Detectors Readout - Experimental Cosmology Group...

of 17 /17
1 Detectors & Readout History: early days The infrared range has been discovered by astronomers! Friedrich Wilhelm Herschel, using a prism and balckened bulb thermometers, detects the infrared section of the solar spectrum (calorific rays, 1800) The final demonstration that IR is also EM waves happens a bit later Macedonio Melloni in 1829 develops the thermomultiplier, a sensitive IR detector. With this system he demonstrates that calorific rays have the same nature as light, also demonstrating that they have polarization properties exactly like light rays. He names the calorific rays “ultrared radiation”. The first astronomical observation is carried out soon after: IR radiation from the moon is detected by Charles Piazzi Smyth in Tenerife, using a thermocouple. He also shows that IR radiation is better detected at higher altitudes. History: early days The first bolometers were developed for astronomy, and allowed the first IR spectroscopy of an astronomical source Samuel Pierpoint Langley in 1878 develops the bolometer: a thin blackened platinum strip, sensitive enough to measure the heat of a cow from a distance of ¼ mile. The detector works because the resistance of the Pt strip changes when heated by the absorbed radiation. The detector is differential: 4 strips are placed in a Wheatstone bridge but only one is blackened and exposed to incoming radiation. Common- mode effects are rejected by the bridge and tiny variations of bolometer resistance can be measured. With his bolometer Langley is able to measure the IR spectrum of the sun, discovering atomic and molecular lines. Old times • Further developments: 1915 : William Coblentz uses thermopiles (an improved version of Macedonio Melloni’s detector !) to measure the infrared radiation from 110 stars, as well as from planets, such as Jupiter and Saturn, and several nebulae. 1920’s : systematic IR observations with vacuum thermopiles (Seth B. Nicholson, Edison Pettit and others): diameters of giant stars 1948: IR observations show that the moon is covered by dust. 1950s: Lead Sulphide photodetectors – Johnson’s star photometry First Semiconductor bolometers, slicing carbon resistors to make the thermistor (W. S. Boyle and K. F. Rodgers, J . Opt . Soc . Am . 49 :66 (1959)) One generation ago The revolution : 1961: Franck J. Low develops the first cryogenic Ge bolometer, boosting the sensitivity by orders of magnitude. 1960’s and ff. bolometers and semiconductors detectors with their telescopes are carried to space using stratospheric balloons and rockets. • Consequence: First sky surveys @ λ 100 μm 1968 First IR ground based large area sky survey (2 μm, from Mt. Wilson) Few decades ago • mm-wave bolometers cooled at 1.5K or 0.3K – operating from space become sensitive enough to measure the finest details of the Cosmic Microwave Background. • Breakthrough: The composite bolometer (absorber and thermistor separated and each optimized independently): N. Coron, P. Richards …

Embed Size (px)

Transcript of Detectors Readout - Experimental Cosmology Group...

  • 1

    Detectors&

    Readout

    History: early days The infrared range has been discovered by

    astronomers! Friedrich Wilhelm Herschel, using a prism and

    balckened bulb thermometers, detects the infraredsection of the solar spectrum (calorific rays, 1800)

    The final demonstration that IR is also EM waves happens a bit later Macedonio Melloni in 1829 develops the

    thermomultiplier, a sensitive IR detector. With thissystem he demonstrates that calorific rays have the same nature as light, also demonstrating that theyhave polarization properties exactly like light rays. He names the calorific rays ultrared radiation.

    The first astronomical observation is carriedout soon after: IR radiation from the moon is detected by Charles

    Piazzi Smyth in Tenerife, using a thermocouple. Healso shows that IR radiation is better detected at higher altitudes.

    History: early days The first bolometers were developed for

    astronomy, and allowed the first IR spectroscopy of an astronomical source Samuel Pierpoint Langley in 1878 develops the

    bolometer: a thin blackened platinum strip, sensitive enough to measure the heat of a cow from a distance of mile.

    The detector works because the resistance of the Pt strip changes when heated by the absorbedradiation.

    The detector is differential: 4 strips are placed in a Wheatstone bridge but only one is blackenedand exposed to incoming radiation. Common-mode effects are rejected by the bridge and tinyvariations of bolometer resistance can bemeasured.

    With his bolometer Langley is able tomeasure the IR spectrum of the sun, discovering atomic and molecular lines.

