Strange Pentaquarks

55

description

Strange Pentaquarks. Michał Praszałowicz M. Smoluchowski Inst. of Physics Jegellonian University , Kraków, Poland. Strange Pentaquarks. Michał Praszałowicz M. Smoluchowski Inst. of Physics Jegellonian University , Kraków, Poland. ~ 15 40. : Positive result : Negative result. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Strange Pentaquarks

Page 1: Strange Pentaquarks
Page 2: Strange Pentaquarks

Strange Pentaquarks

Michał PraszałowiczM. Smoluchowski Inst. of Physics

Jegellonian University, Kraków, Poland

Page 3: Strange Pentaquarks

Strange Pentaquarks

Michał PraszałowiczM. Smoluchowski Inst. of Physics

Jegellonian University, Kraków, Poland

Page 4: Strange Pentaquarks

~1540

Page 5: Strange Pentaquarks

9.12.2008 Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 5

Time dependent experimental status of Q+

γ + d (n )   reactions

γ + p → p Ks0  

γ + p → n K+ K- +

K + (N) → p Ks0

lepton + D, A → p Ks0

p + A → pKs0 + X

p + p → pKs0 + S+

Other Q+ Upper Limits

BaBar

CLAS-d2

BELLE

ALEPH, Z SVD2

LEPS-d2LEPS-C CLAS-d1

DIANA

SAPHIR

SVD2

COSY-TOF

HermesJINR

CLAS-p

LEPS-d

nBCZEUS

BES J,Y

CLAS g11

SPHINXHyperCP

HERA-BFOCUS WA89CDF

: Positive result

: Negative result

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

DIANA

COSY-TOF

Page 6: Strange Pentaquarks

6

Ideal experiment

Page 7: Strange Pentaquarks

7

Formation cross sectionBreit-Wigner cross-section (GM + MP)

0 1/2

1/2

1/2 1/2

K+

n

Page 8: Strange Pentaquarks

7.12.200 Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 8

Time dependent experimental status of Q+

γ + d (n )   reactions

γ + p → p Ks0  

γ + p → n K+ K- +

K + (N) → p Ks0

lepton + D, A → p Ks0

p + A → pKs0 + X

p + p → pKs0 + S+

Other Q+ Upper Limits

BaBar

CLAS-d2

BELLE

ALEPH, Z SVD2

LEPS-d2LEPS-C CLAS-d1

DIANA

SAPHIR

SVD2

COSY-TOF

HermesJINR

CLAS-p

LEPS-d

nBCZEUS

BES J,Y

CLAS g11

SPHINXHyperCP

HERA-BFOCUS WA89CDF

: Positive result

: Negative result

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

DIANA

COSY-TOF

Page 9: Strange Pentaquarks
Page 10: Strange Pentaquarks

10

BELLE: secondary kaon beamfrom D decays interactingwith silicon in vertex detecor :

< 0.64 MeVR. Mizuk, Europhysics 2005, Lisbon. July 2005

Page 11: Strange Pentaquarks

11

Page 12: Strange Pentaquarks

12

Time dependent experimental status of Q+

γ + d (n )   reactions

γ + p → p Ks0  

γ + p → n K+ K- +

K + (N) → p Ks0

lepton + D, A → p Ks0

p + A → pKs0 + X

p + p → pKs0 + S+

Other Q+ Upper Limits

BaBar

CLAS-d2

BELLE

ALEPH, Z SVD2

LEPS-d2LEPS-C CLAS-d1

DIANA

SAPHIR

SVD2

COSY-TOF

HermesJINR

CLAS-p

LEPS-d

nBCZEUS

BES J,Y

CLAS g11

SPHINXHyperCP

HERA-BFOCUS WA89CDF

: Positive result

: Negative result

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

DIANA

COSY-TOF

positive result from LEPS (Japan) remains

Page 13: Strange Pentaquarks

13

T. Nakano (Osaka)

Evidence of the Theta+ in the gamma d ---> K+ K- pn reaction.By LEPS Collaboration (T. Nakano et al.). Published in Phys.Rev.C79:025210,2009. e-Print: arXiv:0812.1035

