Truth, Deduction, ComputationLecture GUntyped λ, Combinators
Vlad PatryshevSCU2013
β-reduction - weirder case
● t = λx ((x x) x)● t t = ?
● (λx ((x x) x)) (λx ((x x) x)) ⇒...● (((λx ((x x) x)) (λx ((x x) x))) (λx ((x x) x)), that is, ((t t) t) - ouch.
β-reduction - weirder, Javascript
weirder = function(x) { return x(x)(x(x)) }
weirder( function(a) { println("called with " + a); return a })
β-reduction - careful with names
t=λz (x y)s=z
Try:
● (λx t) z =● (λx (λz (x y))) z =● λz (z y)
Wrong!
β-reduction - careful with names
t=λz (x y) = λw (x y)s=z
Try:
● (λx t) z =● (λx (λw (x y))) z =● λw (x y)
Right
η-conversion rule
● β: (λx (y x)) z ⇔ (y z)● η: (λx (y x)) z ⇔ (y z)
λx (F x) ⇔ F - where F does not contain x
Wait! What the difference with β?
η-conversion in Javascript
function(x) { return y(x) }
is functionally the same as
y
Church Numerals in Lambda
● 0 ≡ λ f (λ x x)● 1 ≡ λ f (λ x (f x)) ● 2 ≡ λ f (λ x (f (f x))) ● etc● S(n) ≡ λ f (λ x (f ((n f) x)))
f taken (n+1) times
Church Numerals in Javascript
c0=function(f){return function(x){return x}}
c1=function(f){return function(x){return f(x)}}
c2=function(f){return function(x){return f(f(x))}}
// or just
def times(n)=function(f){ return n ? times(n-1)(f) : c0 }
//…
c1=times(1); c2=times(2) etc
//or
def next(n) = function(f) {
return function(x) { return f(n(f)(x)) }
}
Define addition in Lambda
add ≡ λ n λ m λ f λ x ((n f) ((m f) x)))
Let’s try 2+2=4...
f taken n times f taken m times
Proof that 1+3=3+1, in plain PeanoAccording to the definition of the successor function s, we have that
s(0)=1, s(s(0))=2, s(s(s(0)))=3, s(s(s(s(0))))=4 and so forth. Then we have
3+1 = s(s(s(0))) + s(0)
= s(s(s(s(0))) + 0) by axiom x+s(y)=s(x+y)
= s(s(s(s(0)))) by axiom x+0=x
= 4
1+3 = s(0) + s(s(s(0)))
= s(s(0) + s(s(0))) by axiom x+s(y)=s(x+y)
= s(s(s(0) + s(0))) by axiom x+s(y)=s(x+y)
= s(s(s(s(0) + 0))) by axiom x+s(y)=s(x+y)
= s(s(s(s(0)))) by axiom x+0=x
=4
Hence we have proved that 3+1=1+3=4
Proof that 1+3=3+1, λ, page 1S :⇔ λ abc.b(abc)
S0 = λ abc.b(abc) (λ sz.z)
= λ bc.b((λ sz.z) bc)
= λ bc.b((λ z.z) c)
= λ bc.b(c)
λ bc.b(c) = λ sz.s(z) = 1
S1 = λ abc.b(abc) (λ sz.s(z))
= λ bc.b((λ sz.s(z)) bc)
= λ bc.b((λ z.b(z)) c)
= λ bc.b(b(c))
λ bc.b(b(c)) = λ sz.s(s(z)) = 2
Thus, we have the following derivations for the successor function. It does exactly what it is supposed to do: starting from 0, it can produce any natural number.
0 = 0
S0 = 1
S1 = SS0 = 2
S2 = SS1 = SSS0 = 3
S3 = SS2 = SSS1 = SSSS0 = 4
...
Now, let's prove 3+1 = 1+3.
Proof that 1+3=3+1, λ, page 2Now, let's prove 3+1 = 1+3.
