ate of the Traversible Wormholes · 2006. 5. 17. · Traveler should cross it in a finite and...
Transcript of ate of the Traversible Wormholes · 2006. 5. 17. · Traveler should cross it in a finite and...
Fate
ofth
eTra
versib
leW
orm
hole
s—
–B
lack
-Hole
Colla
pse
or
Inflatio
nary
Expansio
n—
–
真貝寿明
Hisa
-akiShin
kai
理化学研究所 基礎科学特別研究員 (計算科学技術推進室)
Com
putationalSci.
Div.,
RIK
EN
(The
Instituteof
Physical
andChem
icalResearch),
Japan
Sean
A.H
ayw
ard
Dept.
ofScience
Education,
Ew
haW
omans
Univ.,
Seoul,
Korea
OU
TLIN
E
•Traversible
worm
hole(M
orris-Thorne
worm
hole,1988)
•Black
Hole
-W
ormhole
synthesis(H
ayward,
1999)
•“D
ynamical
Worm
hole”
•A
numerical
approach,dual-null
formulation
•A
newtyp
eof
criticalbehaviour??
HS
andS.A
.H
ayward,
Phys.
Rev.
D.66
(2002)044005
Morris-T
horne’s“T
raversable”worm
hole
M.S
.M
orrisand
K.S
.T
horne,Am
.J.
Phys.
56(1988)
395
M.S
.M
orris,K
.S.T
horne,and
U.Yurtsever,
PRL
61(1988)
3182
H.G
.Ellis,
J.M
ath.Phys.
14(1973)
104
(G.Clem
ent,Am
.J.
Phys.
57(1989)
967)
Desired
properties
oftraversable
WH
s
1.Spherically
symm
etricand
Static⇒
M.Visser,
PRD
39(89)3182
&N
PB
328(89)
203
2.Einstein
gravity
3.Asym
ptoticallyflat
4.N
ohorizon
fortravel
through
5.T
idalgravitational
forcesshould
be
small
fortraveler
6.Traveler
shouldcross
itin
afinite
andreasonably
small
proper
time
7.M
usthave
aphysically
reasonablestress-energy
tensor
⇒W
eakEnergy
Condition
isviolated
atthe
WH
throat.
⇒(N
ullEC
isalso
violatedin
generalcases.)
8.Should
be
perturbatively
stable
9.Should
be
possible
toassem
ble
1W
hy
Worm
hole
?
•T
heym
akegreat
sciencefiction
–short
cutsbetw
eenotherw
isedistant
regions.M
orris&
Thorne
1988,Sagan
“Contact”
etc
•T
heyincrease
ourunderstanding
ofgravity
when
theusual
energyconditions
arenot
satisfied,due
toquantum
effects
(Casim
ireff
ect,H
awking
radiation)or
alternativegravity
theories,brane-w
orldm
odelsetc.
•T
heyare
verysim
ilarto
blackholes
–both
contain(m
arginally)trapp
edsur-
facesand
canbe
definedby
trappinghorizons
(TH
).
Worm
hole≡H
ypersurface
foliatedby
marginally
trapped
surfaces
•BH
andW
Hare
interconvertible?N
ewduality?
BH
and
WH
arein
terconvertib
le?
(New
Duality?)
S.A
.H
ayward,
Int.J.
Mod.
Phys.
D8
(1999)373
•T
heyare
verysim
ilar–
both
contain(m
arginally)trapp
ed
surfacesand
canbe
defined
bytrapping
horizons(T
H)
•O
nlythe
causalnature
ofthe
TH
sdiff
ers,w
hetherT
Hs
evolvein
plus/
minus
density.
Black
Hole
Worm
hole
Locally
defined
by
Achronal(spatial/null)
outerT
H
Tem
poral
(timelike)
outerT
Hs
⇒1-w
aytraversable
⇒2-w
aytraversable
Einstein
eqs.Positive
energydensity
Negative
energydensity
normal
matter
(orvacuum
)“exotic”
matter
App
earanceoccur
naturallyU
nlikelyto
occurnaturally.
butconstructible
???
