Professo
Nume
Comp
(1) Ca
(2) Ca
(3) (4) Pl
or Kwon, Sehy
erical app
uting exe
alculate Ba
alculate Ba
ot three Ba
Bayes
yug | Dept. o
roach : D
ercise
yesian esti
yesian esti
ayesian est
ian Inference
of Statistics, H
Discrete pr
mator and
mator with
timators an
e | Chapter 9.
HANNAM Un
rior
95% cred
h Beta (2, 4
nd π in the
. Comparing
niversity
ible interva
4) prior.
same grap
Bayesian and
htt
al with no i
ph.
d Frequentist
p://wolfpack
information
t in the p
| 1
.hnu.ac.kr
n.
Professo
Review
Bayesia
+ our
+ pos
Freque
+ like
Freque
Rando
+ d
+ sa
Sampl
rando
statist
samp
+ m
Likeliho
+ Join
+ fun
+ Fre
+ Bay
Point
Freque
+ ML
+ MV
or Kwon, Sehy
w
an view
r belief on
sterior dist
entist
elihood of
entist inte
m sample
ata is draw
ampling di
ling Distr
om sample
tic : (gs =
ling distrib
measure ho
ood
nt PDF of r
nction of th
quentist : e
yesian : upd
estimatio
entist
LE : The val
VUE : Facto
Bayes
yug | Dept. o
the param
ribution of
random sa
erpretatio
wn from a p
stribution
ibution
: ,..,( 21 yy
,...,,( 21 nyyy
bution : (sf
ow the stati
random sa
he paramet
estimate th
date the p
on
ue of para
orization th
ian Inference
of Statistics, H
meter is upd
f the param
mple = sa
on
population
? conceptu
)., ny
)n
)|θs , θ is
istic varies
mple, data
ter, θ
he θ
rior and ge
meter whic
eorem, Rao
e | Chapter 9.
HANNAM Un
dated by d
meter upda
mpling dis
n distributio
ually, all po
s fixed and
over all po
et posterio
ch maximiz
o Cramer L
. Comparing
niversity
ata
ated by dat
tribution o
on with un
ossible rand
d unknown
ossible sam
r |( datθπ
zes the like
Lower Boun
Bayesian and
htt
ta gives co
of data
known and
dom sampl
mples with
)ta
elihood
nd, Rao-Bla
d Frequentist
p://wolfpack
mplete infe
d fixed p
les
the param
ackwell The
t in the p
| 2
.hnu.ac.kr
erence
eter
eorem
Professo
Bayesia
+ Pos
Evalua
+ pre
+ “wh
- es
- Ba
Unbias
+ Unb
+ Bia
+ Bay
MSE m
+ MS
+ MS
+ MV
Comp
Freque
+ E(
+ MS
Bayesia
+ Uni
+ Con
- po
- Ba
or Kwon, Sehy
an
sterior mea
ating by F
e-data anal
hat if the p
stimation c
ayesian : pr
sed
biased esti
s : θθ =)ˆ(B
yesian don’
mean squar
()ˆ( θθ = ESE
()ˆ( θθ VSE =
VUE : no bi
aring est
entist estim
nyEpf = )()ˆ
ppSE f )ˆ( =
an estimat
iform Prior
njugate Pri
osterior (π
ayesian est
Bayes
yug | Dept. o
an or medi
Frequenti
ysis : samp
parameter h
oncept : m
rior
mator : E
θθ −ˆ
’t care of u
re of error2)ˆ θθ − : m
2)ˆ()ˆ θθ B+
as, (θMSE
imators f
mator pf =ˆ
p=) , pV fˆ(
npp )1( −
tor depend
r ~)(pπ
ior (pπ
~)|( datap
imator : p̂
ian Inference
of Statistics, H
an of post
st criteria
pling dist. i
has the val
max.
θθ =)ˆ( , bia
unbiased
r
measure the
)ˆ()ˆ θθ V= e
or propo
ny
= , ~ By
nyVf )() ==
ding prior
)1,1(~ Beta
,(~) aBeta
*(aBeta =
anaypB ++
+=
e | Chapter 9.
HANNAM Un
erior distri
a
s treated a
ue?”
as = 0
e precision
estimator v
rtion
),( pnB
npp )1( −
=
),b
*,bay =+
any
ba
++=
+
. Comparing
niversity
bution of t
as a random
n of estima
variance
)byn +−
ana
b ++
+
Bayesian and
htt
the θ
m variable.
tors
b+
d Frequentist
p://wolfpack
t in the p
| 3
.hnu.ac.kr
Professo
- M
In R :
or Kwon, Sehy
(
)ˆ( VpMSE b
=
=
(n=10), t
Bayes
yug | Dept. o
2)1(
()ˆ(
ban
pBpV b
++
+
rue p=0.3
ian Inference
of Statistics, H
2
2
)1(
)ˆ
pnp
pb
+−
3
e | Chapter 9.
