SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the...

56
THEOLOGY V __________________ SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY __________________ MICHAEL WURTZ INSTRUCTOR

Transcript of SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the...

Page 1: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

THEOLOGY V

__________________

SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY __________________

MICHAEL WURTZ INSTRUCTOR

Page 2: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

SOTERIOLOGY

The word “soteriology” comes from the Greek word for salvation: soteria (σωτηρία).

Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These

include common grace, election, the gospel call, regeneration, conversion,

justification, adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

and glorification. The discussions of common grace, the gospel call, adoption, and union with

Christ are covered sufficiently in our textbook and we will not deal with them in class to provide

sufficient time for the other subjects.

Predestination

In general terms, predestination is God’s determination or decision beforehand. In

Soteriology it refers to God’s choice, before creation, of certain persons for

salvation. For our purposes, predestination and election refer to the same thing.

Before seeing the Bible’s affirmation of the doctrine of predestination, let’s connect what

we saw in Hamartiology to this doctrine. First, both Adam’s guilt and Adam’s corruption are

imputed to every one of his offspring. So what is true about the sin nature is true about every

single human offspring of Adam (everyone who has ever lived except Christ). Second, the nature

of sin is such that everyone is dead in their trespasses.1 That means that every human is by nature

dead in sin and fully under the wrath of God. Third, our sinful natures lead us to hate God and

hate the light.2 So, everyone, of their own will and nature hates God and His light. No one

pursues or seeks after God.

1 Ephesians 2:1-3.

2 John 3:19-21, Romans 3:9-18.

Page 3: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 1

Now, consider the question of predestination. In order to explain away the implications of

predestination, many have suggested that God, in His foresight, looked into the future and saw

who would come after Him and follow Him, and He predestined those individuals to salvation. If

our understanding of Hamartiology is correct, then God could look through all of humanity for

all of time and He would not find a single person naturally seeking Him and following Him. If

God looks upon a valley of dry bones, how many of those bones will arise and serve Him on

their own? None! And if God looks upon Adam’s race of disobedient children, dead in their

trespasses and sins, how many of them will arise and serve Him on their own? None!

Therefore, we see that our understanding of Hamartiology demands that if

anyone will be saved, predestination must be true. Because all men are born dead

in sin, in order to save anyone, God must freely choose whom to save.

Yet, we do not have to rest on our own logic (which is subject to the affects of sin) to see

that predestination is real; the Bible is filled with references to predestination’s reality.

Acts 13:48 –

Ephesians 1:4-6, 11-12 –

Ephesians 2:4-10 –

1st Thessalonians 1:4-5 –

2nd Timothy 1:9 –

1st Peter 1:1 –

Revelation 13:8; 17:8 –

Romans 11:5-6 –

Page 4: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 2

John 15:16 –

1st John 4:19 –

These direct references could be multiplied, and the number of indirect references would

be almost impossible to calculate. The doctrine of predestination according to God’s sovereign,

uninfluenced choice is consistently and clearly taught throughout the Bible. In order for God to

save some, He had to choose whom He would give life to and save. If He had to wait for man to

come to Him, He would wait forever without a single person coming forward.

But what about man’s responsibility? Is man off the hook because of predestination? Not

at all. Man’s sin and guilt are real and fully deserving of God’s wrath. Just because God has

mercy on some who are guilty does not mean the rest are no longer guilty. God clearly calls man

to repent and obey. Those who are not saved refused to obey God’s call and are thus guilty. No

one will be excused from their guilt because they were not predestined. In fact, passages that we

have already looked at indicate that the damned are actively rebelling against God.3

Double Predestination

Double predestination is the doctrine that God not only predestines those whom He will

save, but those who will be damned. Most evangelicals who accept the reality of predestination,

dismiss double predestination out of hand. But, as R.C. Sproul points out: “It is manifestly

obvious that if some people are elect and some are not elect, then predestination has two sides to

it… [predestination] must be double in some sense.” What Sproul means is that if God chooses

3 John 3:20.

Page 5: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 3

some, and is aware of the destiny of the others, and capable of changing that destiny, then there

must be some sense in which he destines those he passed by to go to hell. But in what sense has

God done this?

As most understand it, double predestination is the doctrine that God

predestines the damned in the same way and with the same involvement

as he does the elect. Double predestination states that “God is [just] as active in keeping the

reprobate out of heaven as He is in getting the elect in.”4 The key text for double predestination

is Romans 9:18 which says, “He has mercy on whomever he wills, and he hardens whomever he

wills.”5 So the question behind double predestination is whether or not there is a difference in the

nature of God’s predestination of the saved and of the damned.

Before presenting the evidence for both sides, a few comments are called for. First, do

not associate double predestination with hyper-Calvinism.6 Hyper-Calvinism is a serious error

which directly contradicts clear biblical teaching. Although many hyper-Calvinists believe in

double predestination, a person’s belief in double predestination has no direct bearing on whether

or not they are hyper-Calvinists.

Second, while it is often excruciating for people to even consider the possibility of double

predestination’s reality, we cannot develop our theology on the basis of what we do and don’t

like. We must base our theology on what the Bible says, and if the Bible says something that we

4 Phillip R. Johnson, “Notes on Supralapsarianism and Infralapsarianism,” 1998, !http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/articles/sup_infr.htm (26 June, 2005).

5 v. 18.

6 A hyper-Calvinist can be defined as anyone who affirms any of the following five statements: (1) the gospel call does not apply to all who hear, (2) faith is not the duty of every sinner, (3) the non-elect does not receive the offer of Christ, salvation or mercy, (4) there is no such thing as common grace, or (5) God does not have any sort of love for the non-elect. For a more complete discussion, see the article by our own Philip Johnson, “A Primer on Hyper-Calvinism,” 1998, http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/articles/hypercal.htm (16 June, 2005).

Page 6: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 4

don’t like, we need to change what we like, not what the Bible says. The debate cannot be

centered on our likes and dislikes, or whether or not a certain doctrine is tolerable to us or not.

The question is whether or not the Bible teaches double predestination; if the Bible does, then we

must learn to embrace it; if the Bible does not, we are right in rejecting it.

Third, and closely related to the second, you will find in this discussion many godly

pastors and commentators who bring their theology into Romans 9 and force the text to mean

what their theology says. Such an approach is unacceptable. We must think carefully and

thoroughly about what the Bible says; we cannot justify our interpretation of the Bible by saying

our theology demands that interpretation. We must be able to support our theology from the

Bible.

Fourth, nearly all arguments for double predestination are based on Romans 9. There are

other texts which are related, but most would agree that if Romans 9 does not teach it, the Bible

does not teach it. So our discussion will center on Romans 9.

With these thoughts in mind, let’s look at Romans 9 and then consider the arguments in

favor of double predestination.

Romans 9:6-24, 30-33 –

Based primarily on Romans 9, the following arguments are put forth in support of double

predestination:

1. Paul says that God “hardens whomever He wills.” The most natural

understanding of this statement is that the good or evil within a person is not

Page 7: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 5

determinative in what God does, it is God’s free will alone that determines the

destiny of man.

2. The statement that God “has mercy on whomever He wills” is parallel to “hardens

whomever He wills.” This implies that in the same way God has mercy on

whomever He will, God hardens whomever He wills. We know that God does not

base His election on the works of those He chooses, and so we know that God

does not base His election on the works of those He damns. This idea is

confirmed by the statement in verse 16, that it does not depend on the one who

runs or the one who wills.

