Thermoelectrics of KdS i d t dKondo Semiconductors and...
Transcript of Thermoelectrics of KdS i d t dKondo Semiconductors and...
Hvar 2008 Sept. 21
Thermoelectrics ofK d S i d t dKondo Semiconductors and
Intermetallic Clathrates
T. TAKABATAKEDept. of Quantum Matter and
Inst. for Advanced Materials ResearchHiroshima University
Outline)(
2S=ZFigure of merit
Two strategies for high performance thermoelectric materials
)( elL κκρ +⋅
1. G.D. Mahan and J.O. Sofo (1996), a sharp singularity in thedensity of states very near EF enhance power factor S2/ρdensity of states very near EF enhance power factor S /ρ
2. G. A. Slack (1995), “phonon glass- electron crystal“
rattling of guest atoms reduce κ without increasing ρrattling of guest atoms reduce κ without increasing ρ1. Ce- and Yb-based Kondo semiconductors
Formation of a pseudogap in the renormalized band enhances the S while maintaining the ρ metallic. high power factor.
2. Intermetallic clathrates Type-I Ba8Ga16Sn30 is the best example of phonon glass due to off-center rattling of guest ions.
Thermoelectric Effects and Devices
Heat input Heat absorbedHeat input Heat absorbed
electronhole
Neuromagnetometer using V
Directly convert
g gSuperconducting Quantum Interference DevicesSeebeck effect Peltier effect
Quiet refrigerator without chloroflurocarbonsDirectly convertheat to electricityRecover vehicle waste heat
Quiet refrigerator without chloroflurocarbonsSmall-scale cooling of laser diodes, radiation detectorsTmin=150 KGoal: below 77K cool superconducting deviceswaste heat Goal: below 77K, cool superconducting devices
down to the operating temperature
Low efficiency <10%
Temp difference
Low efficiency <10%
Temp. difference∆Tmax = 2
2
1cZT
Figure of meritZ = S2/ ρ κ
2
Bi-TeZ S / ρ κS: thermopower; high>100 µV/Kρ: electrical resistivity; low<1 mΩcm G J S d d E S T bρ: electrical resistivity; low 1 mΩcmκ: thermal conductivity; low<2 WK/m
G.J. Snyder and E.S. Toberer,Nature materials, 7(2008)105.
High S and low ρ hardly coexist in conventional semimetals and semiconductors, but do ina Kondo semiconductor with a pseudogap.
Giant thermopower in 4f electron Kondo compoundsD Jaccard and J Sierro in Valence Instabilities (1982)D. Jaccard and J. Sierro, in Valence Instabilities (1982)
Mott’s equation
⎤⎡22Yb 4f 13+δ
80CePd3
0
µεεσπ
=⎥⎦⎤
⎢⎣⎡
∂∂−
=ln
3)(
22
eTkTS
Ce 4f 1-δ
Yb 4f 13+δ60
40
V / K
)
40
-20 YbSiTK =300 K
µεεετπ
=⎥⎦⎤
⎢⎣⎡
∂∂
+∂
∂−= cc N
eTk lnln
3
2220
0
S ( µ
V
CeCu2Si2 -60
-40
T 15 KThe lifetime is determined by the
-20
3002001000
-80
3002001000
YbAl3
TK =15 K
Kondo scattering.
)(21 2π NVJ=5/2 2J+1= 6 J=7/2 2J+1= 8
3002001000T ( K )
3002001000T ( K )
)()(
εετ fcf
c
NVh
=0/)( >∂∂ εεfNS >0 p-type
S <0 n-type
TSmax= TKH / 2
Dimension-less figure of merit ZTf C Pd YbAl d F Sifor CePd3, YbAl3 and FeSi
G Mahan B Sales J SharpG. Mahan, B. Sales, J. SharpPhysics Today 50 (1997) No.3, p.42.
Z S 2/ Z = S 2/ρ κ= 0.9 for Bi-Te
f 20 W/K @300Kκ of 20 W/Km @300Kis ten times of Bi-Te
In a good metal like CePd3, conduction electrons have a large contribution to κa large contribution to κ.κ = κel +κph
Ternary Ce valence-fluctuating compounds witha complex structure and a low carrier densitya complex structure and a low carrier density
Quasi Kagome latticeCeRhSn, CeRhIn TK=250 K
Ce momentsCe momentsare frustrated
M. S. Kim et al., PRB 68(2003) 054416.
No enhancement of Scompared to CePd3
κ is reduced to a level smaller than half Z is comparable
Enhance SCeTX honeycomb structure
Enhance Sat T < 100 K
Gap openingin f bands
KondoKondo semiconductors
CeNiSn CeRhSbCeNiSn, CeRhSb,CeRhAs, C
V(A3) Eg/kB (K)Ortho.
