Recent results from the OPERA experimentRecent results from the OPERA experiment University of...

67
1 Björn Wonsak Recent results from the OPERA experiment University of Hamburg

Transcript of Recent results from the OPERA experimentRecent results from the OPERA experiment University of...

  • 1

    Björn Wonsak

    Recent results from the OPERA experiment

    University of Hamburg

  • The Collaboration~140 physicists, 28 institutions, 11 countries

  • 3Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    The OPERA Experiment .ντ Candidatesνe AnalysisOutlook

    Overview

  • 4Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    The OPERA Experiment .ντ Candidatesν

    e Analysis

    Outlook

    Overview

  • 5Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    OPERA:Oscillation Project with Emulsion tRacking Apparatus

    Long baseline neutrino oscillation experimentVery pure νµ beam from CERN to LNGS

    Goal: Observation of ντ appearance

    CERN

    LNGS

    730 km

  • 6Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    CERN Neutrinos to Gran Sasso Beam

    Beam Characteristics:

    p.o.t./year 4.5 1019

    17 GeV

    L 730 km

    (νe+νe)/νµ 0.87% *

    νµ/νµ 2.0% *

    ντ/νµ negligible (~10-7)

    *Interaction rates at LNGS

    1.7% oscillation to τ

  • 7Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Detector Concept

    • Goal: Direct observation of ντ in νµ beam

    • OPERA has to look for this special topology

    νµ …………….. ν τ → τ - + X Oscil lation CC- interaction

    µ - ντ νµ 17.4 %

    h- ντ neutrals 52.5 %

    e- ντ νe 17.8 %

    h+h-h- ντ neutrals 12.3 %

    τ decay

    decay ‘kink‘

    B.R.:

  • 8

    Background Processes

    Most important background processes:• Charm production and decay• Hadron re-interactions in lead• Large-angle muon scattering in lead (LAS)

    ντ CC τ

    µ, e, hadron

    Signal

    charm µmuon misidentified

    Background

    νµ CC + charm prod.

    Use Emulsion Cloud Chambers (ECC) to achieve a high enough spatial resolution and density.

  • 9Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    The OPERA Brick

    • Sandwich of 56 Pb sheets (1mm) + emulsions• High spatial resolution (track: σx ≈ 0.05μm, σθ ≈ 2mrad, vertex: σx ≈ 1μm)• Changeable Sheets (CS) emulsion doublet for first checks

    ECC = Stand-alone Detector:• Momentum measurements for hadrons (multiple scattering)• Pion/Muon separation at low energy (dE/dx)• Electron identification and energy measurements for e,γ

    plastic base 200µm

    emulsion layers44µm each

    10.2 x 12.7 x 7.5 cm3

    8.3kg

    10 X0

    14 mm

    14 mm

    reconstructed electromagnetic shower

    CS

    Pb

    ντ

    1 mm

  • 10Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Hybrid Detector

    Emulsion Cloud Chambers

  • 11Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    The OPERA Detector

  • 12Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    The OPERA Detector

    Super Module 1 (SM1) Super Module 2 (SM2)

  • 13Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    The OPERA Detector

    TargetSM1

    TargetSM2

    Target Region:- Target Tracker (Scintillator)- Lead/Emulsion bricks (75.000 per SM)

    Target mass: ~1.25 kton

  • 14Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    The OPERA Detector

    Target

    v μX

    B B

    Magnetic spectrometer:Magnet region:

    Iron & RPCsPrecision Tracker:

    6 planes of drift tubes

  • 15Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Reconstruction (I): Magnetic Spectrometer

  • 16Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Reconstruction (II): Brick Finding

    Iterative process: on average 1.6 bricks involved

    (Target Tracker)

  • 17Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Brick Manipulation System

    • Bricks are automatically extracted

    • Position of brick at given time is recorded in database

  • 18Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Emulsion Scanning

    44 µm emulsion sheet

    3D image: 16 tomographic imagesField of view:

    300µm

  • 19Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Emulsion Scanning

    Scanned volume around interaction point ~2cm3

    Scan volume around track stopping point reconstructed in several plates

  • 20Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Emulsion Scanning

    Reject passing-through and low-energy tracks

    Scanned volume around interaction point ~2cm3

  • 21Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Emulsion Scanning

    Identify tracks pointing to common interaction point

    Scanned volume around interaction point ~2cm3

  • 22Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Oscillation Analysis

  • 23Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Status of the Data Analysis