3. Both the vessel of mercy and the vessel of wrath are taken from the same lump of

clay. Therefore, the decision to save one and damn the other is not based on the

clay, but on the sovereign freedom of the potter. Therefore God does not base His

hardening on the self-hardening of the non-elect, but on His own will.

4. God’s predestination of Jacob was before birth, and along with that election came

the reprobation of Esau, also before birth. It is therefore consistent to state that as

Jacob was destined to salvation before he was born, Esau was destined to

damnation before he was born. The decision that God made is explicitly said to

have been “before either had done anything good or evil.” Thus, God could not

have based his decree on Esau hardening his own heart.

5. Fifth, the statement in Romans 11:7 that “The elect obtained it and the rest were

hardened,” makes another parallel between the elect and the non-elect. The

Page 8: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 6

effectual call of the elect is parallel to the hardening of the non-elect. Those who

did not obtain it, as the elect did, were hardened.

Additional arguments have been made, but these are probably the most persuasive

arguments in favor of double predestination. If you don’t find these arguments persuasive in the

least, it is most likely because you are not reading Romans 9 carefully enough. Again, we cannot

dismiss the teaching of Romans 9 because our theology doesn’t allow such teaching. Take down

your theological defenses, and look honestly at Romans 9. If you do, these arguments will at

least appear plausible.

Even though these arguments for double predestination are plausible, in the end they

should be rejected for the following reasons.

1. Although Romans 9:18 states that God hardens whomever he wills, this does not

mean that God’s choice to harden has no connection to Pharaoh’s sin. In response

to this, most commentators are quick to point out that Pharaoh hardened his own

heart several times before God hardened Pharaoh’s heart.7 But God told Moses

that he would harden Pharaoh’s heart before Moses even spoke to Pharaoh. So

God’s decision to harden Pharaoh’s heart cannot be based on Pharaoh’s own self-

hardening. Yet, when God spoke to Moses and told him that he would harden

Pharaoh’s heart, Pharaoh was not a neutral person, he was already in rebellion to

God. Pharaoh was “dead in his trespasses and sins,” and was “a child of wrath.”

7 Exodus 9:12 is the first time Moses says the LORD hardened Pharaoh’s heart. Prior to this Pharaoh hardened his own heart, 8:15, 32. However, 7:13, and 22 state that Pharaoh’s heart was hardened, which is passive, and prior to Pharaoh hardening his own heart.

Page 9: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 7

Nowhere does God say, “Before time began, I chose Pharaoh for hardening and

destruction.” Rather, it is only after the fall, and after Pharaoh has demonstrated

rebellion against God that God declares He will harden Pharaoh. This is distinct

from God’s election of the saints before time began.

2. While the statement “He will have mercy on whomever He wills” is parallel to

“He hardens whomever He wills,” that does not mean they are identical. We must

bear in mind that this statement is not spoken before creation, but in the context of

a fallen world. Therefore it is wrong to conclude that this points to God’s eternal

decree to damn certain individuals before sin ever existed.

3. It is true that the two vessels (v. 21) are made from the same lump, but this is not

a neutral lump that God is forming before creation. God forms from a sinful,

fallen lump. God can take one piece and prepare dishonorable vessels, He can

take another lump and make honorable vessels, He can take another and destroy it

because it is all destined to damnation already. Isn’t it clear from Romans 3:9-18

that whatever lump of humanity God draws from is a totally depraved lump?

4. Appealing to “Before either had done anything good or evil” (vv. 10-11) cannot

be used to justify double predestination. God spoke to Rebekah and told her that

the older would serve the younger after the fall. Therefore Adam’s guilt and

corruption had already been imputed to her unborn children. Paul's point in saying

that it was “Before either had done anything good or evil” is to insist that Jacob

did not merit God’s election. Paul includes evil not to somehow bypass the

Page 10: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 8

consequences of the fall, but to make emphatic that election is not because of

works. The whole balance of Jacob’s good and evil deeds, and Esau’s good and

evil deeds, is not the basis of God’s election one way or the other.

5. Continuing on the fourth point, some have claimed that God declared “Jacob I

have loved and Esau I have hated,” before either had done anything good or evil.

That is not true. The statement in verse 12, “Though they were not yet born and

had done nothing either good or bad” is a quotation from Genesis 25:23. But the

quotation in the following verse, “As it is written, ‘Jacob I loved, but Esau I

hated’,” is taken from Malachi 1:2, over a thousand years after Jacob and Esau

had died. God did not say, “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated” before Jacob and

Esau were born. Paul quotes Malachi 1:2 to confirm that the “older shall serve the

younger” came about according to God’s purpose in election. Nowhere does it say

in the Genesis account that Esau served the younger, and in fact it appears at

several points that the opposite is taking place (Gen 32-33). So Paul quotes

Malachi to show that Genesis 25 was indeed true. Paul is not declaring that God

chose to hate Esau before Esau had done any evil. In fact, Malachi 1:4 seems to

indicates that Esau was evil.

6. Romans 11:7 does in fact indicate a parallel between the saved and the damned.

God is active in both. God does not just “pass over” the non-elect. He actively

hardens them. But that does not mean that God is active in the same way that he is

Page 11: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 9

in salvation. God’s election of the saints took place before creation. But God’s

hardening of those who are not elect is not said to take place before creation.

7. Verse 16 argues strongly that God’s mercy is the basis of election and not works,

“So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy.”

If double predestination were being argued for in Romans 9, we would expect a

statement along the lines of “Damnation does not depend on human rebellion or

sin, but on God, who has wrath.” Such a statement cannot be found anywhere in

Scripture. This points to a distinction between election and reprobation.

8. One of the greatest problems in seeing double predestination in Romans 9 is the

statement found in verses 31-32, “Israel who pursued a law that would lead to

righteousness did not succeed in reaching that law. Why? Because they did not

pursue it by faith, but as if it were based on works. They have stumbled over the

stumbling stone.” If Paul were arguing for unconditional damnation, wouldn’t he

answer the question differently? Why did they not succeed in reaching that law?

Because God hardened them. Instead, Paul says that they did not obtain it because

they tried to obtain it without faith. The basis for their condemnation is not God’s

election to damnation, but their lack of faith. This argues strongly that God’s

predestination of the saints is fundamentally different from his predestination of

the damned.

Page 12: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 10

For theses reasons we cannot accept double predestination as a doctrine taught in the

Bible. However, we ought to learn from Romans 11:7 that God does not merely pass over the

non-elect. Many have said that God doesn’t send anyone to hell, they choose to go there. That’s

not true.8 Not only does God send people to hell, He actively hardens those He has not chosen, so

that He can display His righteous wrath in them. That is an extremely difficult concept to accept,

but it is unmistakably taught in Romans 9.

8 Luke 12:4-5.

Page 13: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 11

REGENERATION

Because everyone is born dead in their trespasses and sins, and because we have no

capacity to bring ourselves to life and follow God, it was absolutely necessary for God to act on

His own initiative in saving us. So God’s sovereign choice of those He would save depends

entirely on Him and not on us. That is the relationship between Hamartiology and predestination.

We now turn to the question of what God does after He predestines us. How does He

actually save us? It’s clear from Scripture that God doesn’t just take an unbelieving man and

remove all sin from him and instantly make him perfect like Jesus.9 So how does God go about

transforming a man dead in trespasses and sins into a man who is truly like Christ? Clearly the

first step is predestination, but that happens before creation. What steps does God take to save a

person once they have been born?

It stands to reason that if we are all born dead in our trespasses, then before anything else

can happen, God must impart life to us. This act of God giving us life is referred to as

regeneration. The idea of regeneration can easily be seen in Jesus’ discussion with Nicodemus.

