Mg-doped fluorapatite nanoparticles-poly(ε-caprolactone) electrospun nanocomposite: Microstructure...
Transcript of Mg-doped fluorapatite nanoparticles-poly(ε-caprolactone) electrospun nanocomposite: Microstructure...
Accepted Manuscript
Mg-doped fluorapatite nanoparticles-poly(ε-caprolactone) electrospun nano-
composite: Microstructure and mechanical properties
Zeinab Fereshteh, Mohammad hossein Fathi, Reza Mozaffarinia
PII: S0749-6036(14)00241-9
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2014.07.011
Reference: YSPMI 3328
To appear in: Superlattices and Microstructures
Received Date: 1 July 2014
Accepted Date: 3 July 2014
Please cite this article as: Z. Fereshteh, M.h. Fathi, R. Mozaffarinia, Mg-doped fluorapatite nanoparticles-poly(ε-
caprolactone) electrospun nanocomposite: Microstructure and mechanical properties, Superlattices and
Microstructures (2014), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2014.07.011
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers
we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Mg-doped fluorapatite nanoparticles-poly(ε-caprolactone) electrospun nanocomposite
: microstructure and mechanical properties
Zeinab Fereshteh*,1, Mohammad hossein Fathi 1, Reza Mozaffarinia1
1 Biomaterials Research Group, Department of Materials Engineering, University of
Technology, 8415683111, IRAN
* Correspondence to: Tel.: +98 311 3915708; fax: +98 311 3912752. E-mail addresses:
abstract
The aim of this study was to prepare and characterize the poly (ε-caprolactone)/Mg-doped
fluorapatite nanoparticles (PCL/nMg-FA) nanocomposite electrospun scaffolds. The effect
of solvent type on distribution of nanoparticles and mechanical properties of the scaffolds
was also investigated. The optimized nanofibrous scaffold was obtained by 5 wt. % nMg-
FA while its tensile strength and elastic modules were significantly enhanced compered to
PCL scaffolds. It is noteworthy that no surfactant was used in present study. The Mg-FA
nanoparticles were homogeneously dispersed in the nanofibers and prepared scaffolds
without any agglomeration.
Key words: Nanocomposites, Apatite; Mechanical properties; Biomedical applications;
Mg-doped fluorapatite nanoparticle.
1. Introduction
Several inorganic biomaterials such as bioactive ceramics including silicate glasses,
forstrite, tricalcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite (HA), and selected compositions of apatite
have been widely used for bone regeneration applications.1,2 The biocompatibility of HA is
due to its compositional and structural similarities to the mineral phase of bone.3 Because
of its noble bioactivity, biocompatibility and osteoconductivity with human body
components, HA and other modified apatites such as Fluorine-substituted HA, Fluorapatite
(FA), Mg-substituted HA and so on, have received increasing attentions in the field of
biomedical applications. Among them, Mg2+ substituted FA provides greater
biocompatibility and biological properties than pure FA or HA.4 On the other hand, fluorine
ions are known to affect the mineralization and bone formation in vivo, resulting from their
antibacterial effect. Also, the osteoblast responses are improved through fluoride
incorporation.5
The macro-porous bioceramics are considered as brittle materials; additionally, polymeric
materials are unable to bear the applied loads in many applications.5 Therefore, the
polymeric materials are generally combined with bioactive ceramics to form composite
scaffolds. The obtained composite systems present several advantages such as controllable
scaffold degradation rate, enhanced bioactivity and mechanical properties, and improved
scaffold structural integrity.6 Based on the aforementioned advantages, the composite
materials containing bioactive ceramics and biodegradable polymers have emerged as ideal
candidates for bone regeneration and tissue engineering scaffolds. 5,7
Electrospinning is an efficient method for developing fibrous structures with controllable
diameters ranging from nano to micrometer; hence, electrospinning is regarded as a suitable
choice for bone tissue preparation; for instance, it has been already shown that electrospun
scaffolds have the potential to promote osteoblastic cell function and bone proliferation.8
One of the most studied biodegradable polymers for this purpose is poly (ε-caprolactone)
(PCL). This polymer is aliphatic polyester, biocompatible and bioresorbable which is
hydrolytically devoid of toxic by-product. PCL has numerous applications as medical
scaffold, screw bones for sutures and staples, fracture fixation, drug delivery vehicles to
mats or porous structures for tissue engineering.5, 7-10 In the ceramic/ polymer composite, it
is remarkable that the behavior of the ceramic particles inside the polymer matrix. They
should distributed homogenous and evenly. To date, researchers used various ways to
achieve this aim, such as: modification of ceramic surface and using ultrasonic.11-13
The objective of this paper is to develop a novel nanocomposite scaffold by Mg-doped
fluorapatite (nMg-FA) nanoparticles and biodegradable PCL fibers using electrospinning
process for guided bone regeneration. Moreover, the effects of solvent, polymer
concentration, applied voltage, nozzle to collector distance and content of ceramic are
evaluated in order to obtain optimized process parameters. Our hypothesis is that PCL is a
suitable biomaterial to fabricate scaffold, and the addition of nMg-FA nanoparticle
improves the biomedical properties of the polymeric scaffold. Also, by choosing binary
solvent system can be achieved a homogenous ceramic/polymer composites scaffold.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials and methods
Poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL, Mw = 80,000, m.p. 60� ) (Sigma-Aldrich), and solvents
including 99.8 v% chloroform (Ch), 99.8 v% methanol (MeOH) and 99.8 wt. % ethanol
(EtOH) (Merck Co) were used as starting materials. Also, Mg-doped fluorapatite (nMg-FA)
nanoparticles were prepared by sol-gel method according to Ref [4].