Ce3Bi4Pt3CeOs4Sb12,
gCePtSn 276.9 ---CeNiSn 264.3 14C RhSb 269 1 28
Cubic
4 12YbB12
CeRhSb 269.1 28CeRhAs 239.1 280
High thermopower at low T
150
100CeRhAs
CeOs4Sb12
0
50
V / K
)
CeRhSb
CeNiSnSmax >100 µV/Karises from gap formation
-50
0
S ( µ
V a ses o gap o at o
Ts: incoherent Kondo
-100
50
YbB12
T
s
-1501 10 100
TS
T ( K )
Opening of a narrow gap on cooling
Hybridization gap modelMagnetic susceptibility y g p
10
C PtSSteep slope of DOS
Conductionband8
u / m
ol ) CePtSn
局在磁気モーメント有S eep s ope o OSenhances S
local 4f momentZ=S2/ρ κ
Gap Eg
6
4
10-3
em
u
CeNiSnB//a
Residual carriers retainhigh electrical conduction
4
2化率
χ (
CeRhSbχ
Density of states0
磁化
3002001000
CeRhAs 局在磁気モーメント無4f electron band
3002001000T ( K )
A pseudogap in the 4f electronic states of CeRhSb
Band structure
p g p
Photoemission t calculation
K. Shimada et al., F. Ishii and T. Oguchi, i
spectroscopy
PRB 66, 155202 (2002).
JPSJ 73, 145 (2004).semi-conductor
Electron dente
nsity
semimetal
nsity of statesaliz
ed In
t
metal
s / eV atomN
orm
a
Binding Energy (meV)Jz=±3/2
Kondo Metal Semimetal SemiconductorCePtSn CeNiSn, CeRhSb CeRhAs
Thermopower Thermal conductivityElectrical resistivity
4 I II b
S (µV/K) κ (W/Km)ρ (µΩcm) 100
80 CeRhAs CePd3
103
104
CeRhAsI II b 80
60
40
CeRhAs
CeRhSbCePd3 101
CeRhAs
3
102
10CeRhSbCeNiSn
40
20
0CeNiSn
CeNiSnCeRhSb
T *
101
10
CePtSnCePd3
0
-20
40
CePtSn
∆T II b
100 CePtSn∆T II b
T
1 10 100T ( K )
-401 10 100
T ( K )1 10 100
T ( K )S is enhanced at low Tby the gap formation
κph at high T is reduced by valence fluctuations
ρ remains low in the pseudo-gapped state
100
m) CeRhAsI II a
II bA i t i TE ti
1
10
ρ ( m
Ωcm
II b
II cAnisotropic TE properties
in CeRhAs
200
150
100V /
K ) ∆T II a
S//a of 186 µV/K is among th hi h t k f
12
100
50
0
S (
µV II c
II b
the highest known forCe-based compounds.
Fi f it 12
8
4(W /
K·m
)
∆T II b
II a
II c
Figure of meritZ = S2 / ρ κfor //c 1x10-3 /K at 115 K
4
0κ
( II a
1.00 81 )
c
cf. Z = 2x10-3 /K at 100 K 0.80.60.40.2Z
( 10-3
K-
a b
for CsBi4Te6the best p-type materialD Y Ch t l 0.0
1 10 100T ( K )
D.-Y. Chung et al., Science 287, 1024 (2000).
Ce3Bi4Pt3 cubic Y Sb Au typecubic Y3Sb4Au3-type
structure
M. F. Hundley et al., PRB42 (1990) 6842, Physica B171(1991)254.
K. Katoh and T. Takabatake,
Tetragonal point symmetry for Ce
,J. Alloys Compd. 268(1998)22.
CeT4Sb12 (T = Ru, Os)f
Issue: Does rattling of Ce scatters phonons?cubic filled skutterudite
120
100
Narazu et al., JPSJ 77 Suppl. A (2008).
80
60
40
S ( µ
V / K
)
CeOs4Sb12 II <001>
Ru Os
10
20
0
S
1
ρ ( m
Ωcm
)
Semimetallic for T = RuTakeda et al
6
)
Ce “rattles” in T8Sb12 cage
Takeda et al., Physica B 259-261 (1999) 92. Semiconducting for T = OsE.D. Bauer et al.,
4
2κ ( W
/ K
·m
Crystalline peakNo “rattling” effect Weak peak
E.D. Bauer et al., J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 13 (2001) 4495.