John 3:1-8 – Jesus tells Nicodemus that no one can see the kingdom of God unless he is

born again. This means that in order to have eternal life, we must be

born of the Spirit.

9 1 John 1:10.

Page 14: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 12

From this we can define regeneration simply as the instantaneous act of God in which He

imparts spiritual life. Just like our first birth, our second birth does not depend upon

on our own will, but on the will of our Father. This is confirmed in the following passages.

John 1:12-13 –

Ephesians 2:4-5, 8 –

Now the question arises, how does this regeneration relate to saving faith? Does one

come before the other? Are we first regenerated and then we have faith, or do we first have faith

and then we are regenerated?

The difficulty in answering this question comes from the fact that it is impossible for a

dead person to believe; no will seek after God on their own initiative.

Romans 3:11-12 –

1 Corinthians 2:14 –

But it is impossible for a person to be saved apart from faith. Based on this, many people

have concluded that regeneration must take place before a person has faith. That conclusion is

acceptable as long as we are careful to clarify that regeneration is not salvation. Yet, once we say

that regeneration takes place before salvation, the problem arises of having unsaved regenerate

people in the world. People who are not dead to God, but spiritually alive, and yet not saved.

That notion is impossible to support scripturally. Therefore, we add in a further clarification, that

regeneration in always followed immediately by saving faith. To following diagram illustrates

the difference:

Page 15: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 13

Regeneration Faith

Time

Salvation

Incorrect View

Regeneration

Faith

Time

Salvation

Correct View

So, while regeneration is necessary for a person to believe, you will never find an

unbelieving regenerate person. God grants a person spiritual life so that they can see the beauty

of the gospel, and as soon as they have that life they respond in faith to the gospel. So as far as

any human can tell, regeneration and saving faith appear to be simultaneous.

Colossians 2:13 –

In conclusion, we can say with confidence that on our own we never would have believed

in Christ. Therefore, God must have given our hearts new life in order for them to embrace Jesus

Christ. That imparting of new life is called regeneration, and it takes place immediately before

we exercise faith in Christ.

Page 16: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 14

CONVERSION

Conversion is a word which is frequently used today but which is somewhat uncommon

in the Bible. In fact, “conversion” is found only once in the Bible.10 But even if the word was not

used frequently, the concept was. The New Testament is filled with synonyms for conversion: to

become obedient to the faith, to become a disciple, to receive the word, to turn from wickedness,

to repent and turn, and the list goes on. Regardless of what word we use, the concept of

conversion is definitely a biblical one, and the question arises, when is a person truly converted?

What does it take to be converted, or what is required to be saved?

There are some who advocate non-lordship salvation, or what’s called easy believism.

Easy believism is the notion that the only requirement for salvation is belief, and that belief is

simple acceptance of the truth of Christ, with or without obedience.

John 3:16 –

Acts 16:31 –

Romans 10:9 –

1st John 5:1 –

Advocate of easy believism say that belief, mere intellectual ascent, is the only

requirement for salvation. So when a seven year old raises his hand at vacation Bible school to

receive Jesus into his heart, we can be confident that he is saved. If he goes on living a life of sin

and wickedness, that doesn’t change the fact that he believed, and therefore is assured of heaven.

10 Convert is found 4 times.

Page 17: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 15

They will often separate accepting Jesus as savior from accepting Him as Lord. The

seven year old accepted Jesus as his savior, but that doesn’t mean he accepted Jesus as Lord.

Conversion takes place as soon as Jesus is accepted as savior, but dramatic live changes may not

take place until later on in life (if ever) when Jesus is accepted as Lord. In response to this

teaching, which was exploding in the 70s and 80s, many pastors and teachers said that you were

not saved unless you accepted Jesus as Lord. Accepting Jesus as savior without accepting Him as

Lord was equal to not accepting Him at all. These teachers came to be known as lordship

salvationists; those who advocated lordship salvation. The lordship salvationists responded by

accusing their opponents of teaching non-lordship salvation.

As an aside, it was in response to this crisis in the 80s that John MacArthur wrote, The

Gospel According to Jesus, which created a stir in every corner of evangelicalism, and brought

MacArthur permanently into the national evangelical spotlight. Apart from the MacArthur Study

Bible, The Gospel According to Jesus will likely be his most powerful contribution to American

Christianity.

It’s true that the Bible often presents belief as the one and only requirement for

conversion, but we must understand what belief implies. There are many passages which make it

abundantly clear that belief is not merely accepting a list of truths about Jesus.

Matthew 8:29 –

Matthew 7:15-27 –

1 Thessalonians 1:9 –

Matthew 13:44-45 –

Page 18: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 16

Genuine faith, or saving faith, is the only requirement for conversion. And genuine faith

is the kind of faith that builds its house upon the rock of obedience, that turns from

sinful idolatry to God, and that treasures Christ so highly it is willing to sell everything

just to gain Him. Any faith that does not do these things is not genuine faith, but dead faith.

Page 19: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 17

JUSTIFICATION

We saw in our discussion of Hamartiology that man is guilty before God and totally

depraved. That led us to conclude that God’s free and sovereign election was necessary for

salvation. We then saw that regeneration must take place before a person can have faith, and that

true saving faith includes a turning from sin to seek after and treasure Christ. When a person has

that faith, they are saved and given eternal life. But where does their guilt go? If Adam’s guilt is

imputed to man, how can he ever enter heaven and stand before God?

The answer is justification. Justification is God’s legal declaration that

we are righteous in His sight. God justifies us and on the basis of that justification we are given

access to heaven. But how can God be both just and justifier? That is, how can God justify the

unrighteous, while remaining just? Before we answer this question, we must return to our

discussion of imputation.

Romans 5:15-19 –

So in the same way that Adam’s guilt was imputed to us, so the righteousness of Christ is

imputed to us. But that’s only half the story. Not only is Christ’s righteousness imputed to us,

our guilt was imputed to Christ.

2 Corinthians 5:18-21 –

So, on the cross, God imputed to Christ all the sins of all the people who would ever

believe in Him, and treated Christ as though those sins were His own. And when we are justified,

Page 20: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 18

God takes the complete and perfect righteousness of Christ and imputes to us. This is the

doctrine of substitution.

Now we can return to the question of how God is able to be both just and justifier. When

God declares us righteous (justifies us), He remains just in doing so because He has imputed our

sin to Christ and given it just punishment upon the cross; and because He has imputed Christ’s

righteousness to us He is thus just in declaring us righteous.

In this we must recognize that our justification is not on the basis of our works, but on the

basis of Christ’s works. It is not our own righteousness that prompts God to justify us, but the

righteousness of Christ. And this is not new to the New Testament, it has always been true.

Romans 4:1-8 – Both Abraham and David were justified by their faith.

How does justification fit into the order or events that we have seen thus far? Before

creation God predestined us based upon His own sovereign choice. He imparted spiritual life to

us so that we could believe the gospel and be saved. So where does justification fit into that

order? Are we justified at the same time we are regenerated? Are we justified at the instant we

first have genuine faith in Christ?

Galatians 2:16 –

According to Paul, we believe in order to be justified. That places justification

after saving faith in Christ. Our faith in Christ results in substitution, which gives God the basis

for justification. Our works cannot be the basis of our justification or justification would no

longer be by grace, but would be a wage earned. But if we are justified, then according to James,

we will inevitably do works of righteousness.

Page 21: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 19

To sum up what we have learned so far: God predestined us before creation, and then in

our life regenerated us so that we would believe in Christ and then be justified. And having been

justified we now walk in (works of) righteousness. A person who has no work of righteousness is

an unsaved person; not because salvation is based on works, but because salvation always

produces works.

