5.1 Second-Order linear PDE - Pennsylvania State University ·  · 2010-02-115.1 Second-Order...

10
5.1 Second-Order linear PDE Consider a second-order linear PDE L[u]= au xx +2bu xy + cu yy + du x + eu y + fu = g, (x,y) U (5.1) for an unknown function u of two variables x and y. The functions a,b and c are assumed to be of class C 1 and satisfying a 2 + b 2 + c 2 = 0. The operator L 0 [u] := au xx +2bu xy + cu yy consisting of the second order terms of L is called the principal part of L. Many of the fundamental properties of the solutions of (5.1) are determined by the sign of the discriminant of L. The discriminant Δ(L)(x,y) is defined by Δ(L)(x,y) = det ba cb = b 2 ac where a,b and c are evaluated at the point (x,y). We are interested in how the PDE is transformed under changes of coor- dinates. We consider a C 1 - map F (x,y)=(ξ (x,y)(x,y)) whose Jacobian satisfies detJ (x,y) = det ξ x ξ y η x η y =0 at each point of (x 0 ,y 0 ) U . The inverse function theorem implies that near the point (x 0 ,y 0 ) the map F has an inverse F -1 (ξ,η)=(x(ξ,η),y(ξ,η)). The inverse is of class C 1 . Now, assuming that u is a solution of (5.1), define w(ξ,η)= u(x(ξ,η),y(ξ,η)). Then u(x,y)= w(ξ (x,y)(x,y)) and, by the chain rule, u x = w ξ ξ x + w η η x u y = w ξ ξ y + w η η y u xx = w ξξ (ξ x ) 2 +2w ξη ξ x η x + w ηη (η x ) 2 + w ξ ξ xx + w η η xx u yy = w ξξ (ξ y ) 2 +2w ξη ξ y η y + w ηη (η y ) 2 + w ξ ξ yy + w η η yy u xy = u yx = w ξξ ξ x ξ y + w ξη (ξ x η y + η x ξ y )+ w ηη ξ x η y + w ξ ξ xy + w η η xy Substituting into (5.1), we find that L[w]= Aw ξξ +2Bw ξη + Cw ηη + Dw ξ + Ew η + Fw = G (5.2) 32

Transcript of 5.1 Second-Order linear PDE - Pennsylvania State University ·  · 2010-02-115.1 Second-Order...

Page 1: 5.1 Second-Order linear PDE - Pennsylvania State University ·  · 2010-02-115.1 Second-Order linear PDE Consider a second ... and η to be the solution of (5.10). To solve (5.9),

5.1 Second-Order linear PDE

Consider a second-order linear PDE

L[u] = auxx + 2buxy + cuyy + dux + euy + fu = g, (x, y) ∈ U (5.1)

for an unknown function u of two variables x and y. The functions a, b andc are assumed to be of class C1 and satisfying a2 +b2 +c2 6= 0. The operator

L0[u] := auxx + 2buxy + cuyy

consisting of the second order terms of L is called the principal part of L.Many of the fundamental properties of the solutions of (5.1) are determinedby the sign of the discriminant of L. The discriminant ∆(L)(x, y) is definedby

∆(L)(x, y) = det

[b ac b

]= b2 − ac

where a, b and c are evaluated at the point (x, y).We are interested in how the PDE is transformed under changes of coor-

dinates. We consider a C1- map F (x, y) = (ξ(x, y), η(x, y)) whose Jacobiansatisfies

detJ(x, y) = det

[ξx ξyηx ηy

]6= 0

at each point of (x0, y0) ∈ U . The inverse function theorem implies that nearthe point (x0, y0) the map F has an inverse F−1(ξ, η) = (x(ξ, η), y(ξ, η)).The inverse is of class C1. Now, assuming that u is a solution of (5.1),define w(ξ, η) = u(x(ξ, η), y(ξ, η)). Then u(x, y) = w(ξ(x, y), η(x, y)) and,by the chain rule,

ux = wξξx + wηηx

uy = wξξy + wηηy

uxx = wξξ(ξx)2 + 2wξηξxηx + wηη(ηx)2 + wξξxx +wηηxx

uyy = wξξ(ξy)2 + 2wξηξyηy + wηη(ηy)

