Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC

Post on 25-Feb-2016

44 views 0 download

description

Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC . E. Maina U. Torino. MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006. LHC Physics Agenda. Higgs (SM?) SUSY No Higgs nor SUSY Top QCD …………. SM Higgs discovery. H→μeνν. Asai et al. What if no Higgs?. Consistency of SM is lost - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC

1

Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion

simulations at the LHC E. Maina

U. Torino

MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006

2

LHC Physics Agenda Higgs (SM?) SUSY No Higgs nor SUSY

Top QCD …………

3

SM Higgs discovery

H→μeνν

Asai et al.

4

What if no Higgs?

Consistency of SM is lost SM Effective theory Why does SM with weak radiative

corrections work so well? MSSM not a viable replacement

EWWG 05

Where do we look for clues to what lies beyond SM ?

5

Boson-Boson scattering and Unitarity

6

Unitarity

Expand Amp in partial waves M=∑j aj (s) Pj (cos(ϑ)) SS†=1 ⇒ |aj(s)|≤1 Low Energy Th. M(VV→VV)∝s/v2 No H

Unitarization: one example

aj = a0j /(1-ia0j) a0j∝s

Small s LET⇒Large s a⇒ j→1

NOT UNIQUE!!Works well in ππ

7

Unitarization: eg: Butterworth,Cox,Forshaw PRD65(02)96014different ways of constructing amplitudes which are unitary from low order amp

Must be prepared for the unexpectedMust know SM “background” e.g VTVT

8

t-tbar, qqH, VV→VV require Multiparton ME MC’s

Dedicated: ALPGEN, GR@PPA …. General purpose, automatic: MADEVENT, COMPHEP, GRACE, AMEGIC …. NLO: MC@NLO match NLO calculation with PS

QCD is flavour blind: smaller number of basic amps

No full EW six fermion MC : enter PHASE, PHANTOM

9

PhantomBallestrero, Belhouari,Bevilacqua,E.M.

Dedicated event generator O(α6)+O(α4αs2)

All q1q2→f1f2 f3 f4 f5f6, gg →f1f2 f3 f4 f5f6 , gq→…… Exact matrix elements. No production ⊗decay or EVBA One-shot: generates unweighted events for all processes simultaneously

Efficient: good coverage of phase-space Interfaced with showering/hadronization via LH protocol

Interfaced with FAMOS (as Phase1.0) Overcomes Problems due to

Large number of processes Large number of diagrams/process Large number of channels/enhanced regions

q1q2→q1q2 q3 q4 lv covered in Phase1.0 Accomando,Ballestrero,E.M. hep-ph/0504009

10

Phantom 0.9 : qq→4qlv At O(α6)

All particles outgoingAdding ud↔cs, e ↔μ, CC ⇒1K processes

All processes generated simultaneously

Two step procedure

As in Phase 1.0

11

Phantom 0.9: qq→4ql⁺l⁻O(α6)

Good generation efficiency≈ 10-3

12

PHACT PLB350(95)225hep-ph/9911318

13

I= 〈 f 〉 A

ΔI∝〈 (f−〈 f 〉 )2 〉

14

Adaptive integration (VEGAS) Adapts well to cuts Rough estimate of integrand shape usually enough Fails if too many peaks or along diagonals

Multichannel Requires a large number of channels All channels are integrated over simultaneously Sensitive to cuts, efficiency generally small Adapts varying the channel relative weight

Iterative-Adaptive Multichannel NEW! (Phase+Phantom)

Merges best feautures of both! Adapts well to cuts Rough estimate of integrand shape enough Small number of channels required (Multimapping) Channels are integrated separately Good efficiency

15

An interesting example:

It includes:

• ZZ → W+W- Higgs → WW• ZW- → ZW-• W-Z → ZW-• W-W- → W-W- • W- → W-W+W- 2 Higgs → WW chanls• W- → ZZW- Higgs → ZZ

Homework: check it out

1046 diagrams

16

First results qq→4qlv Accomando,Ballestrero,Bolognesi,E.M.,Mariotti hep-ph/0512219

17

Tag vs decay quarks

Selection

18

Signal vs Bkg

Bad

19

PHASE vs PYTHIA

PYTHIA has only LL in EVBA approximation

After: Top rejection W mass

mH=500 GeV No Higgs

20

PHASE vs MADEVENTuu→uuqqμν Not the full set of processesqq=u-dbar,c-sbar

MADEVENT: qqWV Decay⊗

VVV production vetoed

Could produce exact resultLong CPU time

21

M(VW)>800GeV +pT+E+η+Mij cutsSmall sensitivity to MH in SM range SM ⇒predictions well defined. Not just counting exp

22

qq→qqH, H→ZZ, ZZ→llqqAccomando, Ballestrero, Belhouari, E.M. in preparation

EW bkg + interference included exactlybkg ≈ 10% exact spin correlations

23

M(VZ)>800GeV +pT+E+η+Mij cuts

Red lines:|ηZ| < 2|ηqc| < 2

ηqc

Full: noHDash:mh=200 GeV

24

Internal gluon QCD correctionswith G. Bevilacqua (Torino)

Includes qq→tt No external g

First results: no real analysis 70<M(jcjc)<90GeV

All qq→4qlv processes

25

Improvements and projectsPhantom 1.0qq→6f O(α6) as first step

2q → 2q4l ready WW&ZW&ZZ final states lept 2q → 4qlnu @ O(αs

2 αw4) first results available

2g → 4qlnu @ O(αs2 αw

4) ready Main TOP channel! Good control of tails is essential 2g → 4ql⁺l⁻ ready 2g → 2q4l ready 2q → 4ql⁺l ⁻@ O(αs

2 αw4)

t-tbar: spin correlations qqWW→qqlνlν Alternative models of EWSB Standard candle