Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb

26 August 2010

Intro & Selections

• Reference current ttbar selections– New: Mt < 25

• Electrons: endcap alignment correction for data, no Δη

• Data & Monte Carlo samples listed at the end

2

W contribution to QCD Fake Rates

• We want to measure the rate of fake leptons from QCD in data

• Leptonic W decays will contribute to some extent– We have so far required low MET ( tcmet < 20 GeV )

to reduce the contribution from W– We now require low transverse mass also ( Mt < 25 )

• What effect does the presence of W have on the fake rate?

3

Electron Fake Rates in Monte Carlo

QCD_Pt30 OnlyQCD_Pt30 + Weν

V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate

Presence of W does not dominate Fake Rate - W contribution introduces some bias - QCD prevails 4

( No cuts on MET or Mt )

Muon Fake Rates in Monte Carlo

W contribution suppressed by requiring low MET and Mt - We have been requiring tcmet < 20, we now require Mt < 25 also - W domination delayed by ~10 GeV in Pt - underlying QCD Fake Rate unaffected

InclusiveMu15 + Wmunu

InclusiveMu15 + Wmunu - tcmet< 20 AND Mt < 25

InclusiveMu15

InclusiveMu15- tcmet< 20 AND Mt < 25

5

Fake Rate Dominated by W

Muon Fake Rates – Comparison of Data and Monte Carlo

W evident in Data also - Good data / MC agreement - W starts to dominate above ~ 35 GeV

How do we estimate the fake rate for Pt > 35 where W is irreducible? - Simply use the fake rate from the 30-35 GeV Pt bin for Pt > 35 GeV - QCD background peaks at low Pt and QCD FR is somewhat flat - Alternatively, use fake rate from b tagged jets

Data ( HLT_Mu9 AND 15 GeV Offline Jet )MC InclusiveMu15 + WmunuMC InclusiveMu15

Luminosity ~ 840 / nb

6

Fake Rates - Jet vs. Lepton Triggered

• Lepton fake rates have so far been determined from jet triggered ( HLT_Jet15U ) samples– Then require offline lepton away from jet trigger

• Jet triggers are now heavily prescaled– HLT_Jet15U prescale is now 200 ( 4.1 v3 at 3.5x1030 )

• Alternatively, can derive fake rates from lepton triggered samples ( Mu9, Ele10_LW_L1R )– Then apply threshold to offline jet away from lepton

• Lepton & Jet triggers should give the same result – Lepton triggers offer more statistics

7

Electron Fake Rates in DataComparison of Jet & Lepton Triggers

Luminosity ~ 840 / nb

HLT_Jet15UHLT_Ele10_LW_L1RAND 15 GeV Offline Jet

Jet & Lepton Triggered Fake Rates are Comparable - Lepton Triggered samples offer higher statistics

V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate

8

Muon Fake Rates in DataComparison of Jet & Lepton Triggers

Luminosity ~ 840 / nb

HLT_Jet15U

HLT_Mu9 AND15 GeV Offline Jet

Jet & Lepton Triggered Fake Rates Agree Before Run 137000 - Difference after run 137000 not yet understood - Lepton triggered samples offer higher statistics

9

Runs before 137000All Runs

Jet Threshold Dependence of Lepton Fake Rates

• Systematic errors are estimated by measuring the dependence of the fake rate on the jet threshold

• Comparison of lepton triggered fake rates with different offline jet pt thresholds are shown on the following slides

10

Muon Fake Rates in DataDependence on Jet Threshold

Luminosity ~ 840 / nb

Systematics ~ 50%Isolation relaxed ( 0.15 to 0.40 ) in the muon fake rate denominator

11

HLT_Mu9

5 GeV 15 GeV 30 GeV 50 GeV

Electron Fake Rates in DataDependence on Jet Threshold

Luminosity ~ 840 / nb

12

HLT_Ele10_LW_L1R 5 GeV 15 GeV 30 GeV 50 GeV

Systematics ~ 50%V2 fake rate ( which does not relax isolation) shows least dependence on jet threshold

V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate

Summary• Leptons from W decay pollute QCD fake rates

– Results in tolerable bias for electrons– Muon fake rate is dominated by W above ~ 35 GeV in

spite of requiring low MET and Mt. • Solution: Extend fake rate from lower Pt or require b tagged jets

• Fake rates derived from lepton triggers offer more statistics than those from jet triggers

• Jet Threshold– Systematics ~ 50%

13

Samples• /InclusiveMu15/Spring10-START3X_V26_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO• /QCD_Pt30/Spring10-START3X_V26_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO • /Wenu/Spring10-START3X_V26_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO• /Wmunu/Spring10-START3X_V26_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO

• /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-SD_EG-Jun14thSkim_v1/RECO• /EG/Run2010A-Jun14thReReco_v1/RECO• /EG/Run2010A-Jul16thReReco-v2/RECO• /EG/Run2010A-PromptReco-v4/RECO

• /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-SD_Mu-Jun14thSkim_v1/RECO• /Mu/Run2010A-Jun14thReReco_v1/RECO• /Mu/Run2010A-Jul16thReReco-v1/RECO• /Mu/Run2010A-PromptReco-v4/RECO

• /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-SD_JetMETTau-Jun14thSkim_v1/RECO• /JetMETTau/Run2010A-Jun14thReReco_v2/RECO• /JetMETTau/Run2010A-Jul16thReReco-v1/RECO• /JetMETTau/Run2010A-PromptReco-v4/RECO

14

Backup Slides

15

16

Runs < 137000 Runs > 137000 Runs < 139000

Runs > 139000 Runs < 141000

Runs > 141000 Runs < 143000

Run Dependence of Muon Fake Rate

All Runs Runs > 136500HLT_15u

HLT_Mu9 AND 15 GeV Offline Jet

Discrepancy between Jet & Lepton triggered FR for runs>137000 not understood

Difference between Jet15U and Muon triggers at high PT?

• This was also seen earlier in the summer• The most likely explanation was that of a run

dependence– Jet15U samples the very earliest runs– Muon triggers are uniform

• We need to verify this again by making the same plots as the previous page but broken up in run periods

• Slide from this summer are in backup (as a reminder of what we had then)

17

Slide circulated in an emai message by Claudio on 10 July 2010

18

Slide circulated in an emai message by Claudio on 10 July 2010

19

Slide circulated in an emai message by Claudio on 10 July 2010

20

Electron Fake Rates in Monte Carlo

QCD_Pt30 OnlyWeν OnlyQCD_Pt30 + Weν

Numerator & Denominator Pt distributions

Num V2 DenV1 Den V3 Den

Fake Rates

QCD_Pt30 OnlyQCD_Pt30 + Weν

V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate

Presence of W does not dominate Fake Rate at high Pt 21

Muon Fake Rates in Monte Carlo

W dominates Fake Rate above ~ 25 GeV

InclusiveMu15 + WmunuInclusiveMu15Wmunu

Fake Rate DenominatorNumerator

22

Muon Fake Rates – Comparison of Data and Monte Carlo

W evident in Data also- Good agreement between data and Monte Carlo - W starts to dominate above ~ 35 GeV

Data ( HLT_Mu9 AND 15 GeV Offline Jet )InclusiveMu15 + WmunuInclusiveMu15Wmunu

Luminosity ~ 840 / nb

Fake Rate DenominatorNumerator

W Supression:- tcmet< 20 - Mt < 25

23

Muon Fake Rates in DataDependence on Muon Trigger

Luminosity ~ 840 / nb

Fake Rate stable for different Muon triggers

W Supression:- tcmet< 20 - Mt < 25

24

Electron Fake Rates in DataComparison of 10 & 15 GeV Lepton Triggers

Luminosity ~ 840 / nb

HLT_Ele10_LW_L1RHLT_Ele15_LW_L1R

W Supression: tcmet< 20, Mt < 25

V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate

25Electron 10 & 15 triggers are comparable

Electron Fake Rates in DataComparison of 10 GeV Lepton Triggers

Luminosity ~ 840 / nb

HLT_Ele10_LW_L1RHLT_Ele10_SW_L1RHLT_Ele10_LW_EleId_L1RHLT_Ele10_SW_EleId_L1RW Supression: tcmet< 20, Mt < 25

V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate

26Trigger ID increases V1 & V2 Fake Rates

Trigger ID cancels out in V3.

V1 & V2 have no offline ID. Trigger IDdecreases the denominator, increasing the Fake Rate

Electron Fake Rates in DataComparison of 15 GeV Lepton Triggers

Luminosity ~ 840 / nb

HLT_Ele15_LW_L1RHLT_Ele15_SW_L1RHLT_Ele15_SW_EleId_L1RHLT_Ele15_LW_CaloEleId_L1RW Supression: tcmet< 20, Mt < 25

V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate

27Trigger ID increases V1 & V2 Fake Rates

Electron Selections• ttbar: Tight Electron Selections

– Pt > 10– SC Et > 10– |η| < 2.5– ECAL Seeded– Spike Removal– VBTF 90 ID

• Data corrected for Endcap alignment• dEta cut removed

– d0 < 400 – Iso< 0.15– No muon with dR of 0.10– Conversion Rejection

• Hit Pattern• Dist < 002• Dcottheta< 002

• Loose Electron Selections– d0 removed for V1, V2, V3– V1: V2 AND V3– V2: Electron ID removed– V3: Isolation relaxed to 0.40 28