0300250200150100500
T ( K )
107
x = 0Yb Lu B
Yb-based Kondosemiconductor
Photoemission
B103
105
µ Ω
cm )
0.25
0.01
0.05
0 50
Yb1-xLuxB12semiconductorYbB12
B
10-1
101
ρ (µ
0.75
1
0.50
-40
0
V /
K )
0.25 0.05
0.751
0.500.875
10 1
-120
-80S
( µV
x = 0
0.01
30
20)
x = 0Yb 5dB122p
F Iga et al
Yb 4f
20
10
κ (W
/ K
m)
0 25 κ
0.05
F. Iga et al.,J. Magn. Magn. Mater.226-230, 85 (2001).
Y T k d t l PRB73
hν =15.8eV
0
1 10 100T ( K )
0.25 κel
Binding energy (meV)Y. Takeda et al., PRB73, 033202 (2006).
Power factor S2/ρ : maximum heat Figure of merit ρabsorbed by the Peltier effect
gZ= S2/ρκ
4
CsBi4Te6
60
50
CeRhSb
Bi2Te3
CePd3
3
K-1) Bi-Te
CeNiSn
50
40
W /
cmK2 )
CsBi4Te6
2
Z ( 1
0-3 K
CeRhSb30
20
子 P
F ( µ
W
CeRhAs
YbB12
1Ce0.9Fe3CoSb12
CeRhAs
YbB12
10
0電
力因
子CeNiSn
CeOs4Sb12
0300250200150100500
Eu8Ga16Ge30CePd3
0
300250200150100500
Eu8Ga16Ge30 Ce0.9Fe3CoSb12Zr0.5Hf0.5NiSn
T ( K ) T ( K )
Potential of Kondo semiconductors for
H b idi ti f 10 100 K i 4f l t t
TE cooling application
• Hybridization gap of 10-100 K in 4f electron systems large thermopower of 100 µV/K coexists withlow resistivity of 1 mΩcm high power factor at T <100 K
• How to reduce the thermal conductivityAlloying cage atoms in Ce(Ru1-xOsx)4Sb12 change rattling ofCe ions incoherent, scatters the acoustic phonons effectively
Superlattices; CeRhSb/CeRhAs→ boundaries scatter phonons
• Approach to a Peltier p-n junction search for Yb-basedsemiconductors compatible with Ce counterparts.p p
Cool superconducting devices below 80 K
Acknowledgements
T. Sasakawa, S. Narazu, D. Hirata, M.S. Kim,J Kitagawa K Umeo F IgaJ. Kitagawa, K. Umeo, F. Iga
Dept. Quantum Matter,ADSM Hiroshima UniversityADSM, Hiroshima University
Y. Takeda, Spring-8H Sugawara Fac Integr Arts & Sci Univ TokushimaH. Sugawara Fac. Integr. Arts & Sci., Univ. Tokushima
H. Okamura Dept. Physics, Kobe Univ.D T Adroja ISIS RAL UKD.T. Adroja ISIS, RAL, UK
Off-Center Rattling and Thermoelectric Propertiesof β-Ba8Ga16Sn30o β a8Ga16S 30
Phonon glass- Electron crystalYes Perhaps
M A A il t l PRB 74 125109(2006)M. A. Avila et al., PRB 74,125109(2006)APL. 92,041901(2008)
K Suekuni et al PRB 75 195210(2007)K. Suekuni et al., PRB 75,195210(2007)PRB 77, 235119(2008)
JPSJ 77, Suppl. A, 61 (2008)
Y. Takasu et al., PRB 74, 174303 (2006)PRL 100, 165503 (2008).
CollaboratorsHiroshima University
Crystal growth and TE measurements
Other Institutions
EXAFSCrystal growth and TE measurementsM.A. Avila UNICAMP – BrazilK. Suekuni, M. Yamamoto, K. Umeo
F. Bridges UCSD – Santa Cruz
XPSK Tanigaki Tohoku U Sendai
Single-crystal XRDH. Fukuoka, S. Yamanaka
K. Tanigaki Tohoku U. – Sendai
Inelastic neutron scatteringC. H. Lee AIST – Tsukuba
Raman scatteringY. Takasu, M. Udagawa
ESRP.G. Pagliuso, C. Rettori g
Ultrasound measurementsI. Ishii, T. Suzuki
G ag uso, C ettoUNICAMP - Brazil
I. Ishii, T. Suzuki
XPS K. Shimada, M. Taniguchi
Dimorphic structure ofDimorphic structure of AA88EE1616XX3030
type I Pm3n
Ba8Ga16Si30B G G
β
A(2)
Ba8Ga16Ge30Ba8Ga16Sn30Ba8In16Ge30
H.G. Schnering et al.,(1998).
