Updated sensitivity estimate

15
Updated sensitivity estimate Suguru Shimizu Osaka University . 1, 2007 RC TREK Collaboration meeting at Saskatchewan (1)Statistical error (2)Systematic error

description

Sep. 1, 2007 JPARC TREK Collaboration meeting at Saskatchewan. Updated sensitivity estimate. Statistical error Systematic error. Suguru Shimizu Osaka University. Analyzing power and FOM. 0.96. 0.92. e + energy (MeV). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Updated sensitivity estimate

Page 1: Updated sensitivity estimate

Updated sensitivity estimate

Suguru ShimizuOsaka University

Sep. 1, 2007JPARC TREK Collaboration meeting at Saskatchewan

(1) Statistical error(2) Systematic error

Page 2: Updated sensitivity estimate

FOM∝AT√ N was calculated by this formula  (see FIFC and PAC reports).

Analyzing power is α=0.38 (at FOM max.)

e+ energy measurement is not so important. Just accept high energy e+ component.

Best e+ angle threshold is about 0.4

Analyzing power and FOM

0.92

0.96

e+

θ

y

cosθ

beam

e+ en

ergy

(MeV

)

cosθ

e + energy (MeV)

cosθ

e + energy (MeV)

e+ angle cut is effective to improve FOM, while e+ energy measurement is less important.

Page 3: Updated sensitivity estimate

FOM for 0 angle threshold for the 0 fwd/bwd analysis

FOM was determined as a function of cos θπ (see FIFC and PAC reports).

<cos θT >=0.68 (at FOM max.)

π0

θ

Beam axis

cosθπ cosθπ

Summary of FOM studyparameters: e+ energy, e+ angle, 0 angle AT

α<cosT>=0.38<cosT>=0.68

ΔPT=1.2x10-4 is obtained with 2.4G   K3   events under the

best FOM condition (only pi0 fwd/bwd analysis).

PT=

Page 4: Updated sensitivity estimate

Systematic error from B field rotation

1mrad. uncertainty of B field PT = 10-3

fwd

bwd

PN

fwd

PNbwd

spectrometer

Side View End View

PNfwd

PNbwd

Left RightLeft Right

B

π0 fwd 1+ PN

bwd 1 PN

fwd/bwd = 1+2PN ≠1

systematic error

Calibration of the polarimetermisalignment using experimental data is very important.

BPT

fwd PTbwd

π0 fwd 1+ PT

bwd 1 PT

fwd/bwd = 1+2PT

Page 5: Updated sensitivity estimate

R comp.

Z comp.

Asymmetry

Rot(z) misalignment Rot(r) misalignment

Asymmetry

Offset is generated from R component of muon spin

Systematic error due to misalignments

offset

offset

Offset is generated from Z component of muon spin

R comp.

Z comp.

beam beamideal Bideal B

Page 6: Updated sensitivity estimate

R comp.

Z comp.

Asymmetry

Rot(z) misalignment Rot(r) misalignment

Introduction of 0

(See E06 technical note   No.2)Time integrated e+ left/right asymmetry z sin0 + r cos0

Asymmetry

Offset is generated from R component of muon spin

Systematic error due to misalignments

offset

offset

Offset is generated from Z component of muon spin

R comp.

Z comp.

beam beamideal Bideal B

Page 7: Updated sensitivity estimate

Time integrated asymmetry

0 : the muon spin phase at t=0

In general, e+ left/right asymmetry can be described by oscillating terms and constant terms(see E06 technote No.2)

KBlack: π0   fwdRed : π0 bwd

0 (deg)

Oscillation terms can be canceled out by the time integration.

0 is determined event by event.

Page 8: Updated sensitivity estimate

Cancellation mechanism for misalignments

Characteristic θ0 dependence of PT and .

K3 MC, Non-zero PT

π0 fwd

π0 bwd

K3 MC, PT=0, δz=5deg

π0 fwd

π0 bwd

A(0)fwd= A(0)bwd = rcos0zsin0

A(0)fwd≠ A(0)bwd

Page 9: Updated sensitivity estimate

Cancellation mechanism for misalignments

Characteristic θ0 dependence of PT and .

K3 MC, Non-zero PT K3 MC, PT=0, δz=5deg

Asub

Asum Asum

Asub

Asum=(Afwd+Abwd)/2. = 0

Asub=(Afwd−Abwd)/2. ≠ 0

effect is drastically reduced by Asub .

Effect of misalignments are cancelled out by the θ0 analysis.

Asum ≠ 0

Asub = 0

Page 10: Updated sensitivity estimate

Separation of PT and misalignments effect

Misalignments are now harmless!

Asum=(Afwd+Abwd)/2.

Asub=(Afwd−Abwd)/2.

Black: no misalignment, non-zero PT

Blue: δz=5deg, non-zero PT

i/o : No misalignmentδ : δz=δr= 5 deg.

AsumAsub

i/o

δi/o

δ

PT (stat)= 1.3 x 10 -4

PT (syst)< 10 -4

with 2.4G K3 events

Page 11: Updated sensitivity estimate

Estimation of systematic error due to misalignments

Misalignments:Assumption in MC is 5 degree

Misalignments:Real case is ~mrad.

In case of 5 degree,PT

sys = 10-4 x 5deg. /mrad ~ 10-2

PTsys= (2±7)x104 was

obtained in MC

The systematic error is expected to be much smaller than 10-4 .

If PTsys~104 in real case,

should be

compare

Page 12: Updated sensitivity estimate

Summary of 0 fwd/bwd analysis

• Sensitivity of 0 fwd/bwd analysis:statistical error 1.2x10-4

systematic error <1.0x10-4

in total 1.2x10-4

To improve the sensitivity(1) 0 left/right analysis(2) Can we use high energy 1 detection with veto counter hit events?

Page 13: Updated sensitivity estimate

PT determination for 0 left/right events

0 left/right analysisPL component are also rotated, together with PT.

PL component can be removed by comparing 0 left and right events.

Beat pattern due to the finite PT can be observed.

Page 14: Updated sensitivity estimate

0 left/right analysis

Asub=(Aleft-Aright)/2 is calculated before time integration of decay time. Large PL component can be removed by this subtraction.

Black: 0 leftRed: 0 right

e+ asymmetry

Large PL component is seen.

Asub=(Aleft-Aright)/2

PT component can be extracted.

K3 MC, Non-zero PT

Page 15: Updated sensitivity estimate

0 left/right analysis

• Asub=(Aleft−Aright)/2 is fitted with, cos(t++) : fitting parameter for e+ fwd/bwd analysis /2 for e+ in/out analysis

bwd-fwdbwd+fwd

e+ asymmetry

e+ asymmetry inoutin+out

Asub=(Aleft−Aright)/2.

fwd bwd

in

out

Z

R

e+ detection

e+

black: e+ fwd/bwdred: e+ in/out

dPT = 1.7 x 10 -4 for 2.4G K3 events