    Old times Further developments:

    1915 : William Coblentz uses thermopiles (an improved version of Macedonio Mellonis detector !) to measure the infrared radiation from 110 stars, as well as from planets, such as Jupiter and Saturn, and several nebulae.

    1920s : systematic IR observations with vacuumthermopiles (Seth B. Nicholson, Edison Pettit and others): diameters of giant stars

    1948: IR observations show that the moon is covered by dust.

    1950s: Lead Sulphide photodetectors Johnsonsstar photometry

    First Semiconductor bolometers, slicing carbonresistors to make the thermistor (W. S. Boyle and K. F. Rodgers, J . Opt . Soc . Am . 49 :66 (1959))

    One generation ago The revolution :

    1961: Franck J. Low develops the first cryogenic Ge bolometer, boosting the sensitivity by orders of magnitude.

    1960s and ff. bolometers and semiconductorsdetectors with their telescopes are carried tospace using stratospheric balloons and rockets.

    Consequence: First sky surveys @ 100 m

    1968 First IR ground basedlarge area sky survey (2 m, from Mt. Wilson)

    Few decades ago

    mm-wave bolometers cooled at 1.5K or 0.3K operating from space

    become sensitive enough to measure the finestdetails of the Cosmic Microwave Background.

    Breakthrough: The composite bolometer (absorber and thermistor

    separated and each optimized independently): N. Coron, P. Richards

  • 2

    Circa 1970

    Circa 1980

    Composite Bolometer(Coron, Richards )

    monoliticbolometer(Goddard, ..)

    Cryogenic Bolometers For FIR & mm-waves spectroscopy we need very wide band

    detectors. Bolometers provide the optimal choice: they are senitivefrom mm-waves to the visible range.

    filter(frequencyselective)

    FeedHorn(angle selective)

    IntegratingcavityRadiation

    Absorber (T)

    Thermometer(Ge thermistor (R)at low T, or TES)

    IncomingPhotons (B)

    Fundamental noise sources are Johnson noise in the thermistor( = 4kTRf), temperature fluctuations in the thermistor(( = 4kGT2f), background radiation noise (Tbkg5) needto reduce the temperature of the detector and the radiativebackground.

    Load resistor

    V

    Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson (1965):We get microwavesisotropically fromevery direction of the sky. Its the Cosmic MicrowaveBackground.Nobel Prize in Physics, 1977

    F. Melchiorri (high mountain, 1974), . P. Richards et al.(balloon, 1980) and then John Mather et al.(1992) with the FIRAS on the COBE satellite: these microwaveshave exactly a blackbody spectrum

    Nobel Prize in Physics, 2006

    COBE-FIRAS COBE-FIRAS was a Martin-Puplett

    Fourier-Transform Spectrometer withcomposite bolometers. It was placed in a 400 km orbit.

    A zero instrument comparing the specific sky brightness to the brightnessof a cryogenic Blackbody

    The output was nulled (within detector noise) for Tref=2.725 K

    The brightness of empty sky is a blackbody at the same temperature !

    The early universe was in thermalequilibrium at high Temperature.

    (cm-1) wavenumber

  • 3

    Primeval Fireball Additionalevidence

    for an earlyhot phase

    Srinand et al. Nature 408 931 (2000)

    COBE Molecules in cosmic clouds(rotational levels)

    )1( zTT o +=

    KTo 725.2=

    Two decades ago

    The spider-web absorber isdevelopedIt minimizes the heat capacity of the

    absorberIt minimizes the cross-section to

    cosmic rays, while maintaining high cross-section for mm-waves

    Spider-Web Bolometers

    Absorber

    Thermistor

    Built by JPL Signal wire

    2 mm

    The absorber is micromachined as a web of metallized Si3N4 wires, 2 m thick, with 0.1 mm pitch.

    This is a good absorber formm-wave photons and features a very low cross section for cosmic rays. Also, the heat capacity isreduced by a large factorwith respect to the solidabsorber.

