Wind Power

50
1 Wind Power CUTTY SARK

description

Wind Power. CUTTY SARK. Weibull Distribution. Weibull Distribution Plotter Programme. LECTURE NOTES BY PROFESSOR J L CAMPBELL University of Guelph. Wind - simple physics. Wind velocity = v: blade radius = R Blades sweep out area A = π R 2 Air density = ρ - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Wind Power

Page 1: Wind Power

1

Wind Power

CUTTY SARK

Page 2: Wind Power

2

Weibull Distribution

Weibull Distribution Plotter Programme

Page 3: Wind Power

3

Wind - simple physics• Wind velocity = v: blade radius = R• Blades sweep out area A = π R2 • Air density = ρ• Mass of air arriving per second = M = A v ρ• Its KE is ½ M v2 = ½ A v3 ρ• Want large swept area ie long blades• The v3 factor is very favourable in high-wind

regions• Cold air is denser - better - implies higher towers

LECTURE NOTES BY PROFESSOR J L CAMPBELL University of Guelph

Page 4: Wind Power

4

Weibull Distribution……….

• Asymmetric – high winds are less probable than low• But high wind speed means much more power (v3)• You CANNOT just substitute the average wind speed

into the equation for power output of turbine• You must add up the power increments at each wind

speed on the distribution• This typically doubles the calculated power output!

Page 5: Wind Power

5

• BUT if you somehow extracted all the kinetic energy, the air would stop dead after the rotors - no more air could arrive - not realistic!

• You can only extract some fraction less than 100% of the energy

Page 6: Wind Power

6

Profile of air flow

• Mass of cylinder of air arriving from right is

M1 =v1 π r12 ρ

• Cylinder exiting at left has decreased velocity, so

M2 = v2 π r22 ρ

• But obviously M1 and M2 are the same• Therefore r2 is larger than r1: the cylinder of air is wider

downstream of the turbine• This helps determine spacing of wind farms

Page 7: Wind Power

7

Efficiency calculation: Bettz’ law

• Wind approaches rotor, perpendicularly, at velocity v1

• Some energy is extracted, so velocity falls to v2

• Assume mean speed through actual rotor is the average ie vm = 0.5 (v1 + v2)

• Mass passing through per sec is m = vm A ρ

• Power extracted = 0.5 m v12 - 0.5 m v2

2

= 0.5 vm A ρ (v12 - v2

2 )

• P = 0.25 A ρ (v1 + v2) (v12 - v2

2 )

• If there were no rotor, undisturbed power would be P0 = 0.5 A ρ v1

3

Page 8: Wind Power

8

• Write v2/v1 = x

• Then ratio R = P/P0 = 0.5 (1 - x2 ) (1 + x)

• R is maximum when dR/dx = 0• Do this. Find that x = 1/3, corresponding to

R = 0.59• So we get maximum efficiency of 59% at

v2/v1 = 1/3

• and Power P = 8 A ρ v13 /27

• Issue of tower spacing in a wind farm

1916

Page 9: Wind Power

9

Wind speeds and location criteria

Power

class

Average speed

m/s

Power density

W/m2

1 < 5.6 0 – 200

2 5.6 – 6.4 200 – 300

3 6.4 – 7.0 300 – 400

4 7.0 – 7.5 400 – 500

5 7.5 – 8.0 500 – 600

6 8.0 – 8.8 600 – 800

7 > 8.8 > 800

Page 10: Wind Power

10

Wind speeds and location criteria……..

• Average speed at Danish installations (ie most advanced country) is 6.3 m/s

• Average SW winds on shores of Great Lakes are to 8 m/s

• In USA there are 232,000 square kms of Class 4 land within 10 km of existing transmission facilities, ie 8 times more land than for Classes 5+6 combined. Effort must focus on Class 4 areas

Page 11: Wind Power

11

Wind speeds……:Mapping the resource

These figures are very similar to Germany, where installation is proceeding rapidly

Page 12: Wind Power

12

Wind - environmental impact

• No air pollution• Electromagnetic interference eliminated via non-

metallic blades• Bird-kills decreased by move from lattice to

tubular towers - average is 2.2 birds per turbine per year - less than office towers

• Main accidents are falls • Noise much decreased - almost none at 200 m• Compatible with farming, recreation, forestry• Only 1-2% of land is actually “occupied” - can

cultivate to within a few metres of a tower

Page 13: Wind Power

13

Wind - installations 1

Page 14: Wind Power

14

Cost issues

Canadian Wind Energy Association

Page 15: Wind Power

15

Wind installations…….2

Page 16: Wind Power

16

Page 17: Wind Power

17

Cost issues……….

