Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component)...
Transcript of Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component)...
![Page 1: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) :
( Is Power relevant...? )
Marcelo B. P. Amato
University of São Paulo, Brazil
Toronto, November, 2018
![Page 2: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
I disclose the following financial relationships (all happening in the
last 5 years) with commercial entities that produce healthcare-
related products or services, relevant to the content I am
presenting:
Company Relationship Content Area
Medtronics Consultant Mechanical Ventilation
Orange Med Consultant Mechanical Ventilation
Philips / Dixtal Research grants E.I.T.
Timpel S.A. Research grants, minority shares E.I.T.
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
Marcelo B.P. Amato
![Page 3: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
0
0
Time
PA
ΔP
Volume control
Zero Flow
Pre
ssure
( cm
H2O
)F
low
(
L /
se
c)
VSET
![Page 4: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Relative Risk of Death in the Hospital versus ΔP in the Combined Cohort after Multivariate Adjustment.
Amato MBP et al. N Engl J Med 2015;372:747-755
![Page 5: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Figure 2b : Combined population of ARDS ( N = 3080 )
*: adjusted for age, APACHE/SAPS risk, arterial-pH, P/F ratio , and study-trial
low
-PP
PLA
T &
low
-DP
hig
h-P
PP
LA
T &
low
-DP
low
-PP
PLA
T &
hig
h-D
P
hig
h-P
PP
LA
T &
hig
h-D
P
Y D
ata
0.5
0.7
1.0
1.4
2.0
∆P ≤ 14 ∆P >14
PPLAT ≥ 30 PPLAT ≥ 30PPLAT < 30PPLAT < 30
P < 0.01
P < 0.001
P = 0.92
Mo
rtal
ity
ris
k (
adju
sted
*)
*: adjusted for study-trial, age, APACHE/SAPS risk, arterial-pH, P/F ratio
(N = 529)
(N = 882)
(N = 260)
(N = 1406)
Figure-2b
?@
? ?30
Worse!
Better!
![Page 6: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
P11P P12P P13PP11A P12A P13AGROUPS
Methods
P16A P15P
SHAM VILI(3-4 hours)
![Page 9: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
P16A
ARDSNET – after 48 hs OLA – after 48 hs
P11P P12P
P15P
P11A
P14A
vs.
![Page 10: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
2nd PET
Sagital
Coronal
Axial
Slice ViewHigh PEEP Group
2nd PET
Low PEEP Group
0.022
Ki (m
in-1
)
0.000
18F-FDG
uptake scale
![Page 11: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
PLATOOLA VS ARDSNET
TEMPO
BASAL POS VILI 0h 6h 12h 24h 36h FINAL
cm
H2
O
0
10
20
30
40
50 ARDSNET
OLA
Plateau Pressure
VILI
Extreme CyclicStress
Same Maximal
Stress !
![Page 12: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
DELTA DE PRESSÃOOLA VS ARDSNET
TEMPO
BASAL POS VILI 0h 6h 12h 24h 36h FINAL
cm
H2O
0
10
20
30
40
50ARDSNET
OLA
Driving Pressure
VILI
High
Cyclic Stress
Low Stress
Extreme CyclicStress
![Page 13: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Anterior.
Posterior
RN
A co
llag
en
typ
e I
control VILI VILI +40hs prot.
P < 0.001
VILI +40hs OLALow Cyclic
StressHigh Cyclic
Stress
![Page 14: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Before
1 monthafter ARDS
6 monthsafter ARDS
Toufen et al - submitted to ICM 2018
![Page 15: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Risk factors for low FVC at 6 months
Driving pressure (cmH2O)
Vita
l c
ap
acity
-6 m
onth
s
Toufen et al - submitted to ICM 2018
![Page 16: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
∆P < 13 cmH2O(n = 9)
∆P ≥ 13 cmH2O(n = 9)
Toufen et al - submitted to ICM 2018
![Page 17: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Anesthesia
Left-Lung
Ventilation
VT = 6 mL/kg
PPLAT = 29 cmH2O
PEEP = 0 cmH2O
P = 29 cmH2O !!!!!