    NEP ~ 2 10-17 W/Hz0.5 isachieved @0.3K

    150KCMB in 1 s

    Mauskopf et al. Appl.Opt. 36, 765-771, (1997)

    1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060

    102

    107

    1012

    1017Langley's bolometer

    Golay Cell

    Golay Cell

    Boyle and Rodgers bolometer

    F.J.Low's cryogenic bolometer

    Composite bolometer

    Composite bolometer at 0.3K

    Spider web bolometer at 0.3KSpider web bolometer at 0.1K

    1year

    1day

    1 hour

    1 second

    Development of thermal detectors for far IR and mm-waves tim

    e re

    quire

    d to

    mak

    e a

    mea

    sure

    men

    t (se

    cond

    s)

    year

    Photon noise limit for the CMB

    Crill et al., 2003 BOOMERanG 1998 bolometers, 300 mKThe same kind of bolometer is used now in Planck @100mK

    Measured performance of Planck HFI bolometers (0.1K)(Holmes et al., Appl. Optics, 47, 5997, 2008)

    =Photonnoiselimit

    Multi-moded

  • 4

    In steady conditions the temperature rise of the sensor isdue to the background radiativepower absorbed Q and to the electrical bias power P:

    The effect of the background power is thus equivalent to an increase of the reference temperature:

    Cryogenic Bolometers

    PQTTG += )( 0

    GQTT

    TTGGQTTGP

    +=

    =

    +=

    00

    00

    '

    )'()(

    T0

    Q(pW)0.27K

    0.28K

    0.26K0 1 2

    In presence of an additional signalQ ejt (from the sky)

    There is a tradeoff between high sensitivity and fast response. The heat capacity C should beminimized to optimize both.

    Using a current biased thermistor toreadout the temperature change:

    Cryogenic Bolometers

    QTGdt

    TdC eff =+

    GC

    GdQdT

    eff

    =

    +=

    2211

    221/

    /)()(

    +===

    ===

    effGTRi

    dQdT

    TRi

    dQdV

    TRdTiidRdVdT

    TdRTR

    T

    Small sensorat low

    temperature

    Responsivity

    A large isimportant forhigh responsivity.

    Gethermistors:

    221/

    )()(

    +=

    =

    effGTRi

    dTTdR

    TRT

    110 KT

    Cryogenic Bolometers Johnson noise in the thermistor

    Temperature noise

    Photon noise

    Total NEP (fundamental):

    Cryogenic Bolometers

    kTRdf

    Vd J 42

    =

    ( )2222

    24

    fCGGkT

    dfWd

    eff

    effT

    +=

    ( )( ) dxeex

    hcTk

    dfWd

    x

    xBGPh

    +=

    2

    4

    32

    552

    114

    dfWd

    dfWd

    dfVd

    NEP PhTJ222

    22 1 +

    +

    =

    Again, needof low

    temperatureand low

    background

    Q

    1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060

    102

    107

    1012

    1017Langley's bolometer

    Golay Cell

    Golay Cell

    Boyle and Rodgers bolometer

    F.J.Low's cryogenic bolometer

    Composite bolometer

    Composite bolometer at 0.3K

    Spider web bolometer at 0.3KSpider web bolometer at 0.1K

    1year

    1day

    1 hour

    1 second

    Development of thermal detectors for far IR and mm-waves

    time

    requ

    ired

    to m

    ake

    a m

    easu

    rem

    ent (

    seco

    nds)

    year

    Photon noise limit for the CMB

    Spider-Web Bolometers

    Absorber

    Thermistor

    Built by JPL Signal wire

    2 mm

    The absorber is micromachined as a web of metallized Si3N4 wires, 2 m thick, with 0.1 mm pitch.

    This is a good absorber formm-wave photons and features a very low cross section for cosmic rays. Also, the heat capacity isreduced by a large factorwith respect to the solidabsorber.

    NEP ~ 2 10-17 W/Hz0.5 isachieved @0.3K

    150KCMB in 1 s

    Mauskopf et al. Appl.Opt. 36, 765-771, (1997)

  • 5

    Crill et al., 2003 BOOMERanG 1998 bolometers, 300 mK

    Cryogenic Bolometers Ge thermistor bolometers have

    been used in many CMB experiments: COBE-FIRAS, ARGO, MAX,

    BOOMERanG, MAXIMA, ARCHEOPS

    Ge thermistor bolometers are extremely sensitive, but slow: the typical time constant C/G isof the order of 10 ms @ 300mK

    Once bolometers reach BLIP conditions (CMB BLIP), the mapping speed can only beincreased by creating largebolometer arrays.

    Bolometer Arrays BOLOCAM and MAMBO are

    examples of large arrayswith hybrid components (Si wafer + Ge sensors)

    Techniques to build fullylitographed arrays for the CMB are being developed.

