Recent Results from Ψ(2S) and χ cJ Decays
description
Transcript of Recent Results from Ψ(2S) and χ cJ Decays
1CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
Recent Results from Ψ(2S) and χcJ Decays
平荣刚
IHEP, BeijingIHEP, Beijing
for the BES Collaboration
中国物理学会 2006 年秋季会议
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
2
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
MKI MKII MKIII CBAL BESI BESII CLEOc
Data samples
3M
14M
6.42 pb-1 continuum data at Ecm=3.65 GeV for bkg study.
4M
2001.Nov.01to 2002.Mar.02
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
4
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
5
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
6
DataMC+cont.+Bg.Cont.+Bg.Bg.
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
7
M. Appelquist and H. D. Politzer, PRL34, 43 (1975)
12%B
B
B
BQ
eeJ/ ψ
eeψ'
XJ/ ψ
Xψ'h
This is the famous (or notorious)
“12% rule”.
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
8
Violation revealed by Mark-II , confirmed by BESI at higher sensitivity.
Extensively studied by BESIIVP mode: , K*+K-+c.c., K*0K0+c.c., 0,…
PP mode: KSKL, K+K-, +-
VT mode: K*K*2, f2’, a2, f2
Multi-body: 3(+-), …
“12% rule” and “ puzzle”
K*K
ρπ
MARK-II
BESII : PLB614, 37 (2005); PRD73, 052007 (2006)CLEOc: PRL94, 012005 (2005)J/, ’ VP
mode
BESII:
B(’)(×10-5)
CLEOc:
B(’)(×10-5)
PDG04/BESII/…
B(J/)(×10-4)
B(’)/B(J/)
(%)
5.1±0.7±1.1 2.4+0.8-0.7±0.2 234±26 0.13±0.03
(2150) 19.4±2.5+11.5-3.4 N/A N/A N/A
+-0 18.1±1.8±1.9 18.8+1.6-1.5±2.8 200±9 0.92±0.11
K*+K-+c.c. 13.3±2.7±1.7 9.2+2.7-2.2±0.9 50±4 0.34±0.20
K*0K0+c.c. 2.9±1.7±0.4 1.3+1.0-0.7±0.3 42±4 2.6±0.6
1.87+0.68-0.62±0.28 2.5+1.2
-1.0±0.2 5.38±0.66 3.7±1.2 1.78+0.67
-0.62±0.17 3.0+1.1-0.9±0.2 1.93±0.23 10.9±3.4
’ 1.87+1.64-1.11±0.33 N/A 1.05±0.18 18±16
<0.40 N/A <0.064 N/A
3.3±1.1±0.5 2.0+1.5-1.1±0.4 8.98±0.92 3.0±1.2
’ 3.1±1.4±0.7 N/A 5.46±0.64 5.7±3.0 <3.1 N/A 23.5±2.7 <0.53’ 3.2+2.4
-2.0±0.7 N/A 2.26±0.43 14±11
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
10
J/, ’ PP: 12% rule BES, PRL 92, 052001 (2004)
CLEO, hep-ex/0603020
KK mode enhanced relative to the 12% rule.Pure EM mode not enhanced, may be suppressed.J/ and ’ are related by ee of charmonia and form factors.
’ (10-5) J/ (10-4) Qh (%)
+– 0.8±0.8±0.2 (CLEO)
(<2.1 @ 90% C.L.)
1.47 ± 0.23
(PDG04)
5.4 ± 5.6
(<15@ 90% C.L.)
K+K– 6.3±0.6±0.3 (CLEO) 2.37 ± 0.31
(PDG04)
26.6 ± 4.6
KSKL 5.8±0.8±0.4 (CLEO)
5.24±0.47±0.48 (BE
S)
5.44 ± 0.54 (average)
1.82 ± 0.13
(BES04)
31.9 ± 5.4
28.8 ± 4.2
29.9 ± 3.7
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
11
MCYXψ'
obsYXψ'
Xψ' εBNn
B
† This value from DM2 only Suppressed!!12 % rule
’ V T
VT mode
B’ X (10 – 4)
(BES-II)
B J/X (10 – 3)
(PDG2002)Qh(%)
f2 2.05 ±0.41 ±0.38 4.3 ±0.6 4.8 ±1.5
a2 2.55 ±0.73 ±0.47 10.9 ±2.2 2.3 ±1.1
K* K*2 1.86 ±0.32 ±0.43 6.7 ±2.6 2.8 ±1.3
f2' 0.44 ±0.12 ±0.11 1.23 ±0.21 † 3.6 ±1.5
PRD69(2004)072001
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
12
’ 3-body
921±40914±42
256±18 44.8±8.7
PRD71,072006(2005); PRD74, 12004 (2006)
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
13
Suppressed!!