2.2. Preparation of scaffold
The electrospinning solutions were prepared by dispersing a certain amount of nMg-FA
into ethanol or methanol. Subsequently, chloroform was added into the solution and mixed
for another 15 min using an ultrasonic bath. Finally, PCL pellets were added into the
solution. To achieve complete dispersion, the prepared solutions were magnetically stirred
at room temperature for 24 h. Fibers were electrospun from polymer solutions containing 8,
10, 12 and 14 % w/v PCL. The parameters used for solution preparation are summarized in
Table 1. The parameters modified in this study include the type of solvent system, and the
amounts of ceramic and polymer. The scheme for fabrication of pure PCL and nMg-
FA/PCL composite nanofibers is presented in Fig. 1.
The solution was fed through a 23 G needle with a feed rate of 1 ml/h and electrospun onto
a grounded collector placed at a distance of 20 cm. The prepared electrospun nanofibers
were collected on a flat aluminum sheet. The electrospinning process was carried out at
humidity of 20% and temperature of 25� . The electrospun fibers were subsequently
desiccator to remove any residual solvent.
2.3. Measurements and characterization
The morphology and size of nanoparticles and nanofibers were assessed using transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) (Philips EM208 accelerating voltage of 100kV) and scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) (Phillips XL 30). The SEM and TEM images of scaffolds were
digitized and analyzed using an image analysis software (NIH Image J) to determine the
size of nanofibers and nanoparticles (n=100). A Philips X-ray diffractometer (XRD) (40
kV) with Cu Kα radiation (λ=0.15406 nm) was used to investigate the structural changes
and phase analysis of the Mg-FA nanoparticles and nanocomposite scaffolds. The XRD
patterns were recorded in 2θ range of 5-60° (step size of 0.02° and time per step of 1s). The
functional groups of the samples were identified by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
(FT-IR) (Bruker-Tensor 27) in the range of 400–4000 cm-1. The compositional analysis and
elemental X-ray mapping were executed using energy dispersive X-ray (EDAX) (SERON
TECHNOLOGY A15- 2100). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) (Rheometric scientific
1998, USA) was carried out to measure the real weight percent of nanoparticles in the
fibrous scaffolds. The mechanical properties of samples were measured in terms of
Young’s modulus, stress/strain at yield point and stress/strain at break by an Instron-type
machine (Zwick, United Kingdom) with load capacity of 10 N and strain rate of 10
mm/min. All samples were prepared in rectangular shape with dimensions of 50×10 mm
from the electrospun membranes. To take the repeatability into account, six samples were
tested for each type of electrospun nanofibrous membranes and the average of test results
was reported. The mechanical testing was conducted at relative humidity and temperature
of 20 ± 5% and 25�, respectively.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Mg-FA nanoparticles characterization
The SEM micrograph, TEM images, XRD pattern, and EDX spectrum of the prepared pure
Mg-doped fluorapatite, with formula of Ca9.5Mg0.5(PO4)6F2, is shown in Fig. 2. The size
distribution curve is also shown in the image inserted in Fig. 2b. It is observed that Mg-FA
is made up of quasi spherical particles with diameter of ~ 12 nm.
