Upsilon Production at LHCb
Quarkonia Workshop, Vienna, 19th April 2011
Giulia Manca, Universita` degli Studi di Cagliari & I.N.F.N.
on behalf of the LHCb collaboration
LHCb-CONF-2011-016
Outline
➡Theory and motivation➡The LHC and LHCb➡Selected quarkonia results
ϒ cross section
➡Conclusions and outlook
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop 2
Introduction➡Many quarkonia states
discovered ~30 years ago➡Nevertheless theproduction mechanism is not fully understood➡Expected large cross-sections at
LHC ->among first measurements ➡High rates make quarkonia
central player for detector and software calibration
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop 3M=9.46 GeV/c2
Fermilab, Summer 1977
Motivations
➡ The production mechanism in pp collisions still unclear
➡ Several models around : Started with Color singlet(CSM)
Undershoots the data, no polarisation prdiction
Extendend to color octet (COM) mechanisms
Better agreement for cross-section, predicts TRANSVERSE polarisation, not
confirmed by experiments NLO CSM describes cross-section and allows LONGITUDINAL polarisation Other models such as color
evaporation model (CEM), kt factorization, soft color interaction model cannot describe the data or make predictions
➡ New data from LHC experiments will help to resolve this issue
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop 4
J/ & ϒ cross section crucial milestone in understanding detector and first step to B cross
section measurement
pT(GeV/c)
Polarisation measurement
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop 5
In the Υ(1S) case, the D0 results (black) are incompatible with the CDF results (green) The CDF results are compatible with the NRQCD predictions (yellow) The D0 results are marginally incompatible with NRQCD predictions The curves are the limiting case of the kT factorization predictionsFor J/psi and Psi(2s) the NRQCD and the data disagree.
CERN and the LHC
19.4.2011 6G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop
p p
NOMINAL (2011) : √s =14 TeVL = 2·1032 cm-2 s-1 (LHCb specific)
pp collider : 2010 :➡ @ √s = 7 TeV➡ L ≈ 1-2·1031 cm-2 s-1
Luminosity @ LHCb
19.4.2011 7G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop
Mar 2010 July 2010 Nov 2010
➡ LHC running very well!
➡ LHCb efficiency ≈90%
➡ This analysis : L ≈ 35 pb-1 (±10%)
Goal : 1 fb-1 (end
of 2011)
The LHCb detector
pp
collision
Point
Vertex
Locator
VELO
Tracking
System
Muon
SystemRICH
Detector
s
Calorimeters
p p
819.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop
Performance numbers relevant to quarkonium analyses:– Charged tracks p/p = 0.35 % - 0.55%, (m)=10-
25 MeV/c2
– ECAL (E)/E= 10% (E/GeV)-1/2 1 % – Muon ID: () = 97%, mis-ID rate () = 1-3 % – Vertexing: proper time resolution 30-50 fs– Trigger: dominantly software
field regularly reversed to cancel detector
asymmetries
=2
=5
Rapidity Range
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop 9
ϒ→ Acceptance
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop 10
LHCb
CMS
ATLASCMS
ATLAS
LHCb
ALICE
Total Acceptance≈3-14%ATLAS Acceptance 85%
Total Acceptance≈20%CMS 85%
Total Acceptance≈8%LHCb Acceptance 86%
ϒ production
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop 11
€
pp →bb + X
Three for the price of one!
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop
BR(Y(1S))=(2.48±0.05)%
BR(Y(2S))=(1.93±0.17)%
BR(Y(3S))=(2.18±0.21)%
12
Trigger and Event Selection
13
L0 Trigger:Single Muon:
Di-Muon:
pT>1.4 GeV/c
pT,1>0.56 GeV/c, pT,2>0.48 GeV/c
HLT1 Trigger:Single Muon:
Di-Muon:
Confirm L0 single Muon and pT>1.8 GeV/c (Prescaled)
Mμμ>2.9 GeV/c2 or cuts on vertex and track quality
HLT2 Trigger:
μ tracks: ● well reconstructed tracks identified as muons in muon detector, ● pT > 1 GeV/c, ● Track fit quality
Reconstructed : ● mass window: 8.5-11.5 GeV/c2, ● vertex fit quality (p(χ2)>0.5%).
Global Event Cuts (GEC): reject events with very large multiplicities (93% efficiency)
Confirm L0 Di-Muon and Mμμ>2.5 GeV/c2Di-Muon:
Cross Section Measurement Strategy
For a generic resonance A:
a) Nfit = number of events in the mass peak in each pT bin, corrected for acceptance and efficiency
b) c) εtot = total efficiency
d) e) ∆pt, ∆y = bins of pT and y
f) ∫Ldt = integrated luminosity
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop
€
dσ ( pp → A )dpT dy 2.0< y< 4.5
Br(A →μ +μ −) =N fit
A (pT ,y;ε tot )
Ldt⋅ ΔpT ⋅ Δy∫
14
a) Number of ϒ(1S) candidates
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop
• Nfit : function=3 Crystal Balls(CB)+exponential for background. Fixed (=2,n=1) and width (2S,3S) to scale with the masses.
