5. Atomic radiation processes - Institute for Astronomy of collision

Post on 01-May-2018

246 views 1 download

Transcript of 5. Atomic radiation processes - Institute for Astronomy of collision

1

5. Atomic radiation processes

Einstein coefficients for absorption and emission

oscillator strength

line profiles: damping profile, collisional broadening, Doppler broadening

continuous absorption and scattering

2

3

A. Line transitions Einstein coefficients

probability that a photon in frequency interval in the solid angle range is absorbed by an atom in the energy level El with a resulting transition El à Eu per second:

atomic property ~ no. of incident photons

probability for absorption of photon with

absorption profile

probability for with

probability for transition l à u

Blu: Einstein coefficient for absorption

4

Einstein coefficients

similarly for stimulated emission

Bul: Einstein coefficient for stimulated emission

and for spontaneous emission

Aul: Einstein coefficient for spontaneous emission

5

Einstein coefficients, absorption and emission coefficients

Iν dF

ds

dV = dF ds

absorbed energy in dV per second:

and also (using definition of intensity):

for the spontaneously emitted energy:

Number of absorptions & stimulated emissions in dV per second:

stimulated emission counted as negative absorption

Absorption and emission coefficients are a function of Einstein coefficients, occupation numbers and line broadening

6

Einstein coefficients are atomic properties à do not depend on thermodynamic state of matter

We can assume TE:

From the Boltzmann formula:

for hν/kT << 1:

for T à ∞ 0

Relations between Einstein coefficients

7

Relations between Einstein coefficients

only one Einstein coefficient needed

Note: Einstein coefficients atomic quantities. That means any relationship that holds in a special thermodynamic situation (such as T very large) must be generally valid.

for T à ∞

8

Oscillator strength

Quantum mechanics

The Einstein coefficients can be calculated by quantum mechanics + classical electrodynamics calculation.

Eigenvalue problem using using wave function:

Consider a time-dependent perturbation such as an external electromagnetic field (light wave) E(t) = E0 eiωt.

The potential of the time dependent perturbation on the atom is:

d: dipol operator

with transition probability

9

Oscillator strength

flu: oscillator strength (dimensionless) classical result from electrodynamics

= 0.02654 cm2/s

The result is

Classical electrodynamics

electron quasi-elastically bound to nucleus and oscillates within outer electric field as E. Equation of motion (damped harmonic oscillator):

damping constant resonant

(natural) frequency

ma = damping force + restoring force + EM force

the electron oscillates preferentially at resonance (incoming radiation ν = ν0)

The damping is caused, because the de- and accelerated electron radiates

10

Classical cross section and oscillator strength

Calculating the power absorbed by the oscillator, the integrated “classical” absorption coefficient and cross section, and the absorption line profile are found:

nl: number density of absorbers

oscillator strength flu is quantum mechanical correction to classical result

(effective number of classical oscillators, ≈ 1 for strong resonance lines)

From (neglecting stimulated emission)

integrated over the line profile

σtotcl: classical

cross section (cm2/s)

Z·L,clº dº = nl

¼e2

mec= nl ¾

cltot

'(º)dº =1

¼

°/4¼

(º ¡ º0)2 + (°/4¼)2[Lorentz (damping) line profile]

11

Oscillator strength

absorption cross section; dimension is cm2

Oscillator strength (f-value) is different for each atomic transition

Values are determined empirically in the laboratory or by elaborate numerical atomic physics calculations

Semi-analytical calculations possible in simplest cases, e.g. hydrogen

g: Gaunt factor

Hα: f=0.6407

Hβ: f=0.1193

Hγ: f=0.0447

12

Line profiles

line profiles contain information on physical conditions of the gas and chemical abundances

analysis of line profiles requires knowledge of distribution of opacity with frequency

several mechanisms lead to line broadening (no infinitely sharp lines)

- natural damping: finite lifetime of atomic levels

- collisional (pressure) broadening: impact vs quasi-static approximation

- Doppler broadening: convolution of velocity distribution with atomic profiles

13

1. Natural damping profile

finite lifetime of atomic levels à line width

NATURAL LINE BROADENING OR RADIATION DAMPING

line broadening

Lorentzian profile

'(º) =1

¼

¡/4¼

(º ¡ º0)2 + (¡/4¼)2

t  = 1 / Aul (¼ 10-8 s in H atom 2 à 1): finite lifetime with respect to spontaneous emission

