Download - Defense of thesis presentation

Transcript
Page 1: Defense of thesis presentation

Activity on demand for Interleukin-12: !A Holy Grail in the field of cancer immunotherapy!

Possible innovative strategies!!

MSc Thesis defense of Danil Koovely !Supervision of Dario Venetz during Spring Semester 2015!Biomacromolecules research group of Prof. Dr. Dario Neri!

ETHZ!

Page 2: Defense of thesis presentation

Boosted proliferation!

Increased !cytotoxicity!

IL-12!

APCs!

IFN-γ!

STRONG!ANTI-TUMOR!EFFECT!

High systemic toxicity due to Cytokine Release Syndrome limits clinical applications !

Introduction to Interleukin-12!

Page 3: Defense of thesis presentation

Intermolecular disulfide bridge!p35!

p40!

- IL-12 covalent heterodimer composed of subunits p35 and p40!    -  Subunits expressed by separate genes. p35 secretion is p40-dependent.!!!-  One intermolecular disulfide bridge present but not crucial for IL-12 formation!

Structure of Interleukin-12!

Page 4: Defense of thesis presentation

0 12 24 36 48 60 720

2

4

6

8

10

time [h]

%ID

/g

bloodtumor

inactive p35inactive p40active IL-12 heterodimer

 

Main concept!!•  Separate administration of individual subunits could prevent systemic toxicity!•  Vascular targeting could enable site-specific reassembly!

time gap

0 12 24 36 48 60 720

2

4

6

8

10

time [h]

%ID

/g

bloodtumor

inactive p35inactive p40active IL-12 heterodimer

IL-12 activity restricted !to the tumor site!  >> potentially no side-effects!

or!

or!

Page 5: Defense of thesis presentation

TEV protease! ! 24 h incubation at 4°C!

TEV  cleavage    site  

p35*-­‐scFv(F8)  

p40*  

Isolated  p35*-­‐scFv(F8)  

Aim: To separate p35*-scFv(F8) from p40* and TEV protease!Method: To assess whether IL-12* can be cleaved by TEV and

purified by a “tandem” of IMAC and protein A purification!    

TEV protease-mediated expression of p35-scFv(F8)!

I  MA  C  

p40*  +  p35*-­‐scFv(F8)  +  TEV  

TEV  

Prot  A  

p40*  +  p35*-­‐scFv(F8)   p40*  

p35*-­‐scFv(F8)  

Page 6: Defense of thesis presentation

185  

80  

115  

65  

     50  

30                      25  

                     15                                10  

TEV  IL-­‐12*  

NR            R   NR            R  L     NR      R  

IL-­‐12*+TEV  

Non cleaved IL-12*!

p35*-scFv(F8)!

p40*!

TEV protease!

à The cleavage site is accessible by the TEV protease!à IL-12*-TEV can be split into p35*-scFv and p40*!

IL-12* and TEV protease were mixed in a molar ratio 1:1 and

incubated at 4°C overnight!

Page 7: Defense of thesis presentation

                                             L        I                FT                W            E                  FT            W                  E    

185  

80  

115  

65  

     50  

30  

                   25  

                     15                                10  

A  

B  

C  

D  

E  

L: Ladder!I: Input!Ft: Flow-through IMAC !W: Wash IMAC !E: Eluate IMAC !Ft: Flow-through Protein A !W: Wash Protein A !E: Concentrated eluate Protein A!A: Non-cleaved IL-12* aggregates!B: Non-cleaved IL-12*!C: Cleaved p35*-scFv(F8)!D: Cleaved p40*!E: TEV enzyme!  

IMAC     Protein  A  

à Both IL-12* subunits are “sticky” !à Despite successful TEV cleavage it is difficult to efficiently separate p35* from p40*!

Page 8: Defense of thesis presentation

Co-expression of mutated IL-12 subunits !

p35*-­‐tag   p40*-­‐tag  

•                                     L              NR            R                                NR          R                                NR        R            

185  

80  

115  

65  

     50  

30                      25  

                     15                                10  

185  

80  115  

65  

     50  

30                      25                        15  

                             10  

p35*-­‐Db(F8)    p40*-­‐Db(F8)      p35*-­‐His        p40*-­‐His     p35*-­‐scFv(F8)     p40*-­‐scFv(F8)    

                                                   L            NR          R                                    NR          R                                    NR        R            

I  MA  C  

Prot  A  +  

1 to 2 molar ratio!

Page 9: Defense of thesis presentation

p35-­‐His  No  SEC  due  to  small  quanLty  of  protein  

   

SEC  purificaLon    

Page 10: Defense of thesis presentation

Ready for further proteins characterization: !1)  SPR for binding kinetics between p35* and p40*!2)  Bioassay of pre-assembled IL-12*!3)  SEC analysis of assembly between p35* and p40*!