  • 24Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Status of the Data Analysis

    In total 18∙1019 pot 20% less than in proposal→

    → 19505 neutrino interaction within target

    At the point of this analysis: 6067 located interaction points 4969 completed decay searches

  • 25Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Charm Hadron Production

    Topology similar to τ-decay (decay modes and lifetime)but with µ at primary vertex good control sample→

  • 26Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Charm Hadron Production

    2008-2010 data analysis:

    Background mainly from hadronic interaction

  • 27Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Charm Hadron Production

    2008-2010 data analysis:

    Kolmogorov test > 0.99 for all plots

  • 28Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    The OPERA Experiment .ντ Candidatesν

    e Analysis

    Summary/Outlook

    Overview

  • 29Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    1st ντ Candidate

    (Date: 22 August 2009, 19:27 (UTC))

    Electronic Detector View:

  • 30Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    1st ντ Candidate

    (Date: 22 August 2009, 19:27 (UTC))

    Electronic Detector View:

  • 31Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Scan-back in ECC

    From CS to Vertex Localisation

    CS prediction

  • 32Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Scan-back in ECC

    Scan-back in ECC

    From CS to Vertex Localisation

  • 33Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Scan-back in ECC

    Scan-back in ECC

    From CS to Vertex Localisation

  • 34Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Scan-back in ECC

    Scan-back in ECC

    From CS to Vertex Localisation

    Kink detection

  • 35Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    From CS to Vertex Localisation

    Large-area scan,full reconstruction of vertices and γ

  • 36Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Reconstructed 1st ντ Candidate

    τ - → ρ - ντ

    ρ - → π0π - π0 → γγ Phys. Lett. B 691 (2010) 138

  • 37Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    rad

    reject < 20 mrad

    Kink angle

    mm

    Decay length

    Red regions:Measured values for ντ candidate

    GeV/ccut

    Daughter momentum

    Characteristics of Decay Topology

    cut

  • 38Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Kinematical Cuts to be Passed

    Missing Pt at primary vertex

    cut

    38

    Pt at decay vertex

    cut

    GeV/c

    NC (MC)

    τ (MC)

    GeV/c

    Missing Pt at primary vertex

    cut

    38

    Reject NC events withlarger missing Pt (neutrino)

    Reject hadron re-interactions

  • 39Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Pt Characteristics

    39

    NC (MC)

    τ (MC)

    rad

    cut

    kink

    νµN νµπ-X

    π -

    νµπ -

    φx

    BG:small φ

    Signal :φ =180o

    τ -decay τ -

    ν τ π-

    X (hadron shower)

    ν τN τ-X

    φ

    φ

  • 40Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    2nd ντ Candidate

  • 41

    2nd ντ Candidate

    τ → 3h ντ

    JHEP11(2013)036arXiv:1308.2553

  • 42

    2nd ντ Candidate

    ● Nuclear fragments visible as short highly ionizing tracks

    ● Give additional information for background reduction

  • 43

    2nd ντ Candidate

  • 44

    3rd ντ Candidate

    Muon momentum: 2.8±0.2 GeV/c from rangeConsistent with MCS in bricks 3.1 [2.6,4.0] GeV/c

  • 45

    Charge Determination of µ

    p2

  • 46

    3rd ντ Candidate

    2.8 GeV µ

    τ → µ decay

    γ attached to primary vertex

    τ

    hadron

  • 47

    3rd ντ Candidate

  • 48

    Nature of Track 2

    D variable

    • Stops in downstream brick without visible charged particles• Range vs. momentum inconsistent with muon hypothesis

  • 49

    3rd ντ Candidate

  • 50

    νµ→ν

    τ Analysis Overview

    Subsample corresponding to 64% of total expectation:(2008-2009 & selected 2010-2012 sample)