3.2. Electrospinning Process
The solvent has a significant influence on electrospinning since at the first step of this
process, dissolution of the polymer into a suitable solvent takes place. The selection of a
proper solvent is done based on various properties such as boiling point, vapor pressure and
volatility. The intermolecular interaction between a polymer and the solvent molecules
(attractive or repulsive) depends solely on the type of the solvent.14 The most important
parameters of the prepared solution include its conductivity and viscosity.10,15,16 A solution
with high conductivity possesses a high surface charge density. The elongational force on
the jet is increased in electric field due to self-repulsion of the excess charges on the
surface.17 This inhibits the Rayleigh instability, enhances whipping, and leads to the finer
fibers. It has been shown that, for a given material and specified processing parameters, the
relative dominance of two instabilities is a function of surface charge density. Therefore,
uniform fibers without bead could be obtained in optimal condition. 18
Increasing the solution viscosity results in the higher resistance to flow; hence, at a constant
applied load, the fibers become thicker as the viscosity rises, in agreement with data
reported in the literature.18-20 It is worth exploring the optimum solution viscosity for
electrospinning process, since very high viscosity requires extremely high operating
voltage, and very low viscosity causes the defects like beads to be appeared in the fibers.
In order to obtain an optimum solvent for electrospinning of nMg-FA/PCL, different single
and binary solvent systems were studied. At this stage, the polymer and bioceramic
concentrations were fixed at 12 and 1 wt. %, respectively. PCL was completely soluble in
chloroform (Ch) but Mg-FA nanoparticles were not well-dispersed in this solvent and other
organic solvents. This arises from hydrophilic surfaces of the ceramic nanoparticles which
require polar solvent for dispersion; thus, ethanol and methanol proposed as the polar
solvents for dispersion of nMg-FA. SEM images from pure chloroform (Ch) nanofibers,
ethanol/chloroform (Et/Ch) nanofibers and methanol/chloroform (Me/Ch) nanofibers are
shown in Fig. 3. In the case of pure chloroform system, the presence of non-uniform and
thick fibers (2.787(1.203) μm) together with agglomerated nanoparticles is evident (Fig.
3b). This feature, which results from the interaction between nanoparticles and organic
systems (Ch/PCL), is not appropriate for fiber preparation, in agreement with data given in
the literature.19,22 As for Ch/Me system, although the fibers diameter was lower than that
observed for pure Ch system, the uniformity of the fibers was decreased (Fig. 3c). In
contrast, very thin and uniform fibers were achieved in the Et/Ch system, as indicated in
Fig. 3d. Beads are observed in all the systems except for the Me/Ch. The binary system of
methanol or ethanol/chloroform results in the fibers smaller than 600 nm. On the other
hand, utilizing the Me/Ch system yields to fibers in the nanoscale range with a few beads,
but nanofibers are non-uniform (0.548 (0.342) μm). Electrospun nanofibers prepared using
Et/Ch system are more uniform (0.692 (0.0783) μm) and several times smaller than those
obtained by pure Ch (0.692 (0.0783) μm). Several properties of different solvents are
presented in Table 2, chloroform as the main solvent is more consistent with ethanol in
terms of solubility and dielectric constant. Based on the outcomes of solvent optimization,
the binary Et/Ch solvent system was chosen for further investigations.
The viscosity and conductivity of solution are considered as competing parameters since
they both are increased with increasing the percentage of ethanol. According to Fig. 4 and
Table 3, the Et/Ch solvent system with ratio of 20/80 presents the optimum condition so
that nanofibers in this system are very small with narrow size distribution. Fig. 4 shows the
SEM images from the binary Et/Ch solvent system containing different volumes of ethanol.
The size of fibers prepared using different solvent systems and their symbols are listed in
Table 3. The fibers diameter and size distribution are initially decreased with increasing the
ethanol volume to 20 % (v/v), after which the fibers become thicker with further ethanol
addition. It is suggested that the ethanol addition at the early stages increases the solution
conductivity to a larger extent than its viscosity, leading to the primary fiber size reduction.
This effect becomes weakened with further increasing the ethanol volume resulting in the
subsequent fibers thickening. Consequently, the binary Et/Ch (20/80) was selected as the
optimum solvent constituent for subsequent experiments.