• AWEA/DOE cite USA wind generation cost as 3.9 – 5 cents(US) per kWh in 2002

• That is 5.3 – 6.8 cents Canadian

• Compare Ontario legislated price of 4.3 c, which is much less than true cost, and which is scheduled to rise

Page 18: Wind Power

18

Costs are dropping• Blades are lighter - towers can be higher: 50-90 m

tubular towers• Lower O/M costs; higher reliability; 25-30 y

lifetime• Bigger turbines: half of new ones now exceed 1

MWe• Early 1980’s cost C$0.55 per kWh• 2000 cost C$0.06 per kWh• General observation in technology: Costs decrease

20% when # of units produced doubles• World capacity likely to double in 5 y

Page 19: Wind Power

19

Design issues

• Tower height is crucial: wind speed at 60 m height can be 20-60% greater than at ground level

• Heavy cold air gives up to 15% more power• Site at end of large flat areas eg Great Lakes• Seek large blade area• Materials must withstand shear stresses• Should rotate to align with changing wind

direction

Page 20: Wind Power

20

Capacity Factor• Another way of stating the annual energy output

from a wind turbine is to look at the capacity factor for the turbine in its particular location. By capacity factor we mean its actual annual energy output divided by the theoretical maximum output, if the machine were running at its rated (maximum) power during all of the 8766 hours of the year.

Page 21: Wind Power

21

126 m diameter5 MW

Page 22: Wind Power

22

Mapping the wind resource….

• Wind speed is only the first part of picture. It is power that matters, and what about direction?

• “Wind rose” concept – see website of Danish Wind Power association

• Divide a circle into 12 quadrants representing 12 measures of wind direction in 30 degree segments of the full 360

• Give each a radius corresponding to the wind speed

Page 23: Wind Power

23

Mapping the wind resource….

• Change to using velocity-cubed and make the radius of each quadrant proportional to the velocity-cubed from that direction – plot in red

• Adjust so that the sum of these v3 values is 100%• Now you are showing the power distribution

around 360 degrees, both in direction and magnitude

• Data for a wind-rose must be averaged over several years – eg from European Wind Atlas

Page 24: Wind Power

24

Page 25: Wind Power

25

Page 26: Wind Power

26

Supply versus demand issue

• Annual capacity factor 25-35%• High winter winds plus cold dense air match

maximum demand, especially for heating buildings

• 68% of Ontario production would be in October - March

• High winter availability counteracts high costs of other sources

• BUT on still, humid summer day, wind is zero and air-conditioning demand is maximum

Page 27: Wind Power

27

Page 28: Wind Power

28

Page 29: Wind Power

29

US Department of Energy

Page 30: Wind Power

30

23. 04. 2009. | 18:29Obamin veliki zaokret prema izvorima energijeU SAD-u će ‘svijetliti’ vjetar, plima i osekaAutor Sergej Županić

Američki predsjednik u vjetroelektrani u Iowi najavio smanjenje emisije CO2 83 posto do 2050, 20% do 2020.

Barack Obama pozvao je na Dan planeta Zemlje svoju naciju na početak “nove ere u uporabi energije”, što bi unaprijedilo očuvanje okoliša i potaknulo gospodarski razvoj te otvaranje novih radnih mjesta.

Page 31: Wind Power

31

Published online 11 February 2009 | Nature 457, 775 (2009) News in BriefWind producers around the world installed more than 27 GW of capacity in 2008, bringing global capacity to nearly 121 gigawatts.

Page 32: Wind Power

32

Page 33: Wind Power

33

Page 34: Wind Power

34

Page 35: Wind Power

35

Integrating power into grid

Page 36: Wind Power

36

Page 37: Wind Power

37

Page 38: Wind Power

38

Page 39: Wind Power

39

Page 40: Wind Power

40

Page 41: Wind Power

41

Page 42: Wind Power

42

Page 43: Wind Power

43

Page 44: Wind Power

44

Page 45: Wind Power

45

Page 46: Wind Power

46

Page 47: Wind Power

47

Page 48: Wind Power

48

Page 49: Wind Power

49

Page 50: Wind Power

50

Nominalna snaga: 5,6 MW

(7 vjetrogeneratora od 850 kilowata)

Realizirana snaga: 1.06 MW -> 19%

1MW, 7M Eura -> 7Eura/W snage