Wireless PHY: Digital Demodulation and Wireless Channels Y. Richard Yang 09/13/2012.

Wireless PHY: Digital Demodulation and

Wireless Channels

Y. Richard Yang

09/13/2012

2

Outline

Admin and recap Digital demodulation Wireless channels

3

Admin

Assignment 1 posted

4

Demodulation Low pass filter and FIR Convolution Theorem

Digital modulation/demodulation ASK, FSK, PSK General representation

Recap

Recap: gi() for BPSK

5

1: g1(t) = cos(2πfct) t in [0, T]

0: g0(t) = -cos(2πfct) t in [0, T]

Note: g1(t) = -g0(t)

cos(2πfct)[0, T]1-1

g1(t)g0(t)

Recap: Signaling Functions gi() for QPSK

6

11: cos(2πfct + π/4) t in [0, T]

10: cos(2πfct + 3π/4) t in [0, T]

00: cos(2πfct - 3π/4) t in [0, T]

01: cos(2πfct - π/4) t in [0, T]

Q

I

11

01

10

00

Recap: QPSK Signaling Functions as Sum of cos(2πfct), sin(2πfct)

7

11: cos(π/4 + 2πfct) t in [0, T]-> cos(π/4) cos(2πfct) +

-sin(π/4) sin(2πfct)

10: cos(3π/4 + 2πfct) t in [0, T]-> cos(3π/4) cos(2πfct) +

-sin(3π/4) sin(2πfct)

00: cos(- 3π/4 + 2πfct) t in [0, T]-> cos(3π/4) cos(2πfct) +

sin(3π/4) sin(2πfct)

01: cos(- π/4 + 2πfct) t in [0, T]-> cos(π/4) cos(2πfct) +

sin(π/4) sin(2πfct)

sin(2πfct)

11

00

10

cos(2πfct)

[cos(π/4), sin(π/4)]

01

[cos(3π/4), sin(3π/4)]

[cos(3π/4), -sin(3π/4)]

[-sin(π/4), cos(π/4)]

We call sin(2πfct) and cos(2πfct) the bases.

Recap: Demodulation/Decoding

8

Considered a simple on-off setting: sender uses a single signaling function g(), and can have two actions send g() or nothing (send 0)

How does receiver use the received sequence x(t) in [0, T] to detect if sends g() or nothing?

Recap: Design

9

Streaming algorithm: use all data points in [0, T] As each sample xi comes in, multiply it by a factor hT-i-

1 and accumulate to a sum y

At time T, makes a decision based on the accumulated sum at time T: y[T]

xTx2x1x0

h0h1h2hT

****

Determining the Best h

10

where w is noise,

Design objective: maximize peak pulse signal-to-noise ratio


11

Assume Gaussian noise, one can derive

Using Fourier Transform and Convolution Theorem:


12

Apply Schwartz inequality

By considering


13

Determining Best h to Use

14

xTx2x1x0

gTg2g1g0

****

xTx2x1x0

h0h1h2hT

****

Matched Filter Decision

is called Matched filter.Example

15

decision time

Summary of Progress

16

After this “complex” math, the implementation/interpretation is actually the following quite simple alg: precompute auto correlation: <g, g>

compute the correlation between received x and signaling function g, denoted as <x, g>

if <x, g> is closer to <g, g> • output sends g

else• output sends nothing

Applying Scheme to BPSK

18

since g0 = -g1 <x, g0> = - <x, g1>

<g0, g0> = - <g0, g1>

rewrite as if |<x, g1> - <g1, g1>| < |<x, g1> - <g0, g1>|

• pick 1 else

• pick 0


g1(t)g0(t)

Interpretation

19

For any signal s, <s, g1> computes the coordinate (projection) of s when using g1 as a base cleaner if g1 is normalized (i.e., scale g1 by

sqrt of <g1, g1>), but we do not worry about it yet

g1=cos(2πfct)[0, T]

<g1(t), g1(t)><g0(t), g1(t)>

=-<g1(t), g1(t)>

<x, g1(t)>

Applying Scheme to QPSK: Attempt 1

20

Consider g00 alone, compute <x, g00> …



Consider g11 alone, compute <x, g11> … Issues

Complexity:• need to compute M correlation, where M is number of

signaling functions• Think of 64-QAM

Objective• the previous scheme is defined for a single signaling

function, does it work for M?

