SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION -...
Transcript of SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION -...
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
Summary and Conclusion
Page 256
SUMMARY
The work presented in the thesis was aimed to develop and validate analytical and
bioanalytical methods for the determination of drugs from the dosage forms and
biological matrices respectively using High Performance Liquid chromatography
(HPLC) and Liquid Chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
The thesis consists of preface and 11 chapters.
In Chapter I, a general introduction about the drugs, types of analytical techniques,
HPLC technique & LC-MS/MS techniques, method development approach and
method validation for analytical and bioanalytical methods are discussed.
In Chapter II and III development and validation of analytical methods for the
determination of Varenicline and Dipyridamole & Aspirin in pharmaceutical dosage
forms using HPLC were discussed.
In Chapter IV and V development and validation of bioanalytical methods for the
determination of Theophylline and Ranitidine in human plasma using HPLC were
discussed.
In Chapter VI to XI development and validation of bioanalytical methods for the
determination of Imatinib, Azithromycin, Donepezil, Gliclazide, Zileuton and
Deferasirox in human plasma using LC-MS/MS were discussed.
CONCLUSION
The present thesis compiled with the development and validation of analytical and
bioanalytical methods for the selected drugs demonstrate the applicability for routine
sample analysis during quality control and bioequivalence/pharmacokinetic studies
respectively. The developed and validated methods are novel for some of the drugs
like Varenicline, Dipyridamole & Aspirin combination, Zileuton and Deferasirox. For
other drugs, the methods have improvements when compared to reported methods.
For bioanalytical methods, both HPLC and LC-MS/MS techniques are used and even
though both the techniques are suitable, LC-MS/MS technique have the advantage
due to more selective and sensitive determination. In LC-MS/MS technique, power of
Summary and Conclusion
Page 257
separation of liquid chromatography and supremacy of selective detection of mass
spectrometry are combined for the selective determination of intended drug from the
biological matrices. LC-MS/MS technique also have the advantage of shorter runtime.
From the developed bioanalytical methods, sensitivity of around 10 ng/ml was
achieved with HPLC and with LC-MS/MS sensitivity of around 50 pg/ml was
achieved with good reproducibility. Even though sensitivity of around 10ng/ml was
achieved with HPLC, it was required more sample cleanup and more effective
processing using selective solid phase extraction cartridges leading to increase in the
cost of the processing activity. For the LC-MS/MS methods, simpler and cost
effective extraction procedures like protein precipitation and liquid-liquid extraction
are used and application of these simpler extraction procedures are cost effective for
the routine application.
For bioanalytical methods, internal standard usage is recommended to control the
processing variations. Usage of labeled or structural analogue internal standards is
preferable to match the properties of the analyte and with the usage of such internal
standards matrix effects will be controlled. For the developed bioanalytical methods
labeled internal standards are used for Imatinib, Donepezil, Zileuton, Deferasirox
methods and structural analogue internal standards are used for Theophylline and
Azithromycin methods. Similar therapeutic category drugs are used as internal
standards for Ranitidine and Gliclazide methods. Usage of internal standards other
than labeled and structural analogues led to the usage of more effective and costlier
processing method of solid phase extraction.
Bioanalytical methods are developed with the limit of quantification and linearity
range suitable for bioavailability/bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic studies.
Generally bioequivalence studies are performed using higher available dose of the
drugs. Both analytical and bioanalytical methods are validated in compliance to
international regulatory guidelines and have shown high degree of selectivity,
sensitivity, reproducibility and stability.
Summary and Conclusion
Page 258
Characteristics of analytical and bioanalytical methods:
Drug Analytical
technique Matrix Extraction method Internal Standard LOQ
Linearity / Calibration
curve range Application
Analytical methods
Varenicline
HPLC Dosage
form Aqueous extraction Not Applicable
Not Applicable 2.5 to 7.5 µg/ml
For Quality Control Dipyridamole
and Aspirin Not Applicable
Dipyridamole:
4 to 80 µg/ml
Aspirin:
0.5 to 10 µg/ml
Bioanalytical methods
Theophylline HPLC
Human
Plasma
Protein precipitation β-hydroxyethyl
theophylline 0.251µg/ml 0.251 to 16.071 µg/ml
For Bioequivalence/
Pharmacokinetic
studies
Ranitidine Solid phase extraction Nizatidine 10.0 ng/ml 10.0 to 1000.5 ng/ml
Imatinib
LC-MS/MS
Protein precipitation Imatinib D8 10.0 ng/ml 10.0 to 4000.1 ng/ml
Azithromycin Liquid-liquid extraction Azithromycin
N-ethyl 5.01 ng/ml 5.01 to 602.25 ng/ml
Donepezil Liquid-liquid extraction Donepezil D7 50.1 pg/ml 50.1 to 25052.5 pg/ml
Gliclazide Solid phase extraction Tolazamide 10.3 ng/ml 10.3 to 2055.2 ng/ml
Zileuton Liquid-liquid extraction Zileuton D4 50.5 ng/ml 50.5 to 10012.7 ng/ml
Deferasirox Liquid-liquid extraction Deferasirox D4 0.201 µg/ml 0.201 to 25.229 µg/ml