HANNAM Un
(an
apa++−−
+
. Comparing
niversity
2)bbp
Bayesian and
htt
d Frequentist
p://wolfpack
t in the p
| 4
.hnu.ac.kr
Professo
When
Overal
Unifo
best c
or Kwon, Sehy
n p is betw
l Best
rm prior is
choice is u
Bayes
yug | Dept. o
ween 0.15~0
s the best.
niform prio
ian Inference
of Statistics, H
0.7, Conjug
Therefore,
or.
e | Chapter 9.
HANNAM Un
gate prior i
when no i
. Comparing
niversity
is the best.
nformation
Bayesian and
htt
.
n about p I
d Frequentist
p://wolfpack
I available,
t in the p
| 5
.hnu.ac.kr
the
Professo
Interva
Freque
+ piv
+ sam
+ pY(
+ 100
Bayesia
+ We
+ 100
Bart’s
Hypot
One-si
+ nul
+ alte
+ *y
+ (Fre
+ (Fre
alte
or Kwon, Sehy
al Estimat
entist
ot method
mpling dist
nppnY ~/)1
/−−
0(1-α)% Co
an
e have exac
0(1-α)% Cr
uniform p
thesis test
ded test
l hypothes
ernative hy
is observe
equentist)
equentist)
ernative hy
Bayes
yug | Dept. o
tion
d : get an s
ribution :
z by CLT
onfidence i
ct posterio
edible inte
prior => po
ting
sis : 0 : pH
ypothesis :
ed out of n
p-value=P
(YP ≥≈α
ypothesis,
ian Inference
of Statistics, H
ampling di
),(~ pnBY
T
nterval : ny
r PDF and
rval : ( 12/B−
α
osterior=B
0p=
0: ppHa >
n Bernoulli
|( * YyYP ≥
~|YyCR≥
0pp >
e | Chapter 9.
HANNAM Un
istribution
) the param
yzny /
2/± α
then, exac
*),*,( 12 Bba −−
)75,27(Beta
0 (or pp <
trials
),(~ 0pnBY
)),( 0pnB w
. Comparing
niversity
which has
meter p is
nnyn )/1( −
t CI (called
*)*,(12/ ba−
−α
0p )
))
where CRy
Bayesian and
htt
no parame
in the PDF
d Credible I
)
is the crit
d Frequentist
p://wolfpack
eter in the
F
Interval) ex
tical value
t in the p
| 6
.hnu.ac.kr
xists
for the
Professo
+ (Ba
+ Nu
+ Alte
The
Two-si
+ nul
+ *y
+ (Fre
+ (Fre
+ (Ba
or Kwon, Sehy
ayesian) P
ll hypothes
ernative hy
re is no str
ded test
l hypothes
is observe
equentist)
equentist)
ayesian) us
Bayes
yug | Dept. o
≤0 :( ppHP
sis : :0 pH
ypothesis :
rong evide
sis : 0 : pH
ed out of n
p-value=P
(2/ P≈α
sing 100(1-
ian Inference
of Statistics, H
∫=0
0
*0 )|
pyp
6.0=
0:0 >pH
ence that p
0p= vs. al
n Bernoulli
|( * YyYP ≥
|( YyY CR≥
-α)% credib
e | Chapter 9.
HANNAM Un
0 * )|( dypπ
6.
6.0>p .
lternative h
trials
,(~ 0pnBY
),(~ 0pnBY
ble interval
. Comparing
niversity
dp is comp
hypothesis
2*)) (whe
)) where y
.
Bayesian and
htt
pared to th
: : ppHa ≠
en * npy >CRy is the
d Frequentist
p://wolfpack
e significan
0p
0p )
critical val
t in the p
| 7
.hnu.ac.kr
nt level.
ue
Professo
Exercis
Exercis
or Kwon, Sehy
se #1
se #2
Bayes
yug | Dept. o
ian Inference
of Statistics, H
e | Chapter 9.
HANNAM Un
. Comparing
niversity
Bayesian and
htt
d Frequentist
p://wolfpack
t in the p
| 8
.hnu.ac.kr
Professo
Monte
or Kwon, Sehy
e Carlo
Bayes
yug | Dept. o
ian Inference
of Statistics, H
e | Chapter 9.
HANNAM Un
. Comparing
niversity
Bayesian and
htt
d Frequentist
p://wolfpack
t in the p
| 9
.hnu.ac.kr
Top Related