![Page 18: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Gattinoni et al. 2016
![Page 19: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Anesthesiology 2016
![Page 20: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
DynamicStatic
![Page 21: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
vs.
![Page 22: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
dissipated
![Page 23: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
![Page 26: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Amato et al.
1998
(N = 53)
Brochard et al.
Brower et al.
Stewart et al.
1998-1999
(N = 288)
ARDSnet2000
(N = 861)
Alveoli2004
(N = 545)
ExpressLOVSTalmor et al.
2008
(N = 1811)
TOTAL2013
(N = 3562)
time1998 2012
![Page 27: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Plateau Pressure
Relative Risk
0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75
1.08 [1.00-1.17]
1.33 [1.24-1.43]Driving Pressure
Tidal Volume
Respiratory Rate
PEEP
1.16 [1.09-1.24]POWER
UNIVARIATE
![Page 28: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Plateau Pressure
Relative Risk
0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75
1.08 [1.00-1.17]
1.33 [1.24-1.43]
Plateau Pressure
Driving Pressure
Tidal Volume
Respiratory Rate
PEEP
MULTIVARIATE
POWER
![Page 29: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Plateau Pressure
Relative Risk
0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75
1.08 [1.00-1.17]
1.33 [1.24-1.43]
Plateau Pressure
Driving Pressure
Tidal Volume
Respiratory Rate
PEEP
Static (PEEP component)
Dynamic (dynamic component)
![Page 30: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
P < 0.001 P = 0.178
![Page 31: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
5XN = 3562 Pts.
![Page 32: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Is it worth to decrease VT or P by 20%,
at the expense of increasing RR by 20%?
![Page 33: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Animal experiment: pigs with ARDS
randomization
6 mL/kg
RR = 28
4.5 mL/kg
RR = 80
Power = 15 J/min Power = 30 J/min
![Page 34: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
∆P ≥ 13
Power = 15 J/min
Low frequency - higher VT
![Page 36: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
∆P < 13
Power = 30 J/min
Higher frequency - lower VT
![Page 37: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Is it worth to decrease VT or P by 20%,
at the expense of increasing RR by 20%?
YES !and forget about power !
![Page 38: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
keeping constant Alveolar Ventilation...
Respiratory Rate ∞
Ris
k of V
ILI
N = 3562 Pts.
![Page 39: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
5XN = 3562 Pts.
![Page 40: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
1. Power calculations do not add relevant
information
2. Better use Driving Pressure only
3. Increasing Respiratory rate may be dangerous
4. But Less dangerous than increasing P
![Page 41: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
4. Each patient has an optimum RR in which
P is minimized with minimum risks
5. This ideal RR is usually above 30
breaths/min
![Page 42: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Thank you!!!!
![Page 43: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
![Page 44: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
keeping constant Alveolar Ventilation...
Respiratory Rate
Tid
al V
olu
me
∞
Dead Space
VA = RR x ( VT – VD )
![Page 45: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
keeping constant Alveolar Ventilation...
Respiratory Rate
Drivin
g
Pre
ssu
re
∞
Minimum P
VA = RR x ( VT – VD )
![Page 46: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
keeping constant Alveolar Ventilation...
Respiratory Rate
RR
re
late
d d
am
ag
e
∞
![Page 47: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
keeping constant Alveolar Ventilation...
Respiratory Rate
Tid
al V
olu
me
∞
Dead Space
VA = RR x ( VT – VD )
![Page 48: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
keeping constant Alveolar Ventilation...
Respiratory Rate ∞
Ris
k of V
ILI
Reducing P∆P = constant,
but RR increases !
![Page 49: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
keeping constant Alveolar Ventilation...
Respiratory Rate ∞
VT / VD
?
Ris
k of V
ILI
![Page 50: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
keeping constant Alveolar Ventilation...
Respiratory Rate ∞
VT / VD
Ris
k of V
ILI
![Page 51: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
keeping constant Alveolar Ventilation...