To further improve the electrospinning process, the effect of different polymer
concentrations ranging from 8-14 wt. % was examined, while other parameters remained
constant. Fig. 4b shows the SEM image of 12 wt. %. Also, SEM images of 10 and 14 wt. %
PCL are presented in Fig. 5. Since the solution containing low polymer concentration
reveals very low viscosity, a minimum polymer concentration is necessary for
electrospinning process. At low concentrations (8 wt. %), the entanglements of the polymer
chains are not able to provide a stable jet and droplets. On the other hand, at high polymer
concentration viscosity of the solution becomes so high that electrospinning is no longer
possible; this is caused by the extremely rapid solidification of the polymer which leads to
blocking the needle outlet in some cases.19 There are some beads at the polymer
concentration of 8 wt. %. By increasing the polymer concentration, beads disappear but the
average diameter of fibers is increased. It appears that minimum polymer concentration of
10 wt. % is required; otherwise, the solution viscosity becomes too low. Therefore,
optimum solution concentration for the electrospinning process was found to be 12 wt. %,
because uniform and non-beaded nanofibers were formed at this conditions.
In electrospinning process, the applied voltage is a key factor since the fibers can be only
formed when a threshold voltage is achieved. It is believed that at high voltages, higher
stretching of solution takes place owing to the stronger electric field and greater columbic
forces in the jet. This yields to the reduction of fiber diameter as well as rapid evaporation
of solvent from the fibers. There is also a greater probability of beads formation at higher
voltages.14 The level of significance varies with the distance between the tip and the
collector.23 It should be noted that an appropriate distance is required to fabricate uniform
fibers; otherwise beads are formed.21 In this research, diameter of PCL/nMg-FA fibers
decreased from 1019 (191) nm to 427 (411) nm with increasing the electric potential from
15 to 25 kV. By increasing the applied voltage, standard deviation changes as the jet fluid
reaches unsteady state. It is known that the average diameter of fibers increases with
decreasing nozzle to collector distance. However, variation of standard deviation is not
significant by increasing distance. According to Table 4, voltage of 25 kV and distance of
20 cm were selected as optimum parameters since they resulted in the minimum average
fibers diameter with maximum uniformity together with the maximum steady state area.
Consequently, other samples were fabricated by the optimum conditions, i. e. Et /Ch
(20/80), 12 wt. % polymer, 25 kV and 20 cm.
Different ceramic concentrations including 1, 5, 10, 15 and 20 wt. % were examined. Fig.
6. demonstrates the SEM images of the nanofibers and their diameter distribution.
Regarding the diameters of the nanofibers, it is observed that the diameter of the nanofibers
is decreased by increasing the ceramic concentration, probably due to the enhanced
dielectric properties of solution. The solution conductivity affects the morphology of
fibers.15 Solutions with high conductivity have high surface charge density, increasing the
elongational force on the jet under a fixed electric field. It is caused by the self-repulsion of
the excess charges on the surface. Then, it inhibits the Rayleigh instability, increases
whipping and forms finer fibers.18 Therefore, it is noted that the fiber diameter is decreased
with increasing the conductivity. Up to a certain concentration (15 wt. % nMg-FA),
standard deviation rises owing to generation of an instable Taylor cone. On the other hand,
multi jets are formed by incorporation of nMg-FA nanoparticles, leading to the fiber
diameter distribution to be increased.
According to Fig. 6, it seems that nMg-FA is not agglomerated in the PCL nanofibers at 15
wt. %. This originates from the appropriate dispersion of nanoparticles in ethanol (protic
polar solvent). The protic polar solvents can donate a proton and have high dielectric
constants. The nMg-FA is highly hydrophilic which consequences the improved dispersion
of nanoparticles in the PCL solution. It seems that when ethanol releases protons, its
oxygen ions are able to interact with the surface of nMg-FA; hence, the dispersion of nMg-
FA in polymer solution is improved. In biomedical applications and using the
biodegradation scaffolds, the dispersion, distribution and capture of the nMg-FA inside the
nanofibers will be effective on biological properties such as bioactivities, rate of
biodegradation and the growth kinetics of the cells.9 In the samples containing 15 and 20
wt. %, nanoparticles were agglomerated, as evidenced by blue arrows in Fig. 6.
