1T.Kobayashi (KEK)
(Present long baseline neutrino experiments and)(Present long baseline neutrino experiments and)
Future Projects to measure Future Projects to measure θθ1313 and the CP and the CP violation phaseviolation phase
Takashi KobayashiIPNS, KEK
Aug. 9, 2004@Hanoi
Contents1. Introduction2. Present LBL experiments3. Future accelerator based projects4. Reactor experiments5. Summary
2T.Kobayashi (KEK)
IntroductionIntroduction• Evidences of ν oscillation
– Atm ν (SK,1998) & solar ν (SK+SNO,2001)– Finite masses!! & Large mixings!!!!!– First evidence beyond SM
• Definite confirmation w/ diff systematics– Present (1st generation) long baseline (LBL) experiments (for atm ν)– Players: K2K (1999~), MINOS (2005~), ICARUS/OPERA(2006~)
• Next steps– Understand whole structure of ν mass/mixing– How similar/different from quark sector?
• “Standard” mixing w/ 3x3 matrix?• Mass hierarchy?• CP violation?Would lead physics beyond SM
– Next generation LBL experiments and reactor exp.• w/ High statistics and small systematics
• New era of precision “Neutrino Flavor Physics”– Cf. Have been done last ~40yrs for quark sector
3T.Kobayashi (KEK)
The K2K The K2K (KEK(KEK--toto--KamiokaKamioka) ) ExperimentExperiment• The first & only running LBL ν
osc. Experiment (1999~)νµ beam (99%) with <E> ~ 1.3GeV w/ KEK 12GeV-PS
• Confirmation of atm ν resultsννµµ disappearancedisappearance and νeappearance
)27.1(sin2sin.2
22
ν
θE
Lmprob ∆⋅=
Signature (νµ else)•Reduction of # of events•Spectrum distortion
4T.Kobayashi (KEK)
Latest Latest ResultsResults on on ννµµ disapp.(Junedisapp.(June 2004)2004)
150.9Null-oscillation104.8Best Fit:108Observation:
Number of eventsPRELIMINARY
Eνrec
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Entries 56
[GeV]
even
ts/0
.2[G
eV]
Best Fit(KS prob: 52%)
No Oscillation(KS prob: 0.11%)
(normalized by area)
K2K-I & K2K-II
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1sin2(2θ)
∆m2
[eV
2 ]
68%90%99%
• Best fit in phys. (all) region– sin22θ = 1.00 (1.53)
∆m2 [eV2] = 2.73×10−3 (2.12)
• Confirmed ν osc at 3.93.9σσ level
Eνrec spec for 1ring µ events
∆m2=1.7~3.5x10-3 eV2
@sin22θ=1 (@90%CL)
2.52.5σσ
2.92.9σσ
8.9x1019 POT (1999Jun~2004Feb)(1020POT proposed)
6.110.10
−−
5T.Kobayashi (KEK)
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
sin22θµe~0.5sin22θ13
∆m2
(eV
2 )
K2K(90%CL)
CHOOZ(90%CL)SK atm.νallowed (90%CL)
Comparison w/ other resultsComparison w/ other results
(same as prev page)
ννµµ disappearancedisappearance
PRL93(2004)051801
ννee appearanceappearance
Consistent w/ Consistent w/ SK SK atmatm νν resultresult
νe disapp
6T.Kobayashi (KEK)
MINOSMINOS
Wide band νµ beam
30205
735km
• wide band νµ beam w/ FNAL 120GeV Main Injector (0.4MW)
• (magnetized)Iron-scintillator sampling calorimeter– 5,400tons @ far, 980tons @ near
νµ CC int./MINOS/yr ~ 2,500 (LE beam)• High precision νµ disappearance• Far detector fully operational since 2003• Beam line almost completing• Start from 2005
Far detector
First Horn being Installed
7T.Kobayashi (KEK)
CCERN ERN NNeutrino to eutrino to GGranran SSassoasso (CNGS)(CNGS)
732km
E(GeV)
ν µC
C/k
T/a
n
• Wide band νµ beamw/ CERN 400GeV SPS <Eν>~17GeV
• Two experiments– OPERA: 1.7kt
Emulsion cloud chamber
– ICARUS: 3kt Liq. ArTPC
• ~5500νµ event/kt/yrντ appearance
• Under construction• First beam to GS
May 2006
8T.Kobayashi (KEK)
For ∆m2 = 0.0025 eV2, sin2 2θ = 1.0
