Lower bounds for Gromov width of coadjoint orbits in milena/UIUC.pdfLower bounds for Gromov width...

download Lower bounds for Gromov width of coadjoint orbits in  milena/UIUC.pdfLower bounds for Gromov width of coadjoint orbits in SO(n). Milena Pabiniak UIUC December 6, 2011

of 50

  • date post

    11-Mar-2018
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    214
  • download

    2

Embed Size (px)

Transcript of Lower bounds for Gromov width of coadjoint orbits in milena/UIUC.pdfLower bounds for Gromov width...

  • Lower bounds for Gromov width of

    coadjoint orbits in SO(n).

    Milena Pabiniak

    UIUC December 6, 2011

  • Problem suggested by

    prof Yael Karshon,

    extension of PhD work of her student

    Masrour Zoghi

    Key points:

    Hamiltonian torus action symplectic embeddings of balls

    Action of the Gelfand-Tsetlin torus (Cetlin, Zetlin).

    1

  • Let (M,) be a 2N-dimensional symplectic

    manifold.

    Gromov Non-Squeezing Theorem being symplectomorphism is much more

    restrictive then just being volume preserv-

    ing.

    The Gromov width of M is the supremum of the set of as such

    that a ball of capacity a

    B2Na ={z CN

    Ni=1

    |zi|2 < a},

    can be symplectically embedded in (M,).

    2

  • G- compact connected Lie group

    Coadjoint action: Gy g

    For matrix groups, coadjoint action is by conjugation.

    T G choice of maximal torus(t)+ choice of positive Weyl chamber

    coadjoint points in positive Weyl chamber

    orbits11 (t)+

    Fact: For any (t)+, the coadjoint orbit through , O, isa symplectic manifold with Kostant-Kirillov symplectic form .

    3

  • Example: G = U(n)

    u(n) = u(n) = n n Hermitian matrices,coadjoint action is conjugation

    T =

    eit1

    eit2. . .

    eitn

    , t+ =

    a1a2

    . . .an

    ; a1 a2 . . . an

    Coadjoint orbits = Hermitian matrices with the same eigenvalues

    4

  • Example: G = SO(2n+ 1), coadjoint action is conjugationso(2n+ 1) = (2n+ 1) (2n+ 1) skew symmetric matricesLet

    R() =

    (cos() sin()sin() cos()

    ), L(a) =

    (0 aa 0

    )Then

    TSO(2n+1) =

    R(1)R(2)

    . . .R(n)

    1

    ; j S1

    (tSO(2n+1))+ =

    L(1)L(2)

    . . .L(n)

    0

    ; j R, 1 . . . n 0

    Coadjoint orbits = matrices with char. pol. tnj=1(t

    2 + 2j ).

    5

  • Example: G = SO(2n), coadjoint action is conjugationso(2n) = (2n) (2n) skew symmetric matrices

    TSO(2n) =

    R(1)R(2)

    . . .R(n)

    ; j S1

    (tSO(2n))+ =

    L(1)L(2)

    . . .L(n)

    ; j R, 1 . . . n1 |n|

    6

  • Theorem 1. Let = (1 > . . . > n) int t+, (i.e. regular),M := O - SO(2n+ 1) coadjoint orbit through .The Gromov width of M is at least the minimum

    min{1 2, . . . , n1 n, 2n},

    what in the language of coroots is

    min{, ; a coroot}.

    Method:

    - construct a proper, centered, Hamiltonian T -space,

    - use it to construct explicit embeddings of symplectic balls;

    7

  • The root system of SO(2n+ 1) consists of vectorsej, j = 1, . . . , n, of squared length 1,(ej ek), j 6= k, of squared length 2.

    Therefore this root system for SO(n) is non-simply laced.Note that

    (ej),

    = 2

    ej,

    ej, ej

    = 2j,and

    (ej ek),

    = 2

    ej ek,

    ej ek, ej ek

    = j kTherefore for in our chosen positive Weyl chamber

    min{, ; a coroot} = min{1 2, . . . , n1 n, 2n}.

    8

  • Why do we care about such lower bound?

    1. (Zoghi) For regular, indecomposable (i.e. with some integral-

    ity conditions) U(n) coadjoint orbits their Gromov width is given

    by min{, ; a coroot}.

    2. (P.) For a class of not regular U(n) coadjoint orbits the above

    formula is a lower bound of their Gromov width.

    3. (Zoghi) For any compact connected Lie group G, an up-

    per bound of the Gromov width of a regular, indecomposable

    coadjoint G orbit is given by the above formula.

    Corollary 2. (P., Zoghi) The Gromov width of regular, indecom-

    posable SO(n) coadjoint orbits is min{, ; a coroot}.

    4. (Caviedes) is working on the upper bounds for non-regular

    monotone U(n) orbits.

    9

  • Action is Hamiltonian: there exists a T -invariant momentum

    map : M t, such that

    (M) = d , t,

    where M is the vector field on M corresponding to t.

    This sign convention for p MT , the isotropy weights ofT y TpM are pointing out of the momentum map image.(S1)2 y C2 gives

    NOT

    10

  • Let T t be an open convex set which contains (M).The quadruple (M,,, T ) is a proper Hamiltonian T-manifoldif is proper as a map to T .

    We will identify Lie(S1) with R using the convention that theexponential map exp : R =Lie(S1) S1 is given by t e2it,that is S1 = R/Z.

    11

  • A proper Hamiltonian T -manifold (M,,, T ) is centered about

    a point T if

    KT ctd XMK , (X).

    Not centered:

    Centered:

    12

  • Hamiltonian T action on M is called toric if dimT = 12 dimM.