15
Same function used on
individualbin fits
19.4.2011G.Manca, Quarkonia
Workshop
a) Number of ϒ (1S) candidates• Nfit : extracted from Crystal Ball (CB) part of the fit with CB+ exponential. •Fix width and masses •Only ϒ(1s) considered.
•2.0 < y < 2.5
0<pT<1 1<pT<2 2<pT<3
3<pT<4 4<pT<5 5<pT<6
6<pT<7 7<pT<8 8<pT<9
9<pT<10 10<pT<11 11<pT<12
12<pT<13 13<pT<14 14<pT<15
16
19.4.2011G.Manca, Quarkonia
Workshop
a) Number of ϒ(1S) candidates
17
19.4.2011G.Manca, Quarkonia
Workshop
Efficiency
The efficiency εtot has been broken in three pieces :
εtot = Nϒ(accepted, reconstructed and triggered)/Nϒ generated
Nϒaccepted Nϒreconstructed Nϒtriggered = Nϒgenerated Nϒaccepted Nϒreconstructed
-Nϒgenerated = Total number of ϒ’s generated in the pT-y chosen range
-Nϒaccepted = Number of ϒ’s generated inside the LHCb angular acceptance (10-400 mrad), in the pT-y chosen range
-Nϒreconstructed=Number of ϒ’s accepted, detected and reconstructed in range -Nϒtriggered =Number of ϒ’s accepted, detected, reconstructed in range and triggered
€
dσ ( pp → Υ(nS )dpT dy Δy
• Br(Υ(nS) →μ +μ −) =N fit
Υ(nS )(pT , y;A,ε trig ,ε reco)
Ldt⋅ ΔpT ⋅ Δy∫
b) A c) εreco d)εtrig
from Monte Carlo
from Data and MC
18
19.4.2011G.Manca, Quarkonia
Workshop
b) Acceptance Nevts gen with in 0<pT<15,2.0<y<4.5,10<<400mrad A=acceptance of the LHCb geometry cut= Nevts generated with in 0<pT<15,2.0<y<4.5
19
A
pT of Y (GeV/c)
y of Y
19.4.2011G.Manca, Quarkonia
Workshop
c) Reconstruction Efficiency N ϒ’s detected,reconstructed in range Εrec = efficiency for ϒ’s to be detected, reconstructed and matched to MC N ϒ’s generated in angular acceptance in range
=
20
pT of Y (GeV/c)
y of Y
25.2.2011 G.Manca, A&S Week
d) Trigger EfficiencyTrigger efficiency: efficiency of the triggers used to select the events ➡ L0 ➡ HLT1➡ HLT2
Calculated in J/ events as a function of (pT1+pT2) and <y>, for independent triggers, then weighed with Lum Since some triggers were prescaled for a portion of the data, an average value is used, weighted by the corresponding luminosity. Several cross checks have been performed to make sure this was correctly handled.
Systematic uncertainty estimated using J/ and ϒ Monte Carlo->later
Applied as a weight to the candidate entering the M() plot N ϒ’s detected,reconstructed,triggered in rangeεtrig= efficiency ϒ’s to be triggered N ϒ’s detected,reconstructed, in range
=
21
d) Trigger Efficiency
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop 22
➡ Scaled number of candidates to get effect as a function of ϒ pT and y
pT of Y (GeV/c)
y of Y
y of Y
pT of Y (GeV/c)
Scaled number of ϒ(1S) candidates
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop
• Nfit : function=3 Crystal Balls(CB)+exponential for background. Fixed (=2,n=1) and width (2S,3S) to scale with the masses.
23
Scaled for the trigger
efficiency
19.4.2011G.Manca, Quarkonia
Workshop
Systematic Uncertainties
24
19.4.2011G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop
Polarisation effect on Calculated reweighting the MC unpolarised events
assuming =±1
= 0 = -1 =+1
25
α = −1 ->full longitudinal polarisationα = +1 -> full transversepolarization, α = 0 -> no polarisation
α = (σT −2σL)/(σT +2σL)With σT /L cross sections for production of transverse and longitudinal polarised
pT of Y (GeV/c)
pT of Y (GeV/c) pT of Y (GeV/c) pT of Y (GeV/c)
y of Y
y of Y
19.4.2011G.Manca, Quarkonia
Workshop
Polarisation effect on reco
➡ Calculated reweighting the MC unpolarised events assuming =±1
26
α = −1 ->full longitudinal polarisationα = +1 -> full transversepolarization, α = 0 -> no polarisation
α = (σT −2σL)/(σT +2σL)With σT /L cross sections for production of transverse and longitudinal polarised
y of YpT of Y (GeV/c)
Upsilon Cross Section
€
108.3 ± 0.7(stat) -7.9+18.8(pola) ± 22.0(osys) ±10.8(lumi) nb =108.3 ± 0.7(stat) -25.8