    TES offer the naturalsensors. (A. Lee, D. Benford, A. Golding ..hear Richards..)

    Bolocam Wafer (CSO)

    MAMBO (MPIfR for IRAM)

    SWIPE The Short Wavelength Instrument for the Polarization Explorer Uses overmoded bolometers, trading angular resolution for sensitivity Sensitivity of photon-noise limited bolometers vs # of modes:

    3.23.32.5NET Focal Plane (K/sqrt(Hz))=

    302515NET (K/sqrt(Hz) ) =

    1.61.92.4FWHM (deg) =

    835837N det =

    1.42.13.3 (mm)

    22014590f (GHz)

    402515N modes (geom) =

    m0.8F =Instrumentm0.4D lens =Bolometric

    0.25eff =LSPE - SWIPE

    Number of modes actually coupling to the bolometer absorber

    SWIPE Overmoded detectors are obtained coupling large area bolomete

    absorbers to Winston horns. Example of large-throughput spider-web bolometer (being

    developed in Italy, F. Gatti)

    SWIPE bolometers will be made also in Cambridge (Withington)

    SWIPE Overmoded detectors are obtained coupling large area bolometer

    absorbers to Winston horns.

    Simulations confirm that about halfof the modes collected by the Winston horn actually couple to the bolometer absorber(in single-polarization detectors).

    Simulations by L.Lamagna, G.Pisano

  • 6

    EBEX EBEX Focal Plane

    Total of 1476 detectors Maintained at 0.27 K 3 frequency bands/focal plane

    738 element array 141 element hexagon Single TESLee, UCB

    3 mm

    5 cm

    G=15-30 pWatt/K NEP = 1.4e-17 (150 GHz) NEQ = 156 K*rt(sec) (150 GHz) msec, 3=

    150

    150 150

    150250

    250

    420

    Slide: Hanany

    William JonesPrinceton University

    for the

    Spider Collaboration

    The Path to CMBpolJune 31, 2009

    Suborbital Polarimeter for Inflation Dust and the Epoch of ReionizationSuborbital Polarimeter for Inflation Dust and the Epoch of Reionization

    Spider: A Balloon Borne CMB Polarimeter

    Long duration (~30 day cryogenic hold time) balloon borne polarimeter

    Surveys 60% of the sky each day of the flight, with ~0.5 degree resolution

    Broad frequency coverage to aid in foreground separation

    Will extract nearly all the information from the CMB E-modes

    Will probe B-modes on scales where lensing does not dominate

    Technical Pathfinder: solutions appropriate for a space mission

  • 7

    Carbon Fiber Gondola

    Attitude Control flywheel magnetometer rate gyros sun sensor

    Flight Computers/ACS 1 TB for turnaround 5 TB for LDB

    Pointing Reconstruction 2 pointed cameras boresight camera rate gyros

    Six single freq. telescopes

    30 day, 1850 lb, 4K / 1.4 K cryostat

    Constant current bias Very high impedance voltage follower as close as possible to the

    detector (inside dewar) Very low noise OP amp amplifier (1 nV/sqrt(Hz)

    Ge Bolometer Readouthigh impedance (10 M) detector

    To A/D converterand data storageB

    +

    ib

    X 1000

    Inside dewar Outside dewar

    JFET Preamplifier fordifferential AC bias

    AC bias currentis betterbecause the amplifier is usedat a frequencyfar from 1/f noise.

    Sine wave or triangle wavebias

    Demodulatorneeded.

    Differentialbiasing is betterbecausedifferentialamplificationremovescommon interference.

    Low noise, high CNRR amplifierneeded.

    BAC

    -1+1

    10M

    5 pF

    5 pF

    +Vb

    -Vb

    180Hz +

    -VACJFETs,

    x100Lock-in Vout

    REF

    IN

    Planck is a veryambitiousexperiment.