A(2) Sr8Ga16Si30Sr8Ga16Ge30Sr8(Al,Ga)16Si30 K. Kishimoto et al.,(2008).
type VIII I43mA(1)
8( )16 30
Eu8Ga16Ge30α S. Paschen et al., (2001).
Ba8Ga16Sn30 W. Carrillo-Cabrera et al.,8 16 30
Sr8(Al,Ga)16Si30
Eu Ga Ge
W. Carrillo Cabrera et al., (2002).
S P h t l (2001)
K. Kishimoto et al.,(2008).
Eu8Ga16Ge30 S. Paschen et al.,(2001).
Phonon glass and Electron crystalPhonon glass and Electron crystalB C Sales et al PRB 63 245113 (2001)B.C. Sales et al., PRB 63, 245113 (2001).
ρ < 0.8 mΩcmκL < 1 W / m K
typetype--II AA88GaGa1616GeGe3030
BGGBGG n-typeS(300 K) ~ -50µV/K
EGGEGG
S(300 K) ~ -50µV/K
SGGSGG
κκLL of of A88GaGa1616GeGe3030: : GuestGuest--size and size and structurestructure--type dependencetype dependence
Ba2+Ba
Sr2+
B. C. Sales et al., PRB 63,245113 (2001).
Eu2+
S. Paschen et al., PRB 64, 214404 (2001).
α
β
Tc
βTc Split sites
B.C. Chakoumakos et al., J. Alloys Compd. 322, 127 (2001).
0.4Å
Cage-size tuning in Sr8Ga16Si30-xGex
K. Suekuni et al. PRB 75,195210(2007)
X=0 X=30a =10.446 10.726 Å 3% up
quasi on-center off-centerquasi on center off center
41
35 = θE (K)“Crystal”
5956
46
“Gl ” 59“Glass”
Phonon dispersion curves observedby inelastic neutron scattering
C. H. Lee et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Seri.92 (2007) 012169, JPSJ 77 (2008) Suppl. A 260.M. Christensen et al., Nature Materials (2008).
Th ti b h i fl tt d b th k h b idi ti b t th t d tiThe acoustic branch is flattened by the weak hybridization between the guest and acoustic modes. Avoided crossing contradicts with incoherent guest vibrations.Force constant F(Sr2-G1) = 0.008 mdynn / Å = 0.1×F(Sr1-G2)
Strong dependence of κL of Ba8Ga16Ge30g p L 8 16 30on the type of charge carries
A Bentien et al PRB69 (2004) 045107 PRB71 (2005) 165206A. Bentien et al., PRB69 (2004) 045107, PRB71 (2005) 165206, PRB73 (2006) 094301.
I , III n-typeNo peak for VI p typeNo peak for VI p-type,as similar with κ(T) forVII SrGaGe n-typeypVIII EuGaGe n-type• Identical crystal structure
for n- and p-type crystals.for n and p type crystals.• glasslike behavior and κ ∝ T 1.5 are due to scatteringfrom charge carriers.
• A dip at 10-30 K is scatteringfrom bound / localized charge carrier states.
CarrierCarrier--type dependence of type dependence of κκLL of of α- BaBa88GaGa1616SnSn30 30 and Baand Ba88GaGa1616GeGe3030
M. A. Avila et al., PRB 74, 125109 (2006).
A8Ga16Ge30
M. Christensen et al., Physica B 385, 505 (2006).
8 16 30
Sr
p-Ba
n-Baα n-Ba
κL(n) > κL(p)
Issue: Which plays more important role in the glass-like κ L?
Phonon lifetime τ (n) > τ (p)
ssue c p ays o e po a o e e g ass e Lguest rattling or charge carriers
Compared with ferromagnetic EuGaGe nonmagnetic BaGaSn has anCompared with ferromagnetic EuGaGe, nonmagnetic BaGaSn has an advantage in studying low-energy excitations.
Carrier type tuning in single crystals of Carrier type tuning in single crystals of ββ--BaBa88GaGa1616SnSn3030
sample Crystal Latticename composition parameter
Carrier type can be tuned by adjusting the Ga/Sn ratio i th i iti l iti
a e co pos t o pa a eteBa Ga Sn a (Å)
n1 8.0(1) 15.9(2) 30.1(2) 11.685(1)
in the initial composition.