Expected sensitivitiesExpected sensitivitiesνµ disappearance ντ appearance
MINOS 5yrs90% and 99% CL
δ(∆m2)~2x10-4eV2
δ(sin22θ)~5%read from above plot
MINOSMINOS
0.711.9ICARUS1.117.2OPERABGSig
∆m2=2.5x10-3eV2
Full mix.5yrs of runningICARUS: 1.5kt fid mass
Expected signal
9T.Kobayashi (KEK)
3 flavor mixing3 flavor mixing
ilil U νν Σ=Weak Mass eigenstates
Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata Matrix
−⋅
⋅
−⋅
−=
=
−1313
1313
2323
23231212
1212
321
321
321
0010
0
00010001
00
001
10000
cs
sc
ecssccs
sc
UUUUUUUUU
U
i
eee
δ
τττ
µµµ
sij=sinθij, cij=cosθij3 mixing angles and 1 CPV phase
sin22θ12∼0.8(SolarLBL reactor)
sin22θ23~1(Atm ν) Reactor
If neutrino have finite mass, weak and mass eigenstates can differ
Unknown 2 parameters
LBL acc. experiments
mi: 3 masses, ∆∆mmijij: 2 differences: 2 differences
10T.Kobayashi (KEK)
WhatWhat’’s next?s next?00??=|Ue3|2=sinθ13
2
00??=|Ue3|2=sinθ132
• Only unknown mixing θ13– Only upper bound from CHOOZ reactor exp– At the same ∆m2 as νµ disapp. Support 3gen. mix. framework– Open possibility to search for CPV (θany=0 No CPV)
• Mass hierarchy (sign of ∆m2)• CPV• Approaches
– LBL experiment: Multi purpose (θ13, sign(∆m2),CPV, θ23,∆m232)
– Reactor-based νe disappearance: single purpose (θ13), complementary
213
223
212 mmm ∆≈∆<<∆
11T.Kobayashi (KEK)
ννµµ ννee appearance in LBL expappearance in LBL exp
δ −δ, a -a for eννµ →
⋅
⋅×= −
]GeV[]cmg[][eV1056.7 3
25 Ea ρMatter eff.:
CP-odd
δθθ sin
sin2sin
13
12212 ⋅⋅∆≈
+−≡
ELm
PPPPACP
Solar
MainMain
MatterMatter
13CP13
2e sinθ
1A ; 2θsin)N(ν ∝∝
Size of θ13 critical !
12T.Kobayashi (KEK)
~1GeV νµ beam(×100 of K2K)
Tokai
T2K experiment T2K experiment ((approved & start in 2009approved & start in 2009))
Physics motivationsDiscovery of νµ→νe appearancePrecise meas. of disappearance νµ→νx
Discovery of CP violation (Phase2)
Kamioka
J-PARC0.75MW 50GeV PS
Super-K: 50 ktonWater Cherenkov
Phase2:4 MW ?
Phase2: MtonHyper-K?
Long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment from Tokai to Kamioka.
13T.Kobayashi (KEK)
Nuclear and ParticleExperimental Facility
Materials and Life Science
Experimental Facility
Neutrino to Kamiokande
Linac(350m)
3 GeV Synchrotron(25 Hz, 1MW)
Nuclear Transmutation
50 GeV Synchrotron(0.75 MW)
Construction2001~2008
JJapan apan PProton roton AAccelerator ccelerator RResearch esearch CComplex (Jomplex (J--PARC)PARC)
14T.Kobayashi (KEK)
February, 2004
TOKYO
KEK
JAERI
NARITA
J-PARC In JAERI Tokai-siteJAERI:Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute
60km
15T.Kobayashi (KEK)
50G
eV rin
g
target station
De
ca
y v
olu
me
(
Beam dump
( )
Near detector
Muon monitor
( )
Primary proton
beam line
target
Cryogenics
Cryogenics
Extraction point
( )
130m
280m
Primary proton beam lineTarget/Horn systemDecay volume (130m)Beam dumpMuon monitorNear neutrino detector (280m)Second near neutrino detector (~2km): not approved yet
Components
Approved in Dec. 2003Approved in Dec. 2003for 5 years constructionfor 5 years construction(2004~2008JFY)(2004~2008JFY)
Extractionpoint
Target/HornsTarget station
Muon monitor
beam dump
Near neutrino detector
Decay volume
Primary Protonbeam line
50GeVring
SK direction
JJ--PARC Neutrino facilityPARC Neutrino facility
16T.Kobayashi (KEK)
• Decay volume part• July, 2004
Ground breaking of Ground breaking of νν facility @ Jfacility @ J--PARCPARC
17T.Kobayashi (KEK)
Off Axis BeamOff Axis Beam
(ref.: BNL-E889 Proposal)
θTargetHorns Decay Pipe
Super-K.
