Download - The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

Transcript
Page 1: The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

The way to fastand "loss-free" SPS kickers

E. Gaxiola

With contributions from AB-BT-KSL sectionand F. Caspers, T. Kroyer, M. Timmins, J.

Uythoven

Page 2: The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

Kicker Functional specification:

Fast rise- and fall-time very stable magnetic field pulse Rise-, fall-times: 200 ns to 1.1 μs Flattop ripple: 0.5 to 1% Induction field0.08 to 0.16 T

PS / SPS days – 13/01/2005

Limitations: Ferrite Curie temperature: Beam induced losses Beam impedance: Beam stability Maximum operating voltage Switches Maximum current Ferrite core saturation Bsat

Pulsed power Low impedance travelling wave magnet

Speciality magnets * Vacuum; * High voltage; * High currents

Page 3: The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

Today’s kicker systems

Upgraded thyratron switch performance

Semiconductor components applications

Heat conductance cooling Reduced beam impedance

(longitudinal + transverse)Beam stability?!

Page 4: The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

Injection MKP 2001

4 batch LHC-type injection Modernisation/upgrade MKP systems #1 to #3

Impedance increase 12.5 Ω 16.7 ΩFaster rise timeImproved flattop ripple

PFN’s upgrade: Pulse fine tuning

2004 Rise time improvements for MKP system #4

2006 Final fine tuning (as was done for MKE)

Page 5: The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

Extraction MKE LSS4 2003

Magnet cooling for reduced beam induced heating Power semiconductor diode stacks

Increased reliability + lifetime(more cost efficient solution)from LHC MKD kicker generator development

2004 Shortened MKE Generator PFN lengths Optimized rise time PFN front cell adjustments

+ adjustable PFN first coil

Reduced kicker ripple Magnet damping resistors

Optimized fall time Mis-matched TMR values+ Use of SPS transverse feedback system (tested in SPS MD) CNGS double batch extraction practically within specs

Page 6: The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

The hardware limits of the present MKE kicker system are practically reached

Oct 2003 Step 1:As installed in 2003

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

Time [us]or%

1 2 3 4

Rise timeFall time

Usable batch timeOvershoot [%]

Kick pulse f lattop ripple [%]Post kick pulse ripple [%]

Subsequent improvement step

Pulse parameter

SPS MKE LSS4 pulse parameters

July 2004 Step 3:Mismatched TMR values

Nov 2004 Step 4:Fine-tuning adjustable PFN firstcoil for each MKE generator

April 2004 Step 2:Adding Magnet Damping Resistors+ PFN front cell adjustments

Page 7: The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

Tune kicker MKQH Beam impedance reduction Test bench

MKQH kicker magnet withceramic inserts withresistive layer coating

Proof of principle

2004 positive results for beam impedance

Page 8: The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

Approach I

Not applicable to MKE: Due to significantly increased rise time!

Horizontally: 8.2 sigma SPS beamVertically: 3.2 sigma SPS beam

Alumina plates withmetallic finger strips

Ferrite

High voltage conductor Ground electrode

Alumina profile with

Resistive coating

Page 9: The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

SPS kicker heating

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Average MKE temp measured [ o C ]

No

rmal

ised

kic

k am

plit

ud

es [

%]

MKE, p.u. BPH23209

MKE, average p.u.'s

MKE 16.10.03

MKQH, 2003

MKQH, 2004

Results MKQH kicker magnet

< 20042004

T*Curie reached at TMKE,reference= 45ºC >90ºC

Rise time 1-99%: 0.6 µs 2.9 µs

Page 10: The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

Results Impedance Measurements MKQH

Page 11: The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

Further improvements

Studies underwayCapacitive coupling by using metallic finger type strips: Beam impedance reduction Im{Z} and Re{Z} Reduced heating via Re{Z}

2006 Machine implementation on one MKE magnet

(2 cells out of 7 cells)

If successful: Possible full 9 MKE fast extraction kicker upgrade LSS4 and LSS6 for 2007 and beyond(in e.g. shutdowns)

Page 12: The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

Approach II

Horizontally: 8.2 sigma SPS beamVertically: 3.2 sigma SPS beam

Alumina plates withmetallic finger strips

Ferrite

High voltage conductor Ground electrode

Bypass-insert:

Double sided comb structure

Page 13: The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

Approach IIIStrips Printed Directly on Ferrites

Interdigital comb structure 20mm spacing

surface discharge

Page 14: The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

Results Impedance MeasurementsSingle Kicker Cell (Approaches II and III)

Page 15: The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

MKE / MKQH kickers

2004 Lab: Significantly reduced beam impedance! Reduced losses

Next step(s): 2005

Study vacuum high voltage breakdown discharge characteristicsTravelling wave kicker: To be X-checked

2006 SPS tests in LSS6

Page 16: The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

Summary Very useful knowledge build-up phase ’98 –

2006 New kicker diagnostics were added over the past years.

Tests for SPS Complex Application 2003 – 2008 Confirmation of the positive impact of the upgrade of the

injectors for LHC “Old” recuperated equipment Upgraded

“modern” performance.

This is only a preliminary summary of the findings.More extended analysis + documentation required.More detailed modelling Compare measurements and simulations. Proven solutions recommendations.CERN at the frontier: bigger and ….

Page 17: The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers

Summary (continued) MKP: Rise time improvements done

Further simulations + tuning to be done Higher reproducibility needed Spare to be finalized with increased diagnostics

MKQH: Useful test-bed with proof of principle,not straight forward applicable to other kickersBeam impedance reduction realized

MKE: Further tests to be done with stripes for voltage holding, vacuum, pulse shape in 2006

beam tests Larger scale applications in 2007 …. 2008 ? If not successful New concept (Alternative new kickers, lots of $ +

my) MKE pulse specs: After lots of modifications (not possible for 2003 tests) now practically at their limit

together with damper practically fulfilling CNGS double batch specs(is damper use the definitive solution?)