IUGJEPS Vol 24, No1, 2016, pp 74-90

ISSN 2410-3152

2*

α=0.05

0246

02060202

The Estimation Degree of Jordanians Arabic Language Teachers

in Upper Basic Stages of Their Listening Comprehension

Teaching Strategies Practices

Abstract The study aimed at investigating the estimation degree of Jordanians Arabic language teachers in upper basic stages of their listening

comprehension teaching strategies practices, and whether would be statistical significant differences at the level (0.05=α) due to the

variables of; gender, qualification, and teaching experience. To achieve the aims of the study the researchers developed an instrument

consisted of (20) items distributed on listening comprehension teaching stages; pre, while and post listening stages. The sample of the

study consisted of (64) Arabic language teachers in upper basic stage simply randomly selected from the schools of Irbid district

center during the academic year 2014/2015. The results of the study revealed that the estimation degree of Arabic language teachers in

upper basic stages of their listening comprehension teaching strategies practices was high, and there were no statistical significant

differences in their practices due to the variables of; gender, qualification, and teaching experience. Keywords: Arabic Language Teachers, Upper Basic Stage, Listening Comprehension.

drmhjo@hotmail.com

57

) 2102

.

2112

–

2112

.

2007

(2004

2005

Shao-Wen & Liu, 2012 .)

(Vandergrift, 1999)

57

2112 2117

Nunan, 2001).)

2112

2102

.

.

.(2005

Prelistening Stage ،

(Rost, 2002)

(Underwood, 1989; Yagang, 1993)

(Field, 1998).

55

(Fantahun,

2003)

While Listening Stage

(Underwood,

1989; Yagang, 1993).(Field, 1998)

Extensive Listening

Intensive Listening

(Rost, 2002)

(Fantahun, 2003)

Post Listening Stage-

التي

(Fantahun, 2003).

2102

21002102

22

57

2102

.

21

(64)

/

.

2102

211

2100

.

22

21

2100

21211

2112

57

21

20

2112

72

323

722

2 72

22

Yükselci, 2003

0222

(Fantahun, 2003)

27

02

2102

2102

2100

78

2112

2112

2102

2100Yükselci,

2003.(Fantahun, 2003)

(Yükselci, 2003) (Fantahun, 2003)

2102

2102

21002112

2102

2100

2112

(Yükselci, 2003)

(Fantahun, 2003)

2117

21002100

2112

2102

78

0

2

α1012

0

2

2

2

0

21022102

2

21022102

78

22222

0

1

22 22.2

20 22.0

27 22.2

27 27.3

2 2221.2

201 02 22.7

01 02 22.7

64 100

Yükselci, 2003(Fantahun,

2003)2102

21

0

3202

0221

31

0.76

(Cronbach's alpha)2

2

8 0.76

2 0.71

2 0.72

21 0.74

2

107210721072

(Likert)

22

2

78

5-3.67

3.66-2.34

2.33-1

2

20101

(One-

Way ANOVA)

2

3

2 3 3.63 .736

02 3.97 .594

2 2 3.21 .396

21 3.32 .421

2

2032

220

3.973.90222

222

3.63

722

2102

210221132112

2986

(ERSP)

2102

78

.

0232022

(Guth & Pettengill, 2005)

(Johns & Breglund, 2006.)

.

(Brand-Gruwel, Armoutse

and Bos, 1998

(Loffredo, 1996)

2102

2100

2

4

0

3.38 1.037

23.79 .876

2 3.77 .926

2 3.26 1.037

2 3.26 1.038

23.22 1.051

7 3.28 .957

3 3.26 .990

0 4.42 .730

2 4.15 1.111

77

2 4.04 .933

23.90 1.076

23.70 .954

23.60 1.033

0 4.42 .730

24.15 1.115

2 3.89 1.025

2

3.22 .876

23.22 .801

23.64 .784

3.83 .421

2

2

0

3.88

3.79

3.77

3.663.36

(Underwood, 1989; Yagang, 1993).

2

77

(GCSE, 2015)

Underwood, 1989; Yagang, 1993

1997 .(2005

2

(Fantahun, 2003)

(Lindsay & Knight, 2006)

2112

75

2007 (2004

α1012

2

5

22 3.85 .34805

20 3.86 .46094

27 3.91 .42778

27 3.82 .41794

5 26 3.79 .45811

5

10 19 3.85 .43476

10 19 3.96 .34994

2

(One-Way

ANOVA

2201

01 2

6

F

.898 .016 .003 1 .003

.692 .159 .029 1 .029

.529 .644 .118 2 .236

.183 59 10.809

64 965.592

2(F)

.016.159.644

α0.05

77

2102

2100

2102

2112

2102

2112

2117

20

2102037212

2822102222222

0202112027

77

2112

222102222227

2100

0232

2100

2112

2112

2117

2222102230702

2112

2112

2113

2112

23002

2102222210

2117

222112022

2020227022

022

2112

2302100

220222

2102

78

Brand-Gruwel, S., Armoutse, C., and Bos, K. Improving Text Comprehension Strategies in Reading and Listening Settings. Learning and Instruction, 8(1), (1998) 63-81.

Fantahun, H. An Investigation of Classroom Listening Comprehension Teaching Practices in Relation to the New English Course Books: Grade 11 in Focus, Unpublished Master Thesis, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia (2003).

Field, J. Skills and Strategies: Towards a New Methodology for Listening. ELT Journal, Vol. 52, (1998) 110-118.

Modern Foreign Languages, Strategies for Listening at GCSE: GCSE (9–1), Oxford Cambridge and RSA (2015).

Guth, N., and Pettengill, S. Leading a Successful Reading Program. Newark, DE: International Reading Association (2005).

Johns, J., and Berglund, R. Fluency: Strategies and Assessments. Ed: 3rd, Newark, DE: International Reading Association (2006).

Lindsay, C., and Knight, P. Learning and Teaching English: A Course for Teachers. New York: Oxford University Press (2006).

Loffredo, M. Training College Students to Listen At Higher Levels (listening),

Unpublished doctoral dissertation. New York University (1996)

Nunan, D. Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: CUP (2110).

Rost, M. Teaching and researching listening. Harlow: Pearson Education (2002).

Shao-Wen and Liu, C. Teaching Listening Comprehension Skills: A Test-orientated Approach. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(3), (2012) 458-465.

Underwood, M. Teaching Listening. London: Longman (1989).

Vandergrift, L. Facilitating Second Language Listening Comprehension: Acquiring Successful Strategies. ELT journal, 53(3), (1999) 168-176.

Yagang, F. Listening: Problems and Solutions. In T. Kral (ed.) Teacher Development: Making the Right Moves. Washington, DC: English Language Programs Divisions, United States Information Agency (1993).

Yükselci, S. Teachers' Practices and Perceptions Regarding Listening Strategies, and Perceptions of Difficulties Likely to Arise in English Listening Comprehension Lessons. Unpublished Master Thesis, University of Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey (2003).