2 + wξξyy + wηηyy

uxy = uyx = wξξξxξy + wξη(ξxηy + ηxξy) + wηηξxηy + wξξxy + wηηxy

Substituting into (5.1), we find that

L̃[w] = Awξξ + 2Bwξη + Cwηη +Dwξ + Ewη + Fw = G (5.2)

32

Page 2: 5.1 Second-Order linear PDE - Pennsylvania State University ·  · 2010-02-115.1 Second-Order linear PDE Consider a second ... and η to be the solution of (5.10). To solve (5.9),

with the coefficients of the principal part L̃0[w] = Awξξ + 2Bwξη + Cwηη

given byA(ξ, η) = aξ2x + 2bξxξy + cξ2y

B(ξ, η) = aξxηx + b(ξxηy + ξyηx) + cξyηy

C(ξ, η) = aη2

x + 2bηxηy + cη2

y

(5.3)

Observe that[A BB C

]=

[ξx ξyηy ηy

]·[a bb c

]·[ξx ηx

ξy ηy

]t

,

where t denotes the transpose of the matrix. Recalling that the determinantof the product of matrices is equal to the product of the determinants ofmatrices and that the determinant of a transpose of a matrix is equal to thedeterminant of a matrix, we get

det

[A BB A

]= det

[a bb c

]· (J(x, y))2. (5.4)

This shows that the discriminant of L has the same sign as the discriminantof the transformed equation and so it is an invariant of the change of coor-dinates. Consequently, we can classify equations (5.1) according to the signof the discriminant.

Definition 5.1. The equation (5.1) is called

• hyperbolic at (x, y) if ∆(L)(x, y) > 0.

• parabolic at (x, y) if ∆(L)(x, y) = 0.

• elliptic at (x, y) if ∆(L)(x, y) < 0.

Example 5.2. (i) The wave equation utt −uxx = 0 is a hyperbolic equa-tion.

(ii) The heat equation ut − uxx = 0 is a parabolic equation.

(iii) The Laplace equation uxx = uyy = 0 is an elliptic equation.

Example 5.3. Consider the Tricomi equation

yuxx + uyy = 0. (5.5)

Here a = y, b = 0, c = 1 and d = e = f = g = 0. Its discriminant is equal to

det

[b ac b

]= det

[0 y1 0

]= −y.

33

Page 3: 5.1 Second-Order linear PDE - Pennsylvania State University ·  · 2010-02-115.1 Second-Order linear PDE Consider a second ... and η to be the solution of (5.10). To solve (5.9),

Hence the equation (5.5) is hyperbolic for y < 0, parabolic when y = 0, andelliptic for y > 0.

Next we shall show that we can find changes of coordinates in which the(5.1) takes a simple form.

• Hyperbolic equations.

Suppose that equation (5.1) is hyperbolic on the domain U . This meansthat b2 − ac > 0 at each point of U . We shall show that in this we canchoose (x, y) 7→ (ξ(x, y), η(x, y)) so that

A(ξ, η) = aξ2x + 2bξxξy + cξ2y = 0 (5.6)

C(ξ, η) = aη2

x + 2bηxηy + cη2

y = 0. (5.7)

Under such a change of coordinates and dividing by 2B the hyperbolic equa-tion (5.1) takes its canonical form

L̃[w] = wξη + ℓ[w] = G, (5.8)

where ℓ is a first-order linear operator and G is function.Note that if a and c are equal to 0, then the equation (5.1) is already in itscanonical form (just divide by 2b). Hence without loss of generality we mayassume that a 6= 0. Note also that the equation (5.7) for η is the same as(5.6) for ξ. Hence it suffices to consider only one of the equations, say (5.6).It can be written as a product

a

[ξx − −b−

√b2 − ac

aξy

]·[ξx − −b+

√b2 − ac

aξy

]= 0

and so, we need to solve the following two linear equations

ξx − µ1ξy = 0 (5.9)

andξx − µ2ξy = 0, (5.10)

where we have abbreviated

µ1 =−b−

√b2 − ac

aand µ2 =

−b−√b2 − ac

a.