The lattice parameter is largest among type I clathratesn2 7.9(1) 15.8(2) 30.2(2) 11.685(1)
p1 7.8(1) 15.8(2) 30.2(2) 11.707(1)2 8 0(1) 15 8(2) 30 2(2) 11 708(1)
0.2%among type-I clathrates.
p2 8.0(1) 15.8(2) 30.2(2) 11.708(1)
crystalcrystal
fluxflux
Thermopower Thermopower S S andand Electrical resistivity Electrical resistivity ρρ in in β-Ba8Ga16Sn30
200
300 p2
100 n1
0
100
200
V /
K )
p1
Ω c
m )
n1p2
n2
-200
-100
0
S (
µ
1
n210
ρ (
mΩ
p1
3002001000T ( K )
-300n1
13002001000
T ( K )T ( K ) T ( K )
T bl i t
n (1018/cm3)@290 K
Tunable carrier type
Carrier density n can be changedin a limited range.
n1 _
n2 10
p1 8.5in a limited range. p2 5.5
OffOff--center split sites of Ba(2) in center split sites of Ba(2) in β-Ba8Ga16Sn30
• 24k site(0.2437, 0.5, -0.03656) n1(0.2430, 0.5, -0.03685) p1
Ba(2)• doff
0.434 Å n10 439 Å p1
( ) p
cage center 6d (0.25, 0.5, 0) 16i
24k
( )
71 % n1, 68 % p1• Ga occupancy on 6c site
0.439 Å p1
( , , )6c (0.25, 0, 0.5)
24k
0 50)
(b)
• doff increases on cooling0.06
0 05β-phase(a)
0.50
0.45
acem
ent (
Å
β-Ba8Ga16Sn30p1n1
(b)0.05
0.04
0 03Å2 ) Ueq_Ba(2)
p1n1
0.40
0.35-c
ente
r dis
pla
Sr8Ga16Ge30
β-Eu8Ga16Ge300.03
0.02
0.01
Ueq
(
Ueq_Ba(1)
U 0.30off-
3002001000T ( K )
Sr8Ga16Ge30
03002001000
T ( K )
Ueq_cage
Guest vibration mode in Raman scattering spectraGuest vibration mode in Raman scattering spectra
guest(2) site
Y. Takasu et al.,PRL, 100, 165503 (2008).T2g modes
Sr8Ga16Ge30
λ = 514.5nm
Raman active@2K
. uni
ts)
8 16 30
@2K
nsity
(arb
.
Eu8Ga16Ge30
@5K
Inte
n
Ba8Ga16Sn30pGuest mode
3002502001501005001
n
[001]
[110]
• Ba(2) vibrational energy15 cm-1 ≅ 21 K = θR (Cp) Energy Shift (cm-1) [001]
• Ga/Sn cage mode energies are lower than that for Ga/Ge cage(θD=210 K) (θD=312 K)
Specific heat Specific heat CC:: low-energy off-center rattling
5
200
10-3
Ba8Ga16Sn30R. C. Zeller et al., Phys. Rev. B 4, 2029 (1971).
5
4
3g K
4 )x
10-6
glass
SiO2
mol
K4 )x
glassSiO2
β Insulator3
2
/ T 3 (
µJ
/ g
crystal
100
/ T3 ( m
J / n1
p1t l1
0
C /
1 10 100
crystal
0
C /
1 10 100
n2 p2
crystalα
T ( K )1 10 100T ( K )
peak@ 4 Kk @ 10 K i d d
α β• peak@ 4 K,CE+CD do not reproduce the data
• peak @ 10 K is reproducedby CE+CD+Cel
CE: Einstein θE = 50 K CD: Debye Cel: electronic
T - linear coefficient of specific heat
10
0-6
SiO
100
802 )
Ba8Ga16Sn30R. C. Zeller et al., Phys. Rev. B 4, 2029 (1971).