Decoding for QPSK using bases

21

4 signaling functions g00(), g01(), g10(), g11() For each signaling function, computes

correlation with the bases (cos(), sin()), e.g., g00: [a00, b00]

Q: Where did we see a similar computation format for computing a00, b00?

For received signal x, computes ax=<x, cos> and bx=<x, sin> (how many correlations do we do now?)

QPSK Demodulation/Decoding

22

sin(2πfct)

cos(2πfct)

[a01,b01]

[a10,b10]

[a00,b00]

[a11,b11]

[ax,bx]

Q: how to decode?

Look into Noise

23

Assume sender sends gm(t) [0, T] Receiver receives x(t) [0, T]

Consider one sample

where w[i] is noise Assume white noise, i.e., prob w[i] = z is

2

2

2

2

1)(

z

ezf

24

Likelihood

What is the likelihood (prob.) of observing x[i]? it is the prob. of noise being w[i] = x[i] – g[i]

What is the likelihood (prob.) of observing the whole sequence x? the product of the probabilities

Likelihood Detection

25

Suppose we know

Maximum likelihood detection picks the m with the highest P{x|gm}.

From the expression

We pick m with the lowest ||x-gm||2

Back to QPSK

26

QPSK Demodulation/Decoding

27

sin(2πfct)

cos(2πfct)

[a01,b01]

[a10,b10]

[a00,b00]

[a11,b11]

[ax,bx]

Q: what does maximum likelihood det pick?

General Matched Filter Detection: Implementation for Multiple Sig Func.

28

Basic idea consider each gm[0,T] as a point (with

coordinates) in a space

compute the coordinate of the received signal x[0,T]

check the distance between gm[0,T] and the received signal x[0,T]

pick m* that gives the lowest distance value

Computing Coordinates

29

Pick orthogonal bases {f1(t), f2(t), …, fN(t)} for {g1(t), g2(t), …, gM(t)}

Compute the coordinate of gm[0,T] as cm = [cm1, cm2, …, cmN], where

Compute the coordinate of the received signal x[0,T] as x = [x1, x2, …, xN]

Compute the distance between r and cm every cm and pick m* that gives the lowest distance value

Example: Matched Filter => Correlation Detector

30

receivedsignal x

31

BPSK vs QPSK

BPSK

QPSK

fc: carrier freq.Rb: freq. of data10dB = 10; 20dB =100

11 10 00 01

A

t

BPSK vs QPSK

A major metric of modulation performance is spectral density (SD)

Q: what is the SD of BPSK vs that of QPSK? Q: Why would any one use BPSK, given

higher QAM?32

Spectral Density =

bit rate-------------------

width of spectrum used

Context

Previous demodulation considers only additive noise, and does not consider wireless channel’s effects Wireless channels more than add some

noise to a signaling function g(t)

We next study its effects

33

34

Outline


Signal Propagation

36

Isotropic radiator: a single point equal radiation in all directions (three dimensional) only a theoretical reference antenna

Radiation pattern: measurement of radiation around an antenna

zy

x

z

y x idealisotropicradiator

Antennas: Isotropic Radiator

Q: how does power level decrease as a function of d, the distancefrom the transmitter to the receiver?

37

Free-Space Isotropic Signal Propagation

In free space, receiving power proportional to 1/d² (d = distance between transmitter and receiver)

Suppose transmitted signal is cos(2ft), the received signal is

Pr: received power

Pt: transmitted power

Gr, Gt: receiver and transmitter antenna gain

(=c/f): wave length

Sometime we write path loss in log scale: Lp = 10 log(Pt) – 10log(Pr)

d

cdtftfEd

)]/(2cos[),(

38

Log Scale for Large SpandB = 10 log(times)