Quasi Monochromatic Beamx 2~3 intense than NBB
First real application
Statistics at SK(OAB 2 deg,1 yr,22.5 kt)
~ 4500 νµ tot ~ 3000 νµ CC νe ~0.2% at νµ peak
Tuned at oscillation maximum
OAB2.0degOAB2.5degOAB3.0deg
On-axis
18T.Kobayashi (KEK)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5Reconstructed Eν(GeV)
Expected Signal+BGsin22θ13=0.10sin22θ23=1.0∆m2=0.003eV2
Total BG
BG from νµ+antiνµ
T2K sensitivity on T2K sensitivity on ννee appearanceappearance
totalνeνµνeνµ
36.411.524.90.51.710.712.00.01139.5114.624.90.51.710.712.00.1
Signal + BGSignal
Background in Super-K (as of Oct 25, 2001)sin22θ13
sin22θ13
∆m2
Off axis 2 deg, 5 years
Off axis 2 deg, 5 yearsat
Sin22θ13>0.006 C
HO
OZ
excl
uded
x20
δ=0, θ23=π/4
10%10% sys. err
19T.Kobayashi (KEK)
Sensitivity for CPV in T2KSensitivity for CPV in T2K--IIIIJHF-HK CPV Sensitivity
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1sinδ
sin2 2θ
13
no BGsignal stat only
(signal+BG) stat only
stat+2%syst.stat+5%syst.
stat+10%syst.
CHOOZ excludedsin22θ13<0.12@∆m31
2~3x10-3eV2
T2K 3σ discovery
3σ CP sensitivity : |δ|>20o for sin22θ13>0.01 with 2% syst.
4MW, 540kt2yr for νµ6~7yr for νµ
δθθ
ν
sinsin
2sin4 13
12212 ⋅⋅∆≈EmACP
∆m212=6.9x10-5eV2
∆m322=2.8x10-3eV2
θ12=0.594θ23=π/4
T2K-I 90%
20T.Kobayashi (KEK)
NONOννAA• Use Existing NuMI beamline• New 50kt fine grained
detector @~800km and @ 12km off axis
• Liq scint. tracker & particle board absorber (1/3X0)(Alternative:full active liq.sci.)
• Possible future upgrade of MI (0.4MW 2MW):Proton driver
• Proposed. (2008?~)
Assuming ∆m2=2.5x10-3eV2
Messier, ν2004
21T.Kobayashi (KEK)
NONOννA Physics ReachA Physics Reach
50kton baseline detector 50kton baseline
detector
Feld
man
, Asp
en P
AC
200
4
ννee appearanceappearance Mass hierarchyMass hierarchy
22T.Kobayashi (KEK)
Europe: Europe: SPLSPL FrejusFrejusGen
eve
Italy
130km
40kt400kt
• 4MW 2.2GeV Superconducting Proton Linac (SPL) @ CERN
• Low energy wide band (Eν~0.3GeV)• L=130km• Water Cherenkov 40 400kt (UNO)• ~18,000 νµ CC/year/400kt
θ13, CPV• Small matter effect• SPL in R&D, UNO in conceptual design
23T.Kobayashi (KEK)
BNLBNL--HomestakeHomestake• 28GeV AGS upgrade to 1MW
(2MW) cf current 0.1MW• Wide band beam (0.5~6GeV)• L=2,540km• Mton detector• ~13,000 νµ CC/year/500kt• Cover higher osc. maximaGoals
νe appearance• Sign of ∆m23• CPV
θ12, ∆m12Possible w/ only ν run at certain
parameter region• LOI written.