Predestination Regeneration

Saving Faith Justification Works/Fruit

Page 22: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 20

SANCTIFICATION

We often think and speak of salvation in a one dimensional way. We talk of someone

who was recently saved, or we think of the time when we ourselves were saved. And while this

language is certainly appropriate, it falls short of a presenting a full picture of what salvation is.

Salvation is not merely justification, that legal declaration of God that we are righteous in His

sight, but also what we look forward to at the return of Christ.11 And not only is salvation

something that we experienced in the past, and something we will experience in the future, it is

something we are experiencing right now.12 When we speak of salvation that we have

experienced, we are generally talking about justification; when we speak of salvation that we are

presently experiencing, we are generally talking about sanctification; and when we speak of

salvation that we are going to experience, we are generally talking about glorification. These

three elements or tenses of salvation are seen clearly in a number of passages.13

1 John 3:1-2 –

Colossians 3:3-4 –

Justification was defined as God’s legal declaration that we are righteous. Sanctification

can be defined simply as the process of becoming righteous. The word sanctification comes from

the Greek word hagiasmos (ἁγιασμός), which referred to something set apart or sacred. From

this we can more specifically define sanctification as the ongoing growth of a believer, through

11 1 Peter 1:5, Romans 13:11.

12 1 Corinthians 1:18.

13 See also, Romans 8:28-30, 2 Thessalonians 2:13-14.

Page 23: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 21

the power of God, in rejecting sin and following Christ in daily life. Sanctification is

becoming set apart from sin for Christ.

Although the Bible does not always clearly distinguish between these three tenses of

salvation, they are still helpful for us to understand all that goes on in our salvation. The

following chart helps clarify these aspects of salvation:

Justification Past Faith born Legal declaration

I was saved from the penalty of sin

Sanctification Present Faith lived Gradual reformation

I am being saved from the power of sin

Glorification Future Faith realized Total transformation

I will be saved from the presence of sin

In theology this is how justification, sanctification, and glorification are typically

understood. But remember that the Bible doesn’t always have these clearly distinguished notions

in view. For example, Paul refers the Corinthians as “Those who have been sanctified,” right

before he details the myriad of worldly patterns in their church. Here Paul is apparently looking

at justification as the initial act of sanctification (or setting apart) for the Corinthians. He is

certainly not commenting on the completeness of their growth in Christ. This understanding of

sanctification is later confirmed in 1 Corinthians 6:11, where Paul says, “And such were some of

you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus

Christ and by the Spirit of our God.”

Page 24: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 22

Understanding that sanctification is the ongoing growth in rejecting sin and embracing

Christ, how is it accomplished? That is, who is responsible for our sanctification? We were

unable to justify ourselves; God had to do it. We will be unable to glorify ourselves; God will

have to do it. Does that mean we are unable to sanctify ourselves and that God will have to do it?

“Let go, and let God.” That’s how countless thousands of Christians view their

sanctification. I can do nothing on my own strength, and God is the source of truth spiritual life,

so I need to stop trying so hard to be pure and just let go and let God. There’s a ring of

spirituality to the saying that seems to have convinced many of its authenticity. However, there

are serious and dangerous problems with this view of sanctification.

First, the Bible is filled with commands for believers to sanctify themselves.

Romans 6:19 –

Romans 12:1-2 –

2 Timothy 2:22 –

Second, this idea makes the Christian life look effortless, but the Bible makes

the Christian life look very labor intensive. It’s most often the “Let go” which appeals to a

person more than anything else. There doesn’t need to be any effort, or zeal, or work, or labor, or

strife, or tears, or sweat; just let go… and let God

1 Corinthians 9:27 –

1 Timothy 6:11-12 –

Page 25: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 23

There can be no doubt that Paul’s view of the Christian life was one of serious struggle

and effort.

Third, the notion that God is solely responsible for sanctification ultimately results in

placing blame on God for a lack of sanctification. If a person who lets go and lets God is not

growing in sanctification, who takes the blame? If their only responsibility is to let go, then the

only thing they can do wrong is try. As long as they’re not trying, they’re doing everything they

can! So when they’re not trying to sanctify themselves and they’re still not growing, it must be

God’s fault. Of course few would be so bold as to say that, but they struggle to take

responsibility because they’ve let go. Biblically however, when a person is not growing in

sanctification, the blame is put on the believer and not on God.

Hebrews 5:11-14 –

Revelation 2:3-5 –

Fourth, the idea that a Christian should let go, or stop trying, leads to greater

unrighteousness. According to Paul, the Christian life is a battle, a spiritual war; what happens to

a soldier on the battlefield who lets go and puts down his sword and stops fighting? Usually the

battle doesn’t turn in his favor when he does that.

Matthew 5:29-30 –

Christ says that in our battle against sin (sanctification) we should take radical steps to

win. The notion of letting go in that fight with sin would have been complete foolishness to

Christ.

Page 26: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 24

Having seen that the Bible does not advocate a passive approach to our fight against sin,

it’s important to point out that our struggle for sanctification cannot be won in the flesh. We

cannot be sanctified by mere human exertion. In fact, on several occasions the Bible speaks of

God sanctifying us without reference to our own effort.

1 Thessalonians 5:23 –

2 Thessalonians 2:13 –

John 17:17-19 –

So while sanctification is not passive, it is certainly not something we do on our own

strength. Sanctification is the ongoing growth of a believer, through the power of God, in

rejecting sin and following Christ in daily life. Unless the believer actively rejects sin and

follows Christ, sanctification cannot happen. But without the power of God working in the life of

the believer, no effort in rejecting sin will be successful.

Page 27: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 25

PERSEVERANCE

The fifth point of Calvinism, Perseverance of the saints, has long been debated within the

church. Although there are passages which are difficult to reconcile with the doctrine of the

Perseverance of the Saints, we will see that the most common reason for rejecting it is a

misunderstanding of conversion.

The Perseverance of the Saints states that those who are truly saved will continue in the

faith until the end of their lives, and that anyone who does not continue in the faith until the

end of their lives was not truly saved. The biblical evidence for the first half of this

doctrine is substantial.14

John 10:27-29 –

Romans 8:29-30 –

Romans 8:38-39 –

If a person truly comes to Christ, they cannot lose the life He gives them. The Bible

doesn’t speak in terms of the saint’s perseverance as much as it does in terms of Christ’s

faithfulness. If Christ, the shepherd, went and rescued a lost sheep, how could that sheep ever get

away from Him? The emphasis is on Christ’s preservation.

In addition to these clear biblical affirmations, there is also the basic notion of eternal

life. If a person had eternal life, then they would live forever. If they don’t have eternal life now,

14 See also, John 6:38-40, Ephesians 1:13-14, etc.

Page 28: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 26

then they never did. To say that a person had eternal life at one point, but doesn’t

anymore, is a contradiction in terms; because, how long did their eternal life last?

On the other side of perseverance, that someone who does not persevere was never really

saved, the evidence is also quite substantial.

1 John 2:19 –

Matthew 13:3-8; 18-23 –

Hebrews 3:14 – 15

The fact that a person falls away does not mean they had salvation and lost it, it means

they never really had it. There may have been the appearance of salvation, but it was

not true salvation because true salvation never falls away. Consider the various external signs of

salvation that we know don’t finally prove someone is saved: believing that Jesus is Lord,16

following Jesus and being among his disciples for three years,17 being baptized,18 being an elder

in a true church,19 prophesying, performing miracles, and casting our demons.20 So a person can

15 It is a rule of logic that if a conditional statement (if a then b) is true, then the contrapositive must also be true (if not b, then not a). For example, if you are an astronaut, then you are not over six feet tall, is a true conditional statement. Therefore, the contrapositive is also true: if you are over six feet tall, then you are not an astronaut.

