# Subhash Khot IAS Elchanan Mossel UC Berkeley

date post

11-Jan-2016Category

## Documents

view

24download

0

Embed Size (px)

description

### Transcript of Subhash Khot IAS Elchanan Mossel UC Berkeley

Subhash Khot IASElchanan Mossel UC BerkeleyGuy Kindler DIMACSRyan ODonnell IAS

Our main theorem

Unique Games Conjecture+Majority Is Stablest ConjectureIt is NP-hard to approximate MAX-CUT to within any factor better than GW = .878

Conjectures? What?

Usual modus operandi in Mathematics:Prove theorem, give talk.

Non-usual modus operandi in Mathematics:Fail to prove two theorems, give talk.

Why this is still interestingPart 1: The status of the conjectures

Unique Games conjecture

[Khot 02]: A certain graph-coloring problem is NP-hard.

A simple way to think about it:MAX-2LIN(m)Input: Some two-variable linear equations mod m=10, over n variables. You are promised that there is an assignment satisfying 99% of them.Goal: Find an assignment satisfying 1% of them.

Status of UGC: ???. It would be a pity if it were false.

Majority Is Stablest conjecture

Roughly speaking: among all boolean functions in which each coordinate has small influence, the Majority function is least susceptible to noise in the input.

Status of MISC: Almost certainly true, we claim.Preponderance of published evidence supports itPreponderance of expert opinion supports itWe have some partial results

Beating Goemans-Williamson i.e., approximating MAX-CUT to a factor .879 is formally harder* than the problem of satisfying 1% of a given set of 99%-satisfiable two-variable linear equations mod 10.

So, Uri Zwick et al, please work on this problem,rather than this problem.How we want you tointerpret our result

Why this is still interestingPart 2: More justification

More justification

Natural, simple problem; no progress made on it in years.Seemed as though there ought to be plenty of room for improving the GW algorithm. GW is a funny number.Insight into the Unique Games Conjecture.Fourier methods and results independently interesting.Motivates algorithmic progress on other 2-variable CSPs: MAX-2SAT, MAX-2LIN(m),

Plan for the talk:

1. Describe the Unique Games Conjecture.2. State the Majority Is Stablest Conjecture.3. Sketch proof of main theorem.Evidence for Majority Is Stablest Conjecture.Conclusions and open problems

Plan for the talk:

1. Describe the Unique Games Conjecture.2. State the Majority Is Stablest Conjecture.3. Sketch proof of main theorem.Evidence for Majority Is Stablest Conjecture.Conclusions and open problems

Unique Games Conjecture

Unique Label Cover with m colors:Labels [m]

uvInput

Unique Games Conjecture

Unique Label Cover with m colors:Labels [m]

uvSolution

Unique Games Conjecture

Unique Games Conjecture [Khot 02]: For every constant > 0, there exists a constant m = m()such thatit is NP-hard to distinguish between (1)-satisfiable and -satisfiable instances of Unique Label Cover with m labels.

Unique Games Conjecture

A strengthening of the PCP Theorem of AS+ALMSS+RazImplies hardness of MAX-2LIN(m).Implies MIN-2SAT-Deletion hard to approximate to within any constant factor [Khot 02, Hstad], Vertex-Cover hard to approximate to within any factor smaller than 2 [Khot-Regev 03]These results need an appropriate Inner Verifier correctness follows from deep theorem in Fourier analysis. [Bourgain 02; Friedgut 98]

Plan for the talk:

1. Describe the Unique Games Conjecture.2. State the Majority Is Stablest Conjecture.3. Sketch proof of main theorem.Discuss the Majority Is Stablest Conjecture.Conclusions and open problems

Majority Is Stablest Conjecture

Introduced formally by us in the present work.A related conjecture was made in [G. Kalai 02], a paper about Social Choice theory from economics.Folkloric inklings of it have existed for a while. [Ben-Or-Linial 90, Benjamini-Kalai-Schramm 98, Mossel-O. 02, Bourgain 02]

To state it, a few definitions are needed.

Influences on boolean functions

Let f : {1,1} {1,1} be a boolean function.We view {1,1} as a probability space, uniform distribution.

Def: Let i [n]. Pick x at random and let y be x with the ith bit flipped. The influence of i on f is

Inf i ( f ) = Pr [ f(x) f(y) ].

Influence examples

Let f be the Dictator function, f (x) = x1. Inf 1 ( f ) = 1,Inf i ( f ) = 0 for all i 1.

Let f be the Parity function on n bits. Inf i ( f ) = 1for all i.

Let f be the Majority function on n bits. Inf i ( f ) = + o(1)for all i.

n 2/

Noise sensitivity

Let 1 < < 1. Given a string x, applying -noise means: Pick y at random by choosing each coord. independently and w.p. s.t. E[xi yi] = . (Hence E[ x, y ] = n.)For > 0, this means for each bit of x, leave it alone w.p. , replace it with a random bit w.p. 1. [For < 0, first set x = x, = , then do the above.]

Def: The noise sensitivity of f at is

NS ( f ) = Pr [ f(x) f(y) ].

Noise sensitivity examples

Let f be the Dictator function. NS ( f ) = .

Let f be the Parity function on n bits. NS ( f ) = .