8
6
µJ /
g K
2 )x
10
glass
SiO2
60
mJ
/ mol
K 2
β -phase n1
β-phaseSiO2
Tunneling4
2C /
T 3 (
µ
crystal40
20C /
T (
m
α -phase p1 n2
α-phase crystal
TunnelingC = DT
0543210
T 2 ( K )0
1.00.80.60.40.20.0T 2 ( K2 )
p2
T ( K )
A ( J/ l K2)
2/ BTATC +=Free electron model
β phase 29 >>
A (mJ/mol K2)α-phase 8
electronic γ carrier density n5 mJ/mol K2 ⇐ 4x1019 /cm3
3 mJ/mol K2 ⇐ 1x1019 /cm3
θD = 207 K
β-phase 29 >>Tunneling DT >> Electronic γ T
3 mJ/mol K ⇐ 1x10 /cmθD = 218 K
from sound velocity
Thermopower Thermopower S S andand Electrical resistivity Electrical resistivity ρρ in in β-Ba8Ga16Sn30
200
300 p2
100 n1
0
100
200
V /
K )
p1
Ω c
m )
n1p2
n2
-200
-100
0
S (
µ
1
n210
ρ (
mΩ
p1
3002001000T ( K )
-300n1
13002001000
T ( K )T ( K ) T ( K )
T bl i t
n (1018/cm3)@290 K
Tunable carrier type
Carrier density n can be changedin a limited range.
n1 _
n2 10
p1 8.5in a limited range. p2 5.5
OffOff--center split sites of Ba(2) incenter split sites of Ba(2) in β-Ba8Ga16Sn30
• 24k site(0.2437, 0.5, -0.03656) n1(0.2430, 0.5, -0.03685) p1
Ba(2)• doff
0.434 Å n10 439 Å p1
( ) p
cage center 6d (0.25, 0.5, 0) 16i
24k
( )
71 % n1, 68 % p1• Ga occupancy on 6c site
0.439 Å p1
( , , )6c (0.25, 0, 0.5)
24k
0 50)
(b)
• doff increases on cooling0.06
0 05β-phase(a)
0.50
0.45
acem
ent (
Å
β-Ba8Ga16Sn30p1n1
(b)0.05
0.04
0 03Å2 ) Ueq_Ba(2)
p1n1
0.40
0.35-c
ente
r dis
pla
Sr8Ga16Ge30
β-Eu8Ga16Ge300.03
0.02
0.01
Ueq
(
Ueq_Ba(1)
U 0.30off-
3002001000T ( K )
Sr8Ga16Ge30
03002001000
T ( K )
Ueq_cage
Guest vibration mode in Raman scattering spectraGuest vibration mode in Raman scattering spectra
guest(2) site
Y. Takasu et al.,PRL, 100, 165503 (2008).T2g modes
Sr8Ga16Ge30
λ = 514.5nm
Raman active@2K
. uni
ts)
8 16 30
@2K
nsity
(arb
.
Eu8Ga16Ge30
@5K
Inte
n
Ba8Ga16Sn30pGuest mode
3002502001501005001
n
[001]
[110]
• Ba(2) vibrational energy15 cm-1 ≅ 21 K = θR (Cp) Energy Shift (cm-1) [001]
• Ga/Sn cage mode energies are lower than that for Ga/Ge cage(θD=210 K) (θD=312 K)
Specific heat Specific heat CC:: low-energy off-center rattling
5
200
10-3
Ba8Ga16Sn30R. C. Zeller et al., Phys. Rev. B 4, 2029 (1971).
5
4
3g K
4 )x
10-6
glass
SiO2
mol
K4 )x
glassSiO2
β Insulator3
2
/ T 3 (
µJ
/ g
crystal
100
/ T3 ( m
J / n1
p1t l1
0
C /
1 10 100
crystal
0
C /
1 10 100
n2 p2
crystalα
T ( K )1 10 100T ( K )
peak@ 4 Kk @ 10 K i d d
α β• peak@ 4 K,CE+CD do not reproduce the data
• peak @ 10 K is reproducedby CE+CD+Cel
CE: Einstein θE = 50 K CD: Debye Cel: electronic
T - linear coefficient of specific heat
10
0-6
SiO
100
802 )
Ba8Ga16Sn30R. C. Zeller et al., Phys. Rev. B 4, 2029 (1971).