16 Matthew 7:22.

17 John 6:70-71.

18 Acts 8:9-24.

19 Acts 20:29-30.

20 Matthew 7:22; 24:24. See also Hebrews 6:4-8 for additional signs that do not prove a person is saved.

Page 29: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 27

have evidences of saving faith without actually being saved. That is why Paul urges the

Corinthians, “Examine yourselves, to see whether you are in the faith. Test yourselves. Or do

you not realize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you?--unless indeed you fail to meet

the test!”21 And the author of Hebrews says, “For if we go on sinning deliberately after receiving

the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a fearful expectation

of judgment, and a fury of fire that will consume the adversaries.”22

21 2 Corinthians 13:15.

22 Hebrews 10:26-27.

Page 30: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 28

GLORIFICATION

As we’ve already pointed out, in simplest terms, glorification is the freedom from the

presence of sin. Before we are justified, all we do is sin, and we never do righteousness. When

we are being sanctified, we sin, but we also do righteousness. When we are glorified, we never

sin, and all we do is righteousness. Glorification is the culmination of the salvation process;

when we are glorified salvation is complete.

We will discuss heaven and the eternal state in more detail in Theology VI, but a few

applicable points will be made here.

First, our glorification is not just spiritual, it is physical.

Philippians 3:20-21 –

Romans 8:23 –

Second, our glorification will result in complete sinlessness.

Colossians 1:22-23 –

Ephesians 1:4 –

Third, our glorification will result in complete Christlikeness.

Colossians 3:4 –

1 Corinthians 13:12 –

1 John 3:2 –

Page 31: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 29

In concluding our look at Soteriology, let’s briefly review the complete picture of our

salvation. Before time God predestined us. At some point after we heard the gospel, God

regenerated us, at which point we turned from our sin and exercised faith in Christ. Through faith

our sin is imputed to Christ and paid for on the cross, and Christ’s righteousness is imputed to us.

God then justifies us, declaring us righteous. We are then sanctified day after day, bearing fruit

and doing good works until Christ returns or we die. When we receive our glorified bodies we

are glorified and our salvation is fulfilled.

Page 32: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 30

Page 33: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 31

ECCLESIOLOGY

The word, Ecclesiology, comes from two Greek words, ἐκκλησία1(ekklesia, which is

often translated church) and λόγος (logos, which means word, or statement). Ecclesiology is the

study of the church’s nature and function, as well as its place in God’s plan of redemption. We

will look first at the nature of the church, then at its place in God’s broad plan of redemption, and

finally we will look at the local church’s structure and function.

The Nature of the Church

What is the church? When did the church begin? How do churches in one city relate to

churches in other cities? How does the Bible describe and define what the church is? These and

related questions help us explain the nature of the church.

The Meaning of the Word Church

Everyone has heard the word church. To most, church refers either to a church building,

or to the campus of such a building. Church is often associated with a particular branch or

denomination, such as the Catholic Church, or the Church of England. Our English word church

comes from the Greek word kuriakos (κυριακός), which comes from the same root as kurios

(κύριος) and means, belonging to the Lord. However, this Greek word is never used in the NT to

refer to the church. The Greek word used in the NT to refer to the church is ekklesia (ἐκκλησία),

which literally means, that which has the quality or condition of being called out. Much

has been made of this literal meaning, and so it deserves our attention.

It’s easy to hear this definition and assume that when Paul writes, “To the church of the

Thessalonians,” he is referring to those who have been called out of the world by God. While

Page 34: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 32

there is nothing theologically objectionable in this explanation, it is inaccurate and a bit

misleading. The morphology of ekklesia is very simple and lacks any sort of spiritual

background.23 It was in use over a hundred years prior to the NT, long before the church existed.

An ekklesia is simply a gathering of people; anything beyond that basic meaning must be derived

from the context it is found in, not from its morphology.24 Consider the following humorous

examples of what happens when you assume ekklesia always refers to a group of people “called

out.”

Acts 7:38 –

Acts 19:32, 39, 40 –

The basic idea of ekklesia is an assembly or congregation. The type of assembly being

referred to must be determined from the context. So in order for us to understand the nature of

the church, we are on much safer ground when looking at what the NT authors teach about the

church, rather than attempting to derive its nature from the morphology of ekklesia. What

happened over time with the word ekklesia is that it took on a technical definition clearly distinct

from its original root meaning.25 In studying the nature of the church we want to know that

technical definition.

23 ek (out) + kal (to call) + ia (noun; quality or condition) → someone/thing having the condition of being called out.

24 Cf. Hebrews 2:12, which quotes Psalm 22:22. In addition to these examples, the LXX contains over 75 uses of ekklesia before the “church” was even formed.

25 A good example of this in English is the word “good-bye,” which is a contraction of “God be with you.” The fact that good-bye originally referred to God does not mean that when an atheist says good-bye today he is acknowledging that God really does exist.

Page 35: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 33

The Church Local and the Church Universal

As ekklesia is studied throughout the NT, two major technical uses are discerned, beyond

that of a general assembled group. The first of these major technical uses is a local assembly

of people who publicly profess faith in Christ.26 This is what theologians have

termed the local church.27

Romans 16:1 –

Galatians 1:2 –

So the local church is an autonomous assembly of people who profess faith in Christ.

Although the local church is made up of people who profess to be believers, we know that in

reality it has both true and false believers in it.28

1 Corinthians 5:12-13 –

A second major technical use of ekklesia is the collection of all people who are

spiritually united in Christ. This is what theologians call the universal church.29

Ephesians 1:22-23 –

Colossians 1:18 –

26 Alternatively, this use could be defined as a local assembly of the baptized.

27 Some refer to the local church as the visible church.

28 Cf. Acts 8:9-24, 1 Timothy 1:19-20, 2 Timothy 2:16-18.

29 Some refer to the universal church as the invisible church.

Page 36: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 34

While the local church is an actual assembly, the universal church is a spiritual collection

or group and there is no mention of the universal church actually gathering together. If you are

truly a Christian, then you are part of the universal church.

These are only two senses in which ekklesia speaks of the church: a local assembly of

professing believers, and a universal collection of true believers. There is no reference in the NT

to a church building, a church denomination, or a state church. The NT often refers to a plurality

of churches,30 even within a single geographic region.31

The Birth of the Church

There are a multitude of theories regarding the birth or start of the church. Most of these

are based on the faulty assumption that the word ekklesia always refers to the church. So, in Acts

7:38, Stephen says that the church was in the wilderness of Sinai following the Exodus, and in

Matthew 18:17, Christ says that the church is already in existence. Despite the wide variety of

opinions, there is a high majority of biblical scholars who agree that the evidence

overwhelmingly points to the birth of the church on the day of Pentecost.

The church is not mentioned in the OT, and as the body of Christ, the church could

hardly have existed before the incarnation. In addition, Christ speaks of the church as something

He will build, not something He already built.

Matthew 16:18 –

30 Acts 15:41, 1 Corinthians 7:17.

31 1 Corinthians 16:1, 2 Corinthians 8:1, Galatians 1:2.

Page 37: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 35

Added to this is the fact that the church was purchased by the death of Christ.32 So the

church could not have been formed prior to the death of Christ. So why do we say Pentecost?

Two reasons: first, the departure of Christ seems necessary if the church is His body. That means

the church was probably not formed until after the ascension. Second, the arrival of the Spirit

clearly marks the inauguration of something new.