Note that µ1 and µ2 are the real solutions of the equation

aµ2 + 2bµ+ c = 0. (5.11)

34

Page 4: 5.1 Second-Order linear PDE - Pennsylvania State University ·  · 2010-02-115.1 Second-Order linear PDE Consider a second ... and η to be the solution of (5.10). To solve (5.9),

In order to obtain a nonsingular map (x, y) 7→ (ξ(x, y), η(x, y)), wechoose ξ to be the solution of (5.9) and η to be the solution of (5.10).To solve (5.9), we use the method of characteristics (except that we don’tspecify the initial condition). The characteristic equations are

dx

dt= 1,

dy

dt= −µ1,

dz

dt= 0.

The last equation says that the solution ξ is constant along each of the char-acteristics (x(t), y(t)). In view of the first two equations, the characteristicscan be obtain as curves y = y(x) solving

dy

dx=

dydtdxdt

= −µ1, (5.12)

and then the solution ξ is constant at points (x, y(x)). Similarly, one solves(5.10) to obtain η.

In summary, to choose ξ and η one solves the (5.11) to obtain two realroots µ1 and µ2. Then, denoting by

f(x, y) = C1 and g(x, y) = C2

the solutions of characteristics equations

dy

dx= −µ1(x, y and

dy

dx= −µ2(x, y), (5.13)

the variables ξ and η are defined by

ξ(x, y) = f(x, y), η(x, y) = g(x, y).

The solutions of both equations in (5.13) are called the two families of char-

acteristics of (5.1).

Example 5.4. Consideryuxx + uyy = 0

In the region where y < 0, the equation is hyperbolic. Solving yµ2 + 1 = 0,one finds two real solutions

µ1 = − 1

(−y)1/2and µ2 =

1

(−y)1/2

We look for two real families of characteristics, dydx +µ1 = 0 and dy

dx +µ2 = 0,

dy

dx− 1

(−y)1/2= 0 and

dy

dx+

1

(−y)1/2= 0.

35

Page 5: 5.1 Second-Order linear PDE - Pennsylvania State University ·  · 2010-02-115.1 Second-Order linear PDE Consider a second ... and η to be the solution of (5.10). To solve (5.9),

The solutions of the equations are

2

3(−y)3/2 + x = C1 and − 2

3(−y)3/2 + x = C2.

Therefore, we set

ξ =2

3(−y)3/2 + x and η = −2

3(−y)3/2 + x.

The derivatives of ξ and η are,

ξx = 1, ξy = −(−y)1/2, ηx = 1, ηy = (−y)1/2.

With u(x, y) = v(ξ(x, y), η(x, y), one gets

ux = vξ + vη

uy = −(−y)1/2vξ + (−y)1/2vη

uxx = vξξ + 2vξη + vηη

uyy = −yvξξ + 2yvξη − yvηη +1

2(−y)−1/2[vξ − vη].

Substituting into the equation, one obtains

0 = yuxx + uyy

= 4yvξη +1

2(−y)−1/2[vξ − vη] = 4y

[vξη −

1

8(−y)−3/2(vξ − vη)

].

Since ξ − η = 4

3(−y)3/2, one concludes that

vξη −1

6(ξ − η)(vξ − vη) = 0.

• Parabolic equations.