Δ E t ≥ h/2π uncertainty principle

Δν1/2 = Γ / 2π

Δλ1/2 = Δν1/2λ2/c

e.g. Ly α: Δλ1/2 = 1.2 10-4 A

Hα: Δλ1/2 = 4.6 10-4 A

14

Natural damping profile

resonance line

natural line broadening is important for strong lines (resonance lines) at low densities (no additional broadening mechanisms)

e.g. Ly α in interstellar medium

but also in stellar atmospheres

excited line

15

2. Collisional broadening

a) impact approximation: radiating atoms are perturbed by passing particles at distance r(t). Duration of collision << lifetime in level à lifetime shortened à line broader

in all cases a Lorentzian profile is obtained (but with larger total Γ than only natural damping)

b) quasi-static approximation: applied when duration of collisions >> life time in level à consider stationary distribution of perturbers

r: distance to perturbing atom

radiating atoms are perturbed by the electromagnetic field of neighbour atoms, ions, electrons, molecules

energy levels are temporarily modified through the Stark - effect: perturbation is a function of separation absorber-perturber

energy levels affected à line shifts, asymmetries & broadening

ΔE(t) = h Δν = C/rn(t)

16

Collisional broadening

n = 2 linear Stark effect ΔE ~ F for levels with degenerate angular momentum (e.g. HI, HeII)

field strength F ~ 1/r2

à ΔE ~ 1/r2

important for H I lines, in particular in hot stars (high number density of free electrons and ions). However , for ion collisional broadening the quasi-static broadening is also important for strong lines (see below) à Γe ~ ne

n = 3 resonance broadening atom A perturbed by atom A’ of same species

important in cool stars, e.g. Balmer lines in the Sun

à ΔE ~ 1/r3 à Γe ~ ne

17

Collisional broadening

n = 6 van der Waals broadening atom A perturbed by atom B

important in cool stars, e.g. Na perturbed by H in the Sun

n = 4 quadratic Stark effect ΔE ~ F2 field strength F ~ 1/r2

à ΔE ~ 1/r4 (no dipole moment)

important for metal ions broadened by e- in hot stars à Lorentz profile with Γe ~ ne

à Γe ~ ne

18

Quasi-static approximation

tperturbation >> τ = 1/Aul

à perturbation practically constant during emission or absorption

atom radiates in a statistically fluctuating field produced by ‘quasi-static’ perturbers,

e.g. slow-moving ions

given a distribution of perturbers à field at location of absorbing or emitting atom

statistical frequency of particle distribution

à probability of fields of different strength (each producing an energy shift ΔE = h Δν)

à field strength distribution function

à line broadening

Linear Stark effect of H lines can be approximated to 0st order in this way

19

Quasi-static approximation for hydrogen line broadening

Line broadening profile function determined by probability function for electric field caused by all other particles as seen by the radiating atom.

W(F) dF: probability that field seen by radiating atom is F

For calculating W(F)dF we use as a first step the nearest-neighbor approximation: main effect from nearest particle

20

Quasi-static approximation – nearest neighbor approximation

assumption: main effect from nearest particle (F ~ 1/r2)

we need to calculate the probability that nearest neighbor is in the distance range (r,r+dr) = probability that none is at distance < r and one is in (r,r+dr)

relative probability for particle in shell (r,r+dr) N: particle density probability for no particle in (0,r)

Integral equation for W(r) differentiating à differential equation

Normalized solution

Differential equation

21

Quasi-static approximation

mean interparticle

distance:

normal field strength:

define:

from W(r) dr à W(β) dβ:

Stark broadened line profile in the wings, not Δλ-2 as for natural or impact broadening

note: at high particle density à large F0

à stronger broadening ¯ =

F

F0= {r0

r}2

Linear Stark effect:

22

Quasi-static approximation – advanced theory

complete treatment of an ensemble of particles: Holtsmark theory

+ interaction among perturbers (Debye shielding of the potential at distances > Debye length)

number of particles inside Debye sphere

W (¯) =2¯

¼

Z 1

0

e¡y3/2

y sin(¯y)dy Holtsmark (1919),

Chandrasekhar (1943, Phys. Rev. 15, 1)