1 Corinthians 12:13 –

If we were baptized into the body through the Spirit, then the most reasonable time to see

the birth of the body is when the Spirit came; that’s Pentecost. From the day of Pentecost onward

there was a clear assembly of people professing faith in Christ.

Acts 2:37-47 –

Based on these things, it is concluded that the church was formed on the day of Pentecost.

For those first days or maybe just hours, the local church and the universal church were identical.

Since that time the universal church has dramatically increased in size, and local churches have

been formed all over the world. But before the day of Pentecost it could not be said that “All who

believed were together and had all things in common.”33 This was the birth of the church.

32 Acts 20:28.

33 Acts 2:44.

Page 38: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 36

Metaphors for the Church

The NT does not define the nature of the church as much as it describes it. Most of these

descriptions come from metaphors, and so we will devote some time to discussing the various

metaphors used by the NT. We will look at four of the more dominant metaphors for the church:

the body of Christ, the temple of God, the bride of Christ, and the flock. The fact that multiple

metaphors are used to describe the church is a good indication that the church is a complex

entity. We need to guard against a simplistic explanation of the church that ignores its complex

nature and attempts to carry one metaphor too far.

The Body of Christ

This is Paul’s most frequently used metaphor to describe the relationship between Christ

and the church.34 The metaphor of the body of Christ views Christ as the head of the church, and

the church as His body. In the NT, this metaphor always refers to the universal church and not

the local church. Several applications are drawn from this metaphor.

First, the members of the body are mutually edifying to one another.

Ephesians 4:11-16 –

The purpose of the individual parts of the body is the edification of the body as a whole.

Christ gave the church apostles and prophets and teachers and pastors so that they would equip

the people to do the work of the ministry. Everyone who is a part of the body of Christ, the

34 Ephesians 1:22-23; 4:4, 12, 16; 5:30, Colossians 1:18, 24; 2:19. cf. Romans 12:5, 1 Corinthians 12:12-31.

Page 39: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 37

universal church, must use what he has been given to build up the rest of the body. This is why

the local church is so important; that is where this building up can take place. Is it okay to stay

home on Sunday morning and listen to sermons on CD, or online? Why has God given you the

gifts He has given you? Is Sunday about your edification only? No, it is also about the edification

which you provide to the rest of the body. The fact that the church is like a body, indicates that

there should be no maverick Christians; no loners who study the Bible on their own and never

interact with others. That is unacceptable in the church because that man has something to

contribute to the rest of the body, and if he withholds it, the rest of the body suffers.

Second, the members of the body have unity within diversity. The individual

members of the universal church have both unity and diversity. The unity comes from the

commonality of being in the same body and partaking of the same Spirit. It is amazing that when

two genuine believers meet from extremely different backgrounds, they still share such a

tremendous unity because of their place in the body of Christ. The diversity comes in the wide

variety of gifting which Christ distributes to the body.

Ephesians 4:16 –

Isn’t it marvelous that within the body every part of the body contributes something

unique to the whole? The body is built up both by the studious pastor who pours over the

Scripture hour after hour, and the young woman who ministers to orphans every evening. Two

people in the body of Christ can have radically different talents and gifts and yet both contribute

something vital to the body.

The third principle that is drawn from the metaphor of the body is that the members of

the body are subject to the head, Christ. Paul frequently refers to Christ as the head of

Page 40: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 38

the church, His body. The headship of Christ predominantly demonstrates the authority Christ

has over the church. The church is Christ’s.

Ephesians 5:23-24 –

Because Christ has authority over His own body, submission to Christ is not optional

within the church. Christ Himself, and no man, is Lord of the church. The church is directed and

guided by Christ, and as members of His invisible church, we must submit to Him above every

other authority.

So the metaphor of the body emphasizes three characteristics of the church: (1) the

members of the church are to edify one another, (2) the members of the body are diverse, yet

unified, and (3) the members of the body are all subject to the authority of Christ.

The Temple of God

A second metaphor used to describe the church is the temple, or house of God. This

metaphor focuses on God’s action in building the temple, and on God’s presence in the temple.

Whereas the body of Christ focused on the responsibility of the individual members building

each other up and being united with one another, the temple of God focuses on God’s work as

the master craftsman and occupant of the church.

Ephesians 2:19-22 –

1 Peter 2:4-5 –

This temple has Christ as its cornerstone, and the apostles and prophets as its foundation.

The tabernacle and temple of the OT were the indications of God’s presence with the people. In

the wilderness God manifested Himself at the tabernacle in either a pillar of fire or a pillar of

Page 41: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 39

cloud,35 and when the temple was dedicated the whole house was filled with a cloud and with the

glory of the LORD.36 In the same way, the church is now God’s house which He has built and

which He now dwells in.

The Bride

A third metaphor for the church is that of a wife, or bride. This metaphor stresses the

intimacy and relationship between Christ and the church. It is the church’s responsibility

to submit to Christ, but the other actions are done by Christ. It is Christ who gave Himself up for

the sake of the church, it is Christ who sanctifies, cleansing with the water of the word, and it is

Christ who nourishes and cherishes the church. As the bridegroom, Christ is all sufficient in

providing everything intended for the bride. As members of the church, we must look to Christ

for purification, and we must look to Christ for nourishment.

Ephesians 5:22-33 –

The Flock

The local church is referred to as a flock in Paul’s farewell address to the Ephesian

elders, and also in First Peter. The metaphor of a flock stresses the absolute dependence of the

church upon the LORD.

Acts 20:28-30 –

1 Peter 5:2-3 –

35 Exodus 33:9-10; 40:34, Numbers 12:5, Deuteronomy 31:15.

36 1 Kings 8:10-11, Ezekiel 10:4.

Page 42: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 40

Both of these images are used in the context of the local church, and picture the leaders of

the church as shepherds. In addition to these direct references to the flock of God, the term pastor

is actually the same word for shepherd, and points to the specific nature of the office of a pastor.

One of the most telling characteristics of sheep is that they cannot help themselves. They

cannot smell water or food; they cannot clean themselves; they cannot protect themselves from

danger. All these things are the job of the shepherd, and by extension the job of the pastor.

Like a shepherd, a faithful pastor cannot wait for the sheep to communicate their needs to

him, but they must seek out and examine the sheep for themselves and determine what they need

and then give it to them. This demands regular involvement in the lives of those we shepherd.

On the other hand, in this day of mega churches and extreme anonymity, we as sheep,

must put ourselves in a position to avail ourselves of our pastors, so that they can minister to us

as we need. And ultimately we must recognize that pastors are under-shepherds, who themselves

are being shepherded by Christ. Thus, all members of the universal church are sheep in the flock

which Christ is shepherding.

These four metaphors each stress different aspects of the church’s nature. The body

stresses the headship of Christ and mutuality of the members; the temple stresses the action of

God as builder, and His presence within the building; the bride stressed the intimacy between

Christ and the church, as well as the love and care demonstrated by Christ; the flock stresses the

total dependence of the church upon her great shepherd, Jesus Christ.

Page 43: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 41

God’s Plan for the Universal Church

Now that we have a better grasp on the nature of the church, it’s important to look at how

the church fits into God’s ultimate plan. The church has not always existed, so how does it relate

to God’s past and future programs on Earth? Central in this discussion is the church’s

relationship to Israel and the kingdom of God. Has the church replaced Israel? Is the church

synonymous with the kingdom of God? These questions are essential to answer if we are going

to have an understanding of God’s plan for the universal church.