8
6
µJ /
g K
2 )x
10
glass
SiO2
60
mJ
/ mol
K 2
β -phase n1
β-phaseSiO2
Tunneling4
2C /
T 3 (
µ
crystal40
20C /
T (
m
α -phase p1 n2
α-phase crystal
TunnelingC = DT
0543210
T 2 ( K )0
1.00.80.60.40.20.0T 2 ( K2 )
p2
T ( K )
A ( J/ l K2)
2/ BTATC +=Free electron model
β phase 29 >>
A (mJ/mol K2)α-phase 8
electronic γ carrier density n5 mJ/mol K2 ⇐ 4x1019 /cm3
3 mJ/mol K2 ⇐ 1x1019 /cm3
θD = 207 K
β-phase 29 >>Tunneling DT >> Electronic γ T
3 mJ/mol K ⇐ 1x10 /cmθD = 218 K
from sound velocity
Soft Potential Model for CC((TT) of Glasses) of GlassesM. A. Ramos and U. Buchenau, 1998
)()( 42 xxDxDWxV ++=
Anharmonic potential
W : characteristic energy of the potential)()( 21 xxDxDWxV ++= Ps : density of the soft modesA : distribution broadness of the soft modes
• SM: soft mode term
CL(T) = CSM + CTS + CDebye
νν deexkgC x
x
BSM 2
2
0 )1()( −
−∞
−= ∫
( ) ( )∫ −−⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛=
1
0
22264
]12/exp[81)( ttWhAdt
Wh
WPhg s ννν
texp, τmin: constantSoft vibrational density of states
( ) ( )∫⎠⎝ 08 WW
• TLS: two level system (tunneling) term⎞⎛⎞⎛
3/12
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛=
)(ln
91
6 min
exp3/123/12
Tkt
TkWPC
BB
STS τ
π CTLS ∝ T
Analysis of C by the soft potential modelAnalysis of C by the soft potential model200
x10-3
( TH
z-3 )
nits
)
Vibrationaldensity
/ mol
K4 )x
Ba8Ga16Sn30
g ( ν
) / ν
2 (
2 01 51 00 50
(arb
. un y
100C
/ T3 ( m
J /
Sr8Ga16Ge30p
nEu8Ga16Ge30
2.01.51.00.50ν ( THz ) guest(2)
0
C
TLSSM 0
1 10 100T ( K )
SMDebye
A W/k P θ h t i ti fA W/kB Ps θR characteristic energy of (K) (mol-1) soft modes (off-center rattling)
SGG 0.002 4.4 2.0×1021 0.7 THz = 35 K21β-BGS 0.017 3.5 6.4×1021 0.4 THz = 20 K
Interacting dipole model by Nakayama and Kaneshita, Cond mat, 0809.1070v1
Phonon glass behavior in Phonon glass behavior in κκ ofof β-Ba8Ga16Sn30
t l
R. C. Zeller et al., RRB 4, 2029 (1971).
1α-phase n1 p2α-phase
crystal
SiO2∝T3
1
m ) p1
n1
n2
Sr8Ga16Ge30
crystalline
glass
0.1
W /
K m
β h
n1p1v - SiO2
β-phaseT2 1 glass
0.01κ L
( β-phaseβ-phase
glass-like
∝T2.1
∝T2
• lowest among type-I clathrates0 001
∝T1.9∝T1.7
• lowest among type-I clathrates • κL(n) ≅ κL(p)
0.0010.1 1 10 100
T ( K )
off-center rattling is most responsible for the glass-like κ L
TRR model forfor GlassGlass--like like κκLL((TT))
( ) )(1)( TlvTCdT D ωωωκω
∫=
• Debye approximationJ. L. Cohn et al.,RRL 82, 779 (1999).
• Average phonon mean free path1 1
( ) ),(,3
)(0
TlvTCdT DebyeL ωωωκ ∫=
( ) min1111
1 1llll
lRresTS +++
= −−−−
−
• Phonon scattering process
Tunneling states
Phonon scattering process
1
31 11
22tanh
−−
⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ ++
⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛
⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛=
TBkA
TkkAl B
TSωω
h
hh
BA
A
k θResonant scattering by guest vibration
∑ TC 22ωC
322 ⎠⎜⎝⎠
⎜⎝⎠
⎜⎝ TBTkk BB
TS ωh B
Rayleigh scattering
hRB
Rik θωω ==( )∑
Γ+−=−
i iii
ires
TCl22222
1
ωωωωωC
A/B ∝ the density of tunnel states coupled to phonons Rayleigh scattering
C : resonant scattering strengthD : Rayleigh scattering strength
41
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛=−
BR k
Dl ωhD
Analysis of Analysis of κκLL((TT) by) by TTRRRR modelmodel1
Eu8Ga16Ge30: A. Bentien et al., PRB 71, 165206(2005).
