     • date post

27-Mar-2021
• Category

Documents

• view

1

0

Embed Size (px)

Transcript of Quasi-definiteness of generalized Uvarov transforms of moment 2019. 8. 1.¢  70 Generalized...

• QUASI-DEFINITENESS OF GENERALIZED UVAROV TRANSFORMS OF MOMENT FUNCTIONALS

D. H. KIM AND K. H. KWON

When σ is a quasi-definite moment functional with the monic orthogonal polynomial system {Pn(x)}∞n=0, we consider a point masses perturbation τ of σ given by τ := σ + λ

∑m l=1

∑ml k=0((−1)

kulk/k!)δ (k)(x − cl), where λ,

ulk, and cl are constants with ci �= cj for i �= j. That is, τ is a gen- eralized Uvarov transform of σ satisfying A(x)τ = A(x)σ, where A(x) =∏m

l=1(x− cl) ml+1. We find necessary and sufficient conditions for τ to be

quasi-definite. We also discuss various properties of monic orthogonal poly- nomial system {Rn(x)}∞n=0 relative to τ including two examples.

1. Introduction

In the study of Padé approximation (see [5, 10, 21]) of Stieltjes type mero- morphic functions

∫b a

dµ(x)

z−x +

m∑ l=1

ml∑ k=0

Clk k!(

z−cl )k+1 , (1.1)

where −∞ ≤ a < b ≤ ∞, Clk are constants, and dµ(x) is a positive Stieltjes measure, the denominators Rn(x) of the main diagonal sequence of Padé approximants satisfy the orthogonality

∫b a

Rn(x)π(x)dµ(x)+

m∑ l=1

ml∑ k=0

Clk∂ k [ πRn

]( cl

) = 0, π ∈ Pn−1, (1.2)

Copyright c© 2001 Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Applied Mathematics 1:2 (2001) 69–90 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 33C45 URL: http://jam.hindawi.com/volume-1/S1110757X01000225.html

http://jam.hindawi.com/volume-1/S1110757X01000225.html

• 70 Generalized Uvarov transforms

where Pn is the space of polynomials of degree ≤ n with P−1 = {0}. That is, Rn(x) (n ≥ 0) are orthogonal with respect to the measure

dµ+

m∑ l=1

ml∑ k=0

(−1)kClkδ (k)

( x−cl

) , (1.3)

which is a point masses perturbation of dµ(x). Orthogonality to a positive or signed measure perturbed by one or two point masses arises naturally also in orthogonal polynomial eigenfunctions of higher order (≥ 4) ordi- nary differential equations (see [14, 15, 16, 19]), which generalize Bochner’s classification of classical orthogonal polynomials (see [6, 18]). On the other hand, many authors have studied various aspects of orthogonal polynomials with respect to various point masses perturbations of positive-definite (see [1, 2, 8, 14, 27, 28]) and quasi-definite (see [3, 4, 9, 11, 12, 20, 23]) moment functionals. In this work, we consider the most general such situation. That is, we consider a moment functional τ given by

τ := σ+λ

m∑ l=1

ml∑ k=0

(−1)kulk

k! δ(k)

( x−cl

) , (1.4)

where σ is a given quasi-definite moment functional, λ, ulk, and cl are complex numbers with ul,ml �= 0 and ci �= cj for i �= j, that is, τ is obtained from σ by adding a distribution with finite support. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for τ to be quasi-definite. When τ is also quasi-definite, we discuss various properties of orthogonal polynomials {Rn(x)}∞n=0 relative to τ in connection with orthogonal polynomials {Pn(x)}∞n=0 relative to σ. These generalize many previous works in [4, 9, 11, 12, 20, 23].

2. Necessary and sufficient conditions

For any integer n ≥ 0, let Pn be the space of polynomials of degree ≤ n and P =

⋃ n≥0 Pn. For any π(x) in P, let deg(π) be the degree of π(x) with the

convention that deg(0) = −1. For the moment functionals σ, τ (i.e., linear functionals on P) (see ), c in C, and a polynomial φ(x) =

∑n k=0 akx

k, let

〈 σ′,π

〉 := −

〈 σ,π′

〉 ; 〈φσ,π〉 := 〈σ,φπ〉;〈

(x−c)−1σ,π 〉

:= 〈 σ,θcπ

〉 ;

( θcπ

) (x) :=

π(x)−π(c)

x−c ; (2.1)

(σφ)(x) :=

n∑ k=0

( n∑

j=k

ajσjk

) xk; 〈στ,π〉 = 〈σ,τπ〉, π ∈ P.

• D. H. Kim and K. H. Kwon 71

We also let

F(σ)(z) :=

∞∑ n=0

σn

zn+1 (2.2)

be the (formal) Stieltjes function of σ, where σn := 〈σ,xn〉 (n ≥ 0) are the moments of σ. Following Zhedanov , for any polynomials A(z), B(z), C(z), D(z) with no common zero and |C|+ |D| �≡ 0, let

S(A,B,C,D)F(σ)(z) := AF(σ)+B

CF(σ)+D . (2.3)

If S(A,B,C,D)F(σ) = F(τ) for some moment functional τ, then we call τ a rational (resp., linear) spectral transform of σ (resp., when C(z) = 0). Then S(A,B,C,D)F(σ) = F(τ) if and only if

xA(x)σ = C(x)(στ)+xD(x)τ,

〈σ,A〉+x(σθ0A)(x)+xB(x) = (στ)(θ0C)(x)+〈τ,D〉+x(τθ0D)(x). (2.4) In particular, for any c and β in C, let