Page 14: Strange Pentaquarks

7.12.2008 Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 14

Page 15: Strange Pentaquarks

15

MMgK- (GeV)

T. Hotta, Acta Phys. Pol. B36, 2173

Page 16: Strange Pentaquarks

7.12.200 Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 16

Time dependent experimental status of Q+

γ + d (n )   reactions

γ + p → p Ks0  

γ + p → n K+ K- +

K + (N) → p Ks0

lepton + D, A → p Ks0

p + A → pKs0 + X

p + p → pKs0 + S+

Other Q+ Upper Limits

BaBar

CLAS-d2

BELLE

ALEPH, Z SVD2

LEPS-d2LEPS-C CLAS-d1

DIANA

SAPHIR

SVD2

COSY-TOF

HermesJINR

CLAS-p

LEPS-d

nBCZEUS

BES J,Y

CLAS g11

SPHINXHyperCP

HERA-BFOCUS WA89CDF

: Positive result

: Negative result

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

DIANA

COSY-TOF

X

negative results from CLAS high statistics d runcontradicts previous CLAS analysisand contradicts LEPS

Page 17: Strange Pentaquarks

Comparison of LEPS and CLAS

7.12.2008 Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 17

Page 18: Strange Pentaquarks

Comparison of LEPS and CLAS

7.12.2008 Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 18

Page 19: Strange Pentaquarks

7.12.200 Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 19

Time dependent experimental status of Q+

γ + d (n )   reactions

γ + p → p Ks0  

γ + p → n K+ K- +

K + (N) → p Ks0

lepton + D, A → p Ks0

p + A → pKs0 + X

p + p → pKs0 + S+

Other Q+ Upper Limits

BaBar

CLAS-d2

BELLE

ALEPH, Z SVD2

LEPS-d2LEPS-C CLAS-d1

DIANA

SAPHIR

SVD2

COSY-TOF

HermesJINR

CLAS-p

LEPS-d

nBCZEUS

BES J,Y

CLAS g11

SPHINXHyperCP

HERA-BFOCUS WA89CDF

: Positive result

: Negative result

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

DIANA

COSY-TOF

XX

negative results from CLAS high statistics runcontradiced previous experiments

Page 20: Strange Pentaquarks

7.12.2008 Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 20

t-channel production of Q+

p Q+K*

K0

n Q+K*+

K-

p Q+K0

K0

n Q+K+

K-

Page 21: Strange Pentaquarks

7.12.2008 Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 21

t-channel production of Q+

p Q+K*

K0

n Q+K*+

K-

p Q+K0

K0

n Q+K+

K-

known

? ?

Page 22: Strange Pentaquarks

7.12.2008 Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 22

CLAS estimate

limits correspondingto the rangeof K* couplings

Page 23: Strange Pentaquarks

Main assumption

7.12.2008 Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 23

Theta+ exists with M ~ 1540 MeVand total width ~ 1 MeV

What about other members of antidecuplet?

Page 24: Strange Pentaquarks

9.12.2008 Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 24

NA 49NA 61

~1540

1861 ?

1647 ?

1754 ?

Page 25: Strange Pentaquarks

9.12.2008 Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 25

~1540

Page 26: Strange Pentaquarks

7.12.2008 Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 26

hn measurement in D(g,hn)p Kunznetsov et al. preprint (05)

hn hp

GRAAL:hn measurement: quasi-free kinematics

Is there a narrow resonance in nucleon excitation?

Page 27: Strange Pentaquarks

eta photoproduction on nucleon

Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 27

8 10

N

S

Q

Page 28: Strange Pentaquarks

28

•Hints from PWA (Arndt, Azimov, Polyakov, Workman)• STAR (Kabana....)