Suppose that (5.1) is parabolic on the domain U . Hence b2 − ac = 0 ateach point of U . As before assume that a 6= 0 on U . We find a map(x, y) 7→ (ξx, y), η(x, y)) so that B(ξ, η) = A(ξ, η) = 0. It suffices to makeA = 0 since 0 = B2 − AC = B2 implies that B(ξ, η) = 0. Under sucha change of coordinates the parabolic equation (5.1) can be brought to itscanonical form

L̃[w] = wξξ + ℓ[w] = G(ξ, η)

where ℓ is a first-order linear operator and G is function.

36

Page 6: 5.1 Second-Order linear PDE - Pennsylvania State University ·  · 2010-02-115.1 Second-Order linear PDE Consider a second ... and η to be the solution of (5.10). To solve (5.9),

To do this we look for (x, y) 7→ ξ(x, y) so that

A(ξ, η) = aξ2x + 2bξxξy + cξ2y = 0.

Since b2 = ac, we have

aξ2x + 2bξxξy + cξ2y = a

(ξ2x + 2

b

aξxξy +

b2

a2ξ2y

)= a (ξx − µξy)

2 ,

where µ = − ba is the double root of

aµ2 + 2bµ+ c = 0.

So, we look for the solution ξ of the first-order linear equation,

ξx − µξy = 0.

The solution ξ is constant along each characteristic which is determined bythe equation

dy

dx= −µ =

b

a. (5.14)

For the map (x, y) 7→ η(x, y) we can take any map so that ξxξ − ξyξx 6= 0.In summary, in the parabolic case to choose ξ and η one solves the (5.11)

to obtain double root µ = −b/a. Then, denoting by

f(x, y) = C

the solution of characteristics equation

dy

dx= −µ (5.15)

the variable ξ is defined by

ξ(x, y) = f(x, y)

and the variable η is chosen so that ξxξ − ξyξx 6= 0.

Example 5.5. Reduce the following equation to its canonical form and then

find the general solution,

x2uxx − 2xyuxy + y2uyy + xux + yuy = 0

for x > 0.

37

Page 7: 5.1 Second-Order linear PDE - Pennsylvania State University ·  · 2010-02-115.1 Second-Order linear PDE Consider a second ... and η to be the solution of (5.10). To solve (5.9),

The discriminant is equal to

det

[−xy x2

y2 −xy

]= 0

so that the equation is parabolic. The quadratic equation x2µ2−2xyµ+y2 =0 has exactly one solution, µ = y

x . Next we look for characteristics. Theseare solutions of the equation

dy

dx= µ, i.e.,

dy

dx= −y

x.

The family of solutions is given by xy = C. Therefore, we define ξ(x, y) = xyand we take as the second independent variable η(x, y) = x. Then

ξx = y, ξy = x, ηx = 1, ηy = 0.

The Jacobian of the map (x, y) 7→ (ξ(x, y), η(x, y)) is nonzero. Let v(ξ, η) =u(x(ξ, η), y(ξ, η)), that is, u(x, y) = v(ξ(x, y), η(x, y)). Using the chain rule,

ux = yvξ + vη

uy = xvξ

uxx = y2vξξ + 2yvξη + vηη

uxy = xyvξξ + xvξη + vξ

uyy = x2vξξ.

Substituting into the equation, one gets

x2vηη + xvη = 0,

so that, using x = η,

vηη +1

ηvη = 0.

To solve this equation introduce the function w = vη. Then

wη = −1

ηw

which has the general solution w = 1

ηA(ξ). So,

vη =1

ηA(ξ)

38

Page 8: 5.1 Second-Order linear PDE - Pennsylvania State University ·  · 2010-02-115.1 Second-Order linear PDE Consider a second ... and η to be the solution of (5.10). To solve (5.9),

which after integration gives

v(ξ, η) = A(ξ) ln η +B(ξ).