2Fate
ofM
orris-T
horn
e(E
llis)w
orm
hole
?
•“D
ynam
icalw
orm
hole
”defined
by
loca
ltra
ppin
ghorizo
n
•sp
herica
llysy
mm
etric,
both
norm
al/
ghost
KG
field
•apply
dual-n
ull
form
ula
tion
inord
er
tose
ek
horizo
ns
•N
um
erica
lsim
ula
tion
2.1
ghost/
norm
alK
lein
-Gord
on
field
s
Lagrangian:
L=√−
g
R16π−
14π
12(∇
ψ)2+
V1 (ψ
)
︸︷︷
︸norm
al
+14π
12(∇
φ)2+
V2 (φ
)
︸︷︷
︸ghost
The
fieldequations
Gµν
=2
ψ,µ ψ
,ν −g
µν
12(∇
ψ)2+
V1 (ψ
)
−2
φ,µ φ
,ν −g
µν
12(∇
φ)2+
V2 (φ
)
ψ=
dV
1 (ψ)
dψ
,φ
=dV
2 (φ)
dφ
.(H
ereafter,we
setV
1 (ψ)
=0,V
2 (φ)
=0)
2.2
dual-n
ull
form
ula
tion,sp
herica
llysy
mm
etric
space
time
SA
Hayw
ard,CQ
G10
(1993)779,
PRD
53(1996)
1938,CQ
G15
(1998)3147
•T
hespherically
symm
etricline-elem
ent:
ds
2=
r2d
S2−
2e −fd
x+dx−,
where
r=
r(x+,x
−),f
=f(x
+,x
−),···
•T
heEinstein
equations:
∂±∂±
r+
(∂±f)(∂±
r)=
−r(∂±
ψ) 2
+r(∂±
φ) 2,
r∂+∂−
r+
(∂+r)(∂−
r)+
e −f/2
=0,
r2∂
+∂−
f+
2(∂+r)(∂−
r)+
e −f
=+
2r2(∂
+ψ
)(∂−ψ
)−2r
2(∂+φ)(∂−
φ),
r∂+∂−
φ+
(∂+r)(∂−
φ)+
(∂−r)(∂
+φ)
=0,
r∂+∂−
ψ+
(∂+r)(∂−
ψ)+
(∂−r)(∂
+ψ
)=
0.
•To
obtaina
systemaccurate
near±,we
introducethe
conformal
factorΩ
=1/r
.W
ealso
definefirst-order
variables,the
conformally
rescaledm
omenta
expansionsϑ±
=2∂±
r=−
2Ω−
2∂±Ω
(θ±=
2r −1∂±
r)(1)
inaffinities
ν±=
∂±f
(2)
mom
entaof
φ℘±
=r∂±
φ=
Ω−
1∂±φ
(3)
mom
entaof
ψπ±
=r∂±
ψ=
Ω−
1∂±ψ
(4)
The
setof
equations(cont.):
∂±ϑ±
=−
ν±ϑ±−
2Ωπ
2±+
2Ω℘
2±,
(5)
∂±ϑ∓
=−
Ω(ϑ
+ϑ−/2
+e −
f),(6)
∂±ν∓
=−
Ω2(ϑ
+ϑ−/2
+e −
f−2π
+π−
+2℘
+℘−),
(7)
∂±℘∓
=−
Ωϑ∓℘±/2,
(8)
∂±π∓
=−
Ωϑ∓π±/2.
(9)
andrem
ember
theidentity:
∂+∂−
=∂−
∂+:
2.3
Initia
ldata
on
x+
=0,
x−
=0
slices
and
on
S
Generally,
we
haveto
set:(Ω
,f,ϑ
±,φ
,ψ)
onS
:x
+=
x−
=0
(ν±,℘
±,π
±)
onΣ±:
x∓
=0,
x±≥
0
Grid
Structure
forN
umerical
Evolution
xplusxm
inus
worm
hole throat
S
2.4
Morris-T
horn
e(E
llis)w
orm
hole
as
the
initia
ldata
onΣ
+(x
−=
0surface)
onΣ−
(x+
=0
surface)
Ω1/ √
a2+
z2
1/ √a
2+
z2
f0
0
ϑ±
±√
2z/ √a
2+
z2
∓√
2z/ √a
2+
z2
ν+
0
ν−0
φtan −
1(z/a)
−tan −
1(z/a)
℘+
+a/ √
2 √a
2+
z2
℘−
−a/ √
2 √a
2+
z2
ψ0
0
π+
0
π−
0
where
z=
(x+−
x−)/ √
2.