Slim/Gates

~100B

Obama

~10M

~10K

1000 times

40 dB

10,000 times

30 dB

10,000 x 1,000

40 + 30 = 70 dB

39

Path Loss in dBdB = 10 log(times)

source

10 W

d1

1 mW

1 uW

1000 times

40 dB

10,000 times

30 dB

10,000 x 1,000

40 + 30 = 70 dBpower

d2

40

dBm (Absolute Measure of Power)dBm = 10 log (P/1mW)

source

10 W

d1

1 mW

1 uW

1000 times

40 dB

10,000 times

30 dB

10,000 x 1,000

40 + 30 = 70 dBpower

d2

40 dBm

-30 dBm

41

Number in Perspective (Typical #)

42

Exercise: 915MHz WLAN (free space) Transmit power (Pt) = 24.5 dBm Receive sensitivity = -64.5 dBm

Receiving distance (Pr) =

Gt=Gr=1

43

Two-ray Ground Reflection Model

Single line-of-sight is not typical. Two paths (direct and reflect) cancel each other and reduce signal strength

Pr: received power

Pt: transmitted power

Gr, Gt: receiver and transmitter antenna gain

hr, ht: receiver and transmitter height

44

Exercise: 915MHz WLAN (Two-ray ground reflect) Transmit power (Pt) = 24.5 dBm Receive sensitivity = -64.5 dBm

Receiving distance (Pr) =

Gt=Gr=hr=ht=1

45

Real Antennas

Real antennas are not isotropic radiators Some simple antennas: quarter wave /4 on car roofs or

half wave dipole /2 size of antenna proportional to wavelength for better transmission/receiving

/4/2

Q: Assume frequency 1 Ghz, = ?

46

Figure for Thought: Real Measurements

47

Receiving power additionally influenced by shadowing (e.g., through a wall or a door) refraction depending on the density of a medium reflection at large obstacles scattering at small obstacles diffraction at edges

reflection

scattering

diffraction

shadow fadingrefraction

Signal Propagation: Complexity

48

Signal Propagation: Complexity

Details of signal propagation are very complicated

We want to understand the key characteristics that are important to our understanding

49

Outline


Intro shadowing

50

Shadowing

Signal strength loss after passing through obstacles

Same distance, but different levels of shadowing: It is a random, large-scale effect depending on the environment

Example Shadowing Effects

51

i.e. reduces to ¼ of signal10 log(1/4) = -6.02

Example Shadowing Effects

52

i.e. reduces to ¼ of signal10 log(1/4) = -6.02

53

JTC Indoor Model for PCS: Path Loss

)(10 nLdBLogAL fA: an environment dependent fixed loss factor

(dB)B: the distance dependent loss coefficient,d : separation distance between the base station

and mobile terminal, in metersLf : a floor penetration loss factor (dB)

n: the number of floors between base station and mobile terminal

Shadowing path loss follows a log-normal distribution (i.e. L is normal distribution) with mean:

54

JTC Model at 1.8 GHz

)(10 nLdBLogAL f

55

Outline


Intro Shadowing Multipath

56

Signal can take many different paths between sender and receiver due to reflection, scattering, diffraction

Multipath

57

Example: reflection from the ground or building

Multipath Example: Outdoor

ground

58

Multipath Effect (A Simple Example)

d1d2

1

11 ][2cos

d

tfcd

ft2cos

2121 22)(2 21dd

c

ddfff c

dcd

2

22 ][2cos

d

tfcd

phase difference:

Assume transmitter sends out signal cos(2 fc t)

Multipath Effect (A Simple Example)

Where do the two waves totally destruct?

Where do the two waves totally construct?

59

integer2121

dd

c

ddf

Sensitivity: Change Location If receiver moves to the right by /4:

d1’ = d1 + /4; d2’ = d2 - /4;

->

60

21

21

21

2

)4/(4/22

''2

dd

dd

dd

Implication: By moving a quarter of wavelength, destructive turns into constructive.Assume f = 1G, how far do we move?

Backup Slides

61

62

Dipole: Radiation Pattern of a Dipole

http://www.tpub.com/content/neets/14182/index.htmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole_antenna

Wireless PHY: Digital Demodulation and Wireless Channels Y. Richard Yang 09/13/2012.

Documents

Transcript of Wireless PHY: Digital Demodulation and Wireless Channels Y. Richard Yang 09/13/2012.