The Tropical Cyclone Boundary Layer 4: Thermodynamics
Embed Size (px)
description
Transcript of The Tropical Cyclone Boundary Layer 4: Thermodynamics

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate ResearchA partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
The Tropical Cyclone Boundary Layer4: Thermodynamics
Jeff Kepert
Head, High Impact Weather Research
Oct 2013
www.cawcr.gov.au

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Observed thermal structure
• Zhang et al (2011, MWR) composite r-z sections in North Atlantic hurricanes.
Azimuthal wind
Potential temperature
Radial wind
Top of inflow layer
• Obs show that the well-mixed (constant θ) layer is half or less the depth of the inflow layer in TCs.

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Choice of definitions of BL depth
hinfl: inflow layer depth
zi: mixed layer depth
hvmax: height of maximum wind speed
Ricr: Bulk Richardson number = 0.25 From Zhang et al. (2009)
Which is “correct”?

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Interesting questions …
• Why is the inflow layer so stable?
• SST > Ts (by ~2 K), and the inflow layer is turbulent … so it should be “well mixed”
• Why is there a surface superadiabatic layer?
• These occur over land, but normally require a very high skin temperature and light winds … neither of which exist in TCs
• Where is the top of the BL?
Potential temperature
Top of inflo
w laye
r
contour interval = 0.5 K
This work in collaboration with Juliane Schwendike and Hamish Ramsay, Monash University.

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Budget equation for θ
• Potential temperature budget in axisymmetric cylindrical coordinates:
pvhH C
Q
zK
zK
zw
ru
t
4
horizontal advection
vertical advection
horizontal diffusion
vertical diffusion
u
v
w
vK
potential temperature
radial wind
azimuthal wind
vertical velocity
radius
diffusion coefficient
vertical turbulent exchange coefficients for momentum
diabatic
diabatic heating
specific heat at constant pressure

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Budget equation for stability, ∂θ/∂z
• Budget equation of the lapse rate:
pvhH C
Q
zzK
zzK
zz
w
rz
u
zw
zru
zt
2
24
2
22
horizontal advection
vertical advection
differential horizontal advection
stretching
horizontal diffusion
vertical diffusion
diabatic
Can change the sign of ∂θ/∂z
Can’t change the sign of ∂θ/∂z

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
The model
CM1: Axisymmetric TC model of Bryan and Rotunno (2009)
• Non-hydrostatic • Axisymmetric “full-physics” tropical cyclone model• Simulations are time-mean of a quasi-steady state storm at
potential intensity (PI)

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
CM1 modelled wind structure
Radial wind
Azimuthal wind
Vertical wind

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Thermal Structure
Model has close-to-observed thermal structure.
Zhang et al. obsCM1

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Log-like scale, 10-3 K s-1
Red = warming
Blue = cooling
Model θ-budget
10-3 K s-1
Diabatic term10-3 K s-1
Vertical advection

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Red = warming
Blue = cooling
Log-like scale, 10-3 K s-1
Vertical diffusion
Model θ-budget
10-3 K s-1
Horizontal advection

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Budget equation for ∂θ/∂z
• Budget equation of the lapse rate:
pvhH C
Q
zzK
zzK
zz
w
rz
u
zw
zru
zt
2
24
2
22
horizontal advection
vertical advection
differential horizontal advection
stretching
horizontal diffusion
vertical diffusion
diabatic
Can change the sign of ∂θ/∂z
Can’t change the sign of ∂θ/∂z

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Terms in model ∂θ/∂z-budget
• Tends to strengthen the observed stability structure in the core, because (a) the cyclone is warm cored and (b) the inflow is a maximum near 100-m height.
Differential horizontal advection Vertical stretching
• Tends to erode the stability structure near the surface where ∂w/∂z > 0.
Red = stabilising
Blue = destabilising

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Terms in model ∂θ/∂z-budget
Vertical diffusion
• Tends to erode the stability structure, because it mixes towards constant θ. Red = stabilising
Blue = destabilising
Diabatic term

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Model ∂θ/∂z-budget
Horizontal advection Vertical advection
• Horizontal and vertical advection can’t change the stability – they just move it around.
Red = stabilising
Blue = destabilising

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Fluxes: the CBLAST experiment
• CBLAST: Coupled Boundary Layers Air Sea Transfer
• Major field program to measure air-sea fluxes
• Specially instrumented aircraft
• Stepped descents between rainbands (not eyewall)
• Black et al (2007 BAMS)

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Hurricane Boundary Layer at 60 m

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Flux measurements in outer rainbands
• Zhang et al (2009, JAS)

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Heat and moisture fluxes
• Zhang et al (2009, JAS)

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Vertical structure
• Fluxes extend to well above the inversion (stable layer)• Flux becomes zero (~top of boundary layer) at about 2 zi
• Suggests that the stable layer is not the top of the boundary layer
• Momentum flux is similar to that in textbooks, except deeper

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Modelled flow and depth of surface influence
• Two simulation with Kepert and Wang (2001) model, different turbulence parameterisations. From Kepert (2010a QJRMS)
• Dots = height where stress drops to 20% of surface value.

The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Thermal structure conclusions
• The main stabilising term is differential advection.• The inflow decreases with height, and advects cold (low θ) air inwards. So
the cooling is strongest in the lower BL.
• This term reverses (destabilises) right next to the surface because the inflow max is at about 100-m height … so the differential advection is reversed right near the surface.
• Main destabilising terms are:• Vertical diffusion – due to heating from below.
• Differential advection below ~100 m causes the “surface super”.
• One-dimensional thinking is no good for TCBL thermodynamics.• Constant-θ is not a good definition of the TCBL.
• Mixing is much deeper than constant-θ layer.
• Boundary layer depth a little greater than inflow layer depth• In axisymmetric storms
• Motion asymmetry is a difficulty