The mechanism of anti-activation at the Pseudomonas sp. ADP σN ...
-
Upload
nguyenkhanh -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
1
Transcript of The mechanism of anti-activation at the Pseudomonas sp. ADP σN ...
1
1
The mechanism of anti-activation at the Pseudomonas sp. ADP 2
σN-dependent PatzT promoter 3
4
Running title: Anti-activation of a σN-dependent promoter 5
Ana Isabel Platero†, Aroa López-Sánchez, Laura Tomás-Gallardo, 6
Eduardo Santero and Fernando Govantes# 7
Key words: σN-dependent transcription, transcriptional repression, 8
Pseudomonas, atrazine degradation. 9
10
Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, Universidad Pablo de Olavide/Consejo 11
Superior de Investigaciones Científicas/Junta de Andalucía, and Departamento de 12
Biología Molecular e Ingeniería Bioquímica, Universidad Pablo de Olavide. 13
14
†Current address: Abengoa Bioenergy. C/ Energía Solar, nº 1. Palmas Altas. 41014 15
Sevilla, Spain 16
17
#Corresponding author. Address: Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo. Universidad 18
Pablo de Olavide. Carretera de Utrera, Km. 1. 41013 Sevilla, Spain 19
Telephone: +34-954977877. Fax: +34-954349376. E-mail: [email protected] 20
21
AEM Accepted Manuscript Posted Online 13 May 2016Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.00906-16Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
2
ABSTRACT 22
PatzT is an internal promoter of the atzRSTUVW operon directing the synthesis of 23
AtzT, AtzU, AtzV and AtzW, components of an ABC-type cyanuric acid transport system. 24
PatzT is σN-dependent, activated by the general nitrogen control regulator NtrC with the 25
assistance of IHF, and repressed by the LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) AtzR. 26
We have used a variety of in vivo and in vitro gene expression and protein-DNA interaction 27
assays to assess the mechanisms underlying AtzR-dependent repression of PatzT. Here 28
we show that repression only occurs when AtzR and NtrC interact simultaneously with the 29
PatzT promoter region, indicating that AtzR acts as an anti-activator to antagonize 30
activation by NtrC. Furthermore, repression requires a precise rotational orientation of the 31
AtzR and NtrC binding sites, strongly suggesting protein-protein interaction between both 32
proteins on the promoter region. Further exploration of the anti-activation mechanism 33
showed that although AtzR-dependent repression occurs prior to open complex formation, 34
AtzR does not alter the oligomerization state of NtrC or inhibit NtrC ATPase activity when 35
bound to the PatzT promoter region. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that 36
PatzT-bound AtzR interacts with NtrC to prevent coupling of NtrC-mediated ATP 37
hydrolysis with the remodeling of the interactions between E-σN and PatzT that lead to 38
open complex formation. 39
40
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
3
IMPORTANCE 41
Here we describe a unique mechanism by which the regulatory protein AtzR 42
prevents activation of the σN-dependent promoter PatzT. Promoters of this family are 43
always positively regulated, but there are a few examples of overlapping negative 44
regulation. The mechanism described here is highly unconventional, and involves 45
interaction between the repressor and activator protein to prevent the action of the former 46
on the RNA polymerase-promoter complex. 47
48
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
4
INTRODUCTION 49
Promoters transcribed by RNA polymerase bearing the alternative σ factor σN (E-50
σN) are obligately subjected to positive control by enhancer-binding proteins (EBPs) that 51
bind DNA at sites >100 bp upstream from the E-σN binding motifs, designated upstream 52
activation sites (UASs). Activation occurs by a unique mechanism involving 53
oligomerization of the EBP at the UAS, interaction with E-σN by looping out the intervening 54
sequences, and stimulation of closed complex to open complex isomerization concomitant 55
to the hydrolysis of ATP by the conserved central domain of the EBP (1-6). In addition, a 56
handful of σN-dependent promoters are subjected to negative control by proteins other 57
than their EBPs by means of a variety of mechanisms, including (i) interference with DNA 58
loop formation (7-9); (ii) locking RNA polymerase in a form of closed complex insensitive to 59
activation (10); and (iii) competition with the activator for DNA binding (11,12). 60
Interestingly, all of these mechanisms target the activation process, rather than interaction 61
of RNA polymerase with the promoter region, which represents a common form of 62
repression for σ70-dependent promoters in bacteria (13,14). The sole known exception to 63
this rule is AtzR competition with E-σN for DNA binding at the PatzR promoter, a 64
mechanism that was explained by the lack of an UAS in this promoter region, and the 65
concomitant requirement of high promoter occupancy for efficient UAS-independent 66
activation (15). 67
The Pseudomonas sp. ADP 108 kbp plasmid pADP-1 harbors the genes involved in 68
the hydrolytic degradation of the s-triazine atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-69
isopropylamino-1,3,5-triazine)(16). Atrazine degradation requires the products of the 70
constitutively expressed atzA, atzB and atzC genes, involved in atrazine conversion to the 71
central metabolite of s-triazine degradation, cyanuric acid, and the atzDEF operon, 72
encoding the activities required for cyanuric acid conversion to ammonium and carbon 73
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
5
dioxide (17,18). Atrazine and cyanuric acid are primarily used as nitrogen sources, and the 74
atzDEF operon is a target for transcriptional regulation by the general nitrogen control 75
system (19). A regulatory cascade was characterized in which the EBP NtrC activates σN-76
dependent transcription of atzR, encoding the LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR). 77
AtzR in turn activates the divergent atzDEF operon in response to cyanuric acid and a 78
nitrogen limitation signal transduced by the PII protein GlnK. In addition, AtzR represses its 79
own synthesis (17-21). Recently, we showed that atzR is co-transcribed with five additional 80
genes: atzS, encoding a putative outer membrane protein, and the atzTUVW cluster, 81
encoding an ABC-type transport system involved in high affinity uptake of cyanuric acid 82
(22,23). However, an additional σN-dependent promoter, PatzT, located within the atzS 83
coding region, is responsible for most of the transcription of the atzTUVW cluster (22). 84
Similarly to PatzR, PatzT is activated by NtrC in response to nitrogen limitation, and 85
repressed by AtzR in a cyanuric acid-independent fashion. 86
Although PatzR and PatzT share the same regulatory scheme, their architectural 87
features are widely divergent. No UAS for NtrC is present at the PatzR promoter region 88
and NtrC activates from solution or non-specifically bound to DNA, in a UAS-independent 89
fashion (15). UAS-independent activation is known to be fostered by high occupancy of 90
the promoter by E-σN (24-26). Accordingly, PatzR bears an E-σN binding motif with high 91
similarity to the consensus that is strongly bound by E-σN (15). A single AtzR binding site 92
overlaps the PatzR E-σN-binding element and is strictly required for repression (15). In 93
contrast with PatzR, our previous results depicted PatzT as an archetypical σN-dependent 94
promoter, featuring an UAS made out of two NtrC binding sites that is required for high-95
level activation and a binding site for the DNA-bending protein IHF, likely involved in 96
looping out the intervening sequences between the NtrC UAS and the E-σN-binding motif 97
(Fig. 1). Nevertheless, PatzT also displays significant levels of UAS-independent 98
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
6
activation, suggesting a strong interaction between E-σN and its highly conserved binding 99
site (22). AtzR binds the PatzT promoter region at a single site, containing a strong 100
recognition motif centered at position -112 (Fig. 1). This AtzR binding site was also found 101
to be strictly required for repression (22). 102
PatzR and PatzT promoters are two examples of negatively regulated σN-103
dependent transcription. The mechanism of repression has been solved for PatzR, in 104
which AtzR competes with E-σN for interaction with their overlapping binding sites (15). In 105
contrast, the unusual location of the AtzR binding site at the PatzT promoter region, far 106
upstream from the E-σN recognition motif, and the intriguing observation that AtzR cannot 107
repress PatzT transcription when the NtrC binding sites are absent suggest that an 108
unconventional repression mechanism may operate at this promoter. 109
110
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
7
MATERIALS AND METHODS 111
Bacterial strains and growth conditions 112
Bacterial strains used in this work and their relevant genotypes are summarized in 113