    It carries a complex CMB experiment (the state of the art, a few years ago) all the way to L2,

    improving the sensitivity wrtWMAP by at least a factor 10,

    extending the frequencycoveragetowards high frequencies by a factor about 10

    PLANCKESAs mission to map the Cosmic Microwave Background

    Image of the whole sky at wavelengths near the intensity peak of the CMB radiation, with high instrument sensitivity (T/T10-6)

    high resolution (5 arcmin)

    wide frequency coverage (25 GHz-950 GHz)

    high control of systematics

    Sensitivity to polarization

    Launch: 14/May/2009; payload module: 2 instruments + telescope

    Low Frequency Instrument (LFI, uses HEMTs)

    High Frequency Instrument (HFI, uses bolometers)

    Telescope: primary (1.50x1.89 m ellipsoid)

  • 8

    ESA : Jan TauberHFI PI : Jean Loup Puget (Paris)HFI IS : Jean Michel Lamarre (Paris)LFI PI : Reno Mandolesi (Bologna)LFI IS : Marco Bersanelli (Milano)

    Almost 20 years of hard work of a very large team, coordinated by:

    HFI

    LFI

    ScientificLaboratories

    Satellite

    + subcontractors

    NationalAgencies

    PI Puget

    PI Mandolesi

    Ecliptic plane1 o/day

    Boresight(85o from spin axis)

    Field of viewrotates at 1 rpm

    E

    M

    L2

    Observing strategyThe payload will work from L2, toavoid the emission of the Earth, of the Moon, of the Sun

    Why so far ?

    Good reasons to go in deep space: Atmosphere Sidelobes Stability

    In the case of CMB observations, the detectedbrightness is the sum of the brightness from the sky(dominant for the solid anglesdirected towards the sky, in the main lobe) and the Brightness from ground(dominant for the solid anglesdirected towards ground, in the sidelobes).

    RA()main lobe

    side lobes

    FWHM=/D

    boresight

    += dRABdRABAW

    lobesside

    Ground

    lobemain

    sky ),(),(),(),(

    The angular response (beam pattern) RA(,)is usually polarization-dependent

  • 9

    Planck HFI polarization sensitive focal plane

    Ponthieu et al. 2010

    Scan direction

    z

    NEPb = 15 aW/Hz1/2 -> 70 K/Hz1/2Total NET (bolo+photon) = 85 K/Hz1/2

    LFI

    LFIPseudo-correlationDifferential radiometerMeasures I,Q,U30, 44, 70 GHz

    t

  • 10

    Primary

    secondary

    Focal Plane

    Off-axis Dragone Telescope, wide field, good polarizationproperties, 1.89mx1.50m aperture

    Thermal performance :Planck collaboration: astro-ph/1101:2023

    LFI FocalPlane Unit

    Thermal performance :Planck collaboration: astro-ph/1101:2023

    Mission :Planck collaboration: astro-ph/1101:2022

    Mission : Planck collaboration: astro-ph/1101:2022

  • 11

    Real data (from just 15 days of operation)

    Planck 2013 CMB anisotropy map and power spectrum data (red dots with error bars)Green line is the best fit to a 6-parameters cosmology model (inflationary -CDM)

    A large isimportant forhigh responsivity.

    Ge thermistors: Superconducting

    transition edgethermistors:

    Cryogenic Bolometers

    221

    )()(

    1

    +=

    =

    effGRidT

    TdRTR

    110 KT

    11000 KT

    S.F. Lee et al. Appl.Opt. 37 3391 (1998)

    Have very low R, so work better at constant voltage. Letswrite in detail the equations:

    Voltage-Biased Superconducting Bolometers

    [ ]

    PCiG

    TP

    eTTeCiGT

    PP

    TeCiTeGeTT

    dTdR

    RT

    RVP

    TeCiTeGTedTdR

    RdRdVPe

    TedtdCTeG

    RVPe

    dtdQTTeTG

    RV

    RVPeP

    TTGR

    VP

    ii

    iiib

    tititib

    ti

    titibti

    otibbti

    ob

    ++=

    ++=

    +=

    +=

    +

    +=

    +

    ++=

    +++

    =+

    +++

    ++

    +

    2

    )()()(2

    )()(2

    )(22

    2

    1

    )(

    )( The effective thermal conductivity is

    The first part is the Electro-Thermal Feedback (ETF) part. When P increases (a signal arrives) T increases; this increases the

    resistance which in turns decreases the bias power Pb=Vb2/R. As a result the total power (P + Pb) does not decrease as much, and the temperature does not change much.

    For a given incoming power, the ETF reduced the temperature change. It is the reverse of what happens in a semiconductor bolometer, where

    the negative produces a negative ETF, increasing the temperature change.