(Ref: Diwan et al., PRD68, 012002, 2003)
2540 kmHomestake BNL
µ
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Reconstructed ν Energy (GeV)
BNL-HS 2540 km
sin22θ23 = 1.0
∆m2 32 = 2.5e-3 eV 2
1 MW, 0.5 MT, 5e7 sec
No oscillations: 13290 evts
With oscillations: 6538 evts
Background: 1211 evts
24T.Kobayashi (KEK)
Brookhaven to Brookhaven to HomestakeHomestake Physics ReachPhysics Reach
Even with only ν data, CP violation and mass hierarchy are visible
in some regions of parameter space.
Normal hierarchy Reversed hierarchy
But with both ν and ν running, CP precision much higher
Diwan, 3/2004 APS study meeting
25T.Kobayashi (KEK)
G. Mention (APC)
Near detector Far detector
Neutrino Detection Rate per Power Generation
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Energy (MeV)
P.Vogel, PRD, Vol29, 1918 (1984)
P. Vogel et al. PR. C Vol.24, 1543 (1981)
H.V.Klapdor et al., PL 122B 22(1982)H.V.Klapdor et al., PRL vol48, 127 (1982)
G.Zacek et al., PRD 34 (1986) 2621
235U 238U
241Pu
239Pu
3 4 Eν (MeV)
Reactor Reactor ννee disappearancedisappearancen νe from nuclear reactor <E>~3MeVn 1-P(νe→ νe) = sin2(2θ13)sin2(∆m2
31L/4E) + O(∆m221/∆m2
31) : pure θ13
n Small systematic error (<1%) requiredn Identical near det @ O(100)m & far det @a few km
8MeV
30μs
1~8MeV
t
Signal Property
ν e + p → n + e +
e + + e − → 2 γE ν − 0 .8 MeV( )
n + Gd → Gd ' + γ s E∑ = 8 MeV( )
νe signature
26T.Kobayashi (KEK)
ComplementarityComplementarity of Reactorof Reactor--Accelerator Meas.Accelerator Meas.
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14
sin2 2θ13
P ν µ → νe( )
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14
Reactor Measurement= Pure sin22θ13 measurement
Reactor Measurement
J-PARCMeasurement
sin2 θ23 =0.610.39
Reactor-Accelerator combination => a lot of physics potential
* If accuracyis good enough=> |sinδl |
* Answer to θ23 degeneracy
27T.Kobayashi (KEK)
Reactor experiment proposalsReactor experiment proposals
Diablo Canyon
Braidwood
Angra
PenlyChoozCruas
Krasnoyarsk
Taiwan
Kashiwasaki
Daya bay
0.02~0.03
90%CL Sensitivity90%CL Sensitivitysinsin22θθ1313 θθ1313(deg)(deg)
2008
Approved in Approved in francefrance
28T.Kobayashi (KEK)
Near detector site (to be built)
Existing Far detector site
DoubleDouble--CHOOZCHOOZ• Twin reactor cores
– P=2x4.2 GWth• Two 10 tons detectors
– 80% dodecane + 20% PXE + 0.1% Gd
– Near: 100-200 m – 60-80 mwe– Far: 1.05 km - 300 mwe
• 3 years Sensitivity–– 0.6%0.6% systematics– No signal: sin2(2θ13) < 0.02-03
(90% C.L.)– Signal: sin2(2θ13) > 0.04-05 (3σ)
• Prospect (approved & funded approved & funded in Francein France)– 2007: far detector running – 2008: near detector running– Cost ~7Meuros + civil constr.
Near
Far
29T.Kobayashi (KEK)
SummarySummary• First 1st generation experiment K2K
– Confirmed ν oscillation observed in atm ν at SK @3.9σ– Waiting precise meas. from MINOS(2005~), ντ app. from CNGS(2006~)
• Next important issues– Discovery and measurement of only unknown mixing θ13– Mass hierarchy– CP violation
• Next generation LBL experiments covers most– T2K using J-PARC and SK started construction. Start exp. In 2009
θ13 sensitivity ~0.006 (90%CL), ~0.018 (3σ)• |δ|~20deg in phase 2
– NOνA proposal w/ similar potential to T2K• Pure θ13 measurements by reactor experiments
– complementary to disentangle parameter relationsθ13 sensitivity 0.01~0.03 (90%)
– Systematic error (<1%) is key issue– Double-CHOOZ is partially approved
• Neutrino field will continue to be very exciting for coming decades
Top Related