Table 1. Minimal medium containing 25 mM sodium succinate as the sole carbon source 114
was used for in vivo gene expression analysis (27). Nitrogen sources were ammonium 115
chloride or L-serine (1 g l-1). Luria-Bertani (LB) medium was used as rich medium (28). 116
Liquid cultures were grown in culture tubes or flasks with shaking (180 rpm) at 30 or 37ºC 117
(for P. putida or E. coli strains, respectively). For solid media, Bacto-Agar (Difco) was 118
added to a final concentration of 18 g l-1. Antibiotics and other additions were used, when 119
required, at the following concentrations: ampicillin (100 mg l-1), kanamycin (20 mg l-1), 120
carbenicillin (500 mg l-1), rifampicin (10 mg l-1), chloramphenicol (15mg l-1), tetracyclin (5 121
mg l-1) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal) (25 mg l-1). All 122
reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. 123
Plasmid construction 124
Plasmids used in this work are summarized in Table 1. All DNA manipulations were 125
performed according to standard procedures (28). Restriction enzymes, DNA polymerases 126
and T4 DNA ligase were purchased from Roche Applied Science. The Klenow fragment or 127
T4 DNA polymerase was routinely used to fill-in recessed 3' ends and trim protruding 3' 128
ends of incompatible restriction sites. Plasmid DNA preparation and DNA purification kits 129
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, General Electric Healthcare or Macherey-Nagel and 130
used according to the manufacturers specifications. Plasmid DNA was transferred to E. 131
coli and P. putida strains by transformation (29) or by triparental mating (30). E. coli DH5α 132
was used as a host in all cloning procedures. 133
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
8
Site-directed mutagenesis of the PatzT promoter region by overlap extension PCR 134
was performed essentially as described (31), using mutagenic and external 135
oligonucleotides pairs as primers (sequences available upon request), and pMPO805 as a 136
template. The final PCR products containing PatzT promoter sequences from -218 to +319 137
(wild-type PatzT coordinates, relative to the transcriptional start site) were digested with 138
EcoRI and BamHI and cloned into EcoRI- and BamHI-cleaved pMPO234 to generate the 139
PatzT-lacZ fusion plasmids pMPO835, pMPO836, pMPO837, pMPO849, pMPO850, 140
pMPO851, pMPO863 and pMPO864. The presence of the desired mutations and the 141
absence of unwanted alterations were determined by commercial sequencing (Secugen). 142
The EcoRI-BamHI fragments containing the N+5A, N+6A and N+10A PatzT promoter 143
derivatives were excised from pMPO849, pMPO850 and pMPO851, respectively and 144
cloned into EcoRI- and BamHI-digested pTE103 to yield the in vitro transcription template 145
plasmids pMPO853, pMPO854 and pMPO855. 146
β-Galactosidase assays 147
Steady-state β-galactosidase assays were used to examine the expression of the 148
wild-type and mutant PatzT-lacZ fusions in P. putida KT2442. Preinocula of bacterial 149
strains harboring the relevant plasmids were grown to saturation in minimal medium under 150
nitrogen-sufficient conditions (ammonium chloride 1 gl-1) and cells were then diluted in 151
minimal medium containing the appropriate nitrogen sources (1 gl-1 ammonium chloride for 152
nitrogen excess; 1 gl-1 L-serine for nitrogen limitation). Diluted cultures were shaken for 24 153
hours to mid-exponential phase (A600=0.25-0.5). Growth was then stopped and β-154
galactosidase activity was determined from SDS- and chloroform-permeabilized cells as 155
previously described (32). 156
Protein purification 157
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
9
AtzR-His6 was purified from the overproducing strain NCM631 harboring pMPO135 158
and pIZ227 by nickel affinity chromatography as previously described (21). P. putida 159
NtrCD55E,S161F (33) and σN (34) were kind gifts of A. B. Hervás and V. Shingler. E. coli IHF 160
was purified from the overproducing strain E. coli K5746 by ammonium sulfate 161
fractionation and affinity chromatography on heparin-Sepharose as described previously 162
(35). Core E. coli RNA polymerase was purchased from Epicenter Biotechnologies. 163
Gel mobility shift and DNAse I footprinting assays 164
Probes containing the wild-type or mutant PatzT promoter region derivatives were 165
obtained by PCR using the PatzT-lacZ fusion plasmids as templates (primer sequences 166
available upon request). The PCR products were subsequently digested with EcoRI and 167
BamHI and gel purified. DNA fragments were strand-specifically labeled by filling in 5' 168
overhanging ends using the Klenow fragment in a reaction mixture containing [α-32P]-169
dCTP. Unincorporate nucleotides were removed using the MSB Spin PCRapace kit 170
(Invitek). 171
AtzR-DNA complexes were formed at room temperature in 20 μl reactions 172
containing 10 ng of the radiolabeled probe and increasing amounts of purified AtzR-His6 (0 173
to 100 nM) in binding buffer (35 mM Tris acetate pH 7.9, 70 mM potassium acetate, 20 174
mM ammonium acetate, 2 mM magnesium acetate, 1 mM calcium chloride, 1 mM DTT, 5 175
% glycerol, 100 μg ml-1 salmon sperm DNA, 250 μg ml-1 BSA) for 20 minutes. Reactions 176
were stopped with 4 μl of loading buffer (0.125 % w/v bromophenol blue, 0.125% w/v 177
xylene cyanol, 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 8), 1 mM EDTA, 30% glycerol) and samples were 178
separated on a 5% polyacrylamide native gel in Tris-borate-EDTA buffer at 4ºC. Dried gels 179
were exposed to a phosphoscreen and analyzed using the ImageQuant software 180
(Amersham). For competitive gel mobility shift assays, reactions were incubated for 20 181
minutes in the presence of 400 nM AtzR-His6, and subsequently challenged with 182
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
10
increasing concentrations (0-2 μM) NtrCD55E,S161F for 20 additional minutes, or 183
preincubated with 2 μM NtrCD55E,S161F and challenged with 0-400 nM AtzR-His6, in the 184
same conditions as above. Reactions were stopped with 4 μl of loading buffer (0.125 % 185
w/v bromophenol blue, 0.125% w/v xylene cyanol, 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 8), 1 mM EDTA, 186
30% glycerol) and samples were separated on 6.5% polyacrylamide native gels in Tris-187
borate-EDTA buffer at 4ºC. Dried gels were exposed to a phosphoscreen and analyzed 188
using the ImageQuant software (Amersham). 189
Protein-DNA complexes for DNAse I footprinting assays were formed as above. 190
Partial digestion of the DNA was initiated by the addition of 1 μl of an empirically 191
determined dilution (typically 10-2 to 10-3) of a DNAse I stock solution (10 U ml-1, Roche 192
Diagnostics). Incubation was continued for 30 additional seconds and reactions were 193
stopped by the addition of 5 μl stop buffer (1.5 M sodium acetate, pH 5.2; 130 mM EDTA; 194
1 mg ml-1 salmon sperm DNA; 2.4 mg ml-1 glycogen). DNA was subsequently ethanol 195
precipitated, resuspended in 5 μl loading buffer (0.125% w/v bromophenol blue, 0.125% 196
w/v xylene cyanol, 20 mM EDTA, 95% v/v formamide) and separated by gel 197
electrophoresis on a 6% polyacrylamide-6 M urea denaturing sequencing gel. Sequencing 198
reactions were performed with the Sequenase 2.0 kit (USB). Gels were processed and 199
analyzed as above. 200
In vitro transcription 201
Multiround in vitro transcription reactions were performed essentially as described 202
(22) in a final volume of 20 μl containing 35 mM Tris-acetate, pH 7.9; 70 mM potassium 203
acetate; 20 mM ammonium acetate; 5 mM magnesium acetate; 1 mM DTT; 10% glycerol; 204
250 mg l-1 BSA; 20 nM E-σN and 0.5 μg of supercoiled plasmid template containing wild-205
type PatzT (pMPO831) or its mutant variants (pMPO853, pMPO854 and pMPO855). For 206
PatzT activation assays, E. coli core RNA polymerase (Epicentre) (100 nM), P. putida σN 207
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
11
factor (200 nM), IHF (75 nM) and 4 mM ATP were added and incubated for 10 minutes at 208
30°C. Open complex formation was stimulated by addition of NtrCD55E,S161F (0-400 nM) and 209
further incubation for 10 minutes. In repression experiments, AtzR-His6 (0-240 nM) was 210
added either before or after the formation of open complex and incubated for an additional 211
10 minutes at 30ºC. A mixture of ATP, GTP, CTP (final concentration 0.4 mM each), UTP 212
(0.07 mM) and [α32P]-UTP (0.033 μM, Perkin Elmer) was added to initiate transcription. 213
After a 5 min incubation at 30°C, re-initiation was prevented by the addition of heparin 214
(final concentration 0.1 mg ml-1). The samples were incubated for an additional 5 min at 215
30°C, and the reactions were terminated by the addition of 5 μl of stop buffer (150 mM 216
EDTA, 1.05 M NaCl, 14 M urea, 3% glycerol, 0.075% xylene cyanol, and 0.075% 217
bromophenol blue). Samples were run in 6% polyacrylamide-urea gels in Tris-borate-218
EDTA buffer at room temperature. Gels were processed and analyzed as described 219
above. 220
ATPase activity assays 221
