Secondary RF Plasma System for Mitigation of EUV · PDF fileSecondary RF Plasma System for...
-
Upload
trinhhuong -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Secondary RF Plasma System for Mitigation of EUV · PDF fileSecondary RF Plasma System for...
Secondary RF Plasma System for Mitigation of EUV Source Debris and Advanced Fuels
Diagnostics
Dual In-Situ Crystal• Filters Noise• Extremely Sensetive
Tdepositiojn = KZ-ratio ∆Fxtal2-xtal1 / ρdebris
KZ-ratio = NnaturalF ρquartz / Fxtal12
ρquartz = 2.65 g/cm3
ρdebris = 6.06 g/cm3
Nnatural = 166 kHzFxtal1 = 5.97 MHz
Tdepositiojn = KZ-ratio ∆Fxtal2-xtal1 / ρdebris
KZ-ratio = NnaturalF ρquartz / Fxtal12
ρquartz = 2.65 g/cm3
ρdebris = 6.06 g/cm3
Nnatural = 166 kHzFxtal1 = 5.97 MHz
Dual QCM
QCM Crystals
Debris on Surface Clean Surface
QCM Crystals
Debris on Surface Clean SurfaceDebris on Surface Clean Surface
Faraday Cup
Segregator
• Collects charged particles
• L/D ratio prevents secondary electron emission
• Deflects fast ions away from QCM aperture
• Deflects up to 10 keV Ar
Michael A. Jaworski, Matthew R. Hendricks, Erik L. Antonsen, Brian E. Jurczyk, David N. Ruzic, 1Robert BristolDepartment of Nuclear, Plasma and Radiological Engineering, Plasma Material Interaction Group, University of Illinois at Urbana. Correspondence to [email protected]
3rd International EUVL Symposium, Miyazaki, Japan November 2004
Bulk Plasma at VP
GEA at Ground Potential
Accelerated Ions
Bulk Plasma at VP
GEA at Ground Potential
Accelerated Ions
Collector Grid Current Signal
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
-2.00 -1.50 -1.00 -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00Time [microseconds]
Cur
rent
[mA
]
Current [mA]
Why Not Use a Positive Pulse Voltage?• Anode pulse forces plasma potential up.• Sheath wave propagates new potential
throughout bulk plasma quickly.• Ions already near sheath accelerated even
more into surfaces.• Anomalous current rise measured on
collector grid due to sheath ions.•Large amounts of sputtering due to energetic sheath ions
Bulk Plasma at VP
GEA at Ground Potential
Accelerated Ions
Bulk Plasma at VP
GEA at Ground Potential
Accelerated Ions
Collector Grid Current Signal
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
-2.00 -1.50 -1.00 -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00Time [microseconds]
Cur
rent
[mA
]
Current [mA]
Why Not Use a Positive Pulse Voltage?• Anode pulse forces plasma potential up.• Sheath wave propagates new potential
throughout bulk plasma quickly.• Ions already near sheath accelerated even
more into surfaces.• Anomalous current rise measured on
collector grid due to sheath ions.
• Anode pulse forces plasma potential up.• Sheath wave propagates new potential
throughout bulk plasma quickly.• Ions already near sheath accelerated even
more into surfaces.• Anomalous current rise measured on
collector grid due to sheath ions.•Large amounts of sputtering due to energetic sheath ions
IV Traces of DPF Discharge
• I: Potential Applied to Anode
• II: Breakdown• III: Rundown Initiates• IVa,b: Pinches
I-V Trace No Pre-Ionization
-4.0
-3.5
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5Time (s)
Volta
ge (k
V)
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Cur
rent
(kA
)
VoltageCurrent
I
IIIII
IVa
I-V Trace No Pre-Ionization
-4.0
-3.5
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5Time (s)
Volta
ge (k
V)
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Cur
rent
(kA
)
VoltageCurrent
I
IIIIIIIIII
IVaIVaWhy do we go to zero without pre-ionization?•Surface flashover arcs waste much of the energy. No current can be maintained.
•After many arcs oscillations, enough current builds up to initiate rundown. Voltage has dropped considerably.