Respiratory Rate ∞
VT / VD
Ris
k of V
ILI
![Page 52: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
keeping constant Alveolar Ventilation...
Respiratory Rate ∞
VT / VD
60 ?
Ris
k of V
ILI
![Page 53: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Methods
• Target: PaCO2 of 57 – 63 mmHg
– PEEP: ARDSnet PEEP table
– MODE: VCV square wave flow
![Page 54: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
81
* = P < 0.05 vs VT = 6 mL/kg
![Page 55: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
7.5
Tid
al V
olu
me
( m
L / k
g )
6.1
5.24.6
4.3
3.8
2.8
I____I
![Page 56: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
14
22
15 1312
13
Drivin
g
pre
ssure
(c
mH
2O
)
![Page 57: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
![Page 58: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
![Page 59: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
keeping constant Alveolar Ventilation...
Respiratory Rate ∞
VT / VD
60 ?
Ris
k of V
ILI
![Page 60: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
![Page 61: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Thank you!!!!
![Page 62: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
A B C
Lun
g V
olu
me
Airway Pressure
PPLATPEEP PPeak
EELV
VT
A = Static / PEEP componentB = Dynamic / Elastic componentC = Resistive component
![Page 63: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
![Page 64: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Model E
Model D
![Page 65: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
P = 0.089 P = 0.369 P < 0.001
![Page 66: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
P < 0.001 P = 0.178
![Page 67: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
P or PL ?
( PAW - Pesoph )
![Page 68: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Transpulmonary Driving Pressure (∆PL)
Airw
ay
Drivin
g P
ressure
(∆
P)
![Page 69: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Thank you!!!!
![Page 70: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Mental Experiment….( Einstein’s elevator )
![Page 71: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Effects of Gravity on the space around:
![Page 72: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
PPLAT = 14
PEEP = 0
PPLAT = 45
PEEP = 10
PPLAT = 45
PEEP = 0
Webb & Tierney 1974; Am Rev Respir Dis;110:556
![Page 73: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
![Page 74: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
N = 3080
?
![Page 75: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
N = 3080
?
![Page 76: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
How much you are concerned?
Situation 1:
VT = 8.2 mL/kg
PPLAT = 22 cmH2O
PEEP = 10 cmH2O
Situation 2:
VT = 6.0 mL/kg
PPLAT = 28 cmH2O
PEEP = 5 cmH2O
X
A Quasi-Experimental, Before-After Trial Examining the Impact of an Emergency
Department Mechanical Ventilator Protocol on Clinical Outcomes and Lung-Protective
Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Critical care medicine, Feb 2017
Brian M Fuller; Ian T Ferguson; and 11 more
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002268
P = 12 cmH2O P = 23 cmH2O !!!!
![Page 77: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Relative Risk of Death in the Hospital versus ΔP in the Combined Cohort after Multivariate Adjustment.
Amato MBP et al. N Engl J Med 2015;372:747-755
![Page 78: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Transpulmonary Driving Pressure (∆PL)
Airw
ay
Drivin
g P
ressure
(∆
P)
![Page 79: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
![Page 80: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Patients submitted to risky anesthesia ( N =1783)
*: adjusted for age, APACHE/SAPS risk, arterial-pH, P/F ratio , and study-trial
![Page 81: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
JAMA. 2016;315(8):788-800
Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and
Mortality for Patients With Acute
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in
Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries
N = 12.906
![Page 82: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
![Page 83: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
Relative Risk of Death in the Hospital versus ΔP in the Combined Cohort after Multivariate Adjustment.
Amato MBP et al. N Engl J Med 2015;372:747-755
![Page 84: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
Spontaneous effort ‘magnify’ overall PL
….And the same happens with ∆P
PL = Pplat – Ppl
PL : transpulmonary pressure
PAO : alveolar pressure
Ppl : pleural pressure
PL = 30 – (+8)
PL : transpulmonary pressure
= 22
PL = Pplat– Ppl
PL = 30 – (-4) = 34
Controlled Spontaneous
VT = 360 mL VT = 550 mL
CRS = 18 mL/cmH2O
∆P = 20 cmH2O
PEEP = 10 PEEP = 10
∆P = ??
