[IEEE 2007 International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation Experiments...
Transcript of [IEEE 2007 International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation Experiments...
Comparative Sensitivity Analysis for µBGA and QFN Reliability
Jürgen Wilde, Elena Zukowski University of Freiburg,
Department of Microsystems Engineering Laboratory for Assembly and Packaging
Georges-Koehler-Allee 103, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
Abstract The estimation of product reliability during the design
is one of the key questions in microelectronics. The assembly lifetime is a function of such parameters as geometry, material properties and loads. All these influences exhibit systematic and stochastic variations. The effect of variability can be analysed by a probabilistic FE-simulation and statistical methods. This paper presents an approach for the prediction of thermal fatigue life of two CSP types, the µBGA and the QFN. Besides geometry parameters, also material properties and cycle temperatures are used as variable inputs. Based on a preliminary study the input parameters were defined as normal distributed. Sensitivities of the lifetime to the design parameters were computed and ranked after FE-simulations for both µBGA and QFN packages parameters had been performed. The fatigue life prediction of solder joints used in this work is based on a Coffin-Manson model and it was performed using the stress-strain data extracted from FE-simulations. As there exists a dependency on the solder deformation behaviour, the correct choice of the deformation model of lead-free solder alloys is an important aspect of this work. Summarising, in this work a probabilistic simulation method was developed to compute realistic failure distributions of two CSP types.
1. Introduction Under the current rapid change of electronic
technology, the need to develop assemblies that are increasingly reliable is indispensable. FE analysis can be used to predict performance, lifetime, and reliability already in the design phase. For lifetime calculations, analytical models no longer play an essential role in the technology qualification phase.
Differences in the CTE of the assembly materials result in large stresses and strains during thermal cycles. This is the dominant mechanism leading to failure of soldered assemblies. It is important to predict not only thermal stresses and strains within the system, but also to analyse how different design parameters influence the stress. Furthermore, it is necessary to determine which material properties, geometry parameters and manu-facturing process conditions are critical for reliability.
Reliability of soldered joints under temperature loads is critical not only for BGA but also for QFN (Quad Flat
Non-leaded) packages, one of the most advanced package types. For complementing previous studies, which focused mostly on BGAs, this paper will compare the two packages µBGA and VQFN. Here the solder fatigue life of the assemblies is predicted using the Coffin-Manson equation in combination with parametric FE-models.
2. FE-Model The investigation of design parameters like material
properties, or geometry was carried out using the parametric study approach. A configurable model was constructed, so that a parametric analysis could be performed with variable geometry and material properties without having to rebuild the model for each change. The capability to update finite elements models rapidly allows one to perform Monte Carlo simulations of assemblies with multiple random variables. The existing parameterised deterministic model of µBGA and QFN [1] was extended to a probabilistic model by treating the geometry, dimensions and material properties as random variables.
2.1 Geometric Details A quarter symmetry 3D non-linear finite-elements
model was generated using a modular modelling method [1].
Fig.1 A quarter symmetry 3D FE-µBGA model
Fig.2 A quarter symmetry 3D FE-QFN model
Packages chosen for this study included a QFN and
µBGA packages with 0.5 mm and 0.8 mm pitch size respectively. The connection of the chip to the substrate is accomplished using 49 I/O in a 7×7 matrix for the µBGA and 40 I/O (8×12) in the case of QFN solder joints. Both packages were mounted to non-solder mask defined 1.5 mm thick FR4 board.
Figures 1-3 illustrate the constructed FE-models and provide a detailed view of the copper lands and the solder joint region.
Fig.3a Detailed view of the copper lands-solder joint region of a metallographic QFN cross-section
Fig.3b Detailed view of the copper lands-solder joint region of QFN model
2.2 Material Model Most of the materials properties were assumed to be
linear elastic.
Table 1. Material properties used in simulations, (all data taken at 25°C)
Material CTE, ppm/K E Modulus,
MPa
Silicon 2.6
Orthotropic
c11=165640
c12= 63940
c44= 79510
FR4 (Interposer) 15(X); 16(Y); 50(Z) 23000
Die att. adhesive 65 1500
Solder mask 60 3500
Cu 16,7 130000
FR4 (PCB) 12(X); 17(Y); 45(Z) 23000
Two variants of moulding compounds, which are
identified as LS#1 (Low Stress) and LS#2, are chosen for the investigations. Moulding compound LS#1 has a low Tg and as consequence the CTE difference is high at high temperatures (Fig. 4a).