NtrC ATPase activity was assayed by measuring the production of inorganic 222
phosphate (Pi) using the Enzchek Phosphate Assay Kit (Life Technologies). In order to 223
avoid Pi contamination from the AtzR-His6 preparation, the AtzR-His6 buffer was changed 224
to 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.5 M NaCl, 20 % glycerol, 0.1 mM DTT by discontinuous 225
diafiltration using Nanosep 10K Omega (Pall) centrifugal devices following the 226
manufacturer's instructions. AtzR-His6 DNA binding activity was essentially unchanged as 227
judged from gel motility shift assays. A 110 bp DNA fragment containing the PatzT NtrC 228
and AtzR binding sites was obtained by annealing two complementary DNA 229
oligonucloetides (sequences available upon request). 230
ATPase assay reactions were carried out as specified by the manufacturer, except 231
that the MgCl concentration was increased to 2 mM and 10 mM KCl and 1 mM DTT were 232
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
12
added. Mixtures containing NtrCD55E,S161F (231 nM dimer), AtzR (240 nM tetramer) and/or 233
the PatzT DNA fragment (770 nM) were preincubated for 20 minutes at room temperature. 234
Purine nucleotide phosphorylase was added, followed by 10 min incubation before ATP 235
was added to start the reaction. The kinetics of Pi production was monitored by A360 and 236
used to determine the specific ATPase activity (mol Pi min-1 mol NtrC-1). Phosphate 237
concentrations were derived from standard curves using KH2PO4 as the source of 238
inorganic phosphate. Phosphate release from reactions not containing NtrC was 239
negligible. 240
Blue Native gel electrophoresis 241
Blue Native gel electrophoresis was performed using the Native PAGETM Bis-Tris Gel 242
System (ThermoFisher Scientific). AtzR-His6 and/or NtrCD55E,S161F were diluted in 20 µl in 243
vitro transcription buffer (35 mM Tris-acetate, pH 7.9; 70 mM potassium acetate; 20 mM 244
ammonium acetate; 5 mM magnesium acetate; 1 mM DTT; 10% glycerol), incubated for 245
20 minutes at room temperature, and loaded on a 4-16% Bis-Tris Blue Native gel. 246
Electrophoresis was run and the gel was further processed according to the 247
manufacturer's instructions. 248
249
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
13
RESULTS 250
AtzR-dependent repression occurs prior to open complex formation 251
We have previously shown that PatzT transcription activation can be replicated in 252
vitro in the presence of pure E-σN, the constitutively active NtrC variant NtrCD55E,S161F and 253
IHF. NtrCD55E,S161F has been shown to activate and repress transcription in vivo and in vitro 254
to levels similar to those obtained with wild-type NtrC in a signal-independent fashion 255
(33,36). In order to characterize AtzR-dependent repression of the PatzT promoter in vitro, 256
multi-round transcription assays were performed using supercoiled plasmid pMPO831, 257
which bears the PatzT promoter region from position -218 to +319, as a template, 258
Escherichia coli RNA polymerase core and IHF protein, Pseudomonas putida σN and 259
NtrCD55E,S161F, and hexahistidine-tagged AtzR (AtzR-His6). To determine the effect of open 260
complex formation on AtzR-dependent repression, two sets of transcription reactions were 261
prepared. In the first set, the template was incubated with E-σN, IHF and different 262
concentrations of AtzR-His6 in the presence of ATP. Isomerization to open complex was 263
subsequently triggered by the addition of NtrCD55E,S161F. In the second set, the DNA 264
template was incubated with NtrCD55E,S161F, E-σN and IHF in the presence of ATP to allow 265
open complex formation, which was subsequently challenged with different concentrations 266
of AtzR-His6 prior to the addition of NTPs (see Experimental Procedures for details)(Fig. 267
2,A). When added prior to open complex formation, a clear AtzR-His6 concentration-268
dependent decrease in PatzT activity was observed, to reach a maximum 90% decrease 269
in transcript levels at the highest concentration used. This result indicates that AtzR can 270
efficiently repress PatzT transcription in vitro. In contrast, addition of AtzR-His6 after open 271
complex formation resulted in low levels of repression, reaching a maximum of 20% at the 272
highest concentration used, suggesting that open complex formation prevents AtzR-273
dependent repression. 274
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
14
The data above may also be explained if the presence of NtrC renders the promoter 275
insensitive to repression due to interactions with E-σN or DNA, rather than by promoter 276
closed complex isomerization. To distinguish between these two possibilities two 277
additional sets of in vitro transcription reactions were performed. In the first set, E-σN was 278
pre-incubated with the PatzT template and NtrCD55E,S161F. The closed complex was 279
challenged with AtzR-His6, and then ATP was added to allow isomerization the the open 280
complex prior to the addition of NTPs. In the second set, ATP was added to the template- 281
NtrCD55E,S161F mixture, thus allowing open complex formation, and the open complex was 282
subsequently challenged with increasing AtzR-His6 concentrations prior to the addition of 283
NTPs. (Fig. 2,B). The results were equivalent to those obtained above, as efficient PatzT 284
repression was only observed when open complex formation was not allowed prior to the 285
addition of AtzR-His6. These results confirm that isomerization to an open complex 286
protects PatzT from AtzR-dependent repression, strongly suggesting that AtzR acts on the 287
early steps of the initiation pathway to prevent either closed complex formation or 288
isomerization to the open complex. 289
NtrC and AtzR bind the PatzT promoter region simultaneously 290
The location of the AtzR binding motif, centered at position -112, far upstream from 291
the E-σN binding motif and in the vicinity of the NtrC binding site NtrC-2 (centered at -130), 292
and the fact that AtzR cannot repress PatzT transcription when it is activated by NtrC in an 293
UAS-independent fashion (22) suggest that, rather than tampering with RNA polymerase 294
function, AtzR may antagonize NtrC interaction with the PatzT promoter region (22). To 295
test this possibility, gel mobility shift assays were performed in which PatzT-bound 296
NtrCD55E,S161F was challenged with increasing concentrations of AtzR-His6 and vice versa 297
(Fig. 3). Interaction of NtrCD55E,S161F with the PatzT promoter region resulted in the 298
replacement of the free probe band by a smear spanning much of the corresponding 299
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
15
PAGE lane (Fig. 3, lane 2). This was previously observed (22), and suggests that the 300
NtrCD55E,S161F-PatzT complex in unstable during gel electrophoresis. In contrast, AtzR-His6 301
retarded the PatzT probe to form a single stable complex (Fig. 3, lane 7). Addition of AtzR-302
His6 to a preformed NtrCD55E,S161F-PatzT complex (Fig. 3, lanes 3-6), or NtrCD55E,S161F to a 303
preformed AtzR-His6-PatzT (Figure 2, lanes 8-11) provoked the substitution of the pre-304
existing complexes for a single, stable, slow migrating protein-DNA complex, strongly 305
suggesting that both proteins can bind the PatzT promoter region simultaneously. 306
To characterize the interactions of NtrC and AtzR with the PatzT promoter region 307
further, the effect of challenging a preformed protein-DNA complex with the other protein 308
was also assessed by means of DNAse I footprinting (Fig. 4). NtrCD55E,S161F binding to the 309
PatzT promoter region (Fig. 4, lane 2) resulted in protection of positions -161, -162, -156 to 310
-150 and -136, and hypersensitivity at positions -157, -149, -148, -127 to -125, -119, -118 311
and -116, consistent with interactions at the NtrC1 and NtrC-2 sites (22). AtzR-His6 312
interaction with its site (Fig. 4, lane 7) resulted in a continuously protected region between 313
-109 and -125 with hypersensitive positions at -139, -136, -128, -99, -98, -86 to -84 and -314
64 to -62 (22). Addition of increasing concentrations of AtzR-His6 to a preformed 315
NtrCD55E,S161F-PatzT complex (Fig. 4, lanes 3-6) did not modify the footprinting pattern at 316
the NtrC1 site and the promoter-distal half of the NtrC-2 site. However, the hypersensitivity 317
signature observed at the promoter-proximal half and downstream from the NtrC-2 site 318
(positions -125, -119, -118 and -116) was substituted by the characteristic AtzR 319
footprinting pattern. Challenging a preformed AtzR-His6-PatzT complex with increasing 320
concentrations of NtrCD55E,S161F resulted in the gradual emergence of the NtrC footprinting 321
signature at NtrC1 and promoter-distal half of NtrC2, with no apparent effect on the AtzR 322
footprint. These results are fully consistent with the gel mobility shift results above, 323
indicating that NtrC and AtzR simultaneously bind the PatzT promoter region, although we 324
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
