B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K....
-
Upload
aubrey-harris -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
2
Transcript of B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K....
![Page 1: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
BD(*)K GLW, ADS
Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK)
Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai
Thanks to very active refereeing!
![Page 2: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
ϕ3 from BD(*)K decays
Tree-level ϕ3 determination from interference of BDK and BDK amplitudes.– Need D and D to decay to common final state.
Relative magnitude of suppressed amplitude is rB ~ 0.1. Relative weak phase is ϕ3, and relative strong phase is
δB.
_
_
ϕ3 ~ −arg(Vub)
Color-suppressed Color-allowed
![Page 3: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
![Page 4: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4rD and δD: well known.
Definitions of A and R given in BN1201.
![Page 5: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
BN1201 (presented at LP11, this talk)
BN1201 (presented at LP11, this talk)
Y. Horii, K. Trabelsi et al., PRL (2011)
BN1201 (will be analyzed later)
rD and δD: well known.
![Page 6: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Key Points of the Method
Continuum suppression– 9 variables:
LR(KSFW), Δz, cosθKD, cosθB, |qr|,
cosθT, dDK, QBQK, and ΔQ.(For details, see BN1201.)
– Transformed: NBNB’.
2-D fit for ΔE and NB’.– No significant signal loss due to tight cut on NB’.
Simultaneous fit for Dπ/DK.– Better understanding of Dπ/DK feed across.
Signal MCqq MC
![Page 7: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
1. Result for BDK GLW
![Page 8: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Dπ (KID < 0.6) / Dπ (KID > 0.6) = (7.65 ± 0.14)%, consistent w/ (7.94 ± 0.31)% in MC x Calib.
![Page 9: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
CP+
![Page 10: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
CP−
![Page 11: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
![Page 12: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Comparison of the Results
Since GGSZ observables are related to the same parameters (ϕ3, rB, δB),we obtain predictions on RCP± and ACP± from the GGSZ observables.
Our results are consistent with GGSZ predictions.
WA, GGSZ
Belle, GLW
WA, GLW
WA taken from HFAG 2011 summer.
Belle, GLW
WA, GLW
WA, GGSZ
ACP+ ACP−
1.0 1.1 1.2 1.30.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.30.7 0.8 0.9
0
−0.2
−0.4
0.4
0.2
0
−0.2
−0.4
0.4
0.2
RCP+ RCP−
![Page 13: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
2. Result for BD*K ADS
![Page 14: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
First Evidence for BD*K ADS Mode
Signal seen with 3.5σsignificance for D*Dγ mode.
Ratio to favored mode:
Difference between RDπ0 and RDγ: indication of the effect of the interference term 2rB*rD cos (δB*+δD) cos ϕ3 (opposite sign for RDπ0 and RDγ).
continuumSignal
D*π
BBDK/Dπ
SignalD*π
BBDK/Dπ
continuum
![Page 15: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Asymmetries for BD*K ADS Mode
Asymmetry:
Indication of opposite signfor ADπ0 and ADγ:consistent with expectation.(Opposite strong phasebetween D*Dπ0 and D*Dγ.)
Combining RDπ0, RDγ, ADπ0, and ADγ: indication of negative cos(δB*+δD)cosϕ3 and positive sin(δB*+δD)sinϕ3. Consistent with BD(*)K Dalitz result.
![Page 16: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Comparison of the Results
Since GGSZ observables are related to the same parameters (ϕ3, rB, δB),we obtain predictions on RADS and AADS from the GGSZ observables.
Our results are consistent with GGSZ predictions.
WA, GGSZ
Belle, ADS(Error of AADS,Dπ0 is larger,because of smaller RADS,Dπ0.)
WA, ADS
WA taken from HFAG 2011 summer.
Belle, ADS
WA, ADSWA, GGSZAADS,Dπ0 AADS,Dγ
0.03 0.04 0.05 0.060 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.060 0.01 0.02
0
−0.5
−1
1
0.5
0
−0.5
−1
1
0.5
RADS,Dπ0 RADS,Dγ
![Page 17: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
3. Extraction of ϕ3
![Page 18: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Global fit for ϕ3
Global ϕ3 fit using CKMfitter.
– Includes all BD(*)K observables over the experiments. Recent activities certainly improve the precision.
Now the precision is 10°! Significant contribution from Belle.
New results for BDK ADS added.Belle (PRL), CDF (PLHC11), and LHCb (EPS11).
New results by Belle forBD*K ADS (LP11) and BDK GLW (LP11).
![Page 19: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Summary and Plan
BDK GLW– Large asymmetry (~30%) for DCP+.
– Opposite signs for the asymmetries for CP+ and CP−. BD*K ADS
– First evidence (3.5σ) for D*Dγ.– Difference between D*Dγ and Dπ0: information of ϕ3.
Extraction of ϕ3
– Value obtained by CKMfitter is (68±10)°.– Significant contribution from recent results of Belle.
Will add DKSη(3π), KSω, and KSη’ in BDK GLW analysis, analyze BD*K GLW, and prepare paper draft.
![Page 20: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Backup slides
![Page 21: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Check for BD*π ADS: Validity of the Method
continuum
D*K
BBDK/Dπ
D*π
D*K
BBDK/Dπ
continuumD*π
![Page 22: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
ϕ3 from BDK, DCP eigenstates (GLW)
B-DCP+K-
CP violation clearly established.
New from Belle, full data (772M BB)
B+DCP+K+ B-DCP-K- B+DCP-K+
![Page 23: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
ϕ3 from BDK, Dsuppressed states (ADS)
LHCb also reported the evidence. Promising method for ϕ3 determination.
Y. Horii et al. (Belle),published in PRL 106, 231803 in June 2011
First evidence (4.1σ) obtained.Indication of negative asymmetry.
![Page 24: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
ϕ3 from BD*K, Dsuppressed states (ADS)
Suppressed mode alsoappearing in BD*K, D*Dγ mode.
New from Belle,full data (772M BB)
3.5σ
![Page 25: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
![Page 26: B D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.](https://reader036.fdocument.org/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649d0d5503460f949e1bdc/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26