The Church and Israel

Even though there are many minor issues which separate dispensationalist theologians

from non-dispensational theologians, there is probably no single question which more clearly

distinguishes one from the other, than the relationship between Israel and the church. In general

terms, and recognizing that there are definitely exceptions to this rule: dispensationalists view

the church and Israel as two distinct groups in God’s program with OT prophecies

about Israel being fulfilled in a national, physical Israel, while non-dispensationalists

view Israel as being part of the church with OT prophecies about Israel being fulfilled in

spiritual Israel, the church.

What evidence do the two sides have? A detailed discussion must be put off until our

study of Eschatology, but an introduction will benefit our discussion of the church. The

argumentation of the opposing views usually runs along these lines: dispensationalists begin their

arguments in the OT, and interpret the NT in light of what the OT says. Non-dispensationalists

usually begin their arguments in the NT, and interpret the OT in light of what the NT says. The

dispensationalist will say, “This NT passage cannot mean that, because the OT clearly teaches

Page 44: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 42

this.” The non-dispensationalist will say, “This OT passage cannot mean that, because the NT

clearly teaches this.”

Evidence for the Dispensational View

There are several lines of evidence which support the dispensational view of Israel and

the church. Let me say as a qualification that this evidence is not for dispensationalism as a

system, but for the dispensational view of Israel and the church. At the present time there are far

too many variations of dispensationalism for me to adopt wholesale any particular presentation

of the system. It seems most profitable instead to look at each relevant issue on a case by case

basis. This is an attempt to look at the issue of the relationship between Israel and the church.

We will limit ourselves to two major points. First, the NT clearly teaches that there is a

future for national Israel.37 Second, the promises given to Israel in the OT are not fully

realized in the church.

Nowhere in the NT is the church equated with Israel, and there are frequent distinctions

made between the church and Israel. Romans 11 clearly identifies Israel as a distinct entity from

the church, and plainly teaches that national, physical Israel will one day come to Christ and be

saved.

Romans 11:1 –

Romans 11:11-14 –

Romans 11:25-29 –

37 Cf. Leviticus 26:3-4, 14, 21, 23, 27, 32-33, 38-45.

Page 45: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 43

This passage makes it clear that God intends some time in the future to save the nation of

Israel as a whole. God has not altogether rejected Israel, but has temporarily set Israel aside in

order to bring in all His elect from among the Gentiles. Based on a straight forward and honest

evaluation of Romans 11, we do well to reject any system which proposes God has completely

done away with national Israel.

Second, the promises given to Israel in the OT are not fully realized in the church. There

is no question that the authors of the NT connected the events in the church with promises given

to Israel in the OT.

Acts 2:14-2138 –

The real question is how far did the authors of the NT go in identifying Israel’s promises

with the church. One of the biggest questions in this regard concerns the New Covenant. The

New Covenant was promised to Israel in Jeremiah 31 and Ezekiel 36,39 but appears to be fulfilled

in the church.

Luke 22:20 –

1 Corinthians 11:25 –

2 Corinthians 3:6 –

38 Cf. Joel 2:28-32.

39 Cf. also, Deuteronomy 30-31.

Page 46: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 44

So it appears that the promise of the New Covenant made to Israel in the OT is fulfilled

in the church. But when the OT promises are actually examined, we find that they are not fully

realized in the church.

Jeremiah 31:31-40 –

Ezekiel 36:22-34 –

Despite the fact that the church seems to participate in the New Covenant, there are clear

promises made to Israel which do not have their fulfillment in the church. If the church and Israel

are one, or if the church had replaced Israel, all of the New Covenant would be fulfilled in the

church, and not just some of it.

Although the discussion about Israel and the church is much broader than we have

indicated here, these two issues act as a good starting point: (1) the NT distinguishes between the

church and Israel, and (2) the promises made to Israel in the OT are not fully realized in the

church.

Difficulties for the Dispensational View

There are a number of overlapping problems facing the dispensational view of Israel and

the church, which center around the fact that some passages in the NT seem to equate Israel and

the church. Let’s look at the most frequently cited passage used to prove that the church is Israel.

Galatians 6:13-16 –

Page 47: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 45

While the most superficial reading of this passage would assume “the Israel of God” was

the church, such a view does not make sense in the verse itself, or in the wider context of the

passage. The Israel of God is the section of Israelites who believe in Christ.

Conclusion

The church is not Israel. There are Israelites who are part of the church, and Israelites

who are not part of the church. One day God will save the nation of Israel as a whole, and will

fulfill all His promises to the nation. This is consistent with both the OT promises given to the

nation, and with the NT’s consistent distinction between Israel and the church.

The Church and the Kingdom of God

Another significant question regarding God’s plan for the church is the relationship

between the church and God’s kingdom. Beginning with Augustine in the fifth century AD, there

have always been those who proposed that the church was the kingdom of God, and that God

was building His earthly kingdom through the church. This led to an extreme overlap between

church and state, and drove the thinking of postmillennialists, who believe that through gradual

growth of the church the kingdom of God would be established and then Christ would be ushered

back to earth as king. Few people today advocate such a reading of the Scripture. We will enter a

more thorough discussion of the kingdom of God in Eschatology, but for now we can look at the

evidence for a distinction between the church and the kingdom.

First, we must recognize that the NT clearly teaches all members of the universal church

will inherit the kingdom of God.

2 Thessalonians 1:4-5 –

Page 48: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 46

Colossians 1:13 –

Yet, the NT points to the presence of saints in the kingdom who were never part of the

church. This means that the kingdom of God must be bigger than the boundaries of the church.

Matthew 8:11 –

Luke 13:28-29 –

So the kingdom is not made up entirely of the church, but of all those whom God has

called. The church is part of the kingdom, and all those who are part of the universal church are

part of the kingdom. Old Testament saints, such as Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, are also part of

the kingdom of God. Therefore, the kingdom of God is much broader than just the church.

God’s Plan for the Local Church

We know that the universal church is distinct from Israel and everyone who is in the

universal church is part of the kingdom of God. We also know that Christ is the head of the

universal church, and when He returns He will establish the kingdom of God on earth.

Revelation 11:15 –

So how does the local church fit into this grand scheme? We earlier defined the local

church as a local assembly of people who publicly profess faith in Christ. How do those local

assemblies fit into God’s plan? God has designed these local assemblies for the strengthening

and building up of its members, and ultimately all the members of the universal church. The

instruction given to the church in the NT is not directed at the universal church, but at the local

Page 49: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 47

church. It is assumed that the growth of each individual member of the universal church will take

place in the context of a local assembly of believers.

We want to look at four different aspects of the local church which should provide an

overview of what a local church should look like. These five aspects are the church’s

organization, membership, discipline, and ordinances.

Organization of the Church

Three basic structures for the organization, or governance, of the church have been

suggested and implemented throughout history.

The first is the episcopal structure like the Catholic Church, which puts the pope directly

below Christ, the bishops below the pope, and individual churches beneath each bishop.

The second structure is the presbyterian structure which places elders, or presbyters,

above the local church, the presbytery (formed from the elders of a group of local churches)

above the local churches, and the General Assembly above the presbytery (formed from the

elders within a group of presbyteries).

The third structure is the congregational structure which places elders over the local

church, and Christ over the elders of each individual church.

The congregational structure seems to be what was in place in the NT. There is no

mention of a presbytery, or General Assembly, or pope in the New Testament. It is always elders

who rule over churches, and these elders are never under the authority of anyone but Christ.

Even Paul and Timothy, who helped establish the elders, are never seen as rulers over a group of

churches.