16
cannot rule out that the presence of DNA-bound AtzR may alter the interaction of NtrC with 325
its binding sites, or the oligomeric form of NtrC (dimers or hexamers) bound. 326
PatzT repression requires a precise relative rotational orientation of the NtrC and 327
AtzR sites 328
It has long been known that, although DNA bending or looping acts as a facilitator 329
of EBP-E-σN interactions in many σN-dependent promoters, a misoriented bend may lead 330
to incorrect alignment of the interacting pair, thus preventing activation (37,38). This 331
mechanism has been claimed to operate in several examples of σN-dependent promoter 332
repression (7-9). AtzR is a DNA-bending protein (21), and circular permutation analysis 333
has shown that it causes a 74º bend centered at position -92 of the PatzT promoter region 334
(Supplemental Material, Fig. S1). Thus, interference with DNA loop formation is a feasible 335
mechanism for AtzR repression of the PatzT promoter. To test this hypothesis, we 336
constructed a set of PatzT fusion plasmids in which the rotational orientation and/or the 337
distance between the NtrC and AtzR binding sites, or between both protein binding sites 338
and the downstream elements of the promoter region (IHF and E-σN binding sites) was 339
modified (Fig. 5,A). Plasmids pMPO849, pMPO850, pMPO851, pMPO863 and pMPO864 340
bear 5-, 6-, 10-, 21- or 32-bp insertions between the NtrC2 and AtzR binding sites (these 341
constructs were designated N+5A, N+6A, N+10A, M+21A and N+32 A, respectively). 342
Plasmids pMPO835, pMPO836 and pMPO837 bear 4-, 6- and 10-bp insertions between 343
the AtzR and IHF binding sites (constructs A+4I, A+6I and A10I). To test the effect of these 344
mutations on in vivo PatzT activation and repression, all fusion plasmids were transferred, 345
along with the wild-type PatzT-lacZ fusion pMPO805, to P. putida KT2442, used here and 346
in our previous work as a surrogate host for in vivo gene expression studies (15,21-347
23,39,40), or P. putida KT2442 bearing the AtzR-producing plasmid pMPO109. PatzT 348
expression was assessed from cultures grown in minimal medium containing ammonium 349
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
17
(nitrogen excess) or serine (nitrogen limitation) by means of β-galactosidase assays (Fig. 350
5,B). 351
Analysis of in vivo expression from the wild-type PatzT-lacZ fusion in the absence 352
of AtzR revealed a >100-fold increase in response to nitrogen limitation. This is consistent 353
with our previous observations, and expected for a promoter regulated by the general 354
nitrogen control system (22). None of the mutant promoter regions displayed a defect in 355
activation, and in fact all constructs bearing insertions between the NtrC and AtzR sites 356
(N+5A, N+6A, N+10A, M+21A and N+32A) showed 1.5- to 2-fold increased induction in 357
nitrogen-limited medium. PatzT expression from the wild-type N+5A and N+10A was also 358
assessed in ihf- and ∆ntrC backgrounds (Supplemental Material, Fig. S2). Nitrogen 359
limitation induction was nearly abolished in the absence of NtrC and severely decreased in 360
the absence of IHF in all cases, indicating that expression is similarly dependent on both 361
transcription factors, regardless of the construct. The effect of rotational orientation 362
mutations on PatzT promoter expression was further explored by means of multi-round in 363
vitro transcription assays using supercoiled pMPO831, pMPO853, pMPO854 or 364
pMPO855, bearing wild-type, N+5A, N+6A and N+10A PatzT promoter fragments, 365
respectively, as templates (Fig. 6). In reactions containing E-σN, IHF and NtrCD55E,S161F, but 366
lacking AtzR-His6, the mutant constructs exhibited NtrC concentration-dependent PatzT 367
transcript levels that were similar or greater than those obtained by the wild-type template 368
(Fig. 6,A), consistent with the in vivo observations above. Taken together, our results 369
strongly suggest that NtrC-dependent activation of PatzT is not restricted by the distance 370
or orientation of DNA-bound NtrC relative to promoter-bound E-σN. 371
Analysis of in vivo expression from the wild-type PatzT-lacZ fusion in the presence 372
of AtzR (Fig. 5), showed a 4-fold decrease in activity under nitrogen limitation, consistent 373
with negative control of the PatzT promoter by AtzR (22). Notably, the mutant promoters 374
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
18
bearing insertions of approximately half a helix turn between the NtrC and AtzR sites 375
(N+5A and N+6A) were completely insensitive to AtzR repression, while insertions of 376
approximately one (N+10A), two (N+21A) or three (N+32A) helix turns allowed repression 377
levels similar to those in the wild-type. None of the insertions downstream from the AtzR 378
site (A4I, A6I and A10I) had a significant effect on AtzR-dependent repression of PatzT. In 379
vitro transcription assays performed in the presence of E-σN, IHF, NtrCD55E,S161F and AtzR-380
His6 showed >10-fold AtzR-dependent repression of the wild-type promoter region at both 381
AtzR-His6 concentrations used (Fig. 6,B). A 5 bp insertion (N+5A construct) fully abolished 382
AtzR-dependent repression, while the N+6A template displayed a minor decrease in 383
transcript levels (less than 2-fold). Insertion of a full helix turn (N+10A construct) resulted 384
in repression that was only slightly less efficient than in the wild-type template. Taken 385
together, our results indicate that PatzT repression (i) requires a correct rotational 386
orientation between DNA-bound NtrC and AtzR, (ii) can tolerate an increase in the 387
distance between DNA-bound NtrC and AtzR provided that condition (i) is met, and (iii) 388
does not require correct alignment or a precise distance between the upstream (NtrC and 389
AtzR binding sites) and downstream (IHF and E-σN binding sites) elements of the PatzT 390
promoter region. Considering that NtrC-dependent activation is not sensitive to changes in 391
the distance or orientation of the UAS relative to the E-σN binding site, the evidence 392
obtained does not support the hypothesis that AtzR interference with DNA looping 393
prevents PatzT activation. 394
The rotational orientation of the binding sites does not significantly alter NtrC and 395
AtzR interactions with the PatzT promoter region 396
A trivial explanation to the results above is that the nucleotides inserted in the N+5A 397
and N+6A mutant promoters serendipitously affect AtzR interactions with its binding site, 398
while those inserted in the N+10A, N+21A and N+32 do not, regardless on their effect on 399
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
19
the PatzT promoter architecture. To assess this possibility, AtzR-His6 gel shift assays 400
were performed using wild-type, N+5A, N+6A and N+10A PatzT promoter fragments as 401
probes (Figure 7). AtzR-His6 efficiently retarded all four promoter fragments, indicating that 402
the lack of AtzR-dependent repression of the N+5A and N+6A promoter derivatives is not 403
due to a general defect in AtzR binding. 404
Additionally, we questioned whether the architecture of the NtrC-PatzT promoter 405
complexes formed at the opposite side of the helix might somehow hamper AtzR 406
interaction with its binding site at the mutant N+5A and N+6A promoters. To address this 407
question, we performed DNAse I footprinting analyses in which NtrCD55E,S161F-PatzT 408
complexes preformed on the wild-type, N+5A, and N+10A promoter variants were 409
challenged with increasing concentrations of AtzR (Fig. 8). Addition of NtrCD55E,S161F to the 410
wild-type and mutant probes resulted in similar footprinting patterns around sites NtrC1 411
and NtrC2. Additional hypersensitive bands overlapping the AtzR binding site were also 412
observed, in a variable pattern that may be attributed to differences in sequence due to the 413
insertions present in the mutant promoters. Addition of AtzR-His6 to preformed 414
NtrCD55E,S161F complexes resulted in the replacement of the NtrC-elicited hypersensitive 415
bands overlapping the AtzR binding site with the characteristic AtzR footprint. AtzR-His6 416
binding did not alter the NtrCD55E,S161F footprint upstream from position -126 in the wild-type 417
probe, as discussed above, while the NtrCD55E,S161F footprint was discernible down to 418
position -121 in the N+5A mutant and position -116 in the N+10A mutant. This effect is 419
clearly attributable to a decrease in the overlap of the NtrC and AtzR footprinting patterns 420
as the NtrC2 and AtzR sites are moved apart and correlates very well with the 5- and 10-421
bp insertions present in the mutant promoters. No observable feature in the footprinting 422
patterns could be correlated with the repression proficiency of the promoter variants. 423
Taking together, our results suggest that NtrC and AtzR interact with all the tested PatzT 424
promoter region variants in an independent fashion, and therefore the ability of AtzR to 425
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