!

Yield after SEC purification: 1.9 mg/L ( ~12% of yield pre SEC purification)  

Yield after SEC purification: 1.3 mg/L ( ~5% of yield pre SEC purification)  

5 10 15 20

0

5

10

15

20

25

p35−scFv(F8) S200 10−300

Volume [mL]

mAU

5 10 15 20

0

5

10

15

20

25

p40−scFv(F8) S200 10−300

Volume [mL]

mAU

5 10 15 20

0

2

4

6

8

10

p35−Db(F8) S200 10−300

Volume [mL]

mAU

5 10 15 20

0

2

4

6

8

10

p40−Db(F8) S200 10−300

Volume [mL]

mAU

Yield after SEC purification: 0.6 mg/L ( ~9% of yield pre SEC purification)  

Page 11: Defense of thesis presentation

-­‐10  

10  

30  

50  

70  

90  

110  

130  

-­‐50   50   150   250   350   450  

p35-­‐Db(F8)  +  p40-­‐Db(F8)  

-­‐10  

10  

30  

50  

70  

90  

110  

130  

-­‐50   50   150   250   350   450  

p35-­‐scFv(F8)  +  p40-­‐scFv(F8)  

-­‐-­‐-­‐    500  nM    -­‐-­‐-­‐    250  nM  -­‐-­‐-­‐    125  nM  -­‐-­‐-­‐    62,5  nM  -­‐-­‐-­‐    31,25  nM  -­‐-­‐-­‐    0  nM  

Kd=  35.1  nM  

p35* mutants (scFv or Db)! p40* mutants (scFv or Db)!immobilized on chip!

IL-12* mutants!+  

Coating: 1000 RU (p40*-scFv) 1600 RU (p40*-Db)!  

SPR analysis  

RU   RU  

Page 12: Defense of thesis presentation

10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 1000.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

IL12 equivalents [µM|

A45

0nm

p35S92S/p40C197S reassembly

scIL12 (mouse)6xHis taggedscFv(F8) fusionsDb(F8) fusionsPBS

IC50  scFv(F8)  fusions:  42.02  µM  Db(F8)  fusions:  16.59  µM  

+  

In vitro assembled! IL-12* mutants!

Mouse splenocytes! ELISA  for  IFN-­‐γ!quanLficaLon  

48 h!!37° C  

Bioassay  

Page 13: Defense of thesis presentation

5 10 15 20

0

5

10

15

20

25

Positive control S200 10−300

Volume [mL]

mAU

5 10 15 20

0

5

10

15

20

25

p40−scFv(F8) S200 10−300

Volume [mL]m

AU5 10 15 20

0

5

10

15

20

25

p35−scFv(F8) S200 10−300

Volume [mL]

mAU 14.1  mL  

12.9  mL  

12.2  mL  

10.9  mL  

5 10 15 20

0

5

10

15

20

25

p40/p35 (scFV) 1:1 mol ratio

Volume [mL]

mAU

5 10 15 20

0

5

10

15

20

25

p40/p35 1:2 (scFv) mol ratio

Volume [mL]

mAU

5 10 15 20

0

5

10

15

20

25

p40/p35 1:4 (scFv) mol ratio

Volume [mL]

mAU

FPLC confirmation of in vitro assembly!

Page 14: Defense of thesis presentation

Summary and outlook  

5 10 15 20

0

5

10

15

20

25

Positive control S200 10−300

Volume [mL]

mAU

5 10 15 20

0

5

10

15

20

25

p40−scFv(F8) S200 10−300

Volume [mL]

mAU

5 10 15 20

0

5

10

15

20

25

p35−scFv(F8) S200 10−300

Volume [mL]

mAU

Alternative strategy for p35 production through TEV cleavage was tested and found to be not implementable!

!Different p35-antibody constructs were produced with the co-transfection strategy and successfully isolated. To our knowledge p35 has never been isolated in such a pure quality !!p35- and p40-antibody constructs were found to bind readily in SPR measurements but not so well in SEC. Biological activity in vitro of these constructs was checked and confirmed!!!!!!Behavior in vitro has to be analyzed further in order to explain the different results of FPLC and bioassay!!Behavior of p35-antibody constructs in vivo has to be analyzed in a biodistribution study!!!!! !!!  

Page 15: Defense of thesis presentation

Acknowledgments!

l  Prof. Dr. Dario Neri!l  Dario Venetz!l  The whole Neri lab!

Thanks! Danke! Grazie!