µ channel) = 43%

Efficiency Uncertainties

Main contributions to the total uncertainty are:

Fragmentation photon contribution in data (6% for both photonID and isolation efficiency)

Amount of material knowledge (particualry at high |η|)Data/MC discrepancies for the EM shower shape distributions

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Efficiency Values and UncertaintiesCWγ (e channel) = 36% CWγ (µ channel) = 46%CZγ (e channel) = 29% CZγ (µ channel) = 43%

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Efficiency Values and UncertaintiesCWγ (e channel) = 36% CWγ (µ channel) = 46%CZγ (e channel) = 29% CZγ (µ channel) = 43%

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Cross Section Measurements and Comparisonwith Standard Model Theory

Fiducial Cross Sections

Total Cross Sections

All cross section measurements are consistent within theiruncertainties with the Standard Model expectations

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Cross Section Measurements and Comparisonwith Standard Model Theory

Fiducial Cross Sections

Total Cross Sections

All cross section measurements are consistent within theiruncertainties with the Standard Model expectations

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Conclusions and Future Prospects

First measurement of Wγ and Zγ production cross sectionsat√s = 7 TeV performed by ATLAS using ∼ 35 pb−1 of

integrated luminosity

Experimental measurements are in agreement with StandardModel expectations within error

With more data available this year the Triple GaugeCouplings will be probed with unprecedented precision

Searches will be extended also to Wγ and Zγ resonancedecay of particles beyond Standard Model

Stay Tuned for New Results Very Soon!

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Assuming no/littlecorrelation between photonID variables and isolation:

for background events

With small signalcontamination in the controlregions,NB , NC , and ND from data⇒ amount of background inNA

(Control Region) (Control Region)

(Control Region)(Signal Region)

(Isolated)

Photon IDQuality

(Not Isolated)

Isolation Energy [GeV]65

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Assuming no/littlecorrelation between photonID variables and isolation:

(Isolated)

Photon IDQuality

(Not Isolated)

Method applied only to the Wγ analysis (very limited statistics on Zγ)

Corrections for signal presence in control region applied

Systematics due to the assumptions of the method and the definition ofthe control regions carefully estimated.

Introduction

SignalDefinition

ATLASDetector

e and γ ID

γ Isolation

Data Analysis

Event Selection

Signal Yield

CrossSections

Calculation

Results

Conclusions

Backup

Signal Yield ExtractionAssuming no/littlecorrelation between photonID variables and isolation:

(Isolated)

Photon IDQuality

(Not Isolated)

Signal purity in selected events ∼ 80%

Measurement of W p and Z Production in pp Collisions at s · Introduction Signal De nition ATLAS...

Documents

Transcript of Measurement of W p and Z Production in pp Collisions at s · Introduction Signal De nition ATLAS...

Inverse-kinematic studies with Gretina and Phoswich Wall

Digital Signal Processing-Subha

Digital Signal Processing Using MATLAB

Kinematic Synthesis 2 October 8, 2015 Mark Plecnik.

Signal transduction

–1– Deconvolution Signal Models

22. Kinematic Dynamo Theory; Mean Field Theory …web.gps.caltech.edu/classes/ge131/notes2016/Ch22.pdf238 22. Kinematic Dynamo Theory; Mean Field Theory Dynamo Solutions We seek solutions

2 Dy Signal Processing

Influence of joint clearance on kinematic and dynamic ... · PDF fileResults of kinematic and dynamic analysis of a four bar linkage with joint ... The performance deviation due to

1 radar signal processing

Derivation Kinematic Eqns

Traitement de signal 1

v =hz65AOjabtM How to mathematically solve kinematic problems that involve acceleration.

MX280005A Vector Signal Analysis Software

Kinematic Fitting for b 1 π Events

Echo Cancellation in Audio Signal using LMS · PDF fileEcho Cancellation in Audio Signal using LMS Algorithm ... desired signal d(n), ... function, ξ(n)

MSP430x15x, MSP430x16x, MSP430x161x Mixed Signal ...

MSP430F15x, MSP430F16x, MSP430F161x Mixed Signal ...

Data Signal Analysis

SEPTEMBER 2004 MIXED SIGNAL MICROCONTROLLER