EPSS On-line

Off-line EPSS

CD-Rom

DiskettePaper version

Paper version

Two adresses : mail = Hand delivery-Private courrier services =

FP6-Research Proposals FP6-Research Proposals(Call identifier………) (Call identifier………) European Commission European CommissionB-1049 Brussels rue de Genève 1

B-1140 Brussels

Cases of non elligibility

1. Proposals arriving after the date and time specified in the call concerned will be excluded.

2. Proposals not satisfying the conditions relating to the minimum of participants indicated in the call concerned will be excluded.

3. In case of successive submissions of the same proposal for an indirect RTD action, the Commission will examine the last version received before the closure date.

4. If the same proposal is submitted in paper and electronic format, the Commission will only examine the text submitted under the electronic format.

5. Proposals submitted by email or by fax will be excluded.

Specific cases submitted to the Commission

At the end of each closure of proposals EPSS send a report explaining the problems met. During the last call TI-3-Main, we had the following cases to solve :

• Proposal submitted in wrong call• Proposals submitted on-line but the coordinator oversight to press the

submit button• The coordinator had no time to upload the different parts of the proposal in the system for different reasons and sent them by email after the closure time• They change the content of the proposal just before the closure time and had no time to upload the new version and sent it by email.

On 12 cases presented, 5 have been accepted by a committee of eligibility composed of 2 lawyers of the Commission, an expert in EPSS knowing the different situations and the system, and the call coordinator.

EVALUATION 2004 TI-3-Main: All Proposals

12-0

5-04

06-0

6-04

07-0

6-04

12-0

6-04

499 PROPOSALSRECEIVED

1 transferred to Science & society

1 duplicate

4 non eligible

316 PROPOSALSWere submitted

electronically Representing

63 %

493 PROPOSALSEVALUATED

In17 GROUPS

By185 Experts

Budget : 1.06 B€

Subdivided in 423 STREP

32 CA38 SSA

Subdivision of proposals by panel Nb prop

Panel n° 1 - 3.4.1.1-1 Self-organisation,-assemblingPanel n° 1 - 3.4.1.1-1 Self-organisation,-assembling 47

Panel n° 2 - 3.4.1.1-2 Molecular MotorsPanel n° 2 - 3.4.1.1-2 Molecular Motors 10

Panel n° 3 - 3.4.1.1-3 Expanding knowledge.. Panel n° 3 - 3.4.1.1-3 Expanding knowledge.. 3

Panel n° 4 - 3.4.1.2-1 New knowledge on interfacesPanel n° 4 - 3.4.1.2-1 New knowledge on interfaces 22

Panel n° 5 - 3.4.1.4-1 Char. &/or manipulation…Panel n° 5 - 3.4.1.4-1 Char. &/or manipulation… 25

Panel n° 6 - 3.4.1.5-1 Impact on human healthPanel n° 6 - 3.4.1.5-1 Impact on human health 8

Panel n° 7 - 3.4.1.5-2 Ethical,legal,social aspects res Panel n° 7 - 3.4.1.5-2 Ethical,legal,social aspects res 10

Panel n° 8 - 3.4.2.1-1 Understanding mat. Pheno. Panel n° 8 - 3.4.2.1-1 Understanding mat. Pheno. 8

Panel n° 9 - 3.4.2.1-2 Modelling & design of mf mat Panel n° 9 - 3.4.2.1-2 Modelling & design of mf mat 65

Panel n° 10 - 3.4.2.2-1 Mat. processing Panel n° 10 - 3.4.2.2-1 Mat. processing 103

Panel n° 11 - 3.4.2.2-3 Intel. Bio-ma for tissue repairPanel n° 11 - 3.4.2.2-3 Intel. Bio-ma for tissue repair 41

Panel n° 12- 3.4.2.3-1 Materials by designPanel n° 12- 3.4.2.3-1 Materials by design 48

Panel n° 13 - 3.4.2.3-3 Meas. & testing of mf matPanel n° 13 - 3.4.2.3-3 Meas. & testing of mf mat 3

Panel n° 14 - 3.4.2.3-4 Mapping on multi-funct. matPanel n° 14 - 3.4.2.3-4 Mapping on multi-funct. mat 11

Panel n° 15 - 3.4.3.1-1 Friendly prod. technologies. Panel n° 15 - 3.4.3.1-1 Friendly prod. technologies. 13

Panel n° 16 - 3.4.3.3-2 New life-cycled optimizedPanel n° 16 - 3.4.3.3-2 New life-cycled optimized 61

Panel n° 17 - 3.4.3.3-3 Increasing the user awarnessPanel n° 17 - 3.4.3.3-3 Increasing the user awarness 15

  493

Subdivision of the partners by MS

0,00

2,00

4,00

6,00

8,00

10,00

12,00

14,00

16,00

18,00

20,00

Austria

Belgium

Cypru

s

Czech

Rep

ublic

Denmark

Estonia

Finlan

d

France

German

y

Greec

e

Hunga

ry

Irelan

dIta

ly

Latvi

a

Lithu

ania

Luxe

mbourg

Malta

Netherl

ands

Poland

Portug

al

Slovak

ia

Sloven

iaSpa

in

Sweden

United

King

dom

Subdivision of the funding by MS

0,00

5,00

10,00

15,00

20,00

25,00

Research27%

1%

Industry32%

Others3%

Higher Education

37%

Subdivision of partners by type of organisationSTREP

3%Research

33%

Industry22%

Others16%

Higher Education

26%

Subdivision of partners by type of organisationCA - SSA

SUBDIVISION OF EXPERTS BY TYPE OF ORGANISATION

IND25%

OTHER2%

REC34%

U39%

Subdivision of the experts by country

0,00

2,00

4,00

6,00

8,00

10,00

12,00

14,00%

Budget Scenario - TI Received Eligible

Indicative Budget

12/05/04 07/06/04

M€

499 prop

4572 partners

60 proposals105M€

Selected1,056 1,047M€

493 prop

4536partners

1 out of 8

2.3 M€/prop.

9 part/prop.

120 M€

1out of 5

New Instruments (NI)• The second stage proposals are currently being

evaluated • Two IP proposals with Greek coordinators have

passed (AERONAO -Konstadopoulos and Galiotis). There are no data for the partners (they are not mentioned in the first stage)

• Final results for STREPS (and possibly for NI) will be announced on July 20th