W (¯) =2¯±4/3

¼

Z 1

0

e¡±g(y)y sin(±2/3¯y)dy

g(y) =2

3y3/2

Z 1

y

(1¡ z¡1sinz)z¡5/2dz

± =4¼

3D3N

D = 4.8T

ne

1/2

cm

number of particles inside Debye sphere

Debye length, field of ion vanishes beyond D

Ecker (1957, Zeitschrift f. Physik, 148, 593 & 149,245)

Mihalas, 78!

23

3. Doppler broadening

radiating atoms have thermal velocity

Maxwellian distribution:

Doppler effect: atom with velocity v emitting at frequency , observed at frequency :

24

Doppler broadening

Define the velocity component along the line of sight:

The Maxwellian distribution for this component is:

thermal velocity

if v/c <<1 à line center

if we observe at v, an atom with velocity component ξ absorbs at ν′ in its frame

25

Doppler broadening

line profile for v = 0 à profile for v ≠ 0

New line profile: convolution

profile function in rest frame

velocity distribution function

26

Doppler broadening: sharp line approximation

: Doppler width of the line

thermal velocity

Approximation 1: assume a sharp line – half width of profile function <<

delta function

27

Doppler broadening: sharp line approximation

Gaussian profile – valid in the line core

28

Doppler broadening: Voigt function

Approximation 2: assume a Lorentzian profile – half width of profile function >

Voigt function (Lorentzian * Gaussian): calculated numerically

'(º) =1

¼

¡/4¼

(º ¡ º0)2 + (¡/4¼)2

29

Voigt function: core Gaussian, wings Lorentzian

normalization:

usually α <<1

max at v=0:

H(α,v=0) ≈ 1-α

~ Gaussian ~ Lorentzian

Unsoeld, 68!

30

Doppler broadening: Voigt function

Approximate representation of Voigt function:

line core: Doppler broadening

line wings: damping profile only visible for strong lines

General case: for any intrinsic profile function (Lorentz, or Holtsmark, etc.) – the observed profile is obtained from numerical convolution with the different broadening functions and finally with Doppler broadening

31

General case: two broadening mechanisms

two broadening functions representing

two broadening mechanisms

Resulting broadening function is convolution of the two individual broadening functions

32

4. Microturbulence broadening

In addition to thermal velocity: Macroscopic turbulent motion of stellar atmosphere gas within optically thin volume elements. This is approximated by an additional Maxwellian velocity distribution.

Additional Gaussian broadening function in absorption coefficient

33

5. Rotational broadening

If the star rotates, some surface elements move towards the observer and some away

to observer

Rotational velocity at equator: vrot = Ω•R

Observer sees vrot sini

redshift blueshift

stripes of constant wavelength shift

Intensity shifts in wavelength along stripe

Gray, 1992

blueshift redshift

��

= �v

rot

sin(i)

c

x

R

��

= +v

rot

sin(i)

c

x

R

34

stellar spectroscopy uses mostly normalized spectra à Fλ / Fcontinuum

Rotation and observed line profile

integral over stellar disk towards observer, also integral over all solid angles for one surface element

observed stellar line profile

Spri

ng 2

013

35

M33 A supergiant Keck (ESI)

U, Urbaneja, Kudritzki, 2009, ApJ 740, 1120

Fλ /Fcontinuum

36

stellar spectroscopy uses mostly normalized spectra à Fλ / Fcontinuum

Rotation changes integral over stellar surface

integral over stellar disk towards observer

observed stellar line profile

Correct treatment by numerical integral over stellar surface with intensity calculated by model atmosphere

Gray, 1992

��

= �v

rot

sin(i)

c

x

R

��

= +v

rot

sin(i)

c

x

R

37

Approximation: assume intrinsic Pλ const. over surface

independent of cosθ

integral of Doppler shifted profile over stellar disk and weighted by continuum intensity towards obs.

continuum limb darkening

P (�) = I(�, cos✓)/Ic(�, cos✓)

