Reduction of coincidence summing in gamma-ray spectra using a clover detector

40
Reduction of Coincidence Summing in γ -ray Spectra Using a Clover Detector Peter Bertone Department of Physics and Astronomy University of North Carolina Nuclear Seminar 14 November 2005

description

This is a presentation given to UNC-Chapel Hill Department of Physics Nuclear Seminar in Nov 2005. It describes the results of an experiment designed to reduce coincidence summing in gamma-ray spectra aimed at future experiments in nuclear astrophysics.

Transcript of Reduction of coincidence summing in gamma-ray spectra using a clover detector

  • Reduction of Coincidence Summing in -raySpectra Using a Clover Detector

    Peter Bertone

    Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of North Carolina

    Nuclear Seminar14 November 2005

  • What is Coincidence Summing?

    Beam

    Detector "Can"

    Target HPGe

    Figure : LENA Target/Detector Geometry

  • What is Coincidence Summing?

    278

    6176

    6793

    7278

    0

    7/2+

    3/2+

    3/2

    1/2

    -504

    14N + p

    JpiEx(keV )Ep(keV )

    7556 1/2+

    5183 1/2+

    Figure : Partial Level Diagram for 15O

  • What is Coincidence Summing?

    SFactor

    (keV

    barns)

    0 100 200 300 400

    1e-0

    21e

    -01

    1e+0

    01e

    +01

    1e+0

    2LUNA1LUNA2LENAMunster

    Ecm(keV )

    Figure : 14N(p, )15O Ground State Transition

    Imbriani, et al., arXiv:nucl-ex/0509005 v1, 1 Sep 2005Runkle, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 082503 (2005)Formicola, et al., Phys. Lett. B 591 (2004)Schroder, et al., Nuc. Phys. A467 (1987)

  • Clover DetectorsClose Packed Crystal Geometry

    Each crystal is nominally 50 mm diameter by 80 mm long.

  • Clover Detectors

  • Clover Detectors

  • Some Terminology

    I HPGe or Germanium: The large volume single crystal detectorat LENA.

    I Hit Multiplicity-1 : Category of incoming -ray events thatdeposit all of their energy in one crystal.

    I Hit Multiplicity-2 : Category of incoming -ray events thatdeposit their energy in any two crystals, e.g.:1) One -ray enters the detector and its deposited energy isshared among two crystals.2) Two -rays simultaneously enter via two different crystalsand each crystal absorbs the full energy of each -ray.3) And so on . . .

    I Likewise for Hit Multiplicity-3 and Hit Multiplicity-4.

  • Some Terminology

    I HPGe or Germanium: The large volume single crystal detectorat LENA.

    I Hit Multiplicity-1 : Category of incoming -ray events thatdeposit all of their energy in one crystal.

    I Hit Multiplicity-2 : Category of incoming -ray events thatdeposit their energy in any two crystals, e.g.:1) One -ray enters the detector and its deposited energy isshared among two crystals.2) Two -rays simultaneously enter via two different crystalsand each crystal absorbs the full energy of each -ray.3) And so on . . .

    I Likewise for Hit Multiplicity-3 and Hit Multiplicity-4.

  • Some Terminology

    I HPGe or Germanium: The large volume single crystal detectorat LENA.

    I Hit Multiplicity-1 : Category of incoming -ray events thatdeposit all of their energy in one crystal.

    I Hit Multiplicity-2 : Category of incoming -ray events thatdeposit their energy in any two crystals, e.g.:1) One -ray enters the detector and its deposited energy isshared among two crystals.2) Two -rays simultaneously enter via two different crystalsand each crystal absorbs the full energy of each -ray.3) And so on . . .

    I Likewise for Hit Multiplicity-3 and Hit Multiplicity-4.

  • Some Terminology

    I HPGe or Germanium: The large volume single crystal detectorat LENA.

    I Hit Multiplicity-1 : Category of incoming -ray events thatdeposit all of their energy in one crystal.

    I Hit Multiplicity-2 : Category of incoming -ray events thatdeposit their energy in any two crystals, e.g.:1) One -ray enters the detector and its deposited energy isshared among two crystals.2) Two -rays simultaneously enter via two different crystalsand each crystal absorbs the full energy of each -ray.3) And so on . . .

    I Likewise for Hit Multiplicity-3 and Hit Multiplicity-4.

  • More TerminologyClover Operating Modes

    I Direct Mode: The four clover crystals are operatedindependently. The total spectrum is the channel sum of theindividual crystal spectra. The total efficiency is the sum ofthe four crystal efficiencies.

    I Add-Back Mode: Incoming -ray events are sorted by hitmultiplicity. Events with hit multiplicity > 1 are summed inenergy across the crystals involved. The total spectrum is thechannel sum of the four hit multiplicity spectra. The totalefficiency is the direct mode efficiency plus an add-back factor.

