TTbar τ + jets : Tau Selection Efficiency Study
description
Transcript of TTbar τ + jets : Tau Selection Efficiency Study
TTbar τ + jets:Tau Selection Efficiency Study
William EdsonSUNY at AlbanyAnirvan Sircar
Efficiency Equation Definitions• Selection Signal Efficiency:
εsig = 100 * Σ matched τ’s passing selection / Σ total matched τ’s
• Selection Background Efficiency:εback = 100 * Σ unmatched τ’s passing selection / Σ total matched τ’s
• ID Signal Efficiency εsig = 100 * Σ matched τ’s passing selection / Σ total matched τ’s prior to ID
• ID Background Efficiency εsig = 100 * Σ unmatched τ’s passing selection / Σ total matched τ’s prior to ID
• When denominator = 0, set it to 1 • Tau matching via getTruthMatch function in TNtupleAnalyzer code
– total matched determined during Object Selection– matched/unmatched during tau cut (C7)
Efficiency Study Results J0 – J3
J3 TauID
True matched
τ’s
Unmatched Selected τ’s
Matched Selected
τ’s
Unmatched/Matched
Background Efficiency
Signal Efficiency
Matched τ’s Prior
to ID
ID Signal Efficiency
ID Background
Efficiency
Amount of Events Passing
Selection
LlhLoose 6 1 0 NA 16.7 0 0 0 100 0
LlhMedium,LlhTight,SigLoose,
SigMedium,SigTight
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
•J0, J1 and J3 events all failed the cutflow prior to cut 7 and exhibited no matched taus during object selection
Efficiency Study Results J4
J4 TauID
True matched
τ’s
Unmatched Selected τ’s
Matched Selected
τ’s
Unmatched/Matched
Background Efficiency
Signal Efficiency
Matched τ’s Prior
to ID
ID Signal Efficiency
ID Background
Efficiency
Amount of Events Passing
Selection
LlhLoose 71 19 0 NA 26.8 0 0 0 1900 0
LlhMedium 71 13 0 NA 18.3 0 0 0 1300 0
LlhTight 71 5 0 NA 7.04 0 0 0 500 0
SigLoose 71 13 0 NA 18.3 0 0 0 1300 0
SigMedium 71 10 0 NA 14.1 0 0 0 1000 0
SigTight 71 8 0 NA 11.3 0 0 0 800 0
Efficiency Study Results J5
J5TauID
True matched
τ’s
Unmatched Selected τ’s
Matched Selected
τ’s
Unmatched/Matched
Background Efficiency
Signal Efficiency
Matched τ’s Prior
to ID
ID Signal Efficiency
ID Background
Efficiency
Amount of Events Passing
Selection
LlhLoose 146 45 0 NA 30.8 0 0 0 4500 0
LlhMedium 146 28 0 NA 19.2 0 0 0 2800 0
LlhTight 146 12 0 NA 8.22 0 0 0 1200 0
SigLoose 146 36 0 NA 24.7 0 0 0 3600 0
SigMedium 146 30 0 NA 20.5 0 0 0 3000 0
SigTight 146 8 0 NA 5.48 0 0 0 800 0
Efficiency Study Results FullHad
FullHadTauID
True matched
τ’s
Unmatched Selected τ’s
Matched Selected
τ’s
Unmatched/Matched
Background Efficiency
Signal Efficiency
Matched τ’s Prior
to ID
ID Signal Efficiency
ID Background
Efficiency
Amount of Events Passing
Selection
LlhLoose 3672 987 5 197 26.9 0.136 14 35.7 7050 20
LlhMedium 3672 636 4 159 17.3 0.109 14 28.6 4542 17
LlhTight 3672 252 0 NA 6.86 0 14 0 1800 6
SigLoose 3672 606 3 202 16.5 0.082 14 21.4 4329 20
SigMedium 3672 406 1 406 11.1 0.027 14 7.14 2900 17
SigTight 3672 166 0 NA 4.52 0 14 0 1186 6
Efficiency Study Results Signal
SignalTauID
True matched
τ’s
Unmatched Selected τ’s
Matched Selected
τ’s
Unmatched/Matched
Background Efficiency
Signal Efficiency
Matched τ’s Prior
to ID
ID Signal Efficiency
ID Background
Efficiency
Amount of Events Passing
Selection
LlhLoose 894800 13525 34100 0.397 1.51 3.81 40850 83.5 33.1 2309
LlhMedium 938021 8218 28819 0.285 0.876 3.07 41629 69.2 19.7 1425
LlhTight 938021 3234 16884 0.192 0.345 1.80 41629 40.6 7.77 773
SigLoose 894800 6775 30250 0.224 0.757 3.38 40850 74.1 16.6 1726
SigMedium 938021 4802 25564 0.188 0.512 2.73 41629 61.4 11.5 1075
SigTight 894800 2000 15050 0.132 0.224 1.68 40850 36.8 4.90 773