CRS = 18 mL/cmH2O
550/18 = 30.5= ??
![Page 85: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
keeping constant Alveolar Ventilation...
Respiratory Rate ∞
Ris
k of V
ILI
N = 3562 Pts.
![Page 86: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
keeping constant Alveolar Ventilation...
Respiratory Rate ∞
Ris
k of V
ILI
Reducing
P
∆P = constant,
but RR increases !
![Page 87: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
PEEP
PLAT
![Page 88: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
Role of Strain Rate in the Pathogenesis of Ventilator-Induced Lung Edema*.Protti, Alessandro; Maraffi, Tommaso; Milesi, Marta; Votta, Emiliano; Santini, Alessandro; Pugni, Paola; Andreis, Davide; Nicosia, Francesco; Zannin, Emanuela; Gatti, Stefano; Vaira, Valentina; MD, PhD; Ferrero, Stefano; Gattinoni, Luciano; MD, FRCP
Critical Care Medicine. 44(9):e838-e845, September 2016.DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001718
Flow Rate
![Page 89: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
4
Role of Strain Rate in the Pathogenesis of Ventilator-Induced Lung Edema*.Protti, Alessandro; Maraffi, Tommaso; Milesi, Marta; Votta, Emiliano; Santini, Alessandro; Pugni, Paola; Andreis, Davide; Nicosia, Francesco; Zannin, Emanuela; Gatti, Stefano; Vaira, Valentina; MD, PhD; Ferrero, Stefano; Gattinoni, Luciano; MD, FRCP
Critical Care Medicine. 44(9):e838-e845, September 2016.DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001718
![Page 90: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
PsycologicalBarrier?
![Page 91: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
![Page 92: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
Gattinoni et al. 2016
![Page 93: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
Gattinoni et al. 2016
![Page 94: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
A B C
Lun
g V
olu
me
Airway Pressure
PPLATPEEP PPeak
EELV
VT
A = Static / PEEP componentB = Dynamic / Elastic componentC = Resistive component
![Page 95: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
Gattinoni et al. 2016
RR x V x PEEP
“Potential Energy”(???????)
RR x V x P
![Page 96: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
Gattinoni et al. 2016
Energy Dissipated in Large Airways
(???????)
![Page 97: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
Plateau Pressure
Calculated Terms
Relative Risk
0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75
Driving Pressure (x5) & RR (x1)…………………….
1.33 [1.24-1.43]
1.36 [1.27-1.45]
![Page 98: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
∆P ≥ 13
![Page 99: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
∆P < 13
![Page 100: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
∆P ≥ 13
![Page 101: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
∆P < 13
![Page 102: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
![Page 103: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
![Page 104: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
keeping constant Alveolar Ventilation...
Respiratory Rate
Tid
al V
olu
me
∞
Dead Space
VA = RR x ( VT – VD )
![Page 105: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
RESPIRATORY RATE
30 60 90 120 150 300
TID
AL
V
OL
UM
E
( m
L /
iB
W )
0
2
4
6
8
RR vs VT/ibw
RR vs REAL DATA
HFOV
![Page 106: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
keeping constant Alveolar Ventilation...
Respiratory Rate ∞
VT / VD
60 ?
Ris
k of V
ILI
![Page 107: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
P or PL ?
( PAW - Pesoph )
![Page 108: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
Transpulmonary Driving Pressure (∆PL)
Airw
ay
Drivin
g P
ressure
(∆
P)
![Page 109: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
Transpulmonary Driving Pressure (∆PL)
Airw
ay
Drivin
g P
ressure
(∆
P)
![Page 110: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
Airway Driving Pressure (∆P) cmH2O
Tra
nspulm
onary
Drivin
g P
ressure
(∆
PL)
![Page 111: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
Time
Pre
ssure
![Page 112: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
Col 2
Col 1
Peak Airway pressure
Peak Alveolar pressure
Plateau Pressure
after long pause
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time (seconds)
Pre
ssure
(cm
H2O
)
Airway pressures
Alveolar pressures (estimated by MLR)
SR
SR : Stress relaxation
P1
Tpause ≤ 0.5 sec.