1Sr8Ga16Ge30Eu8Ga16Ge30
ResonanceRayleigh
0.1
( W /
K m
)
pBa8Ga16Sn30
Tunneling states
0.01κ L
nBa8Ga16Sn30
∝ T2
Tunneling states0.001
0.1 1 10 100T ( K )
parameter Unit SGG EGG n-BGS
A/B 105 K/m 4 5 22
C1 1030 /(m s2 K2) 1.3 1.1 2.0Tunneling state density
θ 1K 103 82 78
C2 1030 /(m s2 K2) 3.9 3.3 6.0
θ K 35 25 20 Rayleigh scattering center:
Resonant scattering strength
θ 2K 35 25 20
D 1 /(m K4) 1.8 8 10
θ DK 312(BGG) 312(BGG) 210
Rayleigh scattering center:The positional disorder of A(2) among off-center sites
Structural parameter relevant to low κL
2 0 Ba8Zn8Ge38
Ba8Ni6Ge40 type-1l h2.0
/ K m
)
Ba8Ga16Ge30 Cs8Zn4Sn42
8 8 38Ba8Al16Si30 Ba8Cu6Ge40
Cs Sn44
clathrates24k6d
1.5
0K) (
W / Ba8Ga16Si30
Rb8Zn4Sn42
Rb8Ga8Sn38
Cs8Sn44
6d 24k (cage)1.0
κ L(1
50Eu Ga Ge
Ba8In16Ge30
Sr8Ga16Si30
β Ba Ga Sn
Sr8Ga16Ge30
Cage radius Cage radius = RR6d 6d -- 24k24k0.5
4.84.64.44.24.0
Eu8Ga16Ge30 β − Ba8Ga16Sn30 Ba8In16Ge28Sn2
κL (150K) depends on the cage radius ( Å )RR6d 6d -- 24k 24k (A8E16X30)
= R6d-24k(Sr8Ga16Ge30) (S G G )a (A8E16X30)×
guest ion radius, but is not scaledby the cage radius.
6d 24k( 8 16 30) a (Sr8Ga16Ge30)
Scaling ofScaling of κκL L with the guest free spacewith the guest free space
2.0)
type-1clathrates
Ba8Zn8Ge38
B Al Si
Ba8Ni6Ge40
Ba Cu GeHostr (Å) = 1 11 (Si)
Ionic radius for high coordinationR G (Å) = 1.35 (Eu2+)
2
1 5W /
K m
)
Ba8Ga16Ge30
Ba Ga Si
Cs8Zn4Sn42 clathratesBa8Al16Si30Ba8Cu6Ge40
Cs8Sn44
r H(Å) = 1.11 (Si)1.22 (Ge)1.41 (Sn)
1.44 (Sr2+)1.61 (Ba2+) 1.83 (Rb1+)1.88 (Cs1+)
1.5
150K
) ( W
Ba8Ga16Si30
Sr8Ga16Si30
Rb8Zn4Sn42 Rb8Ga8Sn38
24k6d
1.0
κ L( 1 Sr8Ga16Ge30
Eu Ga Ge
Ba8In16Ge30
β−Ba8Ga16Sn30Ba8In16Ge28Sn2n1
10.5
1.71.61.51.41.31.2guest free space ( Å )
Eu8Ga16Ge30 β 8 16 30 p1
6d 24k guest free space ( Å )increase of rgfs suppression of κL
Guest free spaceGuest free space rr
6d 24k
Guideline for low κ LGuest free space Guest free space rrgfsgfs= R R 6d 6d -- 24k24k-r r guestguest-r r hosthost
Summary on TE clathratesSummary on TE clathrates
• Both p-type and n-type crystals are obtained.
Type-I and type-VIII Ba8Ga16Sn30
p yp yp y• The type-Ι BaGaSn is the best example of “phonon glass”
among intermetallic clathrates. However, more carriersare necessary to realize “electron crystal”.
• Off-center rattling scatters effectively the acoustic phonons, g y pwhich mechanism remains to be further studied.
Universal relation between κ and the guest free spaceUniversal relation between κ L and the guest free spaceprovides a useful guideline for caged TE materials with lower κ L.with lower κ L.
Searching for Rattling Kondo SemiconductorsHow to satisfy two requisites1. A sharp pseudogap at EF
2S=Z1. A sharp pseudogap at EF
in the renormalized band2. Off-center rattling in a caged structure
)( elL κκρ +⋅Z
2. Off center rattling in a caged structureComplex caged compoundswith multiple sites for Ce Sm and Yb ionswith multiple sites for Ce, Sm, and Yb ions one site: Kondo effect / hybridization gap other sites: off-center rattlingother sites: off-center rattlingApproach to greentech applicationefficiency of p-n coupleefficiency of p-n couple, phase stability against heat cycles,costs of materials and so oncosts of materials, and so on.