3.3. Nanocomposite scaffolds characterization
Phase analysis of the PCL scaffolds containing nMg-FA at different levels (pure PCL, 1, 5,
10, 15 wt. %) was carried out using XRD, as shown in Fig. 7. The pure PCL scaffold
pattern consists only of PCL characteristic peaks at ~2θ = 21.4882º and 23.8277º. The XRD
pattern of the nanocomposite scaffold exhibits peaks from both materials (Fig. 7e: 15 wt %
of nMg-FA). There are no extra peaks and/or peak shift on the XRD patterns of scaffolds,
since no chemical reaction occurs between polymeric solution components. This is also
confirmed by FTIR spectra in which the intensity corresponding to PCL peaks decreases by
increasing the nanoparticles content, in agreement with results reported by other
researches.5,7,24
The structure of the nanocomposite was analyzed using FT-IR spectroscopy (Fig. 8). As
seen, characteristic structural bands of both nMg-FA and PCL are observed for all PCL-
nMg-FA ratios. Pure PCL spectrum reveals the peaks corresponding to PCL including -
CH2- group within 3000–2850 cm-1 and 1250–1450 cm-1 regions (symmetric C-H
stretching and C-C stretching, respectively), C=O bonds around the region centered at 1750
cm-1 (stretching vibrations of the carboxyl) and C-O groups within 1150–1250 cm-1 region
(stretching vibrations of the ether groups (C-O-C), C-O stretching vibrations and
asymmetric C-O-C stretching).5 In the spectra of nanocomposites, in addition to PCL
bands, the characteristic absorption bands of nMg-FA are observed. A major peak of
phosphate group is noticed in the region between 1100 and 1000 cm-1. In fact, it is observed
that the PO4-3 absorbance emerges within the range of 950–1100 (symmetric P-O stretching
vibration) and 550–620 cm-1 (vibration mode of phosphate group).25 No band shifts are
observed in the FT-IR spectroscopy, confirming that no chemical reaction occurs in the
mixed components. Compared to FTIR spectrum of pure PCL, the spectra of scaffolds
indicate a number of PCL bands shifted to lower wavenumbers which might be due to the
formation of hydrogen bonds between the specific groups of nMg-FA and PCL.
Fig. 9 shows the X-ray maps related to the scaffolds containing 5 and 10 wt. % nMg-FA
nanoparticles. The mapping of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium and fluorine elements
reveals that the nanoparticles are distributed throughout the mat and also inside the fiber.
Furthermore, the nMg-FA particles are homogeneously dispersed within the nanofibers
without any agglomeration. The higher the nanoparticles content, the higher the intensity is
achieved for all elements in the maps, as illustrated in Fig. 9a, b. It is known that the
relative intensity is decreased with decreasing atomic number. Then, independent of the
element concentration, light elements have a low relative intensity.26 This is why the
relative intensity of phosphorus is higher than calcium while its concentration is lower.
In addition to the X-ray maps, distribution of the nanoparticles in polymer matrix was
investigated by TEM. The TEM images of scaffolds demonstrate that the nMg-FA particles
were sufficiently dispersed in the polymer fibers (Fig. 10). The size of all nanoparticles
attached to nanofibers was found to be less than 10 nm, especially in the case of samples
containing 1 and 5 wt. % nanoparticles (Fig. 10c-f). The nanoparticles were distributed
evenly through the material. Further TEM observations prove that the most of particles are
embedded in the fibers (samples with 1 and 5 wt. % nanoparticles), while some of them
appear to be located on the fiber surface (sample with 10 wt. % nanoparticles).
TGA experiments were performed to analyze the weight loss nMg-FA nanoparticles, pure
PCL and PCL-5 % nMg-FA (Fig. 11). The weight loss of single phase nMg-FA
nanoparticles was 5.67 wt. % within the temperature range of ~ 65-120�, due to the loss of
water molecules from the product. The TGA results show that pure PCL and PCL-5 %
nMg-FA nanofibers undergo single step decomposition. According to the TGA curve,
thermal decomposition of pure PCL and PCL-5 % nMg-FA nanofibers occurs in the
temperature ranges of 310-470 � and 325-600�, respectively. Moreover, the values of
weight loss for pure PCL and PCL-nMg-FA composite nanofibers are 92.32 and
88.26 wt. %, respectively. This originates from decomposition and oxidation of the
polymer nanofibers. It can be observed that the onset of the thermal degradation occurs at
higher temperatures for PCL-5% nMg-FA as compared to pure PCL nanofibers (about 5�).
This is due to the presence of ceramic nanoparticles which enhances thermal stability of
nanocomposite. Furthermore, according to the TGA results, it can be concluded that the
electrospinning process allows the all solvents to be evaporated during the nanofibers
production. As a result, no pre-drying treatment is required for cell viability and cell
attachment tests.
