Prism coupling selectivity in uniaxial anisotropic waveguide: erratum
1
Prism coupling selectivity in uniaxial anisotropic waveguide: erratum Joanna Jannson Warsaw Technical University, Institute of Physics, 00-662 Warsaw, Koszykowa 75, Poland. Received 6 August 1981. 0003-6935/81/244148-01$00.50/0. © 1981 Optical Society of America. In Eqs. (5), (8), and (12) of this paper 1 the sign before the factor ε yz should be opposite, and in Eq. (17) the value yo should be given by y 0 = (ε yz /ε zz )\s + z 0 |. Equation (21) should read Moreover, in Sec. V the last sentence of the third paragraph should read: . . . However, even for α ≠ nπ/2, the influence of optical axis fluctuation on coupling efficiency can be in- creased when we increase the value of l m, which means the realization of optimal coupling for larger gap thicknesses. Reference 1. J. Jannson, Appl. Opt. 20, 374 (1981). 4148 APPLIED OPTICS / Vol. 20, No. 24 / 15 December 1981
Transcript of Prism coupling selectivity in uniaxial anisotropic waveguide: erratum
Prism coupling selectivity in uniaxial anisotropic waveguide: erratum Joanna Jannson
Warsaw Technical University, Institute of Physics, 00-662 Warsaw, Koszykowa 75, Poland. Received 6 August 1981. 0003-6935/81/244148-01$00.50/0. © 1981 Optical Society of America. In Eqs. (5), (8), and (12) of this paper1 the sign before the
factor εyz should be opposite, and in Eq. (17) the value yo should be given by y0 = (εyz/εzz)\s + z0|.
Equation (21) should read
Moreover, in Sec. V the last sentence of the third paragraph should read: . . . However, even for α ≠ nπ/2, the influence of optical axis fluctuation on coupling efficiency can be increased when we increase the value of lm, which means the realization of optimal coupling for larger gap thicknesses.
Reference 1. J. Jannson, Appl. Opt. 20, 374 (1981).
4148 APPLIED OPTICS / Vol. 20, No. 24 / 15 December 1981
