1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG...

25
1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006

Transcript of 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG...

Page 1: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

1

Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion

simulations at the LHC

E. MainaU. Torino

MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006

Page 2: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

2

LHC Physics Agenda Higgs (SM?) SUSY No Higgs nor SUSY

Top QCD …………

Page 3: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

3

SM Higgs discovery

H→μeνν

Asai et al.

Page 4: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

4

What if no Higgs?

Consistency of SM is lost SM Effective theory Why does SM with weak radiative

corrections work so well? MSSM not a viable replacement

EWWG 05

Where do we look for clues to what lies beyond SM ?

Page 5: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

5

Boson-Boson scattering and Unitarity

Page 6: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

6

Unitarity

Expand Amp in partial waves M=∑j aj (s) Pj (cos(ϑ)) SS†=1 ⇒ |aj(s)|≤1 Low Energy Th. M(VV→VV)∝s/v2 No H

Unitarization: one example

aj = a0j /(1-ia0j) a0j∝s

Small s LET⇒Large s a⇒ j→1

NOT UNIQUE!!Works well in ππ

Page 7: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

7

Unitarization: eg: Butterworth,Cox,Forshaw PRD65(02)96014different ways of constructing amplitudes which are unitary from low order amp

Must be prepared for the unexpectedMust know SM “background” e.g VTVT

Page 8: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

8

t-tbar, qqH, VV→VV require Multiparton ME MC’s

Dedicated: ALPGEN, GR@PPA …. General purpose, automatic: MADEVENT, COMPHEP, GRACE, AMEGIC …. NLO: MC@NLO match NLO calculation with PS

QCD is flavour blind: smaller number of basic amps

No full EW six fermion MC : enter PHASE, PHANTOM

Page 9: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

9

PhantomBallestrero, Belhouari,Bevilacqua,E.M.

Dedicated event generator O(α6)+O(α4αs2)

All q1q2→f1f2 f3 f4 f5f6, gg →f1f2 f3 f4 f5f6 , gq→…… Exact matrix elements. No production ⊗decay or EVBA One-shot: generates unweighted events for all processes simultaneously

Efficient: good coverage of phase-space Interfaced with showering/hadronization via LH protocol

Interfaced with FAMOS (as Phase1.0) Overcomes Problems due to

Large number of processes Large number of diagrams/process Large number of channels/enhanced regions

q1q2→q1q2 q3 q4 lv covered in Phase1.0 Accomando,Ballestrero,E.M. hep-ph/0504009

Page 10: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

10

Phantom 0.9 : qq→4qlv At O(α6)

All particles outgoingAdding ud↔cs, e ↔μ, CC ⇒1K processes

All processes generated simultaneously

Two step procedure

As in Phase 1.0

Page 11: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

11

Phantom 0.9: qq→4ql⁺l⁻O(α6)

Good generation efficiency≈ 10-3

Page 12: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

12

PHACT PLB350(95)225hep-ph/9911318

Page 13: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

13

I= 〈 f 〉 A

ΔI∝〈 (f−〈 f 〉 )2 〉

Page 14: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

14

Adaptive integration (VEGAS) Adapts well to cuts Rough estimate of integrand shape usually enough Fails if too many peaks or along diagonals

Multichannel Requires a large number of channels All channels are integrated over simultaneously Sensitive to cuts, efficiency generally small Adapts varying the channel relative weight

Iterative-Adaptive Multichannel NEW! (Phase+Phantom)

Merges best feautures of both! Adapts well to cuts Rough estimate of integrand shape enough Small number of channels required (Multimapping) Channels are integrated separately Good efficiency

Page 15: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

15

An interesting example:

It includes:

• ZZ --> W+W- Higgs --> WW• ZW- --> ZW-• W-Z --> ZW-• W-W- --> W-W- • W- --> W-W+W- 2 Higgs --> WW chanls• W- --> ZZW- Higgs --> ZZ

Homework: check it out

1046 diagrams

Page 16: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

16

First results qq→4qlv Accomando,Ballestrero,Bolognesi,E.M.,Mariotti hep-ph/0512219

Page 17: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

17

Tag vs decay quarks

Selection

Page 18: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

18

Signal vs Bkg

Bad

Page 19: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

19

PHASE vs PYTHIA

PYTHIA has only LL in EVBA approximation

After: Top rejection W mass

mH=500 GeV No Higgs

Page 20: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

20

PHASE vs MADEVENTuu→uuqqμν Not the full set of processesqq=u-dbar,c-sbar

MADEVENT: qqWV Decay⊗

VVV production vetoed

Could produce exact resultLong CPU time

Page 21: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

21

M(VW)>800GeV +pT+E+η+Mij cutsSmall sensitivity to MH in SM range SM ⇒predictions well defined. Not just counting exp

Page 22: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

22

qq→qqH, H→ZZ, ZZ→llqqAccomando, Ballestrero, Belhouari, E.M. in preparation

EW bkg + interference included exactlybkg ≈ 10% exact spin correlations

Page 23: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

23

M(VZ)>800GeV +pT+E+η+Mij cuts

Red lines:|ηZ| < 2|ηqc| < 2

ηqc

Full: noHDash:mh=200 GeV

Page 24: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

24

Internal gluon QCD correctionswith G. Bevilacqua (Torino)

Includes qq-->tt No external g

First results: no real analysis 70<M(jcjc)<90GeV

All qq→4qlv processes

Page 25: 1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.

25

Improvements and projects

Phantom 1.0qq→6f O(α6) as first step

2q --> 2q4l ready WW&ZW&ZZ final states lept 2q --> 4qlnu @ O(αs

2 αw4) first results available

2g --> 4qlnu @ O(αs2 αw

4) ready Main TOP channel! Good control of tails is essential 2g --> 4ql⁺l⁻ ready 2g --> 2q4l ready 2q --> 4ql⁺l ⁻@ O(αs

2 αw4)

t-tbar: spin correlations qqWW→qqlνlν Alternative models of EWSB Standard candle