    → 3 events observed vs. 0.23 events bkg. → p-value for bgk-fluctuation: 7.3∙10-4

    → No-oscil lation hypothesis excluded at 3.2 σ

    0.226

  • 51Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    The OPERA Experiment .ντ Candidatesν

    e Analysis

    Summary/Outlook

    Overview

  • 52

    νe Appearance Analysis

  • 53

    νe Appearance Analysis

    2008+2009 sample (5.25 x 1019 p.o.t.) → Observed 19 ν

    e events

  • 54

    νe Appearance Analysis

    2008+2009 sample (5.25 x 1019 p.o.t.) → Observed 19 ν

    e events

    Expected νe events:

    - νe beam contamination 19.4 ± 2.8

    - Background: τ e→ + misidentified π

    0 0.5 ± 0.2

    From 3-flavour oscillation:ν

    µ → ν

    e 1.4 events (sin2(2θ

    13) = 0.098)

  • 55

    νe Appearance Analysis

    2008+2009 sample (5.25 x 1019 p.o.t.) → Observed 19 ν

    e events

    Expected νe events:

    - νe beam contamination 19.4 ± 2.8

    - Background: τ e→ + misidentified π

    0 0.5 ± 0.2

    From 3-flavour oscillation:ν

    µ → ν

    e 1.4 events (sin2(2θ

    13) = 0.098)

    → compatible with non-oscil lation hypothesis

  • 56

    νe Appearance Analysis

  • 57

    νe Appearance Analysis

    For optimal signal-to-background ratio: E

  • 58

    νe Appearance Analysis

    JHEP07 (2013) 004arXiv:1303.3953

    Search for non-standard oscillations with larger ∆m2

    30 GeV energy cut → S/N=6/9.4

    1-flavour analysis

    sin2(2θnew

    ) < 7.2∙10-3

  • 59Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    The OPERA Experiment .ντ Candidatesν

    e Analysis

    Summary/Outlook

    Overview

  • 60

    Summary/Outlook

    ντ appearance: - 3 events observed- Conservative background estimation → no-oscillation hypothesis excluded at 3.2 σ - Likelihood analysis slightly increases the significance- Improved background studies under way → 4 σ in reach

    νe appearance:- No oscillation observed → restrict parameter space for large ∆m2 significantly

    Analysis ongoing, some interesting events under investigation

  • 61

    Thank you for your attention!

  • 62

    Backup slides

  • 63Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Impact Parameter

    ντ events (MC)NC+CC νμ events (MC)NC+CC νμ events (Data)

  • 64Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Expected Performance (Proposal)Assumptions: Maximal mixing, 22.5x1019p.o.t. (5years @ 4.5x1019p.o.t./year)

    τ Decay Channel

    B.R. (%) Signal Background

    τ → µ 17.7 2.9 0.17τ → e 17.8 3.5 0.17τ → h 49.5 3.1 0.24

    τ → 3h 15.0 0.9 0.17 Total 10.4 0.75

    Expected Events:~ 23600 νμ CC+NC interactions~ 520 νμ interactions~ 205 νe + νe interactions~ 115 ντ CC interactions

    For full mixing and ∆m2 = 2.5 x 10-3 eV2 (scales with (∆m2)2).

  • 65Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Emulsion Scanning

    Vertex reconstruction & kinematical analysis

    The frames correspond to the scanning area:• - Yellow short lines: Measured tracks• - Other colored lines: Interpolation or extrapolation

  • 66Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Brick Location Efficiency

  • 67Björn WonsakMIAMI2013, 13.12.13

    Slide 1Slide 2Slide 3Slide 4Slide 5Slide 6Slide 7Slide 8Slide 9Slide 10Slide 11Slide 12Slide 13Slide 14Slide 15Slide 16Slide 17Slide 18Slide 19Slide 20Slide 21Slide 22Slide 23Slide 24Slide 25Slide 26Slide 27Slide 28Slide 29Slide 30Slide 31Slide 32Slide 33Slide 34Slide 35Slide 36Slide 37Slide 38Slide 39Slide 40Slide 41Slide 42Slide 43Slide 44Slide 45Slide 46Slide 47Slide 48Slide 49Slide 50Slide 51Slide 52Slide 53Slide 54Slide 55Slide 56Slide 57Slide 58Slide 59Slide 60Slide 61Slide 62Slide 63Slide 64Slide 65Slide 66Slide 67