Let f be the Majority function on n bits. NS ( f ) = (arccos )/ o(1). [Central Lim. Th.]

NS ( Dict ) = NS( Maj ) = (arccos )/87.8%

Majority Is Stablest Conjecture

Conjecture:Fix 0 < < 1.Let f : {1,1} {1,1} be any boolean function* satisfyingf is balanced: E[ f ] = 0;f has small influences:Inf i ( f ) < for all i.Then NS ( f ) (arccos )/ o(1).

Plan for the talk:

1. Describe the Unique Games Conjecture.2. State the Majority Is Stablest Conjecture.3. Sketch proof of main theorem.Evidence for Majority Is Stablest Conjecture.Conclusions and open problems

Sketch of the main theorem

The main theorem gives a (poly-time) reduction from Unique Label Cover to Gap-MAX-CUT.The reduction is parameterized by 1 < < 1. (1)-satisfiable ULC instances MAP TO: weighted graphs with cuts of weight o(1) -satisfiable ULC instances MAP TO: weighted graphs with no cuts more than (arccos )/ + o(1) We choose our favorite , viz. *, and then MAX-CUT hardness is ratio of second quantity to first quantity.

Sketch of the main theorem

Sketch of the main theorem{1,1}m(1,1,1)(1,1,1)(1,1,1)

Sketch of the main theorem

Plan for the talk:

1. Describe the Unique Games Conjecture.2. State the Majority Is Stablest Conjecture.Sketch proof of main theorem.4. Evidence for Majority Is Stablest Conjecture.5. Conclusions and open problems.

Noise stability

In working on the Majority Is Stablest Conjecture it is more convenient to work with a linear fcn. of noise sensitivity.

Def: The stability of f at is

S ( f ) = 1 2 NS ( f ).

Note: S ( f ) = 1 2 Pr [ f(x) f(y) ] = 1 2 E[ f(x) f(y) ] = E[ f(x) f(y) ].

S ( Dict ) = 1 S 1 101S ( Maj ) = (2/) arcsin

Evidence for Maj. Is Stablest

Note that Majority is Uniformly Stable for fixed , as n , S ( Majorityn ) is bounded away from 0.On the other hand, Parity is Asymptotically Sensitive for fixed , as n , S ( Parityn ) = 0.

The family of all boolean halfspaces functions of the form sign(a1 x1 + + an xn) are Uniformly Stable ([BKS 98, Peres 98]), and in fact more is true

Evidence for Maj. Is Stablest

[BKS 98] shows that the set of boolean halfspaces asymptotically span the Uniformly Stable functions:Uniformly Stable families of functions have (1) correlation with the family of boolean halfspaces(monotone) function families are Asymptotically Sensitive iff they are asymptotically orthogonal to the set of boolean halfspaces

Theorem [us]: The Majority Is Stablest Conjecture is true when restricted to the set of boolean halfspaces.

g(x) = cS xiFourier detour

Any g : {1,1} R can be expressed as a multilinear polynomial:

Def: For 0 k n, the weight of g at level k is

w(k) = (S) g(x) = (S) xiS [n]i S|S| = k

Fourier facts

if g : {1,1} [1,1], k w(k) 1 (equality if {1,1})

if g is balanced (E[g] = 0), then w(0) = 0

Inf i ( g ) = (S)

S ( g ) = k w(k) kThe more gs weight is at lower levels, the stabler g is.S i

Maj. Is Stablest evidence

Conjecture [Kalai 02]: The symmetric boolean-valued function [symmetric implies small influences] with most weight on levels 1 k is Majority.

Thm [Bourgain 02]: Boolean-valued functions with small influences have at least as much weight beyond level k as Majority (asymptotically).

Thm [us]: Bounded functions with small influences have no more weight at level 1 than 2/, precisely the weight of Majority at level 1.

Corollary of our level-1 result

Weakened version of Majority Is Stablest Conjecture:

Thm: If f : {1,1} [1,1] has small influences and < 0, NS ( f ) / ( 1/) o(1).

+ 1/2

Corollary of our level-1 result

Weakened version of Majority Is Stablest Conjecture:

Thm: If f : {1,1} [1,1] has small influences and < 0,NS ( f ) / ( 1/) o(1).

Cor: The Unique Games Conjecture implies it is NP-hard to approximate MAX-CUT to any factor larger than + 1/2 = .909 < 16/17 = .941

Plan for the talk:

1. Describe the Unique Games Conjecture.2. State the Majority Is Stablest Conjecture.Sketch proof of main theorem.4. Evidence for Majority Is Stablest Conjecture.5. Conclusions and open problems.

Conclusions and open problems

Beating Goemans-Williamson is harder than cracking Unique Label Cover or MAX-2LIN(m).Open problems:Prove Majority Is Stablest Conjecture.What balanced m-ary function f : [m] [m] is stablest?

A conjecture: Plurality.Thm [us]: Noise stability of Plurality is m(-1)/(+1) + o(1).

Conclusions and open problems

Connections between stability conjectures and Unique Games Conjecture:

Proving that m-ary stability is om(1) is probably enough to show that UGC implies hardness of (hence, essentially, equivalence with) MAX-2LIN(m).

Proving a sharp bound for the m-ary stability problem would give strong results for the UGC w.r.t. how big m needs to be as a function of .