Download - Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Transcript
Page 1: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Update on the pp → ΞΞ Analysis

Walter Ikegami Andersson

Uppsala Universityon behalf of the PANDA collaboration

PANDA collaboration meetingNovember 05-09, 2018GSI

1 / 20

Page 2: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Outline

Feasibility studies of pp → Ξ+Ξ− at pbeam = 7.0 GeV/c

Spin observables extraction using spin density matrix formalism

Will be presented on Thursday during plenary sessions

In this presentation

Test effects on reconstruction efficiency when changing differentialcross section

Test feasibility of measuring spin observables of pp → Ξ+Ξ− atpbeam = 4.6 GeV/c

2 / 20

Page 3: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Simulation parameters

Simulations are done with:

Release dec17p2b.

fairsoft may16p1

Fairroot v17.10b

Decay of Ξ handled by Geant4:

Ensures propagationof Ξ in B-field

Event sample: ∼ 8.5 · 105

Parameters:

Antiproton beam:pp = 7.0 GeV/cpp = 4.6 GeV/c

Full Detector Setup

Ideal Mass Hypothesis forKalman Filter

Ideal Pattern Recognition

Ideal Particle Identification

3 / 20

Page 4: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Preselection - first set

Preselection criteria:

Combine pπ− to form Λ candidates

Select |mΛ −M(pπ−)| < 50 MeV/c2

Combine Λπ− to form Ξ− candidates

Select |mΞ −M(Λπ−)| < 50 MeV/c2

DTF Ξ− → Λπ− → pπ−π−

Repeat for Ξ+ candidates

Combine Ξ+Ξ− to form pp system

4 / 20

Page 5: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Preselection - second set

Final selection criteria:

Vertex fit Ξ+Ξ−To propagate variablesfrom vertex to IP

Select ∠(Ξ+Ξ−) > 3 rad

Select ∆z = z(Λ)− z(Ξ) > 0 cm

Four constraint fit Ξ+Ξ−

Choose Ξ+Ξ− pair with smallest4C fit χ2

5 / 20

Page 6: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Preselection 1st set at pbeam = 7.0 GeV/c

Sample True False T/F ε

Λ 4.72× 105 4.75× 105 0.90 55%Λ 4.84× 105 5.39× 105 0.99 57%

Ξ+ 3.65× 105 3.71× 105 0.98 43%Ξ− 3.73× 105 3.49× 105 1.1 44%

Ξ+Ξ− 1st 8.9× 104 1.2× 104 7.6 10.4%

Efficiency of 10.4% after first set of preselection

Must impose further selection and choose one candidate per event

Consider background channels

6 / 20

Page 7: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Final Selection - Ξ Invariant Mass at pbeam = 7.0 GeV/c

Gaussian fit: mfit(Ξ+) = 1322.1 MeV/c2

and σfit(Ξ+) = 3.0 MeV/c2

Gaussian fit: mfit(Ξ−) = 1322.0 MeV/c2

and σfit(Ξ−) = 3.0 MeV/c2

Select |mfit(Ξ)−mpdg (Ξ)| < 15 MeV/c2

Black - Ξ+Ξ−

Red - Σ+(1385)

Blue - ΛΛπ+π−

Green - pp2π+2π−

Cyan - Combi.

]2) [GeV/c+

Ξ(fitm1.27 1.28 1.29 1.3 1.31 1.32 1.33 1.34 1.35 1.36 1.37

10

210

310

410

]2) [GeV/c-Ξ(fitm1.27 1.28 1.29 1.3 1.31 1.32 1.33 1.34 1.35 1.36 1.37

10

210

310

410

7 / 20

Page 8: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Final Selection - Displaced Vertex at pbeam = 7.0 GeV/c

I.P reconstructed with vertex fit

Ξ displaced from I.P

Select(z(Ξ+)− z(V0)) + (z(Ξ−)− z(V0)) > 3

Black - Ξ+Ξ−

Red - Σ+(1385)

Blue - ΛΛπ+π−

Green - pp2π+2π−

Cyan - Combi.

) [cm]0V - z-Ξ

) + (z0V - z+

Ξ(z

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

S+

BS

/

0

50

100

150

200

250

) [cm]0V - z-Ξ

) + (z0V - z+

Ξ(z

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Ent

ries

10

210

310

8 / 20

Page 9: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Final Efficiencies

Limits are 90% C.L.