-50 0 50 100 1500
1x10-5
2x10-5
3x10-5
4x10-5
5x10-5
6x10-5
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000 LS#1 (CTE) FR4 (CTEX) FR4 (CTEY)
You
ng's
mod
ulus
, MP
a
Temperature, °C
CTE
, ppm
/K
LS#1 (Young's modulus)
Fig.4a CTE of moulding compound LS#1 [2]
The second moulding compound has lower CTE than the substrate at all simulated temperatures (Fig4.b).
Temperature dependent values of CTE (22ppm/K@25°C) and Young’s modulus (50GPa@25°C) for SnAgCu solder were found in literature [3].
-50 0 50 100 150 2000
1x10-5
2x10-5
3x10-5
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
LS#2 (CTE) FR4 (CTEX) FR4 (CTEY)
You
ng's
mod
ulus
, MP
a
Temperature, °C
CTE
, ppm
/K LS#2 (Young's modulus)
Fig.4b CTE of moulding compound LS#2
The mechanical properties of solder alloys are non-linear. For modelling the creep deformation of solder materials in FE-simulations, the well-known generalized Garofaldo equation [4] was used. The inelastic strain rate is given as
[ ]
−=
TCCC
dtd Ccr 4
21 exp)sinh( 3σε (1)
σ is von-Mises stress. During the last years, several constitutive models for
Sn95.5Ag3.8Cu0.7 were published, but there is yet no material model, which is accepted as general standard. The analysis of published creep data was performed with five test simulations. The corresponding constants of steady-state creep deformation are shown in the Table 2.
Table 2. Deformation constants of steady-state creep for SnAg3.8Cu0.7 and SnAg3.8Cu1 [10] alloy
C1[1/s] C2 [1/MPa] C3 C4 [K] Reference
3.20E+04 0.037 5.10 6525 [5]
2.78E+05 0.024 6.41 6500 [6]
5.01E+02 0.032 4.96 5434 [7]
9.81E+03 0.045 8.03 8547 [8]
8.78E+08 0.052 5.13 11210 [9]
2.60E-03 0.185 3.00 4655 [10]
For comparison, the isothermal lines of the different
data sets from Table 2 are plotted in Figs. 5a and 5b. The plotted data cover a wide range of stress levels and creep rates [6]. The graph corresponding to [8] shows higher creep resistance than the other models. The largest differences between the data sets are observed at low stresses and low strains.
1 10 10010-1110-1010-910-810-710-610-510-410-310-210-1100
[5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
S
econ
dary
Cre
ep R
ate
(1/s
ec)
Stress (MPa)
Fig.5a Creep strain rate versus von-Mises stress for Sn95.5Ag3.8Cu0.7 at -40°C
1 10 10010-1110-1010-910-810-710-610-510-410-310-210-1100
[5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
Sec
onda
ry C
reep
Rat
e (1
/sec
)
Stress (MPa)
Fig.5b Creep strain rate versus von-Mises stress for Sn95.5Ag3.8Cu0.7 at 125°C
The corresponding hysteresis loops for simulated shear stress versus creep shear strain in Sn95.5Ag3.8Cu0.7 solder joints of BGAs are plotted in Fig.6 for thermal cycles between -40°C and 125°C.
-0,004 -0,003 -0,002 -0,001 0,000-2
-1
0
1
2
3 [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
She
ar s
tress
(MP
a)
Shear strain
Fig. 6 Simulation of shear stress vs. shear strain creep hystereses for Micro-BGA packages
The simulated equivalent creep strain amplitude and the predicted life cycles for each creep models for are given in Table 3. Table 3. Equivalent creep strain amplitude and number of cycles to failure computed with Equation 3
∆εcr Nf Reference 1.33E-2 1215 [5] 1.26E-2 1300 [6] 1.21E-2 1365 [7] 1.02E-2 1700 [8] 1.02E-2 1698 [9] 1.54E-2 998 [10]
From the life prediction results, it becomes evident
that the data have some scattering. The creep-fatigue lives of µBGA solder joints predicted with [8] and [9] are higher than those predicted with [5], [6], [7] and [10]. In the authors´ opinion the data from [6] represent average values for the considered sinh-model parameters and therefore these data are used for our FE-simulations.