20
exert repression cannot be correlated with competition or interference with NtrC for DNA 426
binding. 427
AtzR does not alter NtrC ATPase activity or oligomerization state. 428
The E-σN-dependent promoter activation pathway involves oligomerization of the 429
EBP upon UAS binding to a hexameric conformation that promotes the EBP ATPase 430
activity. Further contacts with the E-σN-promoter closed complex couple ATP hydrolysis to 431
the remodeling of the closed complex into a transcriptionally active open complex (41,42). 432
In order to discern the particular step of this pathway at which AtzR inhibits NtrC activation 433
of PatzT, the possible ability of AtzR to inhibit NtrC oligomerization, AtzR-His6 and 434
NtrCD55E,S161F were incubated separately and simultaneously in in vitro transcription buffer 435
and the protein complexes were resolved in Blue Native gel electrophoresis (Supplemental 436
Material, Fig. S3). Surprisingly, native AtzR-His6 did not migrate as a discrete band and 437
could not be detected in this electrophoresis system. Also, heat-denatured NtrCD55E,S161F 438
did not migrate to its expected size (~53 kDa), but as a single band with an apparent 439
molecular weight of ~90kDa. Both proteins were previously shown to migrate according to 440
their monomer molecular weights in SDS-PAGE (21,33). The native form of NtrCD55E,S161F 441
migrated as three bands, with apparent molecular weights of ~90, ~180 and ~540 kDa, 442
suggesting that this constitutive form is a mixture of monomers, dimers and hexamers in 443
solution. This migration pattern was unchanged in the presence of AtzR-His6, suggesting 444
that the presence of AtzR does not alter the equilibrium between the different oligomeric 445
forms of NtrC. 446
In addition, ATPase activity assays were performed using pure NtrCD55E,S161F in the 447
absence or in the presence of AtzR-His6 (Fig. 9). Addition of AtzR-His6 did not result in a 448
significant decrease in specific ATPase activity (1.3-fold change, p-value=0.26). This 449
assay was also performed in the presence of a ~3-fold molar excess of a 110-bp PatzT 450
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
21
promoter region fragment spanning the NtrC and AtzR binding sites. In the presence of 451
promoter DNA a 2-fold increase (p-value<0.05) in ATPase activity was observed in an 452
AtzR-independent fashion, consistent with the notion that DNA binding stimulates P. 453
putida NtrC oligomerization and ATPase activity, as previously shown for its 454
enterobacterial counterpart and other proteins in this family (41). Significantly, addition of 455
AtzR-His6 did not result in decreased ATP hydrolysis in these conditions. 456
Taken together, these results strongly suggest that AtzR does not inhibit ATP hydrolysis or 457
any of the steps leading to it. As our results above (Fig. 2) indicate that AtzR must operate 458
prior to open complex formation, we propose that PatzT-bound AtzR prevents coupling of 459
ATP hydrolysis to oligomerization of the closed complex into the open complex. 460
461
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
22
DISCUSSION 462
Promoters dependent on the alternative σ factor σN have been widely studied as 463
unique examples of a eukaryotic-like transcriptional activation mechanism in prokaryotic 464
systems (1,24,43). In addition to positive control, a small subset of σN-dependent 465
promoters is subjected to negative regulation. The work presented here demonstrates that 466
a new, unconventional mechanism by which AtzR prevents coupling of NtrC-catalyzed 467
ATP hydrolysis to the isomerization of the E-σN-promoter closed complex to the open 468
complex is accountable for the repression of the Pseudomonas sp. ADP PatzT promoter. 469
Analysis of the few examples of negatively regulated σN-dependent promoters has 470
revealed a fairly diverse array of regulatory mechanisms, generally involving interference 471
of the repressor protein with the activation process (7-12,15,22). The location of the AtzR 472
binding site, adjacent to the NtrC UAS and far upstream from the E-σN recognition 473
element, as well as the early observation that AtzR cannot repress the relatively high 474
levels of UAS-independent, NtrC-activated PatzT transcription observed when the NtrC 475
UAS was inactivated by mutation (22), prompted us to hypothesize that AtzR antagonizes 476
NtrC function when bound to the PatzT promoter region, and therefore performs the role of 477
an anti-activator. To this end, the simplest mechanism would be activator exclusion, 478
involving competition between repressor and activator for interaction with the promoter 479
region, as previously shown for repression of the XylR-activated P. putida Pu promoter by 480
TurA and PprA (11,12). However, gel mobility shift assays showed that AtzR and NtrC 481
simultaneously interact with the PatzT promoter region (Fig. 3), and DNAse I footprinting 482
revealed the simultaneous occupancy of the NtrC1, NtrC2 and AtzR sites (Fig. 4), strongly 483
suggesting that AtzR does not compete with NtrC for DNA binding. It may be argued that, 484
even though AtzR does not exclude NtrC binding the NtrC2 site, the vicinity of DNA-bound 485
AtzR may alter the mode of interaction with this site, a notion supported by the altered 486
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
23
NtrC-induced DNAse I hypersensitivity pattern around NtrC2 in the presence of AtzR (Fig. 487
4). However, promoter derivatives containing insertions of up to 32 bp between the NtrC2 488
and AtzR sites, in which the sites are moved up to three helix turns apart, still show a 489
normal response to AtzR (Fig. 5), indicating that interference with normal NtrC binding is 490
not likely involved in the mechanism of repression. Similarly, the observation that promoter 491
derivatives bearing 4, 6 or 10 bp insertions between the AtzR and IHF binding sites still 492
support wild-type levels of activation and repression (Fig. 5) rules out the possibility that 493
AtzR may interfere with IHF binding to the PatzT promoter region. 494
A second mechanism of anti-activation of σN-dependent promoters exploits the 495
requirement of a DNA loop to facilitate interaction between the DNA-bound EBP and E-σN. 496
Several σN-dependent promoter repressors have been proposed to alter the orientation of 497
the DNA loop hence preventing activation, including the Klebsiella pneumoniae LTTR Nac 498
at its own promoter (7), CcpA at the Bacillus subtilis levanase operon (8) and CRP at the 499
E. coli glnHp2 promoter (9). As AtzR bends DNA upon binding at the PatzT promoter 500
region (Supplemental Material, Fig. S1), AtzR-induced bending may alter the orientation of 501
the DNA loop at the PatzT promoter, thus impairing NtrC interaction with E-σN. However, 502
insertions designed to rotate the NtrC UAS to the opposite side of the helix or to separate 503
it up to three full helix turns from the E-σN binding site failed to diminish PatzT activation 504
(Figs. 5 and 6), indicating that flexibility of the DNA loop is sufficient to accommodate NtrC 505
interaction with RNA polymerase from various orientations and distances. This result is 506
expected for IHF-independent σN-dependent promoters, in which strong binding of E-σN 507
facilitates interaction with the EBP in a position- and orientation-independent fashion 508
(44,45). However, for IHF-dependent promoters, strict dependence on the correct 509
rotational orientation for activation has been documented (38). In vivo expression of the 510
wild-type and mutant PatzT promoters was dependent on both NtrC and IHF 511
(Supplemental Material, Fig. S2). On the other hand, the PatzT promoter displays very 512
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
24
high similarity to the E-σN consensus [TGGCCC-N5-TTGC vs. TGGCAC-N5-TTGC 513
(conserved positions are underlined)]. We propose that, despite the fact that PatzT 514
activation is aided by IHF, strong interaction of E-σN with its highly conserved binding motif 515
may compensate for suboptimal orientation of the NtrC UAS, enabling orientation-516
independent activation. The presence of substantial levels of UAS-independent activation 517
of PatzT (22), a phenomenon associated with promoters with high E-σN occupancy (15,24-518
26) lend further support to this notion. Strikingly, despite the lack of rotational orientation 519
dependency of PatzT activation, AtzR repression of PatzT was impaired when a half-helix 520
turn was inserted between the NtrC UAS and the AtzR binding site, but not when one, two 521
or three full helix turns were inserted at this location (Figs. 5 and 6), indicative of a 522
rotational orientation-dependent effect of AtzR on PatzT activation. However, this pattern 523
was not reproduced when half or a full helix turn was inserted downstream from the AtzR 524
binding site, indicating that a precise rotational orientation of AtzR relative to the 525
downstream elements of the promoter is not required for repression (Fig. 5). If the role of 526