Page 29: Strange Pentaquarks

Properties of N*(1685)

Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 29

η photoprodution depends on: Br x μtransition2

and is therefore dependent on model calculation of μtransition

Г > 1 MeV

Decay to pionis suppressed

Very

goo

d ca

ndid

ate

for

nucl

eon-

like

mem

ber o

fan

tidec

uple

t

Page 30: Strange Pentaquarks

Decay widths

SU(3) relations

= reduced matrix element × SU(3) Clebsch

Page 31: Strange Pentaquarks

Decays of N*(1685) in SU(3) limit

Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 31

Problem: in SU(3) limit decay to pion is 3 times larger than to eta

Page 32: Strange Pentaquarks

Solution: mixing

Page 33: Strange Pentaquarks

SU(3) flavor symmetry

N

,S

-

N ,S, ,

Some trivial facts on SU(3) breaking

Exact SU(3)

N

,S

-

N ,S, ,

N

S

Broken SU(3)

all masses equal GMO mass formulae

Page 34: Strange Pentaquarks

SU(3) flavor symmetry

N

,S

-

N ,S, ,

Some trivial facts on SU(3) breaking

Exact SU(3)

N

,S

-

N ,S, ,

N

S

Broken SU(3)

all masses equal GMO mass formulae

Page 35: Strange Pentaquarks

Mixing8 10

N

S

Q

mixing with ground state octet αthe same for N and Σ

Page 36: Strange Pentaquarks

Decay of Theta+

8 10

N

S

Q

Θ+ → K N

Page 37: Strange Pentaquarks

Decay of Theta+

Θ+ → K N Normal situation: large small large

Antidecuplet: small small large

CA

NC

ELLATIO

N !

Page 38: Strange Pentaquarks

Chiral Quark Soliton Model

In large Nc non-relativistic limit:

Page 39: Strange Pentaquarks

Low lying J+ baryon multiplets

Page 40: Strange Pentaquarks

Mixing with „Roper ocet”8 10

N

S

Q

mixing with „Roper octet” φthe same for N and Σ

Page 41: Strange Pentaquarks

„Roper octet”

1440****

1600 ***, 1660***

1690*** (spin=?,P=?)

N

,S

- GMO mass formula

works wellimprovement possiblethrough additional

mixing

Page 42: Strange Pentaquarks

Decays of N10(1685)mixing with the Roper octet

Page 43: Strange Pentaquarks

Constraining mixing angles

Page 44: Strange Pentaquarks
Page 45: Strange Pentaquarks

Decays of N10(1685)branching rats.along the orange line

Page 46: Strange Pentaquarks

Properties of Σ10 and Ξ10

Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 46

dashed = GMO

Page 47: Strange Pentaquarks

Properties of Σ10 and Ξ10

Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 47

NA 49 (1860) excluded

Page 48: Strange Pentaquarks

Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 48

~1540

1861 ?

1647 ?

1754 ?

1685

~1815

~1935

Page 49: Strange Pentaquarks
Page 50: Strange Pentaquarks
Page 51: Strange Pentaquarks
Page 52: Strange Pentaquarks

Properties of Σ10

Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 52

Page 53: Strange Pentaquarks

Properties of Ξ10

Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 53

Page 54: Strange Pentaquarks

Summary

Michal Praszalowicz, Krakow 54

We still need a dedicated K+N formation experiment todecide existence of Theta+

If Theta+ exists and has total width ~ 1 MeV:

• new narrow resonance N(1685) can be interpreted as a member of antidecuplet only if mixing is included• we propose to consider mixing of antidecuplet with Roper and ground state octets (Roper does not decay to eta N)• SU(3) forbidden decay of N(1685) to πΔ is 20 – 65 %• fixing mixing angles from N(1685) we calculate masses and partial widths of antidecuplet Sigma M ~ 1815 MeV, decays: KN 60% and πΛ 20%, Г~10-30 MeV• antidecuplet Xi ~1935 (contradicts NA 49), Г~10 MeV

Page 55: Strange Pentaquarks