3. Input parameters and loads Material properties and geometry data are used as
analysis inputs. Geometric features exhibit variations, which are caused by manufacturing and assembly processes. Among these are the component placement accuracy on the substrate (diagonal distance from corner joint to corner joint), screen-printing process variations and solder paste parameters like the standoff height. Some geometry parameters and material properties influence the solder joint reliability significantly. For example, the materials and geometry, that define the package structure, have influence on the effective CTE of the package. Therefore, CTE is a function of the coefficients of thermal expansion of the materials, the thickness and the moduli of elasticity [11, 12].
As shown in Fig. 7 a cyclic thermal load is defined by a temperature transient from –40°C to 125°C, with 30 min dwell time and 10 s ramp time.
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000-60-40-20
020406080
100120140
Tem
peta
ture
,°C
Zeit,s
Fig.7 Passive temperature loading cycle used in simulations
For creep analysis, it is important to study the responses for multiple thermal cycles until the hysteresis loops become stabilized. In our simulations creep shear strain is stabilized after the second cycle. Therefore only two thermal cycles were simulated. 4. Results and Discussion 4.1 Fatigue model
For strain-based analysis, Coffin-Manson fatigue models [13-15] are widely used for low cycle fatigue analysis.
αε apl NC ⋅=∆ (2)
Here ∆εpl is the effective von-Mises viscoplastic strain range and α and C are temperature-dependent parameters, which can be obtained experimentally from strain-cycling tests. In practice, for experimental or analytical determination of the creep strain amplitude ∆εcr can be used at high homologous temperatures in the Coffin-Manson equations for the prediction of the number of cycles to failure Nf.
Inelastic strain and stress in µBGAs and VQFNs sol-der joints are taken from FEA. For the evaluation of assembly lifetime, the following damage model [16] was applied:
295.1)(5.4 −∆= crfN ε . (3)
In thermal cycling tests on many components the
times or numbers of cycles to failure will be distributed over rather large intervals. The two-parameter Weibull function is considered as a suitable distribution function for failure times or cycles fN of the assemblies:
β
α
β
α
−
−
−=−=fN
f
t
eNForetF 1)(1)( (4)
Cycles to failure distributions for Weibull plots can be
obtained from thermal cycling simulations only when distributed input parameters are used.
4.2 Probabilistic sensitivity analysis
Probabilistic sensitivities are important in order to improve a design toward a more reliable version. From Monte Carlo simulations, sensitivities can be derived by calculation of correlation coefficients between input variables and output parameters. A frequently used non-parametric correlation tests for sensitivity calculation is the Spearman test based on rank-order correlation [4].
∑∑
∑
−−
−−=
n
ii
n
ii
n
iii
s
SSRR
SSRRr
22 )()(
))(( (5)
There Ri is the rank of xi within the set of observations [x1,x2,…..xn], Si is the rank of yi within the set of
[y1,y2,….yn], and RS , are average ranks of a Ri and Si respectively. Values of sensitivity rS can be distributed in a range from +1 (perfect correlation), through 0 (no correlation), to -1 (perfect negative correlation).
4.3 Effect of solder pad opening size and area ratio
The geometric characteristics can have a significant effect on the thermo-mechanical reliability. Two variants of ball geometry were regarded: NSMD pads on boards and SMD pads on package substrates. For both types the ball radius (225 µm) and the connection radius on the package side (170 µm) are the same and pad radii on the substrate side are different (150 µm and 200 µm respectively). So for variant #1 (small substrate pad) Rs>Rp, while for variant #2 (large substrate pad) Rs<Rp.
Fig.8 Solder ball models with different copper pad designs.
The two-parameter Weibull distribution was used to characterize the lifetime distribution of assembled packages. Smaller pads lead to higher reliability while larger pads have lower lifetime and a higher failure probability.
500 1000 2000
0.02
0.05
0.10
0.25
0.50
0.75 0.90 0.96
Life time, No. of cycles
Failu
re p
roba
bilit
y, %
Fig.9 Computed cycles to failure distributions for two different solder pad opening size (µBGA49)
Sensitivities of lifetime to the change of such input variables as package pad opening radius (Rp) and sub-strate pad radius (Rs) were calculated. Comparison of these coefficients shows that the pad opening radius is a powerful parameter for package reliability optimisation.