AtzR were to alter the orientation of the DNA bend, a similar dependence on rotational 527
orientation would be expected on both sides of the AtzR binding site (37,38). Taken 528
together, the insensitivity of NtrC-dependent activation to changes in position and 529
rotational orientation, along with the inconsistent effect of altered rotational orientation of 530
the AtzR binding site relative to the upstream and downstream promoter elements fail to 531
support an anti-activation model based solely on a distortion exerted by AtzR on the DNA 532
loop formed at the PatzT promoter. 533
Activation of σN-dependent promoter is a complex process. NtrC can bind its UAS 534
elements both in its unphosphorylated (inactive) and phosphorylated (active) forms. 535
However, phosphorylation promotes oligomerization to a hexameric conformation that 536
enhances ATPase activity. DNA loop-mediated interaction with E-σN bound to DNA in a 537
closed complex couples ATP hydrolysis with the remodeling of the E-σN-promoter closed 538
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
25
complex structure, leading to isomerization to the open complex (6,41,42). Our 539
experimental results show that (i) AtzR does not interfere with NtrC binding to the PatzT 540
UAS, as documented in competitive gel mobility shift and DNAse I footprinting assays 541
(Figs. 3, 4 and 8); (ii) AtzR does not alter NtrC oligomerization state, as assessed by Blue 542
Native gel electrophoresis (Supplemental Material, Fig. S3); (iii) AtzR does not interfere 543
with NtrC phosphorylation, as repression was observed in vitro with an NtrC variant 544
(NtrCD55E,S161F), that does not require phosphorylation, in the absence of a phosphate 545
donor (Figs. 2 and 6); (iv) AtzR does not have a relevant effect on DNA loop formation, as 546
evidenced by the in vivo and in vitro phenotypes of our mutants bearing rotationally altered 547
variants of the PatzT promoter region (Figs. 5 and 6); (v) AtzR does not interfere with NtrC 548
ATPase activity or the events (DNA binding and oligomerization), as shown by the fact that 549
AtzR does not decrease the ATPase activity of NtrC, even in the presence of PatzT 550
promoter region DNA (Fig. 9), and (vi) finally, our in vitro transcription assays indicate that 551
AtzR repression occurs prior to open complex formation (Fig. 2). Taken together, our 552
experimental evidence leads to the conclusion that AtzR prevents activation of the PatzT 553
promoter by preventing the productive interactions between NtrC and E-σN that result in 554
the isomerization of the stalled transcriptional initiation closed complex to the initiation-555
proficient closed complex. 556
The observation that AtzR failed to repress PatzT transcription in vivo when bound 557
at the opposite side of the DNA helix, but did so when full helix turn insertions restores the 558
relative orientation of the AtzR and NtrC binding sites (Figs. 5 and 6) indicates that precise 559
alignment between both DNA-bound proteins is critical for repression. Two different 560
mechanisms of anti-activation are compatible with these observations. Firstly, DNA-bound 561
AtzR may interact specifically with NtrC to form a complex that is not proficient in coupling 562
ATP hydrolysis with closed complex remodeling. Should this be the case, the effects of 563
positive or negative cooperativity between both proteins may be too subtle to detect with 564
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
26
the sensitivity of our DNA-binding assays. Additional experimentation in search for further 565
evidence of specific protein-protein interaction between NtrC and AtzR has unfortunately 566
been inconclusive: in vivo interaction was apparent with the bacterial adenylate cyclase-567
based two-hybrid (BACTH) assay, but attempts to detect interaction between the purified 568
proteins in vitro have been so far unsuccessful (data not shown). Alternatively, AtzR may 569
act as a "roadblock" to sterically hinder productive interactions between NtrC and E-σN. 570
This mechanism would not require specific interactions between AtzR and NtrC, and may 571
be mediated either by the bulk of the AtzR tetramer bound next to the NtrC binding site, or 572
by the loss of flexibility of the intervening DNA between the NtrC and E-σN binding sites 573
due to AtzR-mediated DNA bending. While neither of these mechanisms has been 574
previously documented for the repression of a σN-dependent promoter, they are 575
reminiscent of the repression mechanism at the E. coli CRP-dependent deo promoter, in 576
which CytR binds in the vicinity of the CRP binding site and interacts with CRP to prevent 577
contacts with the carboxyl terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit (46,47). We 578
hope that our future research will help clarify these specific details of the repression 579
mechanism at this unique bacterial promoter. 580
581
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
27
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 582
We wish to thank Ana B. Hervás (CABD, Universidad Pablo de Olavide), Linda U. 583
M. Johansson, Lisandro M.D. Bernardo, Eleonore Skärfstad and Victoria Shingler (Umeå 584
University) for purified proteins; Guadalupe Martín and Nuria Pérez for technical help; and 585
all members of the Govantes and Santero laboratories at CABD for their insights and 586
helpful suggestions. 587
588
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
28
REFERENCES 589
1. Morett E, Segovia L. 1993. The sigma-54 bacterial enhancer-binding protein family: 590
mechanism of action and phylogenetic relationship of their functional domains. J 591
Bacteriol 175:6067-6074. 592
2. Buck M, Gallegos MT, Studholme DJ, Guo Y, Gralla, JD. 2000. The bacterial 593
enhancer-dependent sigma(54) (sigma(N)) transcription factor. J Bacteriol 182:4129-594
4136. 595
3. Zhang X, Chaney M, Wigneshweraraj SR, Schumacher J, Bordes P, Cannon W, 596
Buck M. 2002. Mechanochemical ATPases and transcriptional activation. Mol 597
Microbiol 45:895-903. 598
4. Studholme DJ, Dixon R. 2003. Domain architectures of σ54-dependent transcriptional 599
activators. J Bacteriol 185:1757-1767. 600
5. Schumacher J, Joly N, Rappas M, Zhang X, Buck, M. 2006. Structures and 601
organisation of AAA+ enhancer binding proteins in transcriptional activation. J Struct 602
Biol 156:190-199. 603
6. Wigneshweraraj S, Bose D, Burrows PC, Joly N, Schumacher J, Rappas M, Pape 604
T, Zhang X, Stockley P, Severinov K, Buck M. 2008. Modus operandi of the bacterial 605
RNA polymerase containing the σ54 promoter-specificity factor. Mol Microbiol 68:538-606
546. 607
7. Feng J, Goss TJ, Bender RA, Ninfa AJ. 1995. Repression of the Klebsiella 608
aerogenes nac promoter. J Bacteriol 177:5535-5538. 609
8. Martin-Verstraete I, Stulke J, Klier A, Rapoport G. 1995. Two different mechanisms 610
mediate catabolite repression of the Bacillus subtilis levanase operon. J Bacteriol 611
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
29
177:6919-6927. 612
9. Mao XJ, Huo YX, Buck M, Kolb A, Wang YP. 2007. Interplay between CRP-cAMP 613
and PII-Ntr systems forms novel regulatory network between carbon metabolism and 614
nitrogen assimilation in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 35:1432-1440. 615
10. Wang YP, Kolb A, Buck M, Wen J, O'Gara F, Buc H. 1998. CRP interacts with 616
promoter-bound σ54 RNA polymerase and blocks transcriptional activation of the dctA 617
promoter. EMBO J 17:786-796. 618
11. Rescalli E, Saini S, Bartocci C, Rychlewski L, De Lorenzo V, Bertoni G. 2004. 619
Novel physiological modulation of the Pu promoter of TOL plasmid: negative regulatory 620
role of the TurA protein of Pseudomonas putida in the response to suboptimal growth 621
temperatures. J Biol Chem 279:7777-7784. 622
12. Vitale E, Milani A, Renzi F, Galli E, Rescalli E, de Lorenzo V, Bertoni G. 2008. 623
Transcriptional wiring of the TOL plasmid regulatory network to its host involves the 624
submission of the σ54-promoter Pu to the response regulator PprA. Mol Microbiol 625
69:698-713. 626
13. Rojo F. 1999. Repression of transcription initiation in bacteria. J Bacteriol 181:2987-627
2991. 628
14. Rojo F. 2001. Mechanisms of transcriptional repression. Curr Opin Microbiol 4:145-629
151. 630
15. Porrúa O, García-González V, Santero E, Shingler V, Govantes F. 2009. Activation 631
and repression of a σN-dependent promoter naturally lacking upstream activation 632
sequences. Mol Microbiol 73:419-433. 633
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
30
16. Martinez B, Tomkins J, Wackett LP, Wing R, Sadowsky MJ. 2001. Complete 634
nucleotide sequence and organization of the atrazine catabolic plasmid pADP-1 from 635
Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP. J Bacteriol 183:5684-5697. 636
17. Govantes F, García-González V, Porrúa O, Platero AI, Jiménez-Fernández A, 637
Santero E. 2010. Regulation of the atrazine-degradative genes in Pseudomonas sp. 638
strain ADP. FEMS Microbiol Lett 310:1-8. 639
