Shortest Path Algorithms · Given a Graph Path P= V 1 V 2 V 3 … V k has weight W(p) = ¦ Shortest...

Post on 22-Aug-2020

5 views 0 download

Transcript of Shortest Path Algorithms · Given a Graph Path P= V 1 V 2 V 3 … V k has weight W(p) = ¦ Shortest...

Shortest Path Algorithms

Deliverables

Shortest Path Algorithms

Dijkstra Algorithm

Bellman Ford Algorithm

Ford Fulkerson

Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 6/12/2012 6:29 PM 2

Definition

Given a Graph Path P= V1 V2 V3… Vk has weight

W(p) =

Shortest path from u to v is a path of minimum possible weight from u to v. Shortest path weight from u to v is

δ(u, v) = min{ W(p) : P from u to v}

= ∞ if there is no path from u to v

Negative edge weights does not affect the definition of shortest path, however if there is a cycle containing negative edge weight then the shortest path does not exist and δ(u, v) = - ∞

Copyright @ gdeepak.com®

1

1)

1

( ~

k

i i

i

w V V

6/12/2012 6:29 PM 3

Optimal substructure property

• A sub path of a shortest path is a shortest path

• U to V has a shortest path including the sub path X to Y. If there is an alternative shortest path from x to y, then that should have been included in calculating shortest path from u to v.

Copyright @ gdeepak.com®

u x y v

Hypothetical shortest path

6/12/2012 6:29 PM 4

Triangle Inequality

• For all vertices u, v, x є V

• δ (u, v) ≤ δ(u, x) + δ (x, v)

Copyright @ gdeepak.com®

u

x

v δ(u,v)

δ(x,v) δ(u,x)

6/12/2012 6:29 PM 5

Single Source Shortest Path

From a given source vertex s є V find shortest path weight δ (s, v) for all v є V.

The best way to solve from a to b is no easier then solving from a to every one else.

Assuming No negative weights exist and w(u, v) ≥ 0

Means shortest paths exist provided path exist otherwise δ(u, v) = -∞

Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 6/12/2012 6:29 PM 6

Greedy approach

1. Maintain set S of vertices whose shortest path distance from s is known s є S

2. At each step add to S one vertex v є {V-S} whose estimated distance from s is

minimum.

3. Update distance estimates of vertices adjacent to v.

Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 6/12/2012 6:29 PM 7

Dijkstra Example

• Q A B C D E

Copyright @ gdeepak.com®

A

B

C

D

E

10

3

2

1 4

2

9 7

8

6/12/2012 6:29 PM 8

Dijkstra Example

• Q A B C D E

• 0 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Copyright @ gdeepak.com®

A

B

C

D

E

10

3

2

1 4

2

9 7

8

0

s

6/12/2012 6:29 PM 9

Dijkstra Example

• Q A B C D E

• 0 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

• 10 3 ∞ ∞

Copyright @ gdeepak.com®

A

B

C

D

E

10

3

2

1 4

2

9 7

8

10

3

0

s

6/12/2012 6:29 PM 10

Dijkstra Example

• Q A B C D E

• 0 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

• 10 3 ∞ ∞

• 7 11 5

Copyright @ gdeepak.com®

A

B

C

D

E

10

3

2

1 4

2

9 7

8

7

3

11

5

0

s

6/12/2012 6:29 PM 11

Dijkstra Example

• Q A B C D E

• 0 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

• 10 3 ∞ ∞

• 7 11 5

• 7 11

Copyright @ gdeepak.com®

A

B

C

D

E

10

3

2

1 4

2

9 7

8

7

3

11

5

0

s

6/12/2012 6:29 PM 12

Dijkstra Example

• Q A B C D E

• 0 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

• 10 3 ∞ ∞

• 7 11 5

• 7 11

• 9

Copyright @ gdeepak.com®

A

B

C

D

E

10

3

2

1 4

2

9 7

8

7

3

9

5

0

s

6/12/2012 6:29 PM 13

Algorithm

• Dijkstra Algorithm(G,V,E) • d[s] 0 • for each v є V –{s} • do d[v] ∞ • S Φ • Q V • while Q ≠ Null • do u Extract-min(Q) • S S Union {u} • for each v є Adj(u) • do if d[v] > d[u] + w(u, v) • then d[v] d[v] + w(u, v) # implicit decrease key or relaxation step

Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 6/12/2012 6:29 PM 14

Time Complexity

• Shortest path tree is union of all shortest path.

• Complexity = |v| extract-min + |E| decrease key

• For Array O(V2)

• For Binary heap O(V+E) lgV

• For Fibonacci Heap O(E+V lg V)

• Dijkstra is equivalent to a BFS if weights of all the edges are taken as one.

Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 6/12/2012 6:29 PM 15

Bellman Ford Algorithm

• Computes δ (s, v) from source vertex s є V to all vertices v є V or reports that a negative weight cycle exists

• Bellman_Ford(G, w, s) • D[s] 0 • For each v є V-{s} • do d[v] ∞ • For i 1 to |v|-1 • do for each edge (u, v) є E • do if d[v] > d[u] + w(u, v) • then d[v] d[u] + w(u, v) • For each edge (u, v) є E • do if d[v] > d[u] + w(u, v) • then report that a negative weight cycle exists • Else d[v] = δ (s, v)

Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 6/12/2012 6:29 PM 16

Time Complexity

Nonnegative edge weights

Dijkstra’s algorithm: O(E + V lg V)

General

Bellman-Ford: O(VE)

DAG

One pass of Bellman-Ford: O(V + E)

Bellman Ford is Slower then Dijkstra but Dijkstra does not handle negative edge weights

Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 6/12/2012 6:29 PM 17

Bellman Ford Example

• A B C D E

Copyright @ gdeepak.com®

A

B

E

C D

-1

3

4

2

5

2

1

-3

6/12/2012 6:29 PM 18

Bellman Ford Example

• A B C D E

• 0 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Copyright @ gdeepak.com®

A

B

E

C D

-1

3

4

2

5

2

1

-3

0

#1

#5 #8

#6

#4

#7

#2

#3

6/12/2012 6:29 PM 19

Bellman Ford Example

We start from #1, ∞ +2 is ∞ so no change

Then edge #2, ∞ +2 is ∞ so no change

Then edge #3, ∞ +1 is ∞ so no change

Then edge #4, 0 + (-1) is -1 which is less than ∞ so change to -1

Then edge #5, 0 +4 Which is less that ∞ so change it to 4

Then edge #6, ∞ +5 is ∞ so no change

Then edge #7, -1 +3 is 2 so change 4 to 2

Then edge #8, ∞ - 3 is ∞ so no change

6/12/2012 6:33 PM Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 20

Bellman Ford Example

• A B C D E

• 0 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

• 0 -1 ∞ ∞ ∞

• 0 -1 4 ∞ ∞

Copyright @ gdeepak.com®

A

B

E

C D

-1

3

4

2

5

2

1

-3

-1

0

4

#1

#5 #8

#6

#4

#7

#2

#3

6/12/2012 6:29 PM 21

Bellman Ford Example

• A B C D E

• 0 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

• 0 -1 ∞ ∞ ∞

• 0 -1 4 ∞ ∞

• 0 -1 2 ∞ ∞

Copyright @ gdeepak.com®

A

B

E

C D

-1

3

4

2

5

2

1

-3

-1

0

2

#1

#5 #8

#6

#4

#7

#2

#3

6/12/2012 6:29 PM 22

Bellman Ford Example

• A B C D E

• 0 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

• 0 -1 ∞ ∞ ∞

• 0 -1 4 ∞ ∞

• 0 -1 2 ∞ ∞

• 0 -1 2 ∞ 1

Copyright @ gdeepak.com®

A

B

E

C D

-1

3

4

2

5

2

1

-3

-1

0

2

1

#1

#5 #8

#6

#4

#7

#2

#3

6/12/2012 6:29 PM 23

Bellman Ford Example

• A B C D E

• 0 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

• 0 -1 ∞ ∞ ∞

• 0 -1 4 ∞ ∞

• 0 -1 2 ∞ ∞

• 0 -1 2 ∞ 1

• 0 -1 2 1 1

Copyright @ gdeepak.com®

A

B

E

C D

-1

3

4

2

5

2

1

-3

1

-1

0

2

1

#1

#5 #8

#6

#4

#7

#2

#3

6/12/2012 6:29 PM 24

Bellman Ford Example

• A B C D E

• 0 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

• 0 -1 ∞ ∞ ∞

• 0 -1 4 ∞ ∞

• 0 -1 2 ∞ ∞

• 0 -1 2 ∞ 1

• 0 -1 2 1 1

• 0 -1 2 -2 1

Copyright @ gdeepak.com®

A

B

E

C D

-1

3

4

2

5

2

1

-3

-2

-1

0

2

1

#1

#5 #8

#6

#4

#7

#2

#3

6/12/2012 6:29 PM 25

Few points

It is also possible to implement this algorithm in distributed systems because the relaxation step is local and can be independent of other parts.

Bellman ford is used a lot in internet to find the shortest path

If bellman ford fails to converge after |v-1| rounds then there is a negative edge cycle

Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 6/12/2012 6:29 PM 26

All Pairs Shortest Path

• Non Negative Edge Weights

• Dijkstra’s Algorithm |V| times: O(VE + V2lgV)

• Bellman Ford ( once from each vertex)

• Time O(V2E) so for Dense Graph O(v4)

Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 6/12/2012 6:29 PM 27

Another Approach

Consider nXn adjacency matrix A=(aij) of the digraph and define

(dij)(m) =Weight of a shortest path from i to j that uses at

most m edges.

dij(0) = 0 if i=j

dij(0) = ∞ if i≠j

and for m= 1,2,…,n-1

(dij)(m) = mink

{(dik)(m-1) +akj}

Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 6/12/2012 6:29 PM 28

(dij)(m) = mink

{(dik)(m-1) +akj}

for m← 1 to n-1

do for i ← 1 to n

do for j ← 1 to n

do for k ← 1 to n

do if dij > dik + akj

then dij ← dik + akj

Complexity O(n4)