Acts 14:21-23 –

Page 50: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 48

Acts 20:28 –

Titus 1:5 –

It should be acknowledged that the NT does not explicitly forbid something like a

presbytery, or a denomination, but it does give every indication that the elders have

authority over the churches they rule in.40

Membership of the Church

Church membership is vital to the life of any believer in Jesus Christ. Such a statement is

often met with ridicule or even anger in today’s independent and individualistic world, but it is

true. The NT doesn’t come out and say directly, every Christian must be a member in a church,

but it does indicate that something like membership was a part of every believer’s life. Here is

the evidence for such a statement.

Acts 2:41, 47 –

On the day of Pentecost the people who were converted added up to about 3,000 people.

Three thousand is not an easy number to estimate, so it seems most likely that someone was

counting the numbers. This same effort to keep track of numbers is seen in several other places

in the book of Acts.

Acts 4:4, 32 –

40 See Hebrews 13:17 where obedience is clearly commanded.

Page 51: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 49

Acts 6:1-2 –

How would Luke know that the full number of the disciples were present if there was no

list? There were over 5,000 men in their number! So it seems certain that someone was keeping

track of who claimed to be a believer and was considered a disciple. This would also be

necessary in order to deal with the distribution of food.

1st Peter 5:1-3 –

Peter indicates that the elders had certain sheep placed in their charge. This indicates that

the elders knew who was a part of their church and who wasn’t. This gets to a basic question

which every believer must answer: is there an elder who knows that you have been entrusted to

his care?

Hebrews 13:17 –

1st Peter 5:5 –

Both of these passages speak explicitly about obeying “your elders,” or “your leaders.”

Do you know who your leaders are? If not, how can you possibly obey them? And if you do

know who they are, do they know who you are? If they don’t know that you have submitted

yourself to them, how can they possibly be expected to “keep watch over your souls”? That is

what membership is about; formally committing yourself to the care of a church’s leaders, and to

fellowship with the church’s members. The issue is not how membership is achieved, or what it

is called. The issue is whether or not you have made it abundantly clear to the leaders that you

are part of their flock.

Page 52: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 50

One last word to those who will say, “I still don’t see how this demands membership, so

I’m not going to become a member of any church.” We can agree that the Bible doesn’t say we

must be “members” of a church, but if you claim to obey Hebrews 13:17, and your leaders ask

you to become a member if you want their care, then you are obligated to obey their wish.

Discipline of the Church

One of the functions of the local church is formal discipline of its members. This practice

is demanded by Christ and His apostles, and is designed to keep the church and its members

pure. Sadly, most churches refuse to practice any form of church discipline, and thus expose the

entire church to the corrupting influence of unchecked sin. Most people who argue against

church discipline say that church discipline is unloving. That reasoning is frightening because

biblical passages are dismissed on the basis of one’s personal definition of love. Such reasoning

also misses the fact that although church discipline is painful, it is not unloving.

The goal of church discipline is the restoration of the sinning brother, and the removal of

corrupting sin. According to Matthew 18 this process begins with a single person going to

confront a sin seen in another believer’s life. If the person refuses to listen, the matter is brought

to the attention of one or two others, who then all go back to the sinning brother. If the person

refuses to listen to this group, then the matter is brought before the church and the entire church

calls the sinning brother to repentance. If the person still refuses to listen, then he is disciplined

out of the church and everyone in the church is to break all ongoing association with him.

Matthew 18:15-17 –

Page 53: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 51

In 1st Corinthians 5 Paul address a related matter where a so called brother was flaunting

his sin to other believers. In that case Paul’s response was that the man should be removed from

fellowship, and that the people were not to eat with, or have any association with the man.

1st Corinthians 5:6-13 –

In Galatians 6 Paul explains that when a person is stuck in his sin, those who are

believers and recognize the sin should help to restore him with gentleness, being careful not to be

led into temptation through the confrontation.

Galatians 6:1 –

Paul appears to shorten the process of discipline when the sin is being divisive. This is

probably because the sin is so damaging to the rest of the body, and because the person’s heart is

so clearly exposed through this sin.

Titus 3:10-11 –

Some people acknowledge that church discipline should take place, but never participate

in it themselves. One reason is that they believe they are not righteous enough to deal with

someone else’s sin. This comes across as noble and humble, but Christ does not allow such an

excuse.

Matthew 7:3-5 –

Page 54: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 52

If there is unconfessed sin in our lives, then we should not immediately confront someone

else’s sin. But our own sin does not excuse us from confrontation, it compels us to deal with it so

that we can correctly and accurately confront.

A second reason some people don’t actually practice confrontation is that they

misunderstand the principle of overlooking sin. This has become very popular today. There are a

few passages in the Bible that talk about love “covering” or “overlooking” sin. These passages

are interpreted to mean that true love will overlook or ignore many sins, and that it is only the

dreadful or repeated sins we need to confront. Time does not permit a full discussion of this

important issue, but the following points demonstrate that such thinking is flawed.

First, the Bible never advocates ignoring sin. The Bible does talk about covering sin, but

the sin which is to be covered is sin which has already been dealt with. When the Bible tells us to

cover sin, it does not mean that we are to ignore it, but that we are to deal with it and then bury it.

One passage will serve as an example.

Proverbs 19:1141 –

Second, the most frequently proposed justification for ignoring a bunch of “small” sins is

the notion that if we confronted every sin we saw, we would do nothing but confront all day

long. We must first reject this thinking because it rejects biblical principles based on pragmatic

consideration. We should also reject it because it misunderstands the nature of confrontation.

This response assumes that we must confront on all possibilities of sin, but confrontation is

reserved only for known sins. We may frequently have the thought that a person sinned, but

41 Cf. Job 7:21 and Micah 7:18.

Page 55: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 53

confrontation demands that we know the person sinned. Rather than running around confronting

everyone who looks at us in a funny way, we must reserve confrontation for those occasions

when there is no other reasonable conclusion than that a brother has in fact sinned. And

occurrences where this is the case are not frequent. Our problem is that we far too frequently

assume someone is sinning, when we really don’t know that they are. If love believes all things

and hopes all things,42 then we must give our brothers the benefit of the doubt when it looks like

they may have sinned, but we really don’t know whether they have or not.

In conclusion, church discipline should be practiced by the church whenever sin is known

an unrepented of. This confrontation should not be harsh or mean, but gentle and loving, aimed

at the restoration of the brother, but considerate of the corrupting nature of sin. This practice not

only works to keep the church pure, it helps purify the members of the church, and even

ourselves, as we bear in mind the admonition of Paul, to keep watch on ourselves.

Ordinances of the Church

The church is given just two ordinances, baptism and communion. These are sometimes

referred to as sacraments, but the word sacrament should be avoided because of its implication of

imparting grace. It is not participation in these ordinances itself which blesses the believer, but

what they represent and remind us of.

Baptism is commanded of all those who believe, and is only for those who profess faith

in Christ. Baptism is a public profession of faith and should be done by immersion in water.

42 1st Corinthians 13:7.

Page 56: SOTERIOLOGY : : ECCLESIOLOGY · Soteriology is a study of the biblical doctrines surrounding the subject of salvation. These ... adoption, union with Christ, sanctification, perseverance,

TH 5 54

Acts 2:38-41 –

Communion is also reserved only for those who profess Christ. Communion, or the

Lord’s Table, is a commemoration of the death of Christ and the inauguration of the new

covenant. Communion has two elements, as established by Christ: bread and wine.

1st Corinthians 11:23-26 –

Paul gives a serious warning that anyone who eats the bread or drink the cup in an impure

way could be severely disciplined by the Lord. In Corinth there were many people sick, and

some who had even died because of the abuse of the Lord’s Table.