3+1 = 3S1 = (λsz.s(s(s(z))))(λabc.b(abc))(λxy.x(y))
= (λz.(λabc.b(abc)(λabc.b(abc)(λabc.b(abc)(z)))))(λxy.x(y))
= (λabc.b(abc)(λabc.b(abc)(λabc.b(abc))))(λxy.x(y)))
= SSS1 = 4
We can continue to tediously reduce the expression further instead of using the quick solution by reference above to get 3+1 = SSS1 = 4
3+1 = (λabc.b(abc)(λabc.b(abc)(λabc.b(abc))))(λxy.x(y)))
= (λabc.b(abc)(λabc.b(abc)(λbc.b((λxy.x(y))bc))))
= (λabc.b(abc)(λabc.b(abc)(λbc.b((λy.b(y))c))))
= (λabc.b(abc)(λabc.b(abc)(λbc.b(b(c)))))
= (λabc.b(abc)(λbc.b((λbc.b(b(c))bc)))
= (λabc.b(abc)(λbc.b((λc.b(b(c))c)))
= (λabc.b(abc)(λbc.b(b(b(c))))
= (λbc.b((λbc.b(b(b(c))bc))))
= (λbc.b((λc.b(b(b(c)c))))
= (λbc.b(b(b(b(c)))))
= 4
1+3 = 1S3 = (λsz.s(z))(λabc.b(abc))(λxy.x(x(x(y))))
= (λz.((λabc.b(abc))(z)))(λxy.x(x(x(y))))
= (λabc.b(abc))(λxy.x(x(x(y))))
= S3 = 4
We can continue to tediously reduce the expression further instead of using the quick solution by reference above to get 1+3 = S3 = 4
Proof that 1+3=3+1, λ, page 3
We can continue to tediously reduce the expression further instead of using the quick solution by reference above to get 1+3 = S3 = 4
1+3 = (λabc.b(abc))(λxy.x(x(x(y))))
= (λbc.b((λxy.x(x(x(y)))))bc)
= (λbc.b((λy.b(b(b(y)))))c)
= (λbc.b(b(b(b(c)))))
= 4
Hence, it's mathematically proven that 3+1 = 1+3 = 4 in Lambda calculus
Proof that 1+3=3+1, in JavaScript// define
var zero = function(f){ return function(x){return x}}
var succ = function(n){return function(f){return function(x){return f(n(f)(x))}}}
var add = function(m){ return function(n){
return function(f){
return function(x){
return m(f)(n(f)(x))}}}}
// execute
function $(id){ return document.getElementById(id)}
var one = succ(zero)
var two = succ(one)
var three = succ (two)
var four = add(two)(two)
var three_plus_one = add(three)(one)
var one_plus_three = add(one)(three)
var numbers = [one, two, three, four, three_plus_one, one_plus_three,]
$('result').innerHTML = ''
for (var i = 0; i < numbers.length; i++){
var n = numbers[i];
$('result').innerHTML += numbers[i](function(n){return 1+n})(0);
$('result').innerHTML += ' = ';
$('result').innerHTML += numbers[i](function(n){return '(1+' + n + ')'})(0);
$('result').innerHTML += '<br />;
}
Proof that 1+3=3+1, in JavaScript$('result').innerHTML = ''
for (var i = 0; i < numbers.length; i++){
var n = numbers[i];
$('result').innerHTML += numbers[i](function(n){return 1+n})(0);
$('result').innerHTML += ' = ';
$('result').innerHTML += numbers[i](function(n){return '(1+' + n + ')'})(0);
$('result').innerHTML += '<br />;
}
The following result can be obtained from onclick="eval(document.getElementById ("lambda").firstChild.nodeValue)".
1 = (1+0)
2 = (1+(1+0))
3 = (1+(1+(1+0)))
4 = (1+(1+(1+(1+0))))
4 = (1+(1+(1+(1+0))))
4 = (1+(1+(1+(1+0))))
Multiplication in Lambda
mult ≡ λ n λ m λ f λ x (n (m f)) x)))
How about 2*2=4?
take it n times f taken m times
http://dankogai.typepad.com/blog/2006/03/lambda_calculus.html
Exponentiation? Even easier
mn = m * m*…*m // n times… so:
pow ≡ λ n λ m (n m)
Can we have booleans?
● true ≡ λ x λ y x● false ≡ λ x λ y y● and ≡ λ x λ y ((x y) x)● or ≡ λ x λ y ((x x) y)● not ≡ λ x (x (λ a λ c c) (λ a λc a)) ● cond ≡ λ c λ t λ f ((c t) f)
Try It!!!
λ Booleans in Javascript?
● True=function(x){return function(y){return x}}● False=function(x){return function(y){return y}}● And=function(x){return function(y){return x(y)(x)}}● Or =function(x){return function(y){return x(x)(y)}}● Cond = function(c){
return function(t){
return function(f){
return cond(t)(f)
}}}
Try It!!!you may need this:
function p(f) {println(f == True ? "TRUE" : f == False ? "FALSE" : f)}
Or we can try to reduce
1. and true false =2. (λ x λ y (x y x)) true false =3. true false true =4. (λ x λ y x) false true =5. false
How cond works
1. cond true A B =2. λ c λ t λ f ((c t) f) true A B =3. ((true A) B) =4. ((λ x λ y x) A) B = A
5. cond false A B =6. λ c λ t λ f ((c t) f) false A B =7. ((false A) B) =8. ((λ x λ y y) A) B = B
Can we check a number for zero?
is_zero ≡ λ n n (λ x false) true
in Javascript:
is_zero=function(n){ return n(function(x){return false})(true)}
Pair
● pair ≡ λ x λ y λ f (f x y)● first ≡ λ p (p true)● second ≡ λ p (p false)
Moses Schönfinkel
● Invented currying● Invented combinators● His other papers were burned by his neighbors
Combinators
All lambda expressions can be build from these three:S, K, I
No variables required.Hold on.
Combinators
● I ≡ λx x● K ≡ λx (λy x)● S ≡ λx λ y λ z ((x z) (y z))
Combinator I
● I ≡ λx x
It is identity function; in Javascript:
I = function(x) { return x }
Combinator K
● K ≡ λx (λy x)
It builds a constant function;in Javascript:K = function(x) { return function(y){return x} }
Combinator S
● S ≡ λx λ y λ z ((x z) (y z))
It expresses the idea of substitution;in Javascript:S = function(x) { return function(y) { return function(z) { return x(z)(y(z)) } }}
Using Combinators
● ((S K K) x) = (S K K x) = (K x (K x)) = x
So I = SKK
● true=K● false=KI● numbers?
Translating λ to Combinators
To convert an expression e in the lambda calculus to an expression in SKI, define a function ϕ(e):
e ϕ(e)
λx x I
λx c Kc
λx (α β) (S(λx ϕ(α))(λx ϕ(β)))
Now try Church Numerals...
That’s it for today
Top Related