6/12/2012 6:29 PM Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 29

Relaxation Step

No negative weight cycle means

δ (i, j) = dij(n-1)=dij

(n) =dij(n+1)=…

6/12/2012 6:29 PM Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 30

Similarity to Matrix Multiplication

Compute C=A . B, where C, A and B are n x n matrices: cij= 𝑎𝑖𝑘𝑏𝑘𝑗

𝑛𝑘=1

Time = O(n3) using the standard algorithm

There is an identical pattern in the All pair shortest Path if we map + to min and X to +

cij = mink{aik+bkj}

D(m)=D(m-1)XA

where A0= Identity Matrix= 1 ∞ ∞∞ 1 ∞∞ ∞ 1

= I= D0=dij(0)

6/12/2012 6:29 PM Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 31

Similarity to matrix multiplication

• (min,+) multiplication is associative and with real numbers.

• D1=D0.A=A1

• D2=D1.A=A2

• .

• .

• Dn-1=Dn-2.A=An-1 which is equal to δ (i,j)

• Time=O(n.n3) = O(n4) which is no better then the previous ones

6/12/2012 6:29 PM Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 32

Improved Matrix Multiplication

• A2k= AkXAk

• Computing A2, A4,…… in O(lgn) squaring's

• Time = O(n3lgn)

• It can be further improved with Strassen matrix multiplication.

• To detect negative weight cycle check the diagonal for negative values in O(n) additional time

6/12/2012 6:29 PM Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 33

Floyd Warshall Algorithm

cij(k)weight of a shortest path from i to j with intermediate

vertices belonging to the set {1, 2, …, k}

δ(i,j)=cij(n)=aij

6/12/2012 6:29 PM Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 34

Floyd-Warshall Recurrence

6/12/2012 6:29 PM Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 35

Floyd Warshall Recurrence

for k← 1 to n

do for i ← 1 to n

do for j ← 1 to n

do if cij > cik + ckj

then cij ← cik + ckj

• Complexity O(n3)

• It is simple and efficient

6/12/2012 6:29 PM Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 36

Relaxation

Reweighing of edges

Given a label h(v) for each v ∈ V, reweight each edge (u, v) ∈ E by ŵ(u, v) = w(u, v) + h(u) – h(v).

Then, all paths between the same two vertices are reweighted by the same amount

6/12/2012 6:29 PM Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 37

Johnson’s Algorithm

1. Find a vertex labelling h such that ŵ(u, v) ≥ 0 for all (u, v) ∈ E by using Bellman-Ford to solve the difference constraints h(v) – h(u) ≤ w(u, v), or determine that a negative-weight cycle exists. Time = O(VE). 2. Run Dijkstra’s algorithm from each vertex using ŵ. Time = O(VE + V2 lg V). 3. Reweight each shortest-path length ŵ(p) to produce the shortest-path lengths w(p) of the original graph. Time = O(V2). Total time = O(VE + V2 lg V).

6/12/2012 6:29 PM Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 38

Johnson’s algorithm

3 7

4

2

8

-4

6

1 -5

Johnson’s algorithm

3 7

4

2

8

-4

6

1 -5

s

0

0

0

0

0

Add a point s, with a weight 0 edge to each point

Johnson’s algorithm

-1

0 -5

-4 0

3 7

4

2

8

-4

6

1 -5

s

0

0

0

0

0

Implementation of the Bellman-Ford algorithm, a self-s starting shortest distance.

Apply Reweighing

• For edge (0,-4) with w(u, v) as -4 New weight is

w(u, v) + h(u) – h(v) which is [-4+ 0 – (-4) ] = 0

• For edge (0,-1) with w(u, v) as 3 New weight is

w(u, v) + h(u) – h(v) which is [3+ 0 – (-1) ] = 4

and so on

6/12/2012 6:40 PM Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 42

Johnson’s algorithm

-1

0 -5

-4 0

4 10

0

2

13

0

2

0 0

Done

reweighting

Interesting

• Longest path problem is NP-complete because of presence of positive weight cycles.

• DAG’s with negative weights can be done in O(e)

Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 6/12/2012 6:29 PM 44

Questions, Comments and Suggestions

Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 6/12/2012 6:29 PM 45

Question 1

Adding same weight to all the graph edges keeps the shortest path intact?

A) True

B) False

Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 6/12/2012 6:29 PM 46

Question 2

Given a graph G = (V;E) with positive edge weights, the Bellman-Ford algorithm and Dijkstra’s algorithm can produce different shortest-path trees despite always producing the same shortest-path weights. Reason?

A) True

B) False

Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 6/12/2012 6:29 PM 47

Question 3

If all edges in a graph have distinct weights, then the shortest path between two vertices is unique.

• A) True

• B) False

Copyright @ gdeepak.com® 6/12/2012 6:29 PM 48