Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

18
1 Metric regularity Metric subregularity Convex case Home Page I K JJ II J I 1 1 18 £ w « 4 Metric subregularity Xi Yin Zheng Department of Mathematics, Yunnan University $˚˘˜:u DOOR #1: C''˜:nc?

Transcript of Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

Page 1: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 1�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

Metric subregularity

Xi Yin Zheng

Department of Mathematics, Yunnan University

$ÊÆÄ:�uÐØ�

DOOR #1: C©©Û–Ä:nØ�c÷?Ð

Page 2: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 2�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

� 1. Metric regularity

� 2. Metric subregularity

� 3. Convex case

Page 3: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 3�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

1 Metric regularityX, Y—Banach spaces, F : X ⇒ Y—a multifunction,(x, y) ∈ gph(F ) := {(x, y) ∈ X × Y : y ∈ F (x)}

Metric regularity of F at (x, y): there exist κ, δ ∈ (0, +∞) such that

d(x, F−1(y)) ≤ κd(y, F (x)) ∀(x, y) ∈ B(x, δ)×B(y, δ). (1.1)

Strong metric regularity of F at (x, y): there exist κ, δ ∈ (0, +∞) such that(1.1) holds and F−1(y) ∩B(x, δ) is a singleton for all y ∈ B(y, δ).

1. Strong metric regularity of F at (x, y)⇐⇒F−1 is a locally Lipschitz single-valued function around (x, y).2. Metric regularity of F at (x, y)⇐⇒F−1 is pseudo-Lipschitz around (x, y).3. Metric regularity of F at (x, y)⇐⇒F is locally linear-open around (x, y).

Page 4: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 4�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

Theorem I (Banach). Let F be a continuous linear operator between Banachspaces X and Y . Then the following statements are equivalent.(i) F (X) = Y .(ii) F is an open mapping.(iii) F is metrically regular at any point in gph(F ).

Theorem II (Lyusternik-Graves). Let F be a smooth single-valued functionbetween two Banach spaces such that the derivative OF (x) is surjective forsome x. Then F is metrically regular at (x, F (x)).

Theorem III (Robinson-Ursescu). Let F be a closed convex multifunction be-tween two Banach spaces, and let (x, y) ∈ gph(F ) be such that y is an interiorpoint of F (X). Then F is metrically subregular at (x, y).

Page 5: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 5�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

Coderivatives D∗F (x, y), D∗F (x, y), D∗F (x, y) : Y ∗ ⇒ X∗

D∗F (x, y)(y∗) = {x∗ ∈ X∗ : (x∗,−y∗) ∈ N(gph(F ), (x, y)}D∗F (x, y)(y∗) = {x∗ ∈ X∗ : (x∗,−y∗) ∈ N(gph(F ), (x, y)}D∗F (x, y)(y∗) = {x∗ ∈ X∗ : (x∗,−y∗) ∈ N(gph(F ), (x, y)}

for all y∗ ∈ Y ∗.

Theorem IV (Mordukhovich, TAMS 1996). Let X, Y be finite dimensionalspaces and let F : X ⇒ Y be a closed multifunction. Then F is metricallyregular at (x, y) if and only if D∗F (x, y)−1(0) = {0}.

Theorem V(Dontchev et al, TAMS 2004). Let F be metrically regular at(x, y). Then, there exists δ > 0 such that for any single-valued Lipschitz func-tion g : X → Y with lip(g, x) < δ, F + g is metrically regular at (x, y + g(x)).

Page 6: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 6�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

2 Metric subregularityMetric subregularity of F at (x, y): there exist τ, δ ∈ (0, +∞) such that

d(x, F−1(y)) ≤ τd(y, F (x)) ∀x ∈ B(x, δ), (2.2)

where F−1(y) can be regarded as the solution set of the following generalizedequation

y ∈ F (x).

In the special case when F (x) = [ϕ(x), +∞) and y = 0 (resp. y = infx∈X

ϕ(x)),

the metric regularity of F at (x, y) reduces to that ϕ has an error bound (weaksharp minimum) at x.