��

= +v

rot

sin(i)

c

x

R

��

= �v

rot

sin(i)

c

x

R

��

=v

rot

sin(i)

c

x

R

38

Prot

(�) =F (�)

Fc

P

rot

(�) =

R 1�1 P [����(x)]A(x)dx

R 1�1 A(x)dx

G[��(x] =2⇡

p1� x

2 + �2 (1� x

2)

1 + 23�

P

rot

(�) =

Z 1

�1P [����(x)]G[��(x)]dx

Z pa

2 � x

2dx =

1

2(xpa

2 � x

2 + a

2arcsin

x

a

)

using

and normalization à

rotational line broadening

profile function

A(x) =

Z p1�x

2

0(1 + �

p1� x

2 + y

2)dy

39

Rotational line broadening

Rotationally broadened line profile

convolution of original profile with rotational broadening function

G[��(x] =2⇡

p1� x

2 + �2 (1� x

2)

1 + 23� �� = �

v

rot

sin(i)

c

x

R

40

Rotational broadening profile function

G(x)

Unsoeld, 1968

41

Rotationally broadened line profiles

v sini km/s

Note: rotation does not change equivalent width!!!

Gray, 1992

42

observed stellar line profiles

v sini large

v sini small

Gray, 1992

43

Rotationally broadened line profiles

v sini km/s

Note: rotation does not change equivalent width!!!

Gray, 1992

44

observed stellar line profiles

θ Car, B0V vsini~250 km/s

Schoenberner, Kudritzki et al. 1988

45

6. Macro-turbulence

The macroscopic motion of optically thick surface volume elements is approximated by a Maxwellian velocity distribution. This broadens the emergent line profiles in addition to rotation

46

Rotation and macro-turbulence

Gray, 1992

5 Å

rotation

rotation + macro-turb.

47

B. Continuous transitions 1. Bound-free and free-free processes

hνlk

consider photon hν ≥ hνlk (energy > threshold): extra-energy to free electron

e.g. Hydrogen

R = Rydberg constant = 1.0968 105 cm-1

absorption

hν + El à Eu

emission spontaneous Eu à El + hν(isotropic) stimulated hν + Eu à El +2hν(non-isotropic)

photo

ioniz

atio

n -

recom

binat

ion!

bound-bound: spectral lines

bound-free

free-free

κνcont

48

b-f and f-f processes

l à continuum Wavelength (A) Edge

1 à continuum 912 Lyman

2 à continuum 3646 Balmer

3 à continuum 8204 Paschen

4 à continuum 14584 Brackett

5 à continuum 22790 Pfund

Hydrogen

49

b-f and f-f processes

for hydrogenic ions

Gaunt factor ≈ 1

for H: σ0 = 7.9 10-18 n cm2

νl = 3.29 1015 / n2 Hz

- for a single transition

- for all transitions:

Kramers 1923

absorption per particle à

Gray, 92!

50

b-f and f-f processes

for non-H-like atoms no ν-3 dependence

peaks at resonant frequencies

free-free absorption much smaller

peaks increase with n:

late A

late B

Gray, 92!

51

b-f and f-f processes

Hydrogen dominant continuous absorber in B, A & F stars (later stars H-)

Energy distribution strongly modulated at the edges:

Vega

Balmer

Paschen

Brackett

52

b-f and f-f processes : Einstein-Milne relations

Generalize Einstein relations to bound-free processes relating photoionizations and radiative recombinations

line transitions

b-f transitions stimulated b-f emission

53

2. Scattering

In scattering events photons are not destroyed, but redirected and perhaps shifted in frequency. In free-free process photon interacts with electron in the presence of ion’s potential. For scattering there is no influence of ion’s presence.

Calculation of cross sections for scattering by free electrons:

- very high energy (several MeV’s): Klein-Nishina formula (Q.E.D.)