Since ξ(x, y) = xy and η(x, y) = x and u(x, y) = v(ξ(x, y), η(x, y)), thegeneral solution of the equation has the form

u(x, y) = A(xy) ln x+B(xy)

where A,B are two arbitrary functions of class C2.

• Elliptic equations.

Suppose that (5.1) is elliptic on the domain U . Then b2 − ac < 0 at eachpoint of U . This time we look for the map (x, y) 7→ (xξ(x, y), η(x, y)) sothat

A(ξ, η) = aξ2x + 2bξxξy + cξ2y = C(ξ, η) = aη2

x + 2bηxηy + cη2

y

B(ξ, η) = aξxηx + b(ξxηy + ξyηx) + cξyηy = 0.

Under such a change of coordinates and dividing by A, the elliptic equa-tion (5.1) can be brought to its canonical form

L̃[w] = wξξ + wηη + ℓ[w] = G(ξ, η)

where ℓ is a first-order linear operator.The above system consists of two nonlinear first-order equations. Sub-

tracting C(ξ, η) form A(ξ, η) and multiplying B(ξ, η) by 2i leads to thefollowing system,

a(ξ2x − η2

x) + 2b(ξxξy − ηxηy) + c(ξ2y − η2

y) = 0

aξx(2iηx) + b(ξx(2iηy) + ξy(2iηx)) + cξy(2iηy) = 0.

Consequently, setting φ = ξ + iη, one finds that the above system is equiv-alent to

aφ2

x + 2bφxφy + cφ2

y = 0.

This can be written as a product,

a [φx − µ1φy] · [φx − µ2φy] = 0,

where we have abbreviated

µ1 =−b− i

√ac− b2

aand µ2 =

−b− i√ac− b2

a.

39

Page 9: 5.1 Second-Order linear PDE - Pennsylvania State University ·  · 2010-02-115.1 Second-Order linear PDE Consider a second ... and η to be the solution of (5.10). To solve (5.9),

These are complex roots of

aµ2 + 2bµ+ c = 0.

Note that µ1 and µ2 are conjugated, i.e., µ1 = µ2. As in the hyperbolic casewe solve the characteristics equations

dy

dx= −µ1 and

dy

dx= −µ2. (5.16)

This time the solutions are complex. If f(x, y) = C1 and g(x, y) = C2 arecomplex solutions of (5.16), then

φ(x, y) = f(x, y) and ψ(x, y) = g(x, y).

Then set

ξ =1

2(φ+ ψ) and η =

1

2i(φ− ψ).

Example 5.6. Consideryuxx + uyy = 0

In the region where y > 0, the equation is elliptic. Solving yµ2 + 1 = 0, onefinds two complex solutions

µ1 =i

y1/2and µ2 = − i

y1/2

We look for two complex families of characteristics, dydx+µ1 = 0 and dy

dx+µ2 =0,

dy

dx+

i

y1/2= 0 and

dy

dx− i

y1/2= 0.

The solutions of the equations are

2

3y3/2 + ix = C1 and

2

3y3/2 − ix = C2.

Therefore, we set

φ =2

3y3/2 + x and ψ =

2

3y3/2 − x,

and then

ξ =1

2(φ+ ψ) =

2

3y3/2 and η =

1

2i(φ− ψ) = x.

40

Page 10: 5.1 Second-Order linear PDE - Pennsylvania State University ·  · 2010-02-115.1 Second-Order linear PDE Consider a second ... and η to be the solution of (5.10). To solve (5.9),

The derivatives of ξ and η are,

ξx = 0, ξy = y1/2, ηx = 1, ηy = 0.

With u(x, y) = v(ξ(x, y), η(x, y), one gets

ux = vη

uy = y1/2vξ

uxx = vηη

uyy = yvξξ +1

2y−1/2vξ.

Substituting into the equation, one obtains

vξξ + vηη +1

2y3/2vξ = 0.

Finally, since ξ = 2

3y3/2, the equation becomes

vξξ + vηη +3

ξvξ = 0.

41