    But here we measure the bias current at constant voltage. The currentneeded to keep the bias more stable is increased by the ETF. So wedefine

    Voltage-Biased Superconducting Bolometers

    PCiG

    TP

    eTTeCiGT

    PPi

    i

    ++=

    ++=

    CiGT

    PGeff

    ++=

    ( )oi

    L

    GCi

    GTP

    CiGT

    P

    L

    +

    =+

    =+

    =11

  • 12

    The Responsivity is

    And using

    We get

    Defining

    We get

    Voltage-Biased Superconducting Bolometers

    ( )PT

    TP

    VPR

    RRV

    VPRRV

    PRV

    Pi b

    b

    b

    b

    bbb

    111/ 2

    2 =====

    )1( o

    iii

    iLGe

    CiGT

    Pe

    PTP

    CiGT

    PeT

    ++=

    ++=

    ++=

    )1(1

    )1(11

    o

    i

    bo

    ib

    b

    b

    b iLLe

    ViLGe

    TP

    VPT

    TP

    V

    ++=

    ++==

    1+=

    Lo

    iLL

    Ve

    b

    i

    ++=

    11

    )1(1

    For large ETF (L>>1): the time constant is

    reduced wrt the standard one by L+1

    For slow signals (

  • 13

    PROTOTYPE SINGLE PIXEL - 150 GHz (Mauskopf)Schematic:

    Waveguide

    Radial probe

    Nb Microstrip

    Silicon nitride

    Absorber/termination

    TESThermal links

    Similar to JPL design, Hunt, et al., 2002 but withwaveguide coupled antenna

    PROTOTYPE SINGLE PIXEL - 150 GHz (Mauskopf)Details:

    Radial probe

    Absorber - Ti/Au: 0.5 /square - t = 20 nmNeed total R = 5-10 w = 5 m d = 50 m Microstrip line: h = 0.3 m, = 4.5 Z ~ 5

    TES

    Thermal links

    TES Readout

    A very low impedance, extremely low current noiseamplifier is needed

    SQUID (Superconducting quantum interference device)Offers the perfect solution.

    Martedi.

    Very resistant: materials are all suitable for satellite and space missions.

    Extremely simple cold electronics: one single LNA can be used for103-104 pixels. The rest of the readout is warm.

    Very flexible: different materials and geometries can be chosen totune detectors to specific needs.

    order of 103-104 pixels read with a single coax

    Ease of fabrication: one single layer of material is needed.

    Kinetic Inductance Detectors

    A possible solution:

    Main characteristics:

  • 14

    The CPs have zero DC resistance, but the reactance is non-zero and has two distinctcontribution kinetic and magnetic L.

    KIDs working principle:

    In a superconductor below Tc , electrons can bind to form CPs withbinding energy E=2 =3.5*kbTc .

    The total conductivity of the material can beestimated using the two-fluid model

    CPs

    QPs

    The values of ss and sn depend on the densities of QPs and CPs. By measuring them, we can getinformation on nqp .

    Js Jn

    -is2nCP -is2nQP s1nQP

    A better estimate of ss and sn is obtained using the MattisBardeen integrals:

    A better theory...

    Note that:

    Rs decreases exponentially

    Xs becomes constant

    Xs/ Rs grows exponentially

    D. C. Mattis and J. Bardeen, in Phys Rev 111 (1958)

    How can we measure the small variations of Lk?The superconductor can be inserted in a resonating circuit with extremelyhigh Q, since:

    ss RXQ

    The resonator is extremely simple to do, and consists of a shorted length of superconducting line capacitevely coupled to the feedline l/4 resonator

    Cc

    RQPLkin

    Lmag

    Cl

    KIDs are intrinsically multiplexable:

    Unitary transmission off resonance

    Q values very large (~106)

    Multiplexing

    Each resonator acts at the same time as detector and filter

    Cnc

    RnQPLnkin

    Lnmag

    Cnl

    C1c

    R1QPL1kin

    L1mag

    C1l

    C2c

    R2QPL2kin

    L2mag

    C2l

    RF carrier (f 1 + f 2 + ... + f n )

    Pixel 1, f 1 Pixel 2, f 2 Pixel n, f n

    One single amplifier needed!Many potential applications

    M. Calvo et al. in Conf. Proc. of 1st International LDB Workshop (2008)E.Andreotti et al. in NIMR A 572 (2008)

    How do we actually measure the incoming radiation?