’ 3-body BESII: PRD71, 072006 (2005)
BESII: PRD74, 12004 (2006)
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
14
Multi-body ’ decays BESII, PRD73, 052004 (2006)
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
15
Multi-body ’ decays
BESII, PRD73, 052004 (2006)
Some modes are suppressed, some are enhanced, while some others obey the 12% rule!
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
16
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
17
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
18
Facts:
’ VP : suppressed’ PP : enhanced/supressed’ VT : suppressedMulti-body : obey/supRadiative : enhanced/supressed
Seems no obvious rule to categorize the suppressed, the enhanced, and the normal decay modes of J/ and ’.
Summary: “12%” rule
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
19
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
20
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
21
BESII cJ→2(K+K)
Improved precision over PDG (BESI) results on cJKKKK and .
First measurement of cJKK.
c2
c0 c1
Pair production of vectors
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
22
Pair production of vectors
BES: PLB630, 7 (2005)
First observation:
B(c0) =
(2.290.580.41)10-3
B(c2) =
(1.770.470.36)10-3
28c2
38c0
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
23
BES: PRD73, 052006 (2006)
c0
cJ
Evidences for c0 and c0,2.
Agree with COM and QCM predictions.
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
24
Summary of the test of color octet mechanism
● For χcJ →PP, the theoretical results are in general good agreement with experimental values .
●For χc0 →B Bbar, there is no reliable theoretical interpretation. The experimental values of Br(χcJ →Λ Λbar) decays are quite larger than theo. values.
● More experimental information are desirable for determining the color octec wavefunction of χcJ states.
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
25
PWA on c0! +-K+K-.
Motivation :▲Compared with vector and pseudoscalar mesons, little information on scalar and tensor mesons are known.▲ The decays of cJ provide a direct window on studing of 0++ and 2++ mesons.
Different way for scalar study:1. Start from JPC=0++, 1++, 2++
2. Start from gluon+gluon3. Pair production of scalars, very different
from J/ decays
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
26
1. Qi = 0 ; 2. p()+p( ) > 650 MeV [BG:’ J/ ]; 3. Prob( K K )> Prob(
)& Prob( K K )> Prob(
K K K K );4. M( ) [497±50] MeV/c2
& second vertex <5mm
[BG: KS ];
Even
t level
c0 K K
1.Avoid introducing a huge number of partial waves; 2. constrained by present statistics; our study is devoted to c0 K K
1371 events
c0
c1(3511.3±1.3MeV)
c0(3414.7±0.6MeV)
c2(3556.4±0.9MeV)
5C-
fit
BES: PRD72, 092002 (2005)
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
27
( )( K K )
f0(1710) f0(2200) f0(980)
f0(1370)
(770)
BES: PRD72, 092002 (2005)
Q. Zhao, PRD72, 074001 (2005), try to understand these data and the scalars …
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
28
(K )(K )
K*0/2(1430)
K*0(1950)
K*(892)0
With Kappa-kappa
Without Kappa-kappa
S=39.
BES: PRD72, 092002 (2005)
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
29
1P1, 3P1 axial-vector-meson mixing:
1P1 : KA=cosθK1(1400) + sinθK1(1270)
3P1 : KB=cosθK1(1270) + sinθK1(1400)
1371 events
M(K ) [896±60] MeV
M( ) [700,850] MeV
K1(1270)
K1(1270)
K1(1400)
K1(1270)
BES, c0→+K+K
The mixing angle between K1A and K1B >57 degrees, while in ’
decays to K1K, the angle is <29 degrees (PRL83p1918). Why?
(K )K BES: PRD72, 092002 (2005)
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
30
Summary PWA of c0 K K
From the c0 K K decay fit results, it is found thatscalar resonances have larger decay fractions compared to thoseof tensors, and such decays provide a relatively clean laboratoryto study the properties of scalars, such as f0(980),f0(1370),f0(1710),f0(2200) and so on.
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
31
Event selection:
0
24
2 24 4
0
1 15
2 3 1 0 05
3 0 15
0 5s
C
C C
recoil
S K
xy
. ( K ) .
( K ) ( )
. | m . | . GeV .
. K :| m m | . GeV ,
and L . cm
c2
c1
χc1→PPP allowed by spin-parity selection rule
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
32
Nsig=418± 60
Nsig=58± 14 (4.5)Nsig=222±28 (8.8)
sidebanda sideband
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
33
BES: cJ→KK and c0→PPP is suppressed by spin-parity selection;
χc1→PT allowed by spin-parity selection rule
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
34
c c1 c2
PRD74, 12004 (2006)
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
35
Summary
Thanks a lot !
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
36
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
37
CPS2006,Sept. 15 - 17, 2006, Beijing Ping Rong-Gang
38
1P1, 3P1 axial-vector-meson mixing:
Nonstranger member: strange memeber
1P1 : b1(1235): G=+1 KA=cosθK1(1400) + sinθK1(1270)
3P1 : a1(1260): G=-1 KB=cosθK1(1270) + sinθK1(1400)
θ ≈45°