Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection

15
Vasodilating Versus First- Generation β- blockers for Cardiovascular Protection Scott Morgan MSIII November 2012

description

Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection. Scott Morgan MSIII November 2012. Introduction. Hypertension (HTN) Defined as BP >140/90 mmHg Prevalence in US adults is 29% or approximately 59 million Risk factor for several diseases: Cardiovascular (CV) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection

Page 1: Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection

Vasodilating Versus First-Generation -βblockers for Cardiovascular ProtectionScott Morgan MSIIINovember 2012

Page 2: Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection

Introduction

• Hypertension (HTN)• Defined as BP >140/90 mmHg• Prevalence in US adults is 29% or approximately 59 million• Risk factor for several diseases:• Cardiovascular (CV) • Cerebrovascular • Renovascular

• β-blockers • Discovered in mid 1960s• Were first-line HTN treatment previously• Currently falling out of favor due to side effects

Page 3: Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection

-blocker Classesβ

Generation Properties Examples

First Nonselective w/o Vasodilation Propanolol, pindolol, nadolol, tindolol, sotalol

Second β1-selective w/o Vasodilation Atenolol, bisoprolol, metoprolol

Third Nonselective w/ Vasodilation

β1-selective w/ Vasodilation

Carvedilol, bucindolol, labetalol

Nebivolol

Page 4: Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection

Vasodilating Effects

• First and Second-Generation (older generation)• No vasodilation

• Third-Generation• Nonselective w/ Vasodilation• Block vascular α-receptors• Carvedilol, bucindolol, labetalol

• β1-selective w/ Vasodilation• Increase NO• Nebivolol

Page 5: Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection

1st Generation Pharmacology• Inhibits catecholamines acting on β1-receptors in heart• Decreases HR and contractility• Leads to decrease CO (SV x HR) and BP• Decreases cardiac work and oxygen demand

• Inhibits β1-receptors on juxtaglomerular apparatus in kidneys• Decreases renin release• Leads to decreased activation of renin angiotensin

aldosterone system (RAAS)

• Inhibits presynaptic transmission in CNS• Decreases catecholamine release

Page 6: Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection
Page 7: Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection

Older Gen Clinical Indications• Coronary heart disease• Heart failure• Reduce mortality by 30% in HF w/o preserved ejection

fraction• Post-myocardial infarction• Prevent catecholamine arrhythmogenic effects such as

ventricular tachyarrhymias• Chronic stable angina• Reduction in cardiovascular events• PTs with• advanced age• LV dysfunction• Anterior MI

Page 8: Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection

Older Gen for Blood Pressure

Page 9: Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection

Compliance Issues• Lethargy• Drowsiness• Depression• Peripheral vascular effects• Cold extremities

• Sexual side effects• Erectile dysfunction• Orgasmic dysfunction

• Can worsen• Diabetes mellitus• Decreased insulin release by block β2 receptors in pancreas

• COPD• PVD

Page 10: Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection

Nonselective 3rd Gen β-blockers• Carvedilol, bucindolol, metoprolol• Block vascular α-receptors

• Decreased PVR and increased glucose delivery to muscles• Increases insulin sensitivity• Normally vasodilates by NO, but vasoconstricts by SNS• Diabetes and HTN blunt NO effects allowing SNS to increase PVR

• Can raise HDL and lower LDL levels• Increases renal blood flow • Less activation of RAAS• Reduces microalbuminuria• No negative BUN/creatinine effects

Page 11: Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection

Carvedilol• Better tolerated in elderly• Body already has β-blocker like effects

• Decreased β-adrenergic response and increased catecholamine levels

• Less β-blocking effects and more vasodilation

• Less sympathetic activation• Fewer adverse effects• More compliance

• Most common side effects• HA• Dizziness• Orthostatic hypotension

Page 12: Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection

Nebivolol

Page 13: Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection

β-blocker Properties

Page 14: Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection

Summary• Third generation β-blockers are more effective at controlling

HTN than traditional

• More favorable metabolic effects• Better choice with multiple comorbid conditions• Safer in elderly and black populations

• Fewer side effects

• Older generation β-blockers are still useful for treatment of other cardiovascular diseases

Page 15: Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection

Citation

• Fares, Hassan et al. Vasodilating Versus First-Generation β-blockers for Cardiovascular Protection. Postgraduate Medicine. Volume 124; Issue 2: 7-14. March, 2011.