U(c,β)F(σ) := (z−c)F(σ)+β

z−c (2.5)

be the Uvarov transform (see [28, 29]) of F(σ). Then for any {ci}ki=1 and {βi}

k i=1 in C,

F(τ) := U ( ck,βk

) · · ·U(c1,β1)F(σ) = A(z)F(σ)+B(z) A(z)

, (2.6)

where A(z) = ∏k

i=1(z−ci), B(z) = ∑k

i=1 βi ∑k

j=1 j �=i

(z−cj), and by (2.4)

A(x)τ = A(x)σ. (2.7)

In this case, we say that τ is a generalized Uvarov transform of σ. Conversely, if (2.7) holds for some polynomial A(x) (�≡ 0), then

F(τ) = A(z)F(σ)+

( τθ0A

) (z)−

( σθ0A

) (z)

A(z) (2.8)

and F(τ) is obtained from F(σ) by deg(A) successive Uvarov transforms (see ), that is, τ is a generalized Uvarov transform of σ.

In the following, we always assume that τ is a moment functional given by (1.4), where σ is a quasi-definite moment functional. Let {Pn(x)}∞n=0 be the monic orthogonal polynomial system (MOPS) relative to σ satisfying the

• 72 Generalized Uvarov transforms

three term recurrence relation

Pn+1(x) = ( x−bn

) Pn(x)−cnPn−1(x), n ≥ 0,

( P−1(x) = 0

) . (2.9)

Since (1.4) implies (2.7) with A(x) = ∏m

l=1(x−cl) ml+1, τ is a generalized

Uvarov transform of σ. Then our main concern is to find conditions under which a generalized Uvarov transform τ, given by (1.4), of σ is also quasi- definite. In other words, we are to solve the division problem (2.7) of the moment functionals.

Let

Kn(x,y) :=

n∑ j=0

Pj(x)Pj(y)〈 σ,P2j

〉 , n ≥ 0 (2.10) be the nth kernel polynomial for {Pn(x)}∞n=0 and K(i,j)n (x,y)=∂xi∂yjKn(x,y). We need the following lemma which is easy to prove.

Lemma 2.1. Let V = (x1,x2, . . . ,xn)t and W = (y1,y2, . . . ,yn)t be two vec- tors in Cn. Then

det ( In +VW

t )

= 1+

n∑ j=1

xjyj, n ≥ 1, (2.11)

where In is the n×n identity matrix.

Theorem 2.2. The moment functional τ is quasi-definite if and only if dn �= 0, n ≥ 0, where dn is the determinant of (

∑m l=1(ml + 1)) ×

( ∑m

l=1(ml +1)) matrix Dn:

Dn := [ Atl(n)

]m t,l=1

, n ≥ 0, (2.12)

where

Atl(n) =

[ δtlδki +λ

ml−i∑ j=0

ul,i+j

i!j! K(k,j)n

( ct,cl

)]mt ml k=0, i=0

. (2.13)

If τ is quasi-definite, then the MOPS {Rn(x)}∞n=0 relative to τ is given by

Rn(x) = Pn(x)−λ

m∑ l=1

ml∑ i=0

ml−i∑ j=0

ul,i+j

i!j! K

(0,j) n−1

( x,cl

) R(i)n

( cl

) , (2.14)

• D. H. Kim and K. H. Kwon 73

where {R(i)n (cl)} m ml l=1,i=0 are given by

Dn−1

 

Rn ( c1

) R′n

( c1

) ...

R (m1) n

( c1

) Rn

( c2

) ...

R (mm) n

( cm

)

 

=

 

Pn ( c1

) P′n

( c1

) ...

P (m1) n

( c1

) Pn

( c2

) ...

P (mm) n

( cm

)

 

, n ≥ 0 (D−1 = I). (2.15)

Moreover, 〈 τ,R2n

〉 =

dn

dn−1

〈 σ,P2n

〉 , n ≥ 0 (d−1 = 1). (2.16)

Proof. (⇒). Assume that τ is quasi-definite and expand Rn(x) as Rn(x) = Pn(x)+

n−1∑ j=0

CnjPj(x), n ≥ 1, (2.17)

where Cnj = 〈σ,RnPj〉/〈σ,P2j 〉, with 0 ≤ j ≤ n−1. Here, 〈 σ,RnPj

〉 =

〈 τ−λ

m∑ l=1

ml∑ k=0

(−1)kulk

k! δ(k)

( x−cl

) ,RnPj

= −λ

m∑ l=1

ml∑ k=0

ulk

k!

k∑ i=0

( k

i

) R(i)n

( cl

) P

(k−i) j

( cl

) (2.18)

so that

Rn(x) = Pn(x)−λ

n−1∑ j=0

Pj(x)〈 σ,P2j

〉 m∑ l=1

ml∑ k=0

ulk

k!

k∑ i=0

( k

i

) R(i)n

( cl

) P

(k−i) j

( cl

)

= Pn(x)−λ

m∑ l=1

ml∑ k=0

ulk

k!

k∑ i=0

( k

i

) R(i)n

( cl

) K

(0,k−i) n−1

( x,cl

)

= Pn(x)−λ

m∑ l=1

ml∑ i=0

ml−i∑ j=0

ul,i+j

i!j! K

(0,j) n−1

( x,cl

) R(i)n

( cl

) .

(2.19)