  • More TerminologyClover Operating Modes

    I Direct Mode: The four clover crystals are operatedindependently. The total spectrum is the channel sum of theindividual crystal spectra. The total efficiency is the sum ofthe four crystal efficiencies.

    I Add-Back Mode: Incoming -ray events are sorted by hitmultiplicity. Events with hit multiplicity > 1 are summed inenergy across the crystals involved. The total spectrum is thechannel sum of the four hit multiplicity spectra. The totalefficiency is the direct mode efficiency plus an add-back factor.

  • Clover DetectorsInteractions Cartoon

    Figure : Clover Crystals Front View

  • Clover Detectors and Coincidence Summing

    I Direct mode should greatly reduce summing by dividingdetector material into multiple units each with smaller solidangle, but . . .

    I Since each unit (crystal) acts independently, events whichdeposit energy into more than one crystal will not produce afull energy peak thereby degrading overall efficiency comparedto that of a single crystal of comparable volume.

    I We can gain back this efficiency with the add-back modewhereby we sum in energy coincident events occurring in twoor more crystals, wait a minute . . .

    I This just reintroduces coincidence summing of transitions.

    I Is there some way to use the add-back mode to enhanceefficiency while also using the granularity of the cloverdetector to reduce coincidence summing?

  • Clover Detectors and Coincidence Summing

    I Direct mode should greatly reduce summing by dividingdetector material into multiple units each with smaller solidangle, but . . .

    I Since each unit (crystal) acts independently, events whichdeposit energy into more than one crystal will not produce afull energy peak thereby degrading overall efficiency comparedto that of a single crystal of comparable volume.

    I We can gain back this efficiency with the add-back modewhereby we sum in energy coincident events occurring in twoor more crystals, wait a minute . . .

    I This just reintroduces coincidence summing of transitions.

    I Is there some way to use the add-back mode to enhanceefficiency while also using the granularity of the cloverdetector to reduce coincidence summing?

  • Clover Detectors and Coincidence Summing

    I Direct mode should greatly reduce summing by dividingdetector material into multiple units each with smaller solidangle, but . . .

    I Since each unit (crystal) acts independently, events whichdeposit energy into more than one crystal will not produce afull energy peak thereby degrading overall efficiency comparedto that of a single crystal of comparable volume.

    I We can gain back this efficiency with the add-back modewhereby we sum in energy coincident events occurring in twoor more crystals, wait a minute . . .

    I This just reintroduces coincidence summing of transitions.

    I Is there some way to use the add-back mode to enhanceefficiency while also using the granularity of the cloverdetector to reduce coincidence summing?

  • Clover Detectors and Coincidence Summing

    I Direct mode should greatly reduce summing by dividingdetector material into multiple units each with smaller solidangle, but . . .

    I Since each unit (crystal) acts independently, events whichdeposit energy into more than one crystal will not produce afull energy peak thereby degrading overall efficiency comparedto that of a single crystal of comparable volume.

    I We can gain back this efficiency with the add-back modewhereby we sum in energy coincident events occurring in twoor more crystals, wait a minute . . .

    I This just reintroduces coincidence summing of transitions.

    I Is there some way to use the add-back mode to enhanceefficiency while also using the granularity of the cloverdetector to reduce coincidence summing?

  • Clover Detectors and Coincidence Summing

    I Direct mode should greatly reduce summing by dividingdetector material into multiple units each with smaller solidangle, but . . .

    I Since each unit (crystal) acts independently, events whichdeposit energy into more than one crystal will not produce afull energy peak thereby degrading overall efficiency comparedto that of a single crystal of comparable volume.

    I We can gain back this efficiency with the add-back modewhereby we sum in energy coincident events occurring in twoor more crystals, wait a minute . . .

    I This just reintroduces coincidence summing of transitions.

    I Is there some way to use the add-back mode to enhanceefficiency while also using the granularity of the cloverdetector to reduce coincidence summing?

  • Gated Add-Back Operating Mode

    Yes there is.

    Well use the add-back mode and construct rejection gates aroundthe transitions that sum-in to the transition we want the measure.

  • Source Test Procedure

    I Collect data with same 60Co source on both the HPGe andthe Clover detector for the same amount of time and in thesame geometry.

    I Compare efficiencies and coincidence summing for each Cloveroperating mode to the HPGe.

  • HPGe Spectrum for 60Co

    500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

    050

    0015

    000

    2500

    035

    000

    Channel

    Coun

    ts

  • Clover Crystal #1 Spectrum for 60Co

    200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

    050

    0010

    000

    1500

    020

    000

    Channel

    Coun

    ts

  • Direct ModeBlue: HPGeRed: Clover Direct Mode

    Sep 25, 2005 10:03:19 PMRun 0File: narrow-gate-sort-rebinned+Ge - File: 20050918-60Co-Ge-CFD11-4hr - HPGe1, 10, 1, 1

    1220 1240 1260 1280 1300 1320 13400

    2000

    4000

    6000

    8000

    10000

    Channels

    Co

    un

    ts

    60Co sum peak and 208Tl peak. BLUE = Ge; RED = Clover 4-way direct mode.

