Simulation of Acceptance for conical parameters of Lightguide

Post on 15-Feb-2016

41 views 0 download

description

Simulation of Acceptance for conical parameters of Lightguide. S. B. A. R. Definitions: 2a = AB = 8 mm[fixed by choice of PMT] 2b = CD = variable [> 18 mm; fixed by space constraints] c = DN = ( b -a) [fixed by a and b , but convenient!] - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Simulation of Acceptance for conical parameters of Lightguide

John Fry NA62_UK 20-05-2011 1

Simulation of Acceptance for conical parameters of Lightguide

John Fry NA62_UK 20-05-2011 2

A B

CD N

S

Q

P

R

α

β

(α+β)

(α+3β)Definitions:2a = AB = 8 mm [fixed by choice of PMT]2b = CD = variable [> 18 mm; fixed by space constraints]c = DN = (b-a) [fixed by a and b, but convenient!]L = AN [free to vary, but as small as possible] L tanβ = c [β is constrained by a, b, and L]

Coordinates and geometry:D (0, 0); A ((b-a), L); B ((b+a), L); C (2b, 0)Q is the photon impact point (x0, y0) = (y0 tanβ, y0) [for y0 < L]Any photon impacting the cone at Q will reach the PMT in one reflection provided y0 lies between L and the following value:

P is at the centre of curvature on the radius vector bisecting AB

John Fry NA62_UK 20-05-2011 3

17 19 21 23 25 27 29 310

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Effective Area versus Cone Diameter Collection Efficiency versus Cone Diameter

Cone Diameter (mm)

20 mm cone length

Optimum outer diameter <21 mm.

John Fry NA62_UK 20-05-2011 4

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 250

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Effective Area versus Cone Diameter Collection Efficiency versus Cone Diameter

Cone Diameter (mm)

15 mm cone length

Optimum outer diameter <19 mm.

John Fry NA62_UK 20-05-2011 5

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 250

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Effective Area versus Cone Diameter Collection Efficiency versus Cone Diameter

Cone Diameter (mm)

10 mm cone length

Optimum outer diameter <17 mm. Not acceptable for DOuter = 18 mm

John Fry NA62_UK 20-05-2011 6

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000.000

0.100

0.200

0.300

0.400

0.500

0.600

0.700

0.800

0.900

1.000

Fraction of reflected light versus angle

Angle of incidence (degrees)

Frac

tion

of li

ght r

eflec

ted

The conical angle, β, increases with DOuter . The angle of incidenceIncreases with 2nβ for n reflections. Transmission decreases rapidly.

John Fry NA62_UK 20-05-2011 7

1.9 2.4 2.9 3.4 3.9 4.4 4.9 5.4 5.950

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Comparision of Al MgF2 deposits for NA62

Glass Al MgF2 30° simulationGlass Al MgF2 68° simulationGlass Al MgF2 77° simulationGlass Al MgF2 31nm 30° measurementGlass Al MgF2 31nm 68° measurement

Energie in EV

Refle

ction

in %

Cone length 15 mmHalf-angle = 18.4o

[71.6o for comparison with above]