- high energy photons (electrons): Compton (inverse Compton) scattering

- low energy (< 12.4 kEV ' 1 Angstrom): Thomson scattering

in general: κsc = ne σe

54

Thomson scattering

THOMSON SCATTERING: important source of opacity in hot OB stars

independent of frequency, isotropic

Approximations:

- angle averaging done, in reality: σe à σe (1+cos2 θ) for single scattering

- neglected velocity distribution and Doppler shift (frequency-dependency)

55

Simple example: hot star -pure hydrogen atmosphere total opacity

Total opacity

line absorption

bound-free

free-free

Thomson scattering

56

Total emissivity

line emission

bound-free

free-free

Thomson scattering

Simple example: hot star -pure hydrogen atmosphere total emissivity

57

Rayleigh scattering – important in cool stars

RAYLEIGH SCATTERING: line absorption/emission of atoms and molecules far from resonance frequency: ν << ν0

from classical expression of cross section for oscillators:

important in cool G-K stars

for strong lines (e.g. Lyman series when H is neutral) the λ-4 decrease in the far wings can be important in the optical

58

The H- ion - important in cool stars

What are the dominant elements for the continuum opacity?

- hot stars (B,A,F) : H, He I, He II

- cool stars (G,K): the bound state of the H- ion (1 proton + 2 electrons)

only way to explain solar continuum (Wildt 1939)

ionization potential = 0.754 eV

à λion = 16550 Angstroms

H- b-f peaks around 8500 A

H- f-f ~ λ3 (IR important)

He- b-f negligible,

He- f-f can be important

in cool stars in IR

requires metals to provide

source of electrons

dominant source of

b-f opacity in the Sun

Gray, 92!

59

Additional absorbers

Hydrogen molecules in cool stars

H2 molecules more numerous than atomic H in M stars

H2+ absorption in UV

H2- f-f absorption in IR

Helium molecules

He- f-f absorption for cool stars

Metal atoms in cool and hot stars (lines and b-f)

C,N,O, Si, Al, Mg, Fe, Ti, ….

Molecules in cool stars

TiO, CO, H2O, FeH, CH4, NH3,…

60

Examples of continuous absorption coefficients

Teff = 5040 K B0: Teff = 28,000 K

Unsoeld, 68!

61

Modern model atmospheres include

● millions of spectral lines (atoms and ions) ● all bf- and ff-transitions of hydrogen helium and metals ● contributions of all important negative ions ● molecular opacities (lines and continua)

Conc

epci

on 2

007

62

complex atomic models for O-stars (Pauldrach et al., 2001)

AWAP 05/19/05 63

NLTE Atomic Models in modern model atmosphere codes

lines, collisions, ionization, recombination Essential for occupation numbers, line blocking, line force

Accurate atomic models have been included 26 elements 149 ionization stages 5,000 levels ( + 100,000 ) 20,000 diel. rec. transitions 4 106 b-b line transitions Auger-ionization

recently improved models are based on Superstructure Eisner et al., 1974, CPC 8,270

Conc

epci

on 2

007

64

65

Recent Improvements on Atomic Data

•  requires solution of Schrödinger equation for N-electron system

•  efficient technique: R-matrix method in CC approximation

•  Opacity Project Seaton et al. 1994, MNRAS, 266, 805

•  IRON Project Hummer et al. 1993, A&A, 279, 298

accurate radiative/collisional data to 10% on the mean

66

Confrontation with Reality

Photoionization Electron Collision!

Nahar 2003, ASP Conf. Proc.Ser. 288, in press Williams 1999, Rep. Prog. Phys., 62, 1431 !

ü high-precision atomic data ü

67

Improved Modelling for Astrophysics

Przybilla, Butler & Kudritzki 2001b, A&A, 379, 936!

e.g. photoionization cross-sections for carbon model atom !

68

Bergemann, Kudritzki et al., 2012

Red supergiants, NLTE model atom for FeI !

69

Red supergiants, NLTE model atom for TiI !

Bergemann, Kudritzki et al., 2012

70

TiI

TiII

Bergemann, Kudritzki et al., 2012

USM

201

1

71

TiO in red supergiants!

MARCS model atmospheres, Gustafsson et al., 2009!

USM

201

1

72

A small change in !carbon abundances… !!MARCS model!atmospheres!

TiO in red supergiants!

73

The Scutum RSG clusters

CO molecule in red supergiants

Davies, Origilia, Kudritzki et al., 2009

74

Rayner, Cushing, Vacca, 2009: molecules in Brown Dwarfs

75

Exploring the substellar temperature regime down to ~550K Burningham et al. (2009)

T9.0 ~ 550K T8.5 ~ 700K

Jupiter