We
putthe
perturbation
in℘
+:
δ℘+
=ca
exp(−
cb (z−
cc )
2)
where
ca ,c
b ,cc
areparam
eters.
2.5
Gra
vita
tionalm
ass-e
nerg
y
•Localizing,
thelocal
gravitationalm
ass-energyis
givenby
theM
isner-Sharp
energyE
,
E=
(1/2)r[1−g −
1(dr,d
r)]=
(1/2)r+
efr
(∂+r)(∂−
r)=
12Ω[1
+12efϑ
+ϑ−]
while
the(localized
Bondi)
conformal
fluxvector
components
ϕ±
ϕ±
=r
2T±±∂±
r=
r2e
2fT∓∓∂±
r=
e2f(π
2∓−
℘2∓)ϑ
±/8π
.
•T
heyare
relatedby
theenergy
propagationequations
orunified
firstlaw
.∂±
E=
4πϕ±,
E(x
+,x
−)
=a2
+4π
∫(x
+,x −
)
(0,0)(ϕ
+dx
++
ϕ−dx−),
where
theintegral
isindep
endentof
path,by
conservationof
energy.
–lim
x+→
∞E
isthe
Bondi
energy
–lim
x+→
∞ϕ−
theBondi
fluxfor
theright-hand
universe.
–For
thestatic
worm
hole,the
energyE
=a
2/2 √a
2+
z2
iseveryw
herepositive,
maxim
al
atthe
throatand
zeroat
infinity,z→
±∞
,i.e.
theBondi
energyis
zero.
–G
enerally,the
Bondi
energy-lossprop
erty,that
itshould
be
non-increasingfor
matter
satisfyingthe
nullenergy
condition,is
reversedfor
theghost
field.
Num
erica
lG
rid/
Converg
ence
test
x plusx minus
wormhole throatS
Σ+
Σ−
0 5 10
05
1015
20
grid=801
grid=1601
grid=3201
grid=6401
grid=9601
x plus
x minus Figu
re1:
Num
ericalgrid
structu
re.In
itialdata
aregiven
onnull
hypersu
rfacesΣ
±(x
∓=
0,x±
>0)
and
their
intersection
S.
Figu
re2:
Con
vergence
beh
aviou
rof
the
code
forex
actstatic
worm
hole
initial
data.
The
location
ofth
etrap
pin
ghorizon
ϑ−
=0
isplotted
forseveral
resolution
slab
elledby
the
num
ber
ofgrid
poin
tsfor
x+
=[0,20].
We
seeth
atnum
ericaltru
ncation
erroreven
tually
destroy
sth
estatic
configu
ration.
Sta
tionary
Configura
tions
24
68
51
01
5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
x plusx m
inus
expansion plus
24
68
51
01
5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
x plusx m
inus
Energy
Figu
re2:
Static
worm
hole
configu
rationob
tained
with
the
high
estresolu
tioncalcu
lation:
(a)ex
pan
sionϑ
+an
d(b
)lo
calgrav
itational
mass-en
ergyE
areplotted
asfu
nction
sof
(x+,x
−).
Note
that
the
energy
ispositive
and
tends
tozero
atin
finity.
Ghost
pulse
input
–B
ifurca
tion
ofth
ehorizo
ns
0 2 4 6 8 10
02
46
810
x minus
x plus
(a) pu
lse inp
ut w
ith n
egative en
ergy
ghost scalar pulse
θ+ =
0
θ- =
0
Inflationary
expansion
θ+ <
0
θ- >
0
θ+ >
0
θ- <
00 2 4 6 8 10
02
46
810
x minus
x plus
(b1) p
ulse in
pu
t with
po
sitive energ
y
ghost scalar pulse
θ+ =
0
θ- =
0
Black
Hole
x- H
= 4.46
θ+ >
0
θ- <
0
θ+ <
0
θ- >
0
Figu
re3:
Horizon
location
s,ϑ±
=0,
forpertu
rbed
worm
hole.
