Luisa G. Jaime Marcelo Salgado Leonardo...

14
Luisa G. Jaime Luisa G. Jaime Marcelo Salgado Leonardo Patiño

Transcript of Luisa G. Jaime Marcelo Salgado Leonardo...

Page 1: Luisa G. Jaime Marcelo Salgado Leonardo Patiñobccp.berkeley.edu/beach_program/presentations11/Jaime.pdfA robust approach to f(R) gravity A simple idea: We consider f(R) gravity without

Luisa G. JaimeLuisa G. Jaime

Marcelo Salgado

Leonardo Patiño

Page 2: Luisa G. Jaime Marcelo Salgado Leonardo Patiñobccp.berkeley.edu/beach_program/presentations11/Jaime.pdfA robust approach to f(R) gravity A simple idea: We consider f(R) gravity without

Geometry and energy content

G’ TG’µν Tµν

Page 3: Luisa G. Jaime Marcelo Salgado Leonardo Patiñobccp.berkeley.edu/beach_program/presentations11/Jaime.pdfA robust approach to f(R) gravity A simple idea: We consider f(R) gravity without

Standard General Relativity

� Hilbert-Einstein actionMetals 0.03%

Neutrinos 0.3%

Stars 0.5%

Dark Matter ~ 25%

Dark Energy 70%

H + He 4%

Page 4: Luisa G. Jaime Marcelo Salgado Leonardo Patiñobccp.berkeley.edu/beach_program/presentations11/Jaime.pdfA robust approach to f(R) gravity A simple idea: We consider f(R) gravity without

F(R) gravity theories

� Einstein-Hilbert actionMetals 0.03%

Neutrinos 0.3%

Stars 0.5%

Dark Matter ~ 25%

Dark Energy 70%

H + He 4%

� Action for f(R) gravity

Page 5: Luisa G. Jaime Marcelo Salgado Leonardo Patiñobccp.berkeley.edu/beach_program/presentations11/Jaime.pdfA robust approach to f(R) gravity A simple idea: We consider f(R) gravity without

Test that must to pass f(R)

candidates

� Solar system observations.

� Existence of stars and compact objects

� SN Ia observations

� Gravitational waves (Binary pulsar’s observations)

�ETC.

Page 6: Luisa G. Jaime Marcelo Salgado Leonardo Patiñobccp.berkeley.edu/beach_program/presentations11/Jaime.pdfA robust approach to f(R) gravity A simple idea: We consider f(R) gravity without

Standar treatment:Equivalence with Scalar Tensor Theories (STT)

� At the moment, most of the works in f(R), had been made by usingthis equivalence.

� Under this approach the potential asociated is ill defined

� Starobinsky

2

0 20

( ) 1 1n

Rf R R R

− = + + −

� Miranda et al. � Hu & Sawicki

*( ) ln 1R

f R R RR

α

= − +

( )( )

212( )

n

n

Rcmf R m

R= −

−0R *R ( )22 1

nRc

m−

Page 7: Luisa G. Jaime Marcelo Salgado Leonardo Patiñobccp.berkeley.edu/beach_program/presentations11/Jaime.pdfA robust approach to f(R) gravity A simple idea: We consider f(R) gravity without

The controversy:

Existence of neutron stars in f(R) gravity

� The conclutions obteined with the standard approach are ratherquestionble.

� Kobayashi and Maeda in 2008, analized neutronstars in Starobinsky’s model.

� They found that this kind of objects can not exist forStarobinsky’s model (incompressible fluid).Starobinsky’s model (incompressible fluid).

� Ricci scalar diverge inside the star.

� Babichev and Langlois in 2010, work in a similar analysis for compact objectsin Starobinsky’s model but using state equations more realistics, they found:

� Ricci scalar don’t diverge inside the star so this kind of object could exist in f(R) gravity

� Both analysis use the equivalence with scalar tensor theories, use the samef(R) model and they found results in opposite directions.

