The Economics of Instant Gratification

10
The Economics of Instant Gratification NIH Behavior Change Conference David Laibson Harvard University and NBER June 15-16, 2009 Bethesda, Maryland

description

The Economics of Instant Gratification. NIH Behavior Change Conference David Laibson Harvard University and NBER June 15-16, 2009 Bethesda, Maryland. Basic model of time preferences: Quasi-hyperbolic discounting. Present gets full weight Future gets weight β ~ 1/2. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Economics of Instant Gratification

Page 1: The Economics of Instant Gratification

The Economics of Instant Gratification

NIH Behavior Change Conference

David LaibsonHarvard University and NBER

June 15-16, 2009Bethesda, Maryland

Page 2: The Economics of Instant Gratification

Basic model of time preferences:Quasi-hyperbolic discounting

• Present gets full weight• Future gets weight β ~ 1/2

Strotz (1957), Herrnstein (1966), Phelps and Pollak (1968), Laibson (1997)

Page 3: The Economics of Instant Gratification

Application:Exercise

• Suppose exercise generates 6 units of immediate cost• Suppose exercise generates 8 units of delayed benefits• Will you exercise?

• Exercise Today: -6 + ½ [8] = -2• Exercise Tomorrow: 0 + ½ [-6 + 8] = +1

• Agent would like to relax today and exercise tomorrow.• Agent won’t follow through without commitment.

Page 4: The Economics of Instant Gratification

Key ideas• Immediate costs/benefits have

disproportionate weight• Consequently, people tend to avoid and/or

delay investment behaviors– Human capital formation (education)– Exercise– Diet– Sexual abstinence– Smoking abstinence– Medical Adherence– Saving

Page 5: The Economics of Instant Gratification

Three interventions in savings

Pilot interventions in health

Page 6: The Economics of Instant Gratification

Automatic Enrollment401(k) participation by tenure at firm

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48

Tenure at company (months)

Automaticenrollment

Standard enrollment

Madrian and Shea (2001), Choi, Laibson, Madrian, Metrick (2004)

Page 7: The Economics of Instant Gratification

401(k) participation by tenure

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54

Tenure at company (months)

Fra

ctio

n o

f em

plo

yees

eve

r p

arti

cip

ated

Active decision cohort Standard enrollment cohort

Active Decision Cohort

Standard enrollment cohort

Carroll, Choi, Laibson, Madrian, Metrick (2004)

Active Decisions and Deadlines

Page 8: The Economics of Instant Gratification

Time since baseline (months)

Fra

cti

on

Ev

er

Pa

rtic

ipa

tin

g i

n P

lan

2003

2004

2005

Simplified enrollment

Beshears, Choi, Laibson, Madrian (2006)

Page 9: The Economics of Instant Gratification

• Default appointments (e.g. colonoscopy)• Default nutrition (e.g. workplace cafeteria, vending)• Default & active decision immunization (e.g. flu shots)• Active decisions for good health behaviors (e.g. HD of

chronic medications)

• Default medical procedures (e.g. diabetics: stents vs. drugs)

Extensions to health domain

Page 10: The Economics of Instant Gratification

Neural mechanisms

McClure, Laibson, Loewenstein, Cohen (2004)McClure, Ericson, Laibson, Loewenstein, Cohen (2007)

Hare, Camerer, Rangel (2009)

I want a donut

(meso-limbic dopamine)

Stay on your diet

(analytic cortex)