Fig.(a)
isth
ecase
we
supplem
ent
the
ghost
field
,ca
=0.1,
and
(b1)
and
(b2)
arew
here
we
reduce
the
field
,ca
=−
0.1an
d−
0.01.D
ashed
lines
and
solidlin
esare
ϑ+
=0
and
ϑ−
=0
respectively.
Inall
cases,th
epulse
hits
the
worm
hole
throat
at(x
+,x
−)
=(3,3).
A45
counterclo
ckw
iserotation
ofth
efigu
recorresp
onds
toa
partial
Pen
rosediagram
.
Bifu
rcatio
nofth
ehorizo
ns
–go
toa
Bla
ckH
ole
or
Inflatio
nary
expansio
n
x plusx minus
Black HoleBlack Hole or orInflationaryInflationaryexpansionexpansionpulse
input
throat "throat"
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
02
46
810
12
amplitude =
+0.10
amplitude =
+0.01
no perturbationam
plitude = -0.01
amplitude =
-0.10
proper time on the "throat"
Areal Radius at the "throat"Figu
re4:
Partial
Pen
rosediagram
ofth
eevolved
space-tim
e.Figu
re6:
Areal
radiu
sr
ofth
e“th
roat”x
+=
x−,
plotted
asa
function
ofprop
ertim
e.A
ddition
alnegative
energy
causes
inflation
aryex
pan
sion,w
hile
reduced
negative
energy
causes
collapse
toa
black
hole
and
central
singu
larity.
Loca
lEnerg
yM
easu
re–
Dete
rmin
atio
nofth
eB
lack
Hole
Mass
0.0010
0.010
0.10
1.0 10
102
01
23
45
67
8
x plus = 12
x plus = 16
x plus = 20
Energy ( x+, x- )
x minus
(a) pu
lse inp
ut w
ith n
egative en
ergy
0.010
0.10
1.0
01
23
45
6
x plus = 12
x plus = 16
x plus = 20
Energy ( x+, x- )x m
inus
horizon θ+ =
0
formed at x
-=4
.46
(b1) p
ulse in
pu
t with
po
sitive energ
y
Black hole m
assM
= 0.42
Figu
re7:
Energy
E(x
+,x
−)as
afu
nction
ofx−,for
x+
=12,16,20.
Here
ca
is(a)
0.05,(b
1)−0.1
and
(b2)−
0.01.T
he
energy
fordiff
erentx
+coin
cides
atth
efinal
horizon
location
x−H
,in
dicatin
gth
atth
ehorizon
quick
lyattain
scon
stant
mass
M=
E(∞
,x−H
).T
his
isth
efinal
mass
ofth
eblack
hole
orcosm
ologicalhorizon
.
Isth
ere
aM
inim
um
Bla
ckH
ole
Mass
tobe
form
ed?
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.010-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
xH
- - 3
E0
(ca , c
b ) = (10
-4, 9)
(10-4, 6)
(10-4, 3)
(10-1, 3)
(10-1, 6)
(10-1, 9)
(a)
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.5010-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
M
E0
(b)
(10-1, 3)(10
-1, 6)
(10-1, 9)
(ca , c
b ) = (10
-4, 9)
(10-4, 6)
(10-4, 3)
Figu
re8:
Relation
betw
eenth
ein
itialpertu
rbation
and
the
final
mass
ofth
eblack
hole.
(a)T
he
trappin
ghorizon
(ϑ+
=0)
coord
inate,
x−H−
3(sin
cew
efixed
cc
=3),
versus
initial
energy
ofth
epertu
rbation
,E
0 .W
eplotted
the
results
ofth
eru
ns
ofca
=10 −
1,···,10 −4
with
cb
=3,6,
and
9.T
hey
lieclose
toon
elin
e.(b
)T
he
final
black
hole
mass
Mfor
the
same
exam
ples.