18. Govantes F, Porrúa O, García-González V, Santero E. 2009. Atrazine 640
biodegradation in the lab and in the field: enzymatic activities and gene regulation. 641
Microbial Biotechnol 2:178-185. 642
19. García-González V, Govantes F, Porrúa O, Santero E. 2005. Regulation of the 643
Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP cyanuric acid degradation operon. J Bacteriol 187:155-644
167. 645
20. García-González V, Jiménez-Fernández A, Hervás, AB, Canosa I, Santero E, 646
Govantes F. 2009. Distinct roles for NtrC and GlnK in nitrogen regulation of the 647
Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP cyanuric acid utilization operon. FEMS Microbiol Lett 648
300:222-229. 649
21. Porrúa, O, García-Jaramillo M, Santero E, Govantes F. 2007. The LysR-type 650
regulator AtzR binding site: DNA sequences involved in activation, repression and 651
cyanuric acid-dependent repositioning. Mol Microbiol 66:410-427. 652
22. Platero AI, García-Jaramillo M, Santero E, Govantes F. 2012. Transcriptional 653
organization and regulatory elements of a Pseudomonas sp. ADP operon encoding a 654
LysR-type regulator and a putative solute transport system. J Bacteriol 194:6560-6573. 655
23. Platero AI, Santero E, Govantes F. 2014. Genetic evidence of a high-affinity cyanuric 656
acid transport system in Pseudomonas sp. ADP. FEMS Microbiol Lett 352:150-156. 657
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
31
24. Buck M, Cannon W. 1989. Mutations in the RNA polymerase recognition sequence of 658
the Klebsiella pneumoniae nifH promoter permitting transcriptional activation in the 659
absence of NifA binding to upstream activator sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 17:2597-660
2612. 661
25. Morett E, Buck M. (1989) In vivo studies on the interaction of RNA polymerase-σ54 662
with the Klebsiella pneumoniae and Rhizobium meliloti nifH promoters. The role of NifA 663
in the formation of an open promoter complex. J Mol Biol 210:65-77. 664
26. Hoover TR., Santero E, Porter S, Kustu S. 1990. The integration host factor 665
stimulates interaction of RNA polymerase with NIFA, the transcriptional activator for 666
nitrogen fixation operons. Cell 63:11-22. 667
27. Mandelbaum RT, Wackett LP, Allan DL. 1993. Mineralization of the s-triazine ring of 668
atrazine by stable bacterial mixed cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:1695-1701. 669
28. Sambrook J, Russell DW, Russell D. 2000. Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual. 670
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Cold Spring Harbor, New York, NY. 671
29. Inoue H, Nojima H, Okayama H. 1990. High efficiency transformation of Escherichia 672
coli with plasmids. Gene 96:23-28. 673
30. Espinosa-Urgel M, Salido A, Ramos JL. 2000. Genetic analysis of functions involved 674
in adhesion of Pseudomonas putida to seeds. J Bacteriol 182:2363-2369. 675
31. Aiyar A, Xiang Y, Leis J. 1996. Site-directed mutagenesis using overlap extension 676
PCR. Methods Mol Biol 57:177-191. 677
32. Miller JH. 1992. A short course in bacterial genetics: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring 678
Harbor Laboratory Press. Cold Spring Harbor, New York, NY 679
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
32
33. Hervás AB, Canosa I, Little R, Dixon R, Santero E. 2009. NtrC-Dependent 680
Regulatory Network for Nitrogen Assimilation in Pseudomonas putida. J Bacteriol 681
191:6123-6135. 682
34. Johansson LU, Solera D, Bernardo LM, Moscoso JA, Shingle, V. 2008. Sigma(54)-683
RNA polymerase controls sigma(70)-dependent transcription from a non-overlapping 684
divergent promoter. Mol Microbiol 70:709-723. 685
35. Nash HA, Robertson CA, Flamm E, Weisberg RA, Miller HI. 1987. Overproduction 686
of Escherichia coli integration host factor, a protein with nonidentical subunits. J 687
Bacteriol 169:4124-4127. 688
36. Hervás AB, Canosa I, Santero E. 2010. Regulation of glutamate dehydrogenase 689
expression in Pseudomonas putida results from its direct repression by NtrC under 690
nitrogen-limiting conditions. Mol Microbiol 78:305-319. 691
37. Claverie-Martin F, Magasanik B. 1992. Positive and negative effects of DNA bending 692
on activation of transcription from a distant site. J Mol Biol 227:996-1008. 693
38. Molina-Lopez JA, Govantes F, Santero E. 1994. Geometry of the process of 694
transcription activation at the σ54-dependent nifH promoter of Kebsiella pneumoniae. J 695
Biol Chem 269:25419-25425. 696
39. Porrúa O, Platero AI, Santero E, Del Solar G, Govantes F. 2010. Complex interplay 697
between the LysR-type regulator AtzR and its binding site mediates atzDEF activation 698
in response to two distinct signals. Mol Microbiol 76:331-347. 699
40. Porrúa O, López-Sánchez A, Platero AI, Santero E, Shingler V, Govantes F. 2013. 700
An A-tract at the AtzR binding site assists DNA binding, inducer-dependent 701
repositioning and transcriptional activation of the PatzDEF promoter. Mol Microbiol 702
90:72-87. 703
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
33
41. Bush M, Dixon R. 2012. The role of bacterial enhancer binding proteins as specialized 704
activators of σ54-dependent transcription. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76:497-529. 705
42. Joly N, Zhang N, Buck M, Zhang Z. 2012. Coupling AAA protein function to regulated 706
gene expression. Biochim Biophys Acta 1823:108-116. 707
43. Kustu S, Santero E, Keener J, Popham D, and Weiss D. 1989. Expression of sigma-708
54 (ntrA)-dependent genes is probably united by a common mechanism. Microbiol Rev 709
53:367-376. 710
44. Ninfa A, Reitzer L, Magasanik B. 1987. Initiation of transcription at the bacterial 711
glnAp2 promoter by purified E. coli components is facilitated by enhancers. Cell 712
60:1039-1046 713
45. Reitzer L, Magasanik B. 1986. Transcription of glnA in E. coli is stimulated by 714
activator bound to sites far from the promoter. Cell 45:785-787 715
46. Valentin-Hansen P, Sogaard-Andersen L, Pedersen H. 1996. A flexible partnership: 716
the CytR anti-activator and the cAMP-CRP activator protein, comrades in transcription 717
control. Mol Microbiol 20:461-466. 718
47. Kristensen HH, Valentin-Hansen P, Sogaard-Andersen L. 1997. Design of CytR-719
regulated, cAMP-CRP dependent class II promoters in Escherichia coli: RNA 720
polymerase-promoter interactions modulate the efficiency of CytR repression. J Mol 721
Biol 266:866-876. 722
48. Hanahan D. 1983. Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol 723
Biol 166:557-580. 724
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
34
49. Govantes F, Molina-Lopez JA, Santero E. 1996. Mechanism of coordinated 725
synthesis of the antagonistic regulatory proteins NifL and NifA of Klebsiella 726
pneumoniae. J Bacteriol 178:6817-6823. 727
50. Franklin FC, Bagdasarian M, Bagdasarian MM, Timmis KN. 1981. Molecular and 728
functional analysis of the TOL plasmid pWWO from Pseudomonas putida and cloning 729
of genes for the entire regulated aromatic ring meta cleavage pathway. Proc Natl Acad 730
Sci USA 78:7458-7462. 731
51. Marqués S, Gallegos MT, Manzanera M, Holtel A, Timmis KN, Ramos JL. 1998. 732
Activation and repression of transcription at the double tandem divergent promoters for 733
the xylR and xylS genes of the TOL plasmid of Pseudomonas putida. J Bacteriol 734
180:2889-2894. 735
52. Kim J, Zwieb C, Wu C, Adhya S. 1989. Bending of DNA by gene-regulatory proteins: 736
construction and use of a DNA bending vector. Gene 85:15-23. 737
53. Figurski DH, Helinski DR. 1979. Replication of an origin-containing derivative of 738
plasmid RK2 dependent on a plasmid function provided in trans. Proc Natl Acad Sci 739
USA 76:1648-1652. 740
54. Elliott T, Geiduschek EP. 1984. Defining a bacteriophage T4 late promoter: absence 741
of a "-35" region. Cell 36:211-219. 742
743
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
35
LEGENDS TO FIGURES 744
Figure 1. Comparison of the PatzR and PatzT promoter regions. Cartoon depicting the 745
identified cis-acting elements at the PatzR (top) and PatzT (bottom) promoter regions. 746
Promoters are indicated as closed arrows, NtrC binding sites as closed boxes, the 747
symmetrical AtzR-binding sites as two open boxes, and the IHF binding site as a shaded 748
box. The scale indicates coordinates relative to the transcription start point. 749
Figure 2. In vitro repression of the PatzT promoter. In vitro transcription assays using 750
the PatzT promoter region as a template. Isomerization to the open complex was triggered 751
by addition of NtrCD55E,S161F to an ATP-containing mixture (A), or addition of ATP to an 752
NtrCD55E,S161F-containing reaction mixture (B). Each panel shows an autoradiograph of the 753
representative PAGE gel (top), and a plot of the quantified relative transcript abundance 754
(bottom). AtzR-His6 concentrations were 0 (lanes 1), 40 nM (lanes 2), 80 nM (lanes 3), 160 755
nM (lanes 4) or 240 nM (lanes 5). Legends denote the order of AtzR-His6 addition, before 756
(AtzR-NtrC or AtzR-ATP), or after (NtrC-AtzR or ATP-AtzR) open complex formation. 757