Mechanical properties of the scaffolds are of great importance since they should support
cell growth and proliferation between the empty spaces and the local environment for tissue
regeneration period. Fig. 12 shows the typical stress–strain curves for the electrospun
scaffolds. They exhibit similar mechanical behavior under tensile force, as it is
characteristic for ductile materials. At the beginning of the curves (strain < 10%), the
membranes obeys the Hooke’s law, showing a proportional increase of stress and strain. As
strain is continuously increased, the curves deviate from the linear proportionality. As listed
in Table 5, different mechanical properties are achieved for scaffolds depending on the
nMg-FA content. With increasing the nMg-FA content up to 5 wt. %, the tensile modulus,
strains at break and energy per volume of the membranes are increased to 10.2±2.6 (MPa),
408.6±12.8 (%) and 2.34±0.45 (MPa), respectively; while, as the nMg-FA nanoparticle
content reached 10 wt. %, strain at break of scaffolds is decreased to 291.7±13.8. Besides,
tensile modulus of fibrous membranes is decreased at 5 wt. % of nanoparticles due to the
nanoparticles agglomeration and heterogeneity of the structures, as observed in Fig. 6 and
Fig. 10. Previous results on PCL-based electrospun scaffolds also reported the reduced
strain at break at higher amount of filler due to a quasi-brittle behavior.9,27
Yang et al. reported the improved mechanical properties for the PCL membrane by addition
of nAp.27 They suggest that the mechanical reinforcement can be ascribed to an additional
energy-dissipating mechanism of the nanoparticles in PCL. In fact, this additional
dissipative mechanism is a result of the mobility of nanoparticles. During this process, the
nanoparticles orient and align under tensile stress, creating temporary cross-links between
polymer chains, in that way generating a local region of enhanced strength.27 Bianco et al.
also demonstrated that mechanical properties are significantly decayed for HAp contents
higher than 3.6 wt. %.9
On the other hand, the modulus and strength of the fibers increase as the fiber diameter is
decreased. For the fibers with diameter of less than ~ 700 nm, the effect of diameter on
tensile stiffness and strength becomes more predominant. The ductility of the fibers is
increased with increasing the fiber diameter.28 Furthermore, the tensile modulus is
increased for the sample containing 15 wt. % nMg-FA nanoparticles. It is suggested that the
effect of fiber diameter on mechanical properties is more pronounced than the ceramic
content. This can be explained by reducing the fiber diameter. The fiber diameter is
decreased from 460 nm to 383 nm for the samples containing nMg-FA 10 wt. % and nMg-
FA 15 wt. %, respectively. In the case of PCL-20 wt. % nMg-FA, this trend continues and
tensile modulus is decreased.
4. Conclusions
The (nMg-FA)/PCL nanocomposite scaffolds containing 1, 5, 10, 15 and 20 wt. % Mg-
doped fluorapatite nanoparticles were successfully produced by solvent electrospinning
method. Investigation of the single and binary solvent systems revealed the major potential
of Ethanol/Chloroform solvent mixture with ratio of 20/80 for electrospinning nMg-
FA/PCL nanoparticles, leading to the formation of very thin nanofibers with narrow size
distribution. The optimum values of polymer concentration, applied voltage and collector to
needle distance were 12 wt. %, 25 kV and 20 cm, respectively. The nMg-FA particles were
homogeneously dispersed in the nanofibers devoid of agglomeration.
Moreover, nMg-FA nanoparticles content influenced the mechanical properties. Tensile
strength of the scaffolds was increased by decreasing the fiber diameter, and decreased by
increasing the ceramic content. The PCL/nMg-FA 5 wt. % nanocomposite scaffold
revealed the maximum tensile strength (2.34±0.45).
Based on the obtained results, one can conclude that the fibrous nanocomposite prepared by
electrospinning is a promising material for guided bone regeneration scaffold. Besides, the
fibrous nanocomposite can be utilized as an appropriate prototype for further development
of a final membrane for in vitro and in vivo experiments. Because of the simplicity of the
method, many opportunities may exist to further control the fibers size. Furthermore, it
would be interesting to study biological properties of nMg-F /PCL nanocomposite
scaffolds. It appears that addition of nMg-FA nanoparticles increased the hydrophilicity,
bioactivity and degradable ability of pure PCL fibrous membranes.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to council of University of Technology for providing financial
support to undertake this work.