  • Clover Hit Multiplicity-1 Spectrum for 60Co

  • Clover Hit Multiplicity-2 Spectrum for 60Co

    0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

    020

    040

    060

    080

    010

    00

    Energy (keV)

    Coun

    ts

  • Clover Hit Multiplicity-3 Spectrum for 60Co

    0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

    05

    1015

    Energy (keV)

    Coun

    ts

  • Clover Total Add-Back Spectrum for 60Co

  • Clover Gated Hit Multiplicity-2 Spectrum for 60Co

    0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

    020

    040

    060

    080

    010

    00

    Energy (keV)

    Coun

    ts

  • Clover Total Gated Add-Back Spectrum for 60Co

  • Gated Add-Back ModeBlue: HPGeLight Blue: Clover Add-BackRed: Clover Gated Add-Back Sep 25, 2005 10:14:31 PMRun 0

    File: narrow-gate-sort-rebinned+Ge - File: 20050918-60Co-Ge-CFD11-4hr - HPGe1, 19, 1, 1, 15

    1220 1240 1260 1280 1300 1320 13400

    2000

    4000

    6000

    8000

    10000

    Channels

    Co

    un

    ts

    60Co sum peak and 208Tl peak; BLUE = Ge; LIGHT BLUE = Clover add-back mode; RED = Clover gated add-back mode

  • Preliminary Results

    Operating Efficiency Summing ReductionMode Relative to HPGe Ratio Factor

    HPGe 4.90% Direct 90.4% 0.71% 6.90Add-Back 86.4% 3.00% 1.63Gated Add-Back 85.4% 0.71% 6.904way Anti-Coinc 70.6% 0.68% 7.208way Anti-Coinc 49.7% 0.40% 12.25

  • Conclusions

    I Detector granularity does significantly reduce coincidencesumming (no surprise).

    I We have successfully implemented the add-back mode withthe clover detector.

    I We have also successfully developed an operating mode usingrejection gating that preserves the efficiency gains of theadd-back mode while also preserving the level of coincidencesumming suppression seen in direct mode.

    I Using this technique we therefore should be able tosignificantly improve upon the current data for the14N(p, )15O ground state transition and consequently thestellar reaction rate.

  • Conclusions

    I Detector granularity does significantly reduce coincidencesumming (no surprise).

    I We have successfully implemented the add-back mode withthe clover detector.

    I We have also successfully developed an operating mode usingrejection gating that preserves the efficiency gains of theadd-back mode while also preserving the level of coincidencesumming suppression seen in direct mode.

    I Using this technique we therefore should be able tosignificantly improve upon the current data for the14N(p, )15O ground state transition and consequently thestellar reaction rate.

  • Conclusions

    I Detector granularity does significantly reduce coincidencesumming (no surprise).

    I We have successfully implemented the add-back mode withthe clover detector.

    I We have also successfully developed an operating mode usingrejection gating that preserves the efficiency gains of theadd-back mode while also preserving the level of coincidencesumming suppression seen in direct mode.

    I Using this technique we therefore should be able tosignificantly improve upon the current data for the14N(p, )15O ground state transition and consequently thestellar reaction rate.

  • Conclusions

    I Detector granularity does significantly reduce coincidencesumming (no surprise).

    I We have successfully implemented the add-back mode withthe clover detector.

    I We have also successfully developed an operating mode usingrejection gating that preserves the efficiency gains of theadd-back mode while also preserving the level of coincidencesumming suppression seen in direct mode.

    I Using this technique we therefore should be able tosignificantly improve upon the current data for the14N(p, )15O ground state transition and consequently thestellar reaction rate.

  • Next Steps

    I Repeat tests with actual reaction to verify results at higher-ray energies.

    I Remeasure the ground state transition for 14N(p, )15O.

    I Write tome. Graduate.

  • Next Steps

    I Repeat tests with actual reaction to verify results at higher-ray energies.

    I Remeasure the ground state transition for 14N(p, )15O.

    I Write tome. Graduate.

  • Next Steps

    I Repeat tests with actual reaction to verify results at higher-ray energies.

    I Remeasure the ground state transition for 14N(p, )15O.

    I Write tome. Graduate.

  • Thanks for your attention.

    Acknowledgments:

    I Art Champagne

    I Christian Iliadis

    I Werner Tornow

    I Chris Fox

    I Richard Longland

    I Joe Newton

    I Eliza Osenbaugh-Stewart

    I Anton Tonchev

    I Claudio Ugalde