I-V Trace With Pre-Ionization
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Time (s)
Volta
ge (k
V)
-4.2
-3.6
-3.0
-2.4
-1.8
-1.2
-0.6
0.0
0.6
1.2
Cur
rent
(kA
)
CurrentVoltage
II IIII IIIIIIIVaIVa
IVbIVb
Dense Plasma Focus Device
• Electrode cross-sectional view
•Pinch visible at electrode tip
• Pulsing system utilizes a fast hydrogen Thyratronswitch:
• 690 nanosecond current rise time
• L = 89 nH• C=3.33 µF• Repeatable DPF firing
at 0-40 Hz• Well defined pinches
by visual inspection
Picture yellowed by Kapton film
Illinois Debris mitigation for EUV Applications Laboratory (IDEAL)
• IDEAL facility is capable of collecting and analyzing data relevant to EUVL sources•300Vs Varian Turbo Pump•Ebara High-Throughput Dry Roughing Pump•ENI A-500 Tunable RF Amplifier•RF Tube amplifier•DPF Charging Supply (12kW max)•DPF Pulsing System (50 Hz)•Adaptive Pressure Control System•Tetramethyl Tin Bubbler System
• Components•Differential pressure gas manifold scheme•3 turn RF antenna for secondary plasma (1-500W @ 10-35 MHz)•Tin injection and waste retention system
Dense Plasma Focus
RF CoilsFaraday Shield
Faraday Cup
Langmuir Probe
QCM Segregator Tool
Fuel Entrance
Secondary Plasma Source
Oscillator0.1-50 MHz
RF Amplifier0-500W
0.3 – 35 MHz
RF Tube Amplifier
• Three-turn immersed antenna
• Faraday shielded to reduce plasma potential
• Plasma provides debris mitigation and pre-ionization
Plasma ConditionsPlasma Parameters at 300 WTe=3.9 eV, ne=5.9X1010 cm-3
Vp=95V, Vf=80
Faraday Shielded RF Antenna
RF Compensated Langmuir Probe
Mirror for visual inspection of pinch
•Raw data is analyzed to produce the measured slopes at right•Deposition items and erosion items are listed in the table elements and are modified by the segregator or foil trap or both•A system of equations is built by balancing deposition against erosion and the QCM measurement
Ionization Fraction Measurement
.309γ αBi δASnXXX
.516γ β αBj δASnXXXX
.565β αBδASnXXX
.359αBδASnXX
.606γ BASnXLOWX
.825γ β BASnXXLOWX
.744β BASnXLOWX
.373BASnLOWX
Measurement (+/- 0.05)
ErosionTerms
Deposition Terms
GasSegregatorFoilTrap
RFPulse
.309γ αBi δASnXXX
.516γ β αBj δASnXXXX
.565β αBδASnXXX
.359αBδASnXX
.606γ BASnXLOWX
.825γ β BASnXXLOWX
.744β BASnXLOWX
.373BASnLOWX
Measurement (+/- 0.05)
ErosionTerms
Deposition Terms
GasSegregatorFoilTrap
RFPulse
Data Table for Analysis
Index of Symbols
Dense Plasma Focus
RF Coils
Faraday Shield
QCM
β
Fuel Entrance
γ
Erosive
Diffusive
Dense Plasma Focus
RF Coils
Faraday Shield
QCMQCM
β
Fuel Entrance
γ
Erosive
Diffusive
Problem Statement•Different components of debris must be separated
•Intense magnetic field in segregator deflects much of the erosive fast ions from the pinch region
•Foil trap also attenuates some fast ions
•Used in conjunction, a table of variables can be built to study the effect of the RF plasma
The Process
Screening factor of RF plasma (due to physical presence of Foil Trap alone)
i
Screening Factor of RF plasma (due to physical presence of Foil Trap and Segregator)
j
Attenuation of fast ions due to passing through RF plasmaα
Screening factor of RF plasma (due to physical boundaries, but not Foil Trap)
δ
Foil Trap attenuation of fast ionsγ
Segregator attenuation of fast ionsβ
Fast erosive ions from DPFB
Sputtered electrode material and condensable fuel debrisA
Screening factor of RF plasma (due to physical presence of Foil Trap alone)
i
Screening Factor of RF plasma (due to physical presence of Foil Trap and Segregator)
j
Attenuation of fast ions due to passing through RF plasmaα
Screening factor of RF plasma (due to physical boundaries, but not Foil Trap)
δ
Foil Trap attenuation of fast ionsγ
Segregator attenuation of fast ionsβ
Fast erosive ions from DPFB