References
[1] Fathi, M.H., Doostmohammadi, A. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2009, 209, 1385-1391.
[2] Kharaziha, M., Fathi, M.H. J. Mech. Behave. Biomed. Mater. 2010, 3, 530-537.
[3] L. L., Hench, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1998, 81, 1705 – 1728.
[4] Kheradmandfard, M., Fathi, M.H. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 504, 141–145.
[5] Johari, N., Fathi, M.H., Golozar, M.A. Composites: Part B, 2012, 43, 1671–1675.
[6] Boccaccini, A. R., Roether, J. A., Hench, L. L., Maquet, V., Jerome, R. Ceram. Eng.
Sci. Proc., 2002, 23, 805 – 816.
[7] Diba, M., Fathi, M.H., Kharaziha, M. Mater. Lett. 2011, 65, 1931–1934.
[8] Pham, Q.P., Sharma, U., Mikos, A.G. Tissue. Eng. 2006, 12, 1197–211.
[9] Bianco, A., Federico, E.D., Moscatelli, I., Camaioni, A., Armentano, I., Campagnolo,
L., Dottori, M., Kenny, J.M., Siracusa, G., Gusmano, G. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2009, 29,
2063–2071.
[10] Neto, W.A.R., Pereira, I.H.L., Ayres, E., Paula, A.C.C., Averous, L., Góes, A.M.,
Oréfice, R.L., Bretas, R.E.S., Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2012, 97, 2037-2051.
[11] Hong, Z.K., Zhang, P.B., He, C.L., Qiu, X.Y., Liu, A.X., Chen, L., Chen, X.S., Jing,
X.B. Biomaterials, 2005, 26, 6296-6304.
[12] Kharaziha, M., Fathi, M.H., Edris, H. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2013, 24, 9–20.
[13] Kharaziha, M., Fathi, M.H., Edris, H. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2013, 33,
4512-4519.
[14] Bhardwaj, N., Kundu, S.C. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 325–347.
[15] Fong, H., Chun, I., Reneker, D.H. Polymer, 1999, 40, 4585–92.
[16] Huang, L., Nagapudi, K., Apkarian, R.P., Chaikof, E.L. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed.,
2001, 12, 979–93.
[17] Hohman, M.M., Shin, Y.M., Rutledge, G., Brenner, M.P. Phys Fluids, 2001, 13, 2221–
36.
[18] Moghe, A.K., Hufenus, R., Hudson, S.M., Gupta, B.S. Polymer, 2009, 50, 3311–3318.
[19] Schueren, L. V., Schoenmaker, B. D., Kalaoglu, O. I., Clerck, K. D. Eur. Polym. J.
2011, 47, 1256–1263.
[20] Lu, C., Chen, P., Li, J., Zhang, Y. Polymer, 2006, 47 915-921.
[21] Thompson, C.J., Chase, G.G., Yarin, A.L., Reneker, D.H., Polymer, 2007, 48, 6913-
6922.
[22] Lowery, J.L., Datta, N., Rutledge, G.C. Biomaterials, 2010, 31, 491–504.
[23] Yordem, O.S., Papila, M., Menceloglu, Y.Z. Mater Des. 2008, 29, 34–44.
[24] Wang, Y., Liu, L. Guo, S. Polym. Degrad. Stab., 2010, 95, 207–213.
[25] Fathi, M.H., Hanifi, A., Mortazavi, V. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2008, 202, 536–
542.
[26] Goldstein, J. I. Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Micronalysis, 3rd ed.,
Plenum Press, New York, 2003.
[27] Yang, F., Both, S.K., Yang, X., Walboomers, X. F., Jansen, J.A. Acta Biomaterialia,
2009, 5, 3295–3304.
[28] Wong, S. C., Baji, A., Leng, S., Polymer, 2008, 49, 4713–4722.
Figures captions
Fig. 1. Scheme of the plan for fabrication of nMg-FA/PCL composite nanofibers.
Fig. 2. a) SEM micrograph, b) TEM images, (image inserted is size distribution curve), c)
XRD pattern, and d) EDX spectrum of prepared nanoparticles, nMg-FA.
Fig. 3. SEM micrographs and diameter size distribution of the nanofibers for various
solvent systems a, b) Ch, c) Et/Ch, and d) Me/Ch (1 wt. % ceramic and 12 wt. % polymer
in all of samples).