![Page 113: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
Panel B Panel C
Panel A
Ki (m
l/m
in/m
l) Borges & Hedenstierna 2017
One week later…
![Page 114: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
LIM 09 - HCFMUSP
Grafico driving pressure
![Page 115: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
LIM 09 - HCFMUSP
Grafico driving pressure
![Page 116: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
![Page 117: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
![Page 118: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
![Page 119: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
Cyclic Strain)
Cyc
lic
Str
ess
![Page 120: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
Eduardo Costa, Marcelo Amato, Arthur Slutsky (unpublished data)
UnadjustedAdjusted for Confounders
P<0.001
P<0.001
P=0.01
P=0.28
Ris
ko
fD
eat
h(l
og
od
ds)
Ris
ko
fD
eat
h(l
og
od
ds)
Driving Pressure Driving Pressure
Plateau Pressure Plateau Pressure
![Page 121: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
JAMA. 2016;315(8):788-800
Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and
Mortality for Patients With Acute
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in
Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries
N = 12.906
![Page 122: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
![Page 123: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
![Page 124: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
P = 0.004
Results: …”among 545 patients……
…Driving Pressure was the only ventilatory
parameter during ECMO that showed an
independent association with in-hospital
mortality”… (ajusted HR = 1.06 [1.03-1.10])
![Page 125: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
Association between ventilatory settings and development of acute
respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients due to
brain injury
Eva Tejerina, MD, PhD; Paolo Pelosi, MD, PhD; Alfonso Muriel, MSc, PhD; Oscar Peñuelas, MD; Yuda Sutherasan, MD;
Fernando Frutos-Vivar, MD; Nicolás Nin, MD; Andrew R. Davies, MD; Fernando Rios, MD; Damian A. Violi, MD; Konstantinos
Raymondos, MD; Javier Hurtado, MD; Marco González, MD; Bin Du, MD; Pravin Amin, MD; Salvatore M. Maggiore, MD;
PhD; Arnaud W. Thille, MD; Marco Antonio Soares, MD; Manuel Jibaja, MD; Asisclo J. Villagomez, MD; Michael A. Kuiper,
MD; Younsuck Koh, MD; Rui P.Moreno, MD, PhD; Amine Ali Zeggwagh, MD; Dimitrios Matamis, MD Antonio Anzueto, MD;
Niall D. Ferguson, MD, MSc; Andrés Esteban, MD, PhD. for VENTILA group
ARDS No-ARDS
Driving Pressure
![Page 126: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
DELTA DE PRESSÃOOLA VS ARDSNET
TEMPO
BASAL POS VILI 0h 6h 12h 24h 36h FINAL
cm
H2O
0
10
20
30
40
50ARDSNET
OLA
Driving Pressure
VILI
High
Cyclic Stress
Low Stress
Extreme CyclicStress
![Page 127: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
PLATOOLA VS ARDSNET
TEMPO
BASAL POS VILI 0h 6h 12h 24h 36h FINAL
cm
H2
O
0
10
20
30
40
50 ARDSNET
OLA
Plateau Pressure
VILI
Extreme CyclicStress
Same Maximal
Stress !
![Page 128: Optimizing Driving Pressure (ΔP) · Tidal Volume Respiratory Rate PEEP Static (PEEP component) Dynamic (dynamic component) P < 0.001 P = 0.178. N = 3562 Pts. 5X. Is it worth to decrease](https://reader033.fdocument.org/reader033/viewer/2022052809/60773365ff82fc098c25076b/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
Anterior.
Posterior
RN
A co
llag
en
typ
e I
control VILI VILI +40hs prot.
P < 0.001
VILI +40hs OLALow Cyclic
StressHigh Cyclic
Stress