Page 7: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 7�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

Theorem VI (Hoffman, 1952). Let F : Rm ⇒ Rn be a polyhedral multifunc-tion (i.e.,gph(F ) is a polyhedron in Rm × Rn). Then there exists τ > 0 suchthat

d(x, F−1(y)) ≤ τd(y, F (x)) ∀(x, y) ∈ Rm × F (Rm).

Theorem VII (Robinson, 1979). Let F : Rm ⇒ Rn be a piecewise polyhedralmultifunction (i.e.,gph(F ) is the union of finitely many polyhedra in Rm × Rn).Then F is metrically subregular at each (x, y) ∈ gph(F ).

Theorem VIII (Zheng-NG, SIOPT, 2014). Let F be a piecewise polyhedralmultifunction between two normed spaces X and Y , and let y ∈ F (X). Thefollowing statements hold:(1) F is always boundedly metrically subregular at y, that is, for any r > 0

there exists τ > 0 such that

d(x, F−1(y)) ≤ τd(y, F (x)) ∀x ∈ B(0, r).

(2) F is globally metrically subregular at y if and only iflim

d(x,F−1(y))→∞d(y, F (x)) =∞.

Page 8: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 8�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

Theorem IX (Ioffe, TAMS, 1984). Let f be a locally Lipschitz function X andlet x ∈ S(f) = f−1(−R+). Suppose that there exist η, δ ∈ (0, +∞) such that

η ≤ d(0, ∂f(x)) ∀x ∈ B(x, δ) \ S(f).

Then the multifunction F (x) = [f(x), +∞) is metrically subregular at (x, 0).

J(y) := ∂‖ · ‖(y) = {y∗ ∈ SY ∗| 〈y∗, y〉 = ‖y‖} ∀y ∈ Y \ {0}.

For any ε > 0, let

Jε(y) := {y∗ ∈ SY ∗| d(y∗, J(y)) < ε} ∀y ∈ Y \ {0}.

For a subset A of Y and y ∈ Y ,

PA(y) := {y ∈ A| ‖y − y‖ = d(y, A))}

andP εA(y) := {y ∈ A| ‖y − y‖ < d(y, A) + ε}.

Page 9: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 9�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

Theorem 1 Let F be a closed multifunction between Banach spaces X and Yand let (x, y) ∈ gph(F ). The following statements hold:(i) Let ε, η, δ ∈ (0, +∞) be such that

d(0, D∗cF (x, y)(Jε(y − y))) ≥ η

for all x ∈ B(a, δ) \ F−1(y) and all y ∈ P εF (x)(b) ∩B(y, δ). Then

d(x, F−1(y)) ≤ 1

ηd(y, F (x)) ∀x ∈ B

(a,

δ

2 + η

).

(ii) If F is convex, then F is metrically subregular at (x, y) if and only if thereexist ε ∈ (0, 1) and η, δ ∈ (0, +∞) such that

d(0, D∗cF (x, y)(Jε(y − y))) ≥ η

for all x ∈ B(a, δ) \ F−1(y) and all y ∈ P εF (x)(b) ∩B(y, δ).

In the case when F (x) = [f(x), +∞), D∗cF (x, y)(Jε(y − y)) = ∂cf(x) (resp.= ∅) for y = f(x) (resp. y > f(x)).

Page 10: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 10�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

For convenience, we adopt N (F, x, y, τ, δ) defined by

N (F, x, y, τ, δ) := {x ∈ B(x, δ) \ F−1(y) : d(x, F−1(y))) > τd(y, F (x))}.

Clearly, F is metrically subregular at (x, y) with constants τ and δ if and onlyif N (F, x, y, τ, δ) is empty. Therefore, if N (F, x, y, τ, δ) 6= ∅ then F is notmetrically subregular at (x, y) with the constants τ and δ, but F is possiblymetrically subregular at (x, y) with larger constant τ ′ and smaller constant δ′.This motivates us to establish sufficient conditions for the metric subregularityof F at (x, y) only concerning with x in N (F, x, y, τ, δ).