    nCP< nCP

    QPs

    CPs

    Suppose a photon hits the detector

    If its energy is high enough (h > 2E) it can break CPs

    The density of CPs therefore changes

    This leads to a variation of Lkin

    The same effect can be accomplishedby increasing the temperature of the superconductor

    The readout is accomplished bymonitoring the phase of the transmittedsignal

    Lf 10

    dq

    Readout techniqueUsually the phase is redefined and referred to the center of the resonant circle:

    This kind of plots can give allthe information regardingresonator parameters

    It is also the basis for actualmeasurements of radiation

    Remember that:

    T

    QPn)T(nQP

  • 15

    Cryogenic system overview

    SCN-CN coax

    VNA / IQ mixers

    2xDC block2xDC block2x10dB atten

    1xDC block1xDC block1x10dB atten

    KID

    300K

    30K

    2K

    300mK

    SCN-CN coax

    SS-SS coax

    warm amplifier

    cold amplifier

    KIDs readout system

    0.3K 2K

    Re(S21)

    Im(S21)

    DAQ

    fsynt

    fsynt

    PC

    DAC

    ADC

    fsynt

    fsynt f0 , fsynt f1...

    f0, f1...

    f0, f1...

    fsynt f0 , fsynt f1...

    Single pixel readout systemMultipixel readout system

    Both systems share the core components!

    0.3K 2K

    Re(S21)

    Im(S21)

    PC

    DAC

    ADC

    fsynt

    fsynt

    f0, f1...

    f0, f1...

    fsynt f0 , fsynt f1...

    10 mm

    8 mm

    capacitive coupling

    2.5 mm

    0.7 mm

    Al CPW (200nm)

    SiO2 (1m)

    Silicon Substrate(0.5mm)

    KID chip descriptionMaterial: Aluminium6 resonators of varying length

    Substrate:

    The dielectric constant is notexactly determined!

    Base temperature characterization

    All 6 resonances observed!

    Typical resonanceamplitude curve

    51011 .Q

    Effect of temperature variation - 1

    Higher T Higher nqp Higher losses

    Higher T Lower nqp Lower f0

    Amplitude

    Phase

    Effect of temperature variation - 2

    )T(Lf

    TOT

    10

    TOT

    kin

    LL

    =)(L

    )T(L)(f)T(f

    kin

    kin

    021

    000 =

    Quality factor increase

    Estimate of kinetic inductance fraction

    0.018

  • 16

    2D data analysis

    A fitting procedure has been developed to estimate the parametersof the resonators and the effect of the IQ mixers

    The results are in very good agreement with the data:

    Temperature variation - 3

    The blue points correspond to the base temperature resonant frequency

    We obtain sensitivities of 10-3-10-2 deg/nqpequivalent to 10-9-10-8 deg/Nqp

    Optical measurementsSystem modified by adding a filter chain

    Polyethilene

    window

    Fluorogold(400G

    Hz low

    pass)

    Fluorogold+

    145GH

    z bandpassfilter

    Horn KIDGunn diode

    Quasiparticle lifetimeTo estimate the absorbed power that induces the signal we stillneed one piece of information:

    QP

    qpabs

    nP

    =

    QP 30s

    When T decreases, the quasiparticlelifetime increases (nQP smaller!)

    A possible solution: LEKID

    Distributed element KIDs

    Lumped element KIDs

    Needs some sort of antennaResponse depends on where the photon hits the sensor

    C

    L

    It is possible to tune the meandersto match free space impedance!

    ADS simulation

    Electrical NEP measurement

    Dominant contribution given by the warm readout components!

    Still too high for real applications, but:

    High sample rate data acquired

    ( )222

    2 1 QPQP

    QP

    NSNEP +

    =

    Theoretical limit given by GR noiseis as low as 10-20W/Hz0.5 at 100mK

    P. K. Day et al. Lett. Nature 425 (2003)

  • 17

    ConclusionsThe KIDs concept has been studied and theoretical

    models have been developed to analyze their reponse

    The experimental testbench has been completed and characterized

    The first chip has been made and thouroughly tested

    The first results are very promising

    Yet still some open issues

    High Q factors even at 300mK multiplexing!

    Good agreement with theoretical predictions

    First light already seen

    Develop a system to reach lower T (dilution fridge?)

    Optimize optical coupling LEKID

    Thanks for your attention!