Symbols and error bars represent the averages and standard deviations of at least three 758
independent assays. Significance of the differences between the two data sets for each 759
experiment was assessed by the t-test for unpaired samples not assuming equal 760
variances. *: p<0.05. **: p<0.01. ***: p<0.001. Differences were not significant when not 761
indicated. 762
Figure 3. Gel mobility shift assay of AtzR and NtrC on the PatzT promoter region. 763
Autoradiograph of a representative PAGE gel. Lane 1: free PatzT probe. Lanes 2-6: A pre-764
formed complex containing 2 µM NtrCD55E,S161F challenged with 0, (lane 2), 50 nM (lane 3), 765
100 nM (lane 4), 200 nM (lane 5), or 400 nM AtzR-His6. Lanes 7-11: A pre-formed 766
complex containing 400 nM AtzR-His6, challenged with 0 (lane 7), 250 nM (lane 8), 500 767
nM (lane 9), 1 µM (lane 10), or 2 µM (lane 11) NtrCD55E,S161F. AtzR-DNA, NtrC-DNA or 768
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
36
AtzR-NtrC-DNA complexes are denoted by closed, shaded, and open arrows, respectively. 769
Figure 4. DNAse I footprinting assay of AtzR and NtrC on the PatzT promoter region. 770
Autoradiograph of a representative PAGE gel. Lane 1: free PatzT probe. Lanes 2-6: A pre-771
formed complex containing 2 µM NtrCD55E,S161F challenged with 0, (lane 2), 50 nM (lane 3), 772
100 nM (lane 4), 200 nM (lane 5), or 400 nM AtzR-His6. Lanes 7-11: A pre-formed 773
complex containing 400 nM AtzR-His6, challenged with 0 (lane 7), 250 nM (lane 8), 500 774
nM (lane 9), 1 µM (lane 10), or 2 µM (lane 11) NtrCD55E,S161F. Coordinates relative to PatzT 775
transcriptional start are indicated on the right. The approximate locations of the NtrC and 776
AtzR binding sites are denoted by closed and open boxes, respectively. Closed bars and 777
circles indicate positions rendered protected or hypersensitive, respectively, by NtrC 778
binding. Shaded bars and circles indicate positions rendered protected or hypersensitive, 779
respectively, by AtzR binding. 780
Figure 5. β-galactosidase activity of PatzT-lacZ fusions. A. Schematic of the PatzT 781
promoter derivatives used for gene fusion analysis. Sequences of the NtrC2, AtzR and IHF 782
binding sites are shown. Binding sites are coded as in Fig. 1. Vertical arrows indicate the 783
location of the insertions. Plasmid name, construct designation and the number and 784
identity of the nucleotides inserted is shown for each construct. B. Results of the β-785
galactosidase assays performed with the PatzT promoter derivatives above fused to lacZ 786
in pMPO234. Columns and error bars represent the averages and standard deviations of 787
at least three independent assays. Significance of AtzR regulation (-AtzR vs. +AtzR) was 788
assessed for each promoter variant under both nitrogen sufficiency and nitrogen limitation 789
by the t-test for unpaired samples not assuming equal variances. *: p<0.05. **: p<0.01. ***: 790
p<0.001. Differences were not significant when not indicated. Significance of nitrogen 791
regulation (Ammonium vs. serine) was also assessed and differences were found to be 792
significant (0.05>p>0.00002) in all cases (not shown). 793
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
37
Figure 6. In vitro activation and repression of PatzT promoter derivatives. In vitro 794
transcription assays using PatzT promoter region derivatives as templates. A. Activation of 795
PatzT promoter derivatives in the presence of 75 mM IHF and 0 (lanes 1), 200 nM (lanes 796
2) or 400 nM (lanes 3) NtrCD55E,S161F. B. Repression of PatzT promoter region derivatives 797
in the presence of 400 nM NtrCD55E,S161F, 75 nM IHF and 0 (lanes 1), 75 nM (lanes 2) or 798
150 nM (lanes 3) AtzR-His6. Each panel shows an autoradiograph of a representative 799
PAGE gel (top), and a plot of the quantified relative transcript abundance (bottom). Bars 800
represent the averages and standard deviations of at least three independent assays. 801
Significance of NtrC-dependent activation (panel A) and AtzR-dependent repression 802
(panel B) was assessed for each promoter variant by the t-test for unpaired samples not 803
assuming equal variances. *: p<0.05. **: p<0.01. ***: p<0.001. Differences were not 804
significant when not indicated. 805
Figure 7. Gel mobility shift assay of AtzR on PatzT promoter region derivatives. 806
Autoradiograph of a representative PAGE gel, containing the indicated PatzT promoter 807
derivative probes, and 0 (lanes 1), 50 nM (lanes 2) or 100 nM (lanes 3) AtzR-His6. 808
Figure 8. DNAse I footprinting assay of AtzR and NtrC on PatzT promoter region 809
derivatives. Autoradiograph of a representative PAGE gels containing the wild-type (A), 810
N+5A (B), or N+10A (C) probe. Lane 1: free PatzT probe. Lanes 2-6: A pre-formed 811
complex containing 2 µM NtrCD55E,S161F challenged with 0, (lane 2), 50 nM (lane 3), 100 nM 812
(lane 4), 200 nM (lane 5), or 400 nM AtzR-His6. The approximate locations of the NtrC and 813
AtzR binding sites are denoted by closed and open boxes, respectively. Closed bars and 814
circles indicate positions rendered protected or hypersensitive, respectively, by NtrC 815
binding. Shaded bars and circles indicate positions rendered protected or hypersensitive, 816
respectively, by AtzR binding. 817
Figure 9. Effect of AtzR and PatzT promoter DNA on NtrC ATPase activity. ATPase 818
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
38
activity assay of NtrCD55E,S161F (231 nM), in the presence or in the absence of AtzR-His6 819
(240 nM) and/or a PatzT promoter region DNA (770 nM). Data are specific molar activity, 820
assuming that the NtrC active form is a hexamer. Bars represent the averages and 821
standard deviations of at least three independent assays. Significance was assessed by 822
the t-test for unpaired samples not assuming equal variances. *: p<0.05. Differences were 823
not significant when not indicated. 824
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
TABLES
Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in the present work Bacterial strain Genotype/phenotype Reference/source E. coli
DH5α φ80dlacZ∆M15 ∆(lacZYA-argF)U169 recA1 endA1 hsdR17 (rk- mk
+) supE44 thi-1 gyrA relA1 48 KT5746 N5271 [galK ilv his (λ cIts
5857 N7N53 ΔBamΔHI)]/ pPLhimhimA-5. Apr 35 NCM631 hsdS gal λDE3:lacI lacUV5:gen1(T7 RNA polymerase) ∆lac linked to Tn10 49 P. putida KT2440 mt-2 hsdR1 (r- m+) 50 KT2440-IHF3 mt-2 hsdR1 (r- m+) ∆ihfA::Tcr 51 KT2442 mt-2 hsdR1 (r- m+) Rifr 50 MPO201 mt-2 hsdR1 (r- m+) ∆ntrC::Tcr 19 Plasmid Genotype/phenotype Reference/source pBEND2 Vector for circular permutation analysis. Apr 52 pIZ227 pACYC184-derived plasmid containing lacIq and the T7 lysozyme gene; Cmr 49 pMPO103 1.45 Kb fragment containing atzR and the 5´end of atzD, cloned in pBluescript II SK (+). Apr 19 pMPO109 atzR coding sequence and promoter region cloned in pKT230. Kmr 19 pMPO135 pET23b plasmid derivative overexpressing AtzR-His6. Apr 21 pMPO234 Broad-host range lacZ translational fusion vector, based on pBBR1MCS-4. Apr 15 pMPO310 NtrCD55E,S161F expressed from PlacUV5 in a pACYC184-derived plasmid, Cmr 33 pMPO805 PatzT -lacZ transcriptional fusion in pMPO234 carrying the wild-type PatzT promoter. Apr 22 pMPO820 pBEND2 derivative containing the PatzT promoter region This work pMPO831 PatzT wild type template plasmid for in vitro transcription, based on pTE103. Apr 22 pMPO835 PatzT -lacZ transcriptional fusion in pMPO234 bearing a 4 bp insertion between the AtzR and IHF sites. Apr This work pMPO836 PatzT -lacZ transcriptional fusion in pMPO234 bearing a 5 bp insertion between the AtzR and IHF sites. Apr This work pMPO837 PatzT -lacZ transcriptional fusion in pMPO234 bearing a 10 bp insertion between the AtzR and IHF sites. Apr This work pMPO849 PatzT -lacZ transcriptional fusion in pMPO234 bearing a 5 bp insertion between the NtrC2 and AtzR sites. Apr This work pMPO850 PatzT -lacZ transcriptional fusion in pMPO234 bearing a 6 bp insertion between the NtrC2 and AtzR sites. Apr This work pMPO851 PatzT -lacZ transcriptional fusion in pMPO234 bearing a 10 bp insertion between the NtrC2 and AtzR sites. Apr This work pMPO853 PatzT template for in vitro transcription, bearing a 5 bp insertion between the NtrC2 and AtzR sites, based on pTE103. Apr This work pMPO854 PatzT template for in vitro transcription, bearing a 6 bp insertion between the NtrC2 and AtzR sites, based on pTE103. Apr This work pMPO855 PatzT template for in vitro transcription, bearing a 10 bp insertion between the NtrC2 and AtzR sites, based on pTE103. Apr This work pMPO863 PatzT -lacZ transcriptional fusion in pMPO234 bearing a 21 bp insertion between the NtrC2 and AtzR sites. Apr This work pMPO864 PatzT -lacZ transcriptional fusion in pMPO234 bearing a 32 bp insertion between the NtrC2 and AtzR sites. Apr This work pPLhiphimA-5 IHF overproduction plasmid. Apr 35 pRK2013 Helper plasmid used in conjugation. Kmr Tra+ 53 pTE103 Vector for in vitro transcription assays; Apr 54
on April 11, 2018 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from