    Example 3.M - compact symplectic toric manifold

    : M t - moment mapThen:

    := (M) is a convex polytope,

    and for any , F face of

    F

    1(rel-int F )

    is the largest subset of M that is centered about .

    13

  • Proposition 4. (Karshon, Tolman) Let:

    (M2n, ,, T ) - a proper Hamiltonian T -manifold,centered about T and

    1({}) = {p} a single fixed point.

    Then

    M is equivariantly symplectomorphic to{z Cn | +

    |zj|2j T

    },

    where 1, . . . ,n are the isotropy weights at p.

    14

  • Example: Isotropy weights at : 1,2

    2

    1 51

    22

    1

    2

    1(shaded region T ) is equivariantly symplectomorphic to

    {z C2|+ (|z1|21 + |z2|22) T }Notice that

    z B2 = {z C2(|z1|2+|z2|2) < 2} +(|z1|21+|z2|22) T

    B2 M embedds symplectically15

  • G = SO(2n+ 1), T -maximal torus of G, dimT = n

    Fix t+ regular, O-coadjoint orbit through , dimO = n2

    T y O coadjoint (conjugation).

    Centered region for this action is too small.

    For example, for the SO(5) orbit through = (6,1)

    min{, ; a coroot} = min{5,7,12,2} = 2,

    while the centered region is

    16

  • ()

    (p)

    E1

    E2

    2

    2

    1

    5

    = e1 + e2

    e1

    = e2

    () 17

  • Therefore we will use the Gelfand-Tsetlin action.

    First define the Gelfand-Tsetlin functions for a group G of

    rank k.

    Consider a sequence of subgroups

    G = Gk Gk1 . . . G1,

    with maximal tori T = Tk Tk1 . . . T1.

    Inclusion Gj G an action of Gj on the G-coadjoint orbit O.

    This action is Hamiltonian with momentum map

    j : g gj

    18

  • Every Gj orbit intersects the (chosen) positive Weyl chamber

    (tGj)+ exactly once.

    This defines a continuous (but not everywhere smooth) map

    sj : gj (tGj)

    +.

    Let (j) denote the composition sj j:

    O j

    //

    (j) ##HH

    HHHH

    HHHH

    gjsj

    (tGj)+

    The functions {(j)}, j = 1, . . . , k1, form the Gelfand-Tsetlinsystem denoted by : O RN .

    19

  • Example: G = U(n) U(n 1) . . . U(1)

    - maximal tori: diagonal matrices,- t: diagonal Hermitian matrices,- positive Weyl chambers: eigenvalues in non-increasing order.

    Then for a Hermitian matrix A,

    j(A) is its j j top left submatrix and

    (j)(A) = ((j)1 (A) . . . (j)1 (A)) R

    j

    is a sequence of eigenvalues of j(A) ordered in a non-increasingway.

    Due to this ordering, the function (j) is not smooth on thewhole orbit. The singularities may occur when eigenvalues coin-cide.

    20

  • Gelfand-Tsetlin system for SO(2n+ 1).

    SO(2n+ 1) SO(n) . . . SO(2).

    For any k = 2, . . . ,2n, SO(k) injects into SO(2n+ 1) by

    SO(k) 3 B 7(B 00 I

    ).

    SO(k) also acts on O by a subaction of a coadjoint action.This action is Hamiltonian with a momentum map

    k : O so(k),

    k(A) k k top left submatirx of A.

    21

  • Then

    (k)1 (A)

    (k)2 (A) . . .

    (k)

    bk2c(A)

    are such that

    k(A) SO(k)

    L((k)1 (A)) . . .

    L((k)bk2c

    (A))

    0

    if k oddor

    k(A) SO(k)

    L((k)1 (A)) . . .

    L((k)bk2c

    (A))

    if k even .

    22

  • Why not smooth everywhere?

    Due to ordering. The singularities may occur when generalized

    eigenvalues coincide.

    Proposition 5. The functions (k) are smooth at the preimage

    of the interior of the positive Weyl chamber,

    USO(k) := ((k))1(int (tSO(k))

    +).

    23

  • Torus action induced by the Gelfand-Tsetlin system

    On USO(k), (k) is inducing a smooth action of TSO(k).

    For t TSO(k) and A O this new action is

    t A =(B1 tB

    I

    )A

    (B1 t1B

    I

    )

    where B SO(k) is such that

    Bk(A)B1 (tSO(k))+.

    Proposition 6. (k) is a momentum map for the Hamiltonian

    action of the torus TSO(k) on USO(k).

    24

  • Putting together actions of all TSO(k), we obtain the action of

    the Gelfand-Tsetlin torus TGTs

    TGTs = TSO(2n) TSO(2n1) . . . TSO(2)on the set

    U :=2nk=2

    USO(k).

    Momentum map for this action is

    = ((2n),(2n1), . . . ,(2)) : O tGTs = Rn2.

    25

  • Image of the momentum map

    Let {x(k)j |1 k 2n, 1 j bk2c} be basis of R

    n2.

    Proposition 7. The image of the Gelfand-Tsetlin functions

    : O Rn2

    is the polytope, which we will denote by P, definedby the following set of inequalities x

    (2k)1 x

    (2k1)1 x

    (2k)2 x

    (2k1)2 . . . x

    (2k)k1 x

    (2k1)k1 |x

    (2k)k |,

    x(2k+1)1 x

    (2k)1 x

    (2k+1)2 x

    (2k)2 . . . x

    (2k+1)k |x

    (2k)k |,

    for all k = 1, . . . , n, where x(2n+1)j = j.

    Moreover, the dimension of the polytope P is n2, what is half ofthe dimension of O.

    26

  • Graphically,

    . . .

    . . .. . .

    . . .

    . . .

    1 2 n

    x(2n)1 x

    (2n)2 x