� This problem is one motivation to study f(R) theories taking another point of view

Page 8: Luisa G. Jaime Marcelo Salgado Leonardo Patiñobccp.berkeley.edu/beach_program/presentations11/Jaime.pdfA robust approach to f(R) gravity A simple idea: We consider f(R) gravity without

A robust approach to f(R) gravity� A simple idea:

� We consider f(R) gravity without the mapping to their scalar-tensor counterpart, but using the Ricci scalar as an “extra” degree of freedom.

� It is straightforward to write the f(R) field equation in the following way

� Taking the trace of this equation yields:

� And using this in the field equation we find

� These last two equations are the basic equations for f(R) gravity that we propose to use in every application.

Page 9: Luisa G. Jaime Marcelo Salgado Leonardo Patiñobccp.berkeley.edu/beach_program/presentations11/Jaime.pdfA robust approach to f(R) gravity A simple idea: We consider f(R) gravity without

Static and spherically symmetric spacetimes

� In order to test our approach, we consider a static and spherically symetricspacetime:

� So, using equations proposed we have:

� The componets rr, tt and θθ of the field equations give us the next differentialequations:

Page 10: Luisa G. Jaime Marcelo Salgado Leonardo Patiñobccp.berkeley.edu/beach_program/presentations11/Jaime.pdfA robust approach to f(R) gravity A simple idea: We consider f(R) gravity without

Static and spherically symmetric spacetimes

� In order to test our approach, we consider a static and spherically symetricspacetime:

� So, using equations proposed we have:

� The componets rr, tt and θθ of the field equations give us the next differentialequations:

Page 11: Luisa G. Jaime Marcelo Salgado Leonardo Patiñobccp.berkeley.edu/beach_program/presentations11/Jaime.pdfA robust approach to f(R) gravity A simple idea: We consider f(R) gravity without

Solving the equations� We can note that the diferential equations for n, m and R have the form:

( , )i

dyF y r

dx= , , ', , 'iy m n n R R=

� In order to solve this equations a Runge-Kutta algorithm is implemented in a FORTRAN code.

Another equation wich is necesary is Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equation:

� Some boundary conditions must be supplied, in this case we have

� Regularity conditions, if r = 0 then m’ = n’ = 0

� Asymptotic conditions R R1

� Another equation wich is necesary is Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equation:

� In order to obtein realistic neutron stars we faces a technical difficulty:

Page 12: Luisa G. Jaime Marcelo Salgado Leonardo Patiñobccp.berkeley.edu/beach_program/presentations11/Jaime.pdfA robust approach to f(R) gravity A simple idea: We consider f(R) gravity without

Numerical results

Case I: Miranda et al f(R) model

1.8

2.0

*/R R

� Pink

� Red

� Blue

rrg

ttg−rr ttg g−

0.3

1.6

1.4

0

0.5

1.0

1.5

-9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0

1/210 *( )Log rR

0.22

0.2

0.24

0.26

0.28

-1 0 1 2 3

R/Ro

V(R

/Ro

)

Page 13: Luisa G. Jaime Marcelo Salgado Leonardo Patiñobccp.berkeley.edu/beach_program/presentations11/Jaime.pdfA robust approach to f(R) gravity A simple idea: We consider f(R) gravity without

Case II: Starobinsky f(R) model

No singularity in the Ricci scalar.� Black

� Red

� Grey

rrg

ttg−rr ttg g−

-2 0 2 4 6

0

1

2

V(R

/Ro

)

R/Ro

Page 14: Luisa G. Jaime Marcelo Salgado Leonardo Patiñobccp.berkeley.edu/beach_program/presentations11/Jaime.pdfA robust approach to f(R) gravity A simple idea: We consider f(R) gravity without

Conclusion� We have devised a straigthforward and robust approach to f(R)

gravity without resorting to the usual mapping to STT.

� With this method is posible to analyze in a rather transparent and well defined way several aspects of these alternative theories.

� In particular we focused on the existence of relativistic extended � In particular we focused on the existence of relativistic extended objects. We found that, for some f(R) models, such objects can beconstructed without ambiguity.

� Building realistic neutron stars with a realistic de Sitterbackground in f(R) gravity still remains a technical callenge.

� In a near future we plan to study in more detail this issue withother aspects of f(R) gravity using our approach.