Fig. 4. SEM images and diameter size distribution of the nanofibers of the binary solvent
system of Et/Ch for different volume of ethanol: a) Et 10, b) Et 20, c) Et 25 and d) Et 30.
Fig. 5. SEM images and diameter size distribution of the nanofibers of a) 10 wt. % PCL b)
14 wt. % PCL in Et/Ch (20/80).
Fig. 6. SEM images and diameter size distribution of the nanofibers a) 1 wt. % nMg-FA, b)
5 wt. % nMg-FA, c) 10 wt. % nMg-FA, d) 15 wt. % nMg-FA, e) 20 wt. % nMg-FA
nanoparticles and f) curve of nanofiber diameter versus content of ceramic.
Fig. 7. XRD patterns of produced PCL–nMg-FA scaffolds with different fractions of
nanoparticles: a) PCL pure, b) 1, c) 5, d) 10 and e) 15 wt.%.
Fig. 8. FTIR spectra of produced PCL–nMg-FA scaffolds with different weight fractions of
nMg-FA.
Fig. 9. The X-ray maps of a) the PCL-5 wt. % and b) the PCL-10 wt. % scaffolds.
Fig. 10. TEM micrographs of the nanofibers of: a, b) Pure PCL; c, d) PCL-nMg-FA 1 %; e,
f) PCL-nMg-FA 5 % and g, h) PCL-nMg-FA 10 %.
Fig. 11. TGA curves of nMg-FA nanoparticle, the electrospun PCL and PCL-5 % nMg-FA.
Fig. 12. Typical tensile stress–strain curves of the electrospun scaffolds.
Table captions
Table 1. Selected factors and their levels.
Table 2. Properties of the solvents.
Table 3. Size of prepared fibers using different solvent systems (single and binary systems).
Table 4. Average fiber diameter size and standard deviation as a function of voltage (kV)
and nozzle to collector distance.
Table 5. Mechanical properties of the electrospun scaffolds.
Table 6. Selected factors and their levels.
EtOH / Ch Polymer (wt./v %) Ceramic (wt.%)
0/100 8 1
10/90 10 5
20/80 12 10
25/75 14 15
30/70 20
Table 7. Properties of the solvents.
Solvent Solubility parameter (MPa-1/2)
Dielectrical constant
Specific density (20 ��
Viscosity (20 / cP)
Boiling temperature ( )
Vapor pressure (20 �/mmHg)
Chloroform 18.84 4.80 1.48 0.58 61.7 160
Methanol 29.20 33.0 0.79 0.6 64.7 96
Ethanol 26.2 24.3 0.79 1.1 78.4 43.7
Table 8. Size of prepared fibers using different solvent systems (single and binary systems).
Solvent system Symbol Size of fiber (nm) S.D
pure chloroform Ch 2787 1203
Methanol/ chloroform Mt/ Ch 548 342
Ethanol/ chloroform Et/ Ch 692 78.3
Binary solvent system of Ethanol/ chloroform (v/v)
Ethanol Chloroform Symbol Size of fiber S.D
10 90 Et 10 872 540
20 80 Et 20 692 78.3
25 75 Et 25 1194 824
30 70 Et 30 1067 566
Table 9. Average fiber diameter size and standard deviation as a function of voltage (kV) and nozzle to
collector distance.
Voltage
Distance 25 cm 20 cm 15 cm
25 kV 427 (411) 490 (73) 646 (189)
20 kV 553 (102) 633 (152) 914 (191)
15 kV 677 (229) 714 (193) 1019 (139)
Table 10. Mechanical properties of the electrospun scaffolds.
Sample Stress (MPa) Strain (%) E-Modulus (MPa)
PCL Pure 2.29±0.13 444.8±46.2 14.9±2.8
PCL-1% 1.87±0.35 319.0±12.1 38.5±4.3
PCL-5% 2.34±0.45 408.6±12.8 10.2±2.6
PCL-10% 1.67±0.34 291.7±13.8 9.8±1.5
PCL-15% 1.83±0.1 155.6±3.9 15.4±2.7
PCL-20% 1.64±0.12 236.6±10.35 11.9±1.4
Figure 1
Figure
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure
Figure 11
Figure 12
Highlights
• ���������� ������ ������������������������������������� ����������������
���� � �������!����������"���#���� ����������� �����$�
• %���������!������������������ �����!�����������������������$�
• ������������������� ����!������ ���������������������������������#�����������������
� ��������!��������������� �������$��