We
seeth
atM
appears
toreach
anon
-zerom
inim
um
forsm
allpertu
rbation
s.
Norm
alP
ulse
(atra
velle
r)In
put
–Form
ing
aB
lack
Hole
0 2 4 6 8
02
46
8
x minus
x plus
normal scalar
pulse
θ+ =
0
θ- =
0
Black
Hole
Figu
re9:
Evolu
tionof
aw
ormhole
pertu
rbed
by
anorm
alscalar
field
.H
orizonlo
cations:
dash
edlin
esan
dsolid
lines
areϑ
+=
0an
dϑ−
=0
respectively.
Critica
lM
inim
um
Bla
ckH
ole
Mass
again
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.010-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
xH
- - 3
E0
(a)
(ca , c
b ) = (10
- 2, 9)
(10- 2, 6)
(10-2, 3)
~ ~
(0.5, 3)
(0.5, 3)
(0.5, 6)
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.5010-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
M
E0
(b)
(0.5, 3)
(0.5, 6)
(0.5, 9)
(ca , c
b ) = (10
- 2, 3)
(10- 2, 9) (10
- 2, 6)
~ ~
Figu
re10:
The
same
plots
with
Fig.?
?for
the
small
conven
tional
field
pulses.
(a)T
he
trappin
ghorizon
(ϑ+
=0)
coord
inate,
x−H −
3(sin
cew
efixed
cc=
3),versu
sin
itialen
ergyof
the
pertu
rbation
,E
0 .W
eplotted
the
results
ofth
eru
nsof
ca
=0.5,···,10 −
2
with
cb=
3,6,an
d9.
They
lieclose
toon
elin
e.(b
)T
he
final
black
hole
mass
Mfor
the
same
exam
ples.
Tra
velth
rough
aW
orm
hole
–w
ithM
ain
tenace
Opera
tions!
0 2 4 6 8 10
02
46
810
x plus case A (no m
aintenance)
case C
case B
x minus
ghost scalar pulsefor m
aintenance
normal scalar pulse
(travellers)
Figu
re11:
Atrial
ofw
ormhole
main
tenan
ce.A
ftera
norm
alscalar
pulse,
we
signalled
agh
ostscalar
pulse
toex
tend
the
lifeof
worm
hole
throat.
The
travellerspulse
arecom
mon
lyex
pressed
with
anorm
alscalar
field
pulse,
(ca ,c
b ,cc )
=(+
0.1,6.0,2.0).H
orizonlo
cations
ϑ+
=0
areplotted
forth
reecases:
(A)
no
main
tenan
cecase
(results
ina
black
hole),
(B)
with
main
tenan
cepulse
of(c
a ,cb ,c
c )=
(0.02390,6.0,3.0)(resu
ltsin
anin
flation
aryex
pan
sion),
(C)
with
main
tenan
cepulse
of(c
a ,cb ,c
c )=
(0.02385,6.0,3.0)(keep
stationary
structu
reupto
the
end
ofth
isran
ge).
Discu
ssion
Dynam
icsofth
eEllis-M
orris-T
horn
etra
versib
lew
orm
hole
⇒W
His
Unsta
ble
(A)w
ithpositiv
eenerg
ypulse
⇒B
lack
Hole
(B)w
ithnegativ
eenerg
ypulse
⇒In
flatio
nary
expansio
n
⇒(A
)co
nfirm
sduality
conje
cture
betw
een
BH
and
WH
.
⇒(B
)pro
vid
es
am
ech
anism
for
enla
rgin
ga
quantu
mw
orm
hole
tom
acro
scopic
size.
•W
eansw
ere
dto
the
questio
nof:
what
happens
ifour
hero
(or
hero
ine)
atte
mpts
totra
verse
the
worm
hole
.
•N
ew
disco
verie
softh
ecritica
lbehavio
ur.
“Scie
nce
can
be
stranger
than
science
fictio
n.”