Channel Ξ+Ξ− Σ(1385)+Σ(1385)− ΛΛ2π+2π− pp2π+2π− DPMSample 8.5 × 105 10 × 107 10 × 107 10 × 107 10 × 107

σeff [µb] 0.123 4.33 24.1 390 58 300Weight factor 1 3.06 17.06 278 41 214

Preselection 2nd 7.83 × 104 3.15 × 104 3.51 × 103 1 14Final selection 6.76 × 104 3 14 0 0

N weighted 6.76 × 104 9 239 0 0S/B 420 7.4 × 103 283 > 106 > 0.7

Final signal efficiency of ε = 7.9%

High purity, S/B > 100 across relevant background channels

9 / 20

Page 10: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Differential cross section

Introduce forward-peaking distribution andsee change in final efficiency

10 / 20

Page 11: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Forward peaking distributions

Angular dsitribution modeled with empirical function, t ′ reducedmomentum transfer

I ∝ abe−bt′ + cde−dt′

h_d0thtcmEntries 852765Mean 0.5411Std Dev 0.4985

θcos 1− 0.8− 0.6− 0.4− 0.2− 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

h_d0thtcmEntries 852765Mean 0.5411Std Dev 0.4985

θcos

More lenient caseε = 7.5%

h_d0thtcmEntries 843918Mean 0.9248Std Dev 0.094

θcos 1− 0.8− 0.6− 0.4− 0.2− 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0

50

100

150

200

250

310× h_d0thtcm

Entries 843918Mean 0.9248Std Dev 0.094

θcos

Extreme case, parameters similar topp → Σ0Λ at pbeam = 6.0 GeV/c

ε = 5.0%

11 / 20

Page 12: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Spin Observables at pbeam = 4.6 GeV/c

Feasibility of measuring spin observables atpbeam = 4.6 GeV/c

12 / 20

Page 13: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Preselection 1st set at pbeam = 4.6 GeV/c

Sample True False T/F ε

Λ 5.14× 105 5.43× 105 0.95 60%Λ 5.25× 105 6.15× 105 0.85 62%

Ξ+ 3.87× 105 4.07× 105 0.95 46%Ξ− 3.95× 105 4.41× 105 0.90 46%

Ξ+Ξ− 1st 9.7× 104 8.9× 103 11 11.4%

Efficiency of 11.4% after first set of preselection

Must impose further selection and choose one candidate per event

Consider background channels

13 / 20

Page 14: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Final Selection - Ξ Invariant Mass at pbeam = 4.6 GeV/c

Gaussian fit: mfit(Ξ+) = 1322.2 MeV/c2

and σfit(Ξ+) = 2.8 MeV/c2

Gaussian fit: mfit(Ξ−) = 1322.2 MeV/c2

and σfit(Ξ−) = 2.8 MeV/c2

Select |mfit(Ξ)−mpdg (Ξ)| < 15 MeV/c2

Black - Ξ+Ξ−

Red - Σ+(1385)

Blue - ΛΛπ+π−

Green - pp2π+2π−

Cyan - Combi.

]2) [GeV/c+

Ξ(fitm1.27 1.28 1.29 1.3 1.31 1.32 1.33 1.34 1.35 1.36 1.37

10

210

310

410

]2) [GeV/c-Ξ(fitm1.27 1.28 1.29 1.3 1.31 1.32 1.33 1.34 1.35 1.36 1.37

10

210

310

410

14 / 20

Page 15: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Final Selection - Displaced Vertex at pbeam = 4.6 GeV/c

I.P reconstructed with vertex fit

Ξ displaced from I.P

Select(z(Ξ+)− z(V0)) + (z(Ξ−)− z(V0)) > 3

Black - Ξ+Ξ−

Red - Σ+(1385)

Blue - ΛΛπ+π−

Green - pp2π+2π−

Cyan - Combi.

) [cm]0V - z-Ξ

) + (z0V - z+

Ξ(z

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

S+

BS

/

0

50

100

150

200

250

) [cm]0V - z-Ξ

) + (z0V - z+

Ξ(z

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Ent

ries

1

10

210

310

15 / 20

Page 16: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Final Efficiencies at pbeam = 4.6 GeV/c

Limits are 90% C.L.