+30.9 (syst) nb
Comparison with Theory
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop 28
Y. Q. Ma, K. Wang and K. T. Chao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 042002.
P. Artoisenet, PoS ICHEP 2010 (2010) 192.
J.-P. Lansberg, Eur. Phys. J. C 61 (2009) 693
A. D. Frawley, T. Ullrich and R. Vogt, Phys. Rep. 462 (2008) 125.
Comparison with CMS
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop 29
Conclusions
➡ϒ(1S) cross section measured. ϒ(2S) and ϒ(3S) are under way
➡Agreement with theory good!➡Trigger efficiency and polarisation
uncertainty can be improved ➡ϒ polarisation next step➡Should be ready for the summer
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop 30
Back up
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop 31
ϒ cross section
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop 32
G.Bodwin, talk at Berkeley workshop May 2009
ϒ rate ~ 1/100 J/ψ rateLHC rate ~ 50 Tevatron rate
Caveats:1. These plots only include the color-
singlet contributions lower limit2. Branching ratios not included3. Our energies lower than 5 GeV
more events4. Rapidity range different (but flat
y)5. 10 TeV!
33
Level 0: Hardware triggers From Muon system & calorimeters
High Level Trigger (HLT) 1: Software triggersAdd information from VELO and tracking stations to Level 0 informationFind primary vertices, etc.
HLT2: Software triggersUse all of the detector information to makeinclusive and exclusive selections
The LHCb Trigger
Trigger and Event Selection
19.4.2011 G.Manca, Quarkonia Workshop 34
Trigger Efficiency
25.2.2011 G.Manca, A&S Week 35
• Systematics: difference between e(trig) measured in J/ MC events and the true value in ϒ MC
Caveat: this is the per bin effect, the effect on the cross section is 6-16%
25.2.2011 G.Manca, A&S Week
a) Number of ϒ (1S) candidates• Nfit : extracted from Crystal Ball (CB) part of the fit with CB+ exponential. •Fix width and masses •Only ϒ(1s) considered.
•2.0 < y < 2.5
0<pT<1 1<pT<2 2<pT<3
3<pT<4 4<pT<5 5<pT<6
6<pT<7 7<pT<8 8<pT<9
9<pT<10 10<pT<11 11<pT<12
12<pT<13 13<pT<14 14<pT<15
36
25.2.2011G.Manca, A&S Week
a) Number of ϒ (1S) candidates• Nfit : extracted from Crystal Ball (CB) part of the fit with CB+exponential. •Fix width,m2S,m3S to 50 MeV. •Only ϒ(1s) considered.
•2.5 < y < 3.0
0<pT<1 1<pT<2 2<pT<3
3<pT<4 4<pT<5 5<pT<6
6<pT<7 7<pT<8 8<pT<9
9<pT<10 10<pT<11 11<pT<12
12<pT<13 13<pT<14 14<pT<15
37
25.2.2011 G.Manca, A&S Week
a) Number of ϒ (1S) candidates• Nfit : extracted from Crystal Ball (CB) part of the fit with CB+exponential. •Fix width,m2S,m3S to 50 MeV. •Only ϒ(1s) considered.
•3.0 < y < 3.5
0<pT<1 1<pT<2 2<pT<3
3<pT<4 4<pT<5 5<pT<6
6<pT<7 7<pT<8 8<pT<9
9<pT<10 10<pT<11 11<pT<12
12<pT<13 13<pT<14 14<pT<15
38
25.2.2011 G.Manca, A&S Week
a) Number of ϒ (1S) candidates• Nfit : extracted from Crystal Ball (CB) part of the fit with CB+exponential. •Fix width,m2S,m3S to 50 MeV. •Only ϒ(1s) considered.
•3.5 < y < 4.0
0<pT<1 1<pT<2 2<pT<3
3<pT<4 4<pT<5 5<pT<6
6<pT<7 7<pT<8 8<pT<9
9<pT<10 10<pT<11 11<pT<12
12<pT<13 13<pT<14 14<pT<15
39
25.2.2011 G.Manca, A&S Week
a) Number of ϒ (1S) candidates• Nfit : extracted from Crystal Ball (CB) part of the fit with CB+exponential. •Fix width,m2S,m3S to 50 MeV. •Only ϒ(1s) considered.
•4.0 < y < 4.5
0<pT<1 1<pT<2 2<pT<3
3<pT<4 4<pT<5 5<pT<6
6<pT<7 7<pT<8 8<pT<9
9<pT<10 10<pT<11 11<pT<12
12<pT<13 13<pT<14 14<pT<15
40
25.2.2011 G.Manca, A&S Week
Choice of Fit functionCB+exponential (default)
41
25.2.2011 G.Manca, A&S Week
Choice of Fit functionCB+polynomial
42
25.2.2011 G.Manca, A&S Week
Y : Pt rec vs. Pt gen
12.1.2011 Giulia Manca, FWG Meeting 43
Towards 2S…
25.2.2011 G.Manca, A&S Week 44
..and the 3S
25.2.2011 G.Manca, A&S Week 45
Top Related