0,13 0,14 0,15 0,16 0,17 0,18 0,19
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500 rs=0.57
Life
time,
cyc
le
Rp, µm
Fig.10a Sensitivity of lifetime to package pad opening radius (µBGA49)
0,12 0,13 0,14 0,15 0,16 0,17 0,18
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500 rs=-0.1
Life
time,
cyc
le
Rs, µm
Fig.10b Sensitivity of lifetime to substrate pad radius (µBGA49)
For comparison, we have investigated the influence of QFN solder joint geometry parameters on package lifetime.
Fig.11 Interconnect geometry parameters on VQFN
For VQFN the fatigue life of soldered joints shows a positive sensitivity to increasing Cu-pad dimensions, which determine solder joint geometry. However, PCB pad width Ys has the strongest influence (rs=0.33) on the
large pad small pad
Rp Rp
Rs Rs
Xp
Xs
Ys
Yp
small pad
large pad
lifetime. Therefore, the increase of solder pads and solder land areas leads to increasing solder joint reliability.
Xp
Xs
Yp
Ys
0,00 0,05 0,10 0,15 0,20 0,25 0,30 0,35Sensitivity
Fig.12 Lifetime sensitivity plot of interconnect geometry variables for the FE-model of an QFN
It is shown, that µBGAs with larger solder mask opening size and QFNs with longer peripheral lead length have longer fatigue lives.
4.4 Effect of moulding compound CTE on fatigue life The material data of the moulding compound can be
important for the assembly reliability. Both properties Young’s modulus and CTE values change dramatically around the glass transition temperature. Therefore, the influence of the variance of the moulding compounds´ CTE on the package lifetime was investigated.
A higher CTE of a moulding compound increases the effective package CTE and reduces the CTE mismatch with PCB. This factor which tends to increase the fatigue life. We have investigated two variants: In one case, the CTE of the moulding compound is lower than that of the PCB (LS#2). In the second case (LS#1) the difference in CTEs between moulding compound und PCB was inverse in a high temperature range, αMC > αPCB .
µBGA QFN
LS#1
LS#2
Fig.13a Package deformations for two different moulding compounds at -40°C (displacement scale factor=50)
A qualitative comparison of the thermal-mechanical
behaviour of packages with different moulding compound CTEs is shown in Fig. 13. It can be seen, that at –40°C
both variants of mould compound show the same modes of package deformation.
At 125°C, the deformation behaviour of assemblies with both moulding compounds is different. For packages with inverse ∆α (αMC>αPCB), the stress of moulding compound in the die overhang area increases due to an increase of the thermal expansion of the moulding compound in the die overhang area.
µBGA QFN
LS#1
LS#2
Fig.13b Package deformations for two different moulding compound CTEs at 125°C (displacement scale factor=50)
Finite elements modelling indicated that LS#1 would
improve fatigue life compared with LS#2 (Fig. 14).
3000 5000 70000.02
0.05
0.10
0.25
0.50
0.75
0.90 0.96
Life time, No. of cycles
Failu
re p
roba
bilit
y, %
Fig. 14 Cycles to failure for two different moulding compounds (temperature cycling -40°C to +125°C for VQFN-40)
Another interesting fact is that for LS #1 the location
of the critical zone is changed due to the influence of the CTE of the moulding compound. In order to investigate the effect of the variability of geometry and material properties a Monte Carlo simulation was conducted. All input values were changed according to their distributions and strain-based fatigue life predictions were made. In the case when LS#2 was used for the µBGA, the critical zone with the highest strain range was found in the corner balls for all simulations. For LS#1, the critical zone was
Lead pad length
PCB pad length
Lead pad width
LS#1
LS#2
PCB pad width
displaced to the next ball in the diagonal inward direction. Nevertheless for some geometry value sets the zone of maximum strain appeared in the corner balls.
µBGA QFN
LS#1
LS#2
Fig.15 Location of the critical zone for two different moulding compound CTEs (displacement scale factor=50)
5. Conclusions A comparative analysis of µBGA and QFN is
undertaken regarding geometric and material parameters. Stress and creep analyses were utilized to predict the reliability of lead free solder joints during thermal cycling. Simulations results coupled with sensitivity analyses show the same behaviour for both types of packages.