Theorem 2 Let F be a closed multifunction between Banach spaces X and Yand let (x, y) ∈ gph(F ), and let ε, η, δ ∈ (0, +∞) be such that

d(0, D∗cF (x, y)(Jε(y − y))) ≥ η

for all x ∈ N (F, x, y, τ, δ) and all y ∈ P εF (x)(b)∩B(y, δ). Then F is metrically

subregular at (x, y).

Page 11: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 11�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

Adopting an admissible function ϕ (namely an increasing ϕ : R+ → R+ suchthat ϕ(0) = 0 and [ϕ(t) → 0 ⇒ t → 0]), consider the following more generalmetric subregularity: F is said to be metrically ϕ-subregular at (x, y) ∈ gph(F )

if there exist τ, δ ∈ (0, +∞) such that

ϕ(d(x, F−1(y))) ≤ τd(y, F (x)) ∀x ∈ B(x, δ).

In the special case when ϕ(t) = tp, the metric ϕ-subregularirty reduces to theso-called Holder metric subregularity.

For ε, δ, β ∈ (0, +∞), let

B(F, x, y, ε, δ) := {(x, y) : x ∈ B(x, δ) \ F−1(y), y ∈ P εF (x)(y) ∩B(y, δ)}

andKβ(x, y) := {(x, y) ∈ X × Y : ‖y − y‖ ≤ β‖x− x‖}.

Page 12: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 12�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

Theorem 3 Let ϕ be a convex admissible function and F be a closed multifunc-tion between two Banach spaces X and Y . Let α ∈ (0, 1), ε, δ ∈ (0,+∞),β ∈ (0, +∞] and (x, y) ∈ gph(F ) be such that

1

αϕ′+

(d(x, F−1(y))

1− α

)≤ d(0, D∗F (x, y)(Jε(y − y)))

for all (x, y) ∈ B(F, x, y, ε, δ) ∩Kβ(x, y). Let

δ′ := min

1 + α, ϕ−1(δ)

}and κ := max

{1,ϕ′+(δ′)

αβ

}.

Thenϕ(d(x, F−1(y))) ≤ κd(y, F (x)) ∀x ∈ BX(x, δ′).

Page 13: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 13�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

3 Convex case

Let f : Rm → R ∪ {+∞} be a proper lower semicontinuous convex functionand C is a closed convex subset of Rm. In the case that

F (x) :=[

max{f(x), d(x,C)}, +∞)∀x ∈ Rm,

Lewis and Pang (1997) proved that if f(x) = 0 and ∂f(x) 6= ∅ then

metric subregularity of F at (x, 0) =⇒ N(F−1(0), x) = N(C, x) + R+∂f(x)

Lewis and Pang’s open problem: find a useful converse of the abobe implication(characterize the metric regularity via the normal cone identity).

Page 14: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 14�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

Let ϕ be a proper lower semicontinuous extended real convex function on aBanach space X and consider the following convex inequality

(CIE) ϕ(x) ≤ 0.

Let S denote the solution set of (CIE), that is, S := {x ∈ X : ϕ(x) ≤ 0}. In thespecial case when ϕ is a continuous convex funciton, recall that (CIE) satisfiesbasic constraint qualification (BCQ) at a ∈ bd(S) if

N(S, a) = R+∂ϕ(a). (3.3)

To solve Lewis and Pang’s open problem, using the singular subdifferential∂∞ϕ, we introduce the following notions:

(BCQ) N(S, a) = ∂∞ϕ(a) + R+∂ϕ(a),

(SBCQ) N(S, a) ∩BX∗ ⊂ ∂∞ϕ(a) + [0, τ ]∂ϕ(a).

Page 15: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 15�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

Theorem 4 Let ϕ be a proper lower semicontinuous convex function on a Ba-nach space X and F (x) := [ϕ(x), +∞) for all x ∈ X . Then F is metricallysubregular at (x, 0) with ϕ(x) = 0 if and only if there exist τ, δ ∈ (0, +∞) suchthat the convex function ϕ has strong BCQ at each x ∈ bd(F−1(y)) ∩ B(x, δ)

with the same constant τ .