Sputtered electrode material and condensable fuel debrisA
. . : 0.825Deposition Erosion Measuremente g A Bγβ
− =− =
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
3570.53571.03571.53572.03572.53573.03573.53574.03574.53575.03575.53576.03576.53577.03577.53578.0
QCM Raw Data HIgh Power RF
Foil Trap In & Seg Off
Foil Trap In & Seg On
Foil trap Out & Seg On
Foil Trap Out & Seg Off
Cry
stal
Fre
quen
cy D
iffer
ence
(H
z)
Time (minutes)
(1 ) .371(1 )(1 )
B MB N
B O
βγγβ
− = =− =− =
The above equations can be rearranged into:
βγ
γβ
γβ
=−−
−=−
=−−
)1(1
)1(1
)1()1(
NM
NM
NM
The resulting set of equations can be reduced by linearly combining terms to obtain for the first four equations:
12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
3552
3554
3556
3558
3560
3562
Foil Trap In,Seg Off
Foil TrapIn,Seg OnFoil Trap
Out,Seg On
Foil Trap Out,Seg Off
Cry
stal
Fre
quen
cy D
iffer
ence
(Hz)
Time (minutes)
QCM RAW DATA MINIMUM POWER RF
12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
3552
3554
3556
3558
3560
3562
Foil Trap In,Seg Off
Foil TrapIn,Seg OnFoil Trap
Out,Seg On
Foil Trap Out,Seg Off
Cry
stal
Fre
quen
cy D
iffer
ence
(Hz)
Time (minutes)
QCM RAW DATA MINIMUM POWER RF
•High pressure discharge
•Large deposition
•Quick coating of witness plate sample
Initial Tetramethyltin Operation in July
Latest Tetramethyltin Operation•Stable TMSnoperation achieved•QCM measurements indicate additional fuel deposition
•High pressure discharge
•Large deposition
•Quick coating of witness plate sample
Initial Tetramethyltin Operation in July
Latest Tetramethyltin Operation•Stable TMSnoperation achieved•QCM measurements indicate additional fuel deposition
Faraday Cup MeasurementFaraday Cup Signal
Time of Flight Analysis ofPinch Energy Distribution
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Time [microseconds]Fa
rada
y C
up S
igna
l [m
V]
-3.5
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Elec
trod
e Vo
ltage
[kV]
Faraday Cup SignalElectrode Voltage
t = 0
E = 4380 eV
E = 930 eV
trundown=350ns
• Distance from Pinch to Faraday Cup = 40 cm
• Large Positive Signal (2-2.5 µs) Corresponds to Plasma Pulsed Positive
• Rundown time corresponds to a sheath velocity that is 4390 eV
• 200 mV peak signal indicates flux of 3e16 ions/cm2-s assuming singly ionized particles
Tetramethyltin Sn(CH3)4Operation
Acknowledgements•INTEL Corporation for funding this research under contract SRA159-03.•Cymer Inc. and Xtreme Technologies GmbH for collaborative discussions.
Which can then be further simplified, allowing for the value of γ to be found as:
2
1 4 1
2
1M O M ON N N N
MN
M ON N
γ
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− + ± − −⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
=
⎛ ⎞− +⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
After obtaining γ, it is a simple matter to return to the first set of equations and obtain a solution for all of the variables in the system.
Results and ConclusionError
.734i
.861j
.555α
.716δ
.590γ
.347β
.568B
.941A
ResultsVariable Error
.734i
.861j
.555α
.716δ
.590γ
.347β
.568B
.941A
ResultsVariableIDEAL has shown the ability to mitigate debris using a secondary RF discharge. A large amount of sputtered material from both the electrode and the fuel itself is diverted away from the QCM by the presence of a plasma. We also note the ability of a strong magnetic field to divert erosive ions. Used in combination, the effect is multiplied.
A higher density plasma is need. Our next experiments will increase the power of the plasma, while maintaining a low plasma potential to minimize coil sputtering with the Faraday shield. An improved foil trap will lead to more realistic simulations of commercial EUV DPP sources.