Channel Ξ+Ξ− Σ(1385)+Σ(1385)− ΛΛ2π+2π− pp2π+2π− DPMSample 8.5 × 105 10 × 107 10 × 107 10 × 107 10 × 107

σeff [µb] 0.41 4.33 14.7 130 68 800Weight factor 1 0.946 3.21 28.6 15 087

Preselection 2nd 8.65 × 104 3.29 × 104 2.61 × 104 105 5Final selection 7.23 × 104 1 39 0 0

N weighted 7.23 × 104 0.9 125 0 0S/B 527 7.63 × 104 576 > 1.1 × 103 > 2.1

Final signal efficiency of ε = 8.5%, higher than pbeam = 4.6 GeV/ccase

High purity, S/B > 500 across relevant background channels, purerthan pbeam = 4.6 GeV/c case

16 / 20

Page 17: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Polarisation Py at pbeam = 4.6 GeV/c

Simulate sample of 107 signal events to construct acceptancecorrection matrices

Acceptance correct and extract spin observables with method ofmoments

ΛθCos 1− 0.8− 0.6− 0.4− 0.2− 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Pol

aris

atio

n

1−

0.5−

0

0.5

1

YP

YPInputPRELIMINARY

ANDAPMC simulation

ΛθCos 1− 0.8− 0.6− 0.4− 0.2− 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

)/2

Y +

PY

(P

1−

0.5−

0

0.5

1

)/2Y

+ PY

(P

InputPRELIMINARY

ANDAPMC simulation

17 / 20

Page 18: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Spin Correlation Cii at pbeam = 4.6 GeV/c

Simulate sample of 107 signal events to construct acceptancecorrection matrices

Acceptance correct and extract spin observables with method ofmoments

ΛθCos 1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1

Spi

n co

rrel

atio

n C

xx

0.2−

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

xxC

InputPRELIMINARY

ANDAPMC simulation

ΛθCos 1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1

Spi

n co

rrel

atio

n C

yy

0.2−

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

yyC

InputPRELIMINARY

ANDAPMC simulation

ΛθCos 1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1

Spi

n co

rrel

atio

n C

zz

0.2−

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

zzC

InputPRELIMINARY

ANDAPMC simulation

18 / 20

Page 19: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Spin Correlation Cij at pbeam = 4.6 GeV/c

Simulate sample of 107 signal events to construct acceptancecorrection matrices

Acceptance correct and extract spin observables with method ofmoments

ΛθCos 1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1

Spi

n co

rrel

atio

n C

xz

0.2−

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

xzC

zxCInputPRELIMINARY

ANDAPMC simulation

ΛθCos 1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1

)/2

zx +

Cxz

(C

0.2−

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

)/2zx + Cxz

(C

InputPRELIMINARY

ANDAPMC simulation

19 / 20

Page 20: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Summary & Outlook

Analysis at pbeam = 7.0 GeV/c yields a signal efficiency of ε = 7.9%

Testing two forward peaking distributions yield ε = 7.5% andε = 5.0%

Spin observables analysis also tested at pbeam = 4.6 GeV/c- Signal efficiency of ε = 8.5%- Spin observables can be extracted

Thank you for your attention!

20 / 20

Page 21: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Summary & Outlook

Analysis at pbeam = 7.0 GeV/c yields a signal efficiency of ε = 7.9%

Testing two forward peaking distributions yield ε = 7.5% andε = 5.0%

Spin observables analysis also tested at pbeam = 4.6 GeV/c- Signal efficiency of ε = 8.5%- Spin observables can be extracted

Thank you for your attention!

20 / 20

Page 22: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Backup

20 / 20

Page 23: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Acceptance functions

Acceptance used forCxx

xk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1xk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

xk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1xk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

xk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1xk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

xk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1xk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

xk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1xk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

xk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1xk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

xk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1xk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

xk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1xk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

20 / 20

Page 24: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Acceptance functions

Acceptance used forCyy

yk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1yk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

yk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1yk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

yk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1yk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

yk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1yk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

yk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1yk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

yk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1yk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

yk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1yk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

yk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1yk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

20 / 20

Page 25: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Acceptance functions

Acceptance used forCzz

zk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1zk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

zk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1zk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

zk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1zk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

zk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1zk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

zk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1zk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

zk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1zk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

zk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1zk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

zk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1zk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

20 / 20

Page 26: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Acceptance functions

Acceptance used forCxz

xk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1zk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

xk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1zk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

xk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1zk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

xk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1zk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

xk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1zk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

xk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1zk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

xk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1zk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

xk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1zk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

20 / 20

Page 27: Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of ... · Walter Ikegami Andersson Uppsala University on behalf of the PANDA collaboration PANDA collaboration meeting November

Acceptance functions

Acceptance used forCzx

zk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1xk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

zk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1xk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

zk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1xk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

zk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1xk

1−0.5−00.5

10

0.1

0.2

zk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1xk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

zk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1xk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

zk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1xk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

zk1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1xk

1−0.5−00.510

0.1

0.2

20 / 20