• Increase of solder mask opening sizes for µBGA and peripheral lead length for QFN increased also package fatigue life.
• Values of the CTE difference between moulding compounds and substrates can change the location of the critical zones
• It is important use optimal moulding compound CTE, in order to prevent inverse CTE difference.
Acknowledgments The described investigations were funded by the
Federal Ministry of Economics and Labour BMWA under the AIF research program (AIF project number 13.821 N) and supported by the Research Association on Welding and Allied Processes of the German Welding Society DVS (DVS-No. 10.040). The authors are very grateful for this support.
References [1] Zukowski, E., Deier, E., Wilde, J., “Correct
modelling of geometry and materials properties in the thermo-mechanical finite-elements-simulation of chip scale packages”, Proc. Eurosime 2005, pp. 545-552.
[2] S. Fischer, “Einfluss der Aufbau- und Verbindungs-technik auf die funktionalen Eigenschaften thermomechanisch belasteter Sensoren”,
Dissertation, University of Freiburg, 2006, ISBN-10:3-89959-527-0
[3] Database for solder properties with emphasis on new lead-free solders, Release 4.0, National Institute of Standards&Technology and Colorado School of Mines, www.boulder.nist.gov/div853/lead%20free /solders.html
[4] ANSYS 10.0 Documentation [5] John, Pang, H. L., Xiong, B. S., Low, T. H., ''Creep
and fatigue characterization of lead free 95.5Sn-3.8Ag-0.7Cu solder'', Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2004, Vol.2, pp.1333- 1337
[6] Schubert, A., Dudek, R., Auerswald, E., Gollhardt, A., Michel, B., Reichl, H., ''Fatigue life models of SnAgCu and SnPb solder joints evaluated by experiments and simulations,'' 53rd ECTC Conference Proc., 2003, pp. 603-610
[7] Pang, J., Xiong, B., ''Mechanical Properties for 95.5Sn-3.8Ag-0.7Cu Lead-Free Solder Alloy,'' IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies. 2005, Vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 830-840.
[8] Dušek, M. and Hunt, C., ''Measurement of materials properties of lead-free solders for modelling requirements'', Proc. SMTA Int. Conf., 2003, pp.753-757
[9] Pang, J.H.L., Xiong, B.S., Neo, C.C., Zhang, X.R. and Low, T.H., ''Bulk solder and solder joint properties for lead-free 95.5Sn-3.8Ag-0.7Cu solder alloy'', Proc. 53rd ECTC, 2003, pp.673-679
[10] Wiese, S., Schubert, A., Walter, H., Dudek, R.,Feustel, F., Meusel, E., Michel, B. , ''Constitutive behaviour of lead-free solders vs. lead-containing solders-experiments on bulk specimens and flip-chip joints'', Proc. 51rd ECTC, 2001, pp.890-902
[11] Chaparala, S.C.; Roggeman, B.D.; Pitarresi, J.M.; Sammakia, B.G.; Jackson, J.; Griffin, G.; McHugh, T., “Effect of geometry and temperature cycle on the reliability of WLCSP solder joints”, IEEE Trans. CPMT, Vol. 28, No 3, 2005, pp. 441- 448.
[12] Lall, P.; Singh, N.; Suhling, J.C.; Strickland, M.; Blanche, J. “Thermo-mechanical reliability tradeoffs for deployment of area array packages in harsh environments joints”, IEEE Trans. CPMT, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2005, pp. 457- 466.
[13] IPC-SM-785, Guidelines for accelerated testing of surface mount solder attachments. IPC, Lincolnwood, IL, USA, 1992.
[14] Schmidt, C. G; Simons, J. W. and Kanazawa, C. H., “Thermal fatigue behaviour of J-lead solder joints”, IEEE Trans. CPMT-Part A, 1995,Vol. 18, No. 3
[15] Solomon, J.D;. “Fatigue of 60/40 solder”, IEEE Trans. CHMT, (1986). Vol. CHMT-9, pp 423-433.
[16] Dudek, R., Rzepka, S., Dobritz, S., Doring, R., Keybig, K., Wiese, S., Michel, B.: “Fatigue life prediction and analysis of wafer level packages with SnAgCu solder balls”, Electronics Systemintegration Technology Conference, 2006, Vol. 2, pp.903-911