Theorem 5 Let F be a closed convex multifunction between Banach spaces Xand Y and (x, y) ∈ gph(F ). Then F is metrically subregular at (x, y) if andonly if there exists δ > 0 such that F has strong BCQ at each x ∈ bd(F−1(y))∩B(x, δ) with the same constant, that is, there exists τ ∈ (0, +∞) such that

N(F−1(y), x) ∩BX∗ ⊂ τD∗F (x, y)(BY ∗) ∀x ∈ bd(F−1(y)) ∩B(x, δ).

Page 16: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 16�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

Theorem 6 Let F be a closed convex multifunction between Banach spaces Xand Y . Then F is globally metrically subregular at y ∈ F (X) (i.e., there existsτ ∈ (0, +∞) such that d(x, F−1(y)) ≤ τd(y, F (x)) for all x ∈ X) if and onlyif there exist τ ∈ (0, +∞) such that

N(F−1(y), x) ∩BX∗ ⊂ τD∗F (x, y)(BY ∗) ∀x ∈ C,

where C is some recession core of F−1(y) in the sense F−1(y) = C+F−1(y)∞.If, in addition, F−1(y) is a polyhedron, then F is globally metrically subregularat y if and only if

N(F−1(y), x) = D∗F (x, y)(Y ∗) ∀x ∈ C.

Page 17: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 17�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

Theorem 7 Let F be a closed multifunction between Banach spaces X and Yand let (x, y) ∈ gph(F ). Then the following statements hold:(i) If F is metrically subregular at (x, y), then there exist η, δ ∈ (0, +∞) suchthat

N(F−1(y), x) ∩BX∗ ⊂ ηD∗F (x, y)(BY ∗) ∀x ∈ F−1(y) ∩B(x, δ).

(ii) If F is subsmooth at (x, y), F is metrically subregular at (x, y) if and onlyif there exist η, δ ∈ (0, +∞) such that

N(F−1(y), x) ∩BX∗ ⊂ ηD∗F (x, y)(BY ∗) ∀x ∈ F−1(y) ∩B(x, δ).

Page 18: Study on Damage Effect of Dense fragment Cluster Impact on ...

1

Metric regularity

Metric subregularity

Convex case

Home Page

I K �

JJ II

J I

1 18�� 18�

� £

òÑ�¶w«

' 4

ò Ñ

References

[1] A. L. Dontchev, A. S. Lewis and R. T. Rockafellar, The radius of metric regularity, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society,

355 (2003), pp.493-517.

[2] A. L. Dontchev and R. T. Rockafellar, Implicit Functions and Solution Mappings, Springer, New York, 2009.

[3] A. D. Ioffe, Metric regularity and subdifferential calculus. Russ. Math. Surveys 55 (2000), pp.501-558.

[4] B. S. Mordukhovich, Variational Analysis and Generalized Differentiation, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2006.

[5] B. Zhang and X.Y. Zheng, Well-posedness and generalized metric subregularity with respect to an admissible function, Science China

Mathematics, 62(2019), pp.809-822.

[6] X. Y. Zheng and K. F. Ng,, Metric regularity and constraint qualifications for convex inequalities in Banach spaces, SIAM J. Optim.,

14(2004).pp.757-772.

[7] X. Y. Zheng and K. F. Ng, Metric Subregularity and Constraint qualifications for Convex Generalized equations in Banach spaces,

SIAM J. Optim., 18(2007), pp.437-460.

[8] X. Y. Zheng and K. F. Ng, Calmness for L-subsmooth multifunctions in Banach spaces, SIAM J. Optim., 19(2009), 1648-1673.

[9] X. Y. Zheng and K. F. Ng, Metric subregularity and calmness for nonconvex generalized equations in Banach spaces, SIAM J. Optim.,

20(2010), pp.2119-2136.