Probabilistic Models

21
Probabilistic Models • Value-at-Risk (VaR) • Chance constrained programming – Min variance – Max return s.t. Prob{function≥target}≥α – Max Prob{function≥target} – Max VaR Finland 2010

description

Probabilistic Models. Value-at-Risk (VaR) Chance constrained programming Min variance Max return s.t. Prob{function≥target}≥ α Max Prob{function≥target} Max VaR. Value at Risk. Maximum expected loss given time horizon, confidence interval. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Probabilistic Models

Page 1: Probabilistic Models

Probabilistic Models

• Value-at-Risk (VaR)• Chance constrained programming

– Min variance– Max return s.t. Prob{function≥target}≥α– Max Prob{function≥target}– Max VaR

Finland 2010

Page 2: Probabilistic Models

Value at Risk

Maximum expected loss given time horizon,

confidence interval

Finland 2010

Page 3: Probabilistic Models

VaR = 0.64expect to exceed 99% of time in 1 year

Here loss = 10 – 0.64 = 9.36

Finland 2010

Page 4: Probabilistic Models

Use• Basel Capital Accord

– Banks encouraged to use internal models to measure VaR

– Use to ensure capital adequacy (liquidity)– Compute daily at 99th percentile

• Can use others– Minimum price shock equivalent to 10 trading days

(holding period)– Historical observation period ≥1 year– Capital charge ≥ 3 x average daily VaR of last 60

business days

Finland 2010

Page 5: Probabilistic Models

VaR Calculation Approaches• Historical simulation

– Good – data available– Bad – past may not represent future– Bad – lots of data if many instruments (correlated)

• Variance-covariance– Assume distribution, use theoretical to calculate– Bad – assumes normal, stable correlation

• Monte Carlo simulation– Good – flexible (can use any distribution in theory)– Bad – depends on model calibration

Finland 2010

Page 6: Probabilistic Models

Limits

• At 99% level, will exceed 3-4 times per year• Distributions have fat tails• Only considers probability of loss – not

magnitude• Conditional Value-At-Risk

– Weighted average between VaR & losses exceeding VaR

– Aim to reduce probability a portfolio will incur large losses

Finland 2010

Page 7: Probabilistic Models

Optimization

Maximize f(X)Subject to: Ax ≤ bx ≥ 0

Finland 2010

Page 8: Probabilistic Models

Minimize VarianceMarkowitz extreme

Min Var [Y]Subject to: Pr{Ax ≤ b} ≥ α∑ x = limit = to avoid null solutionx ≥ 0

Finland 2010

Page 9: Probabilistic Models

Chance Constrained Model

• Maximize the expected value of a probabilistic function

Maximize E[Y] (where Y = f(X))Subject to: ∑ x = limitPr{Ax ≤ b} ≥ αx ≥ 0

Finland 2010

Page 10: Probabilistic Models

Maximize Probability

Max Pr{Y ≥ target}Subject to: ∑ x = limitPr{Ax ≤ b} ≥ αx ≥ 0

Finland 2010

Page 11: Probabilistic Models

Minimize VaR

Min LossSubject to: ∑ x = limitLoss = initial value - z1-α √[var-covar] + E[return]

where z1-α is in the lower tail, α= 0.99

x ≥ 0

• Equivalent to the worst you could experience at the given level

Finland 2010

Page 12: Probabilistic Models

Demonstration DataStock S Bond B SCIP G

Average return 0.148 0.060 0.152Variance 0.014697 0.000155 0.160791Covariance with S

0.000468 -0.002222

Covariance with B

-0.000227

Finland 2010

Page 13: Probabilistic Models

Maximize Expected Value of Probabilistic Function

• The objective is to maximize return:Expected return = 0.148 S + 0.060 B + 0.152 G• subject to staying within budget:Budget = 1 S + 1 B + 1 G ≤ 1000Pr{Expected return ≥ 0} ≥ αS, B, G ≥ 0

Finland 2010

Page 14: Probabilistic Models

SolutionsProbability{return≥0}

α Stock Bond Gamble Expected return

0.50 0 - - 1000.00 152.000.80 0.253 379.91 - 620.09 150.480.90 0.842 556.75 - 443.25 149.770.95 1.282 622.18 - 377.82 149.510.99 2.054 668.92 - 331.08 149.32

Finland 2010

Page 15: Probabilistic Models

Minimize Variance

Min 0.014697S2 + 0.000936SB - 0.004444SG + 0.000155B2 - 0.000454BG + 0.160791G2

st S + B + G 1000 budget constraint 0.148 S + 0.06 B + 0.152 G ≥ 50 • S, B, G ≥ 0

Finland 2010

Page 16: Probabilistic Models

SolutionsSpecified

GainVariance Stock Bond Gamble

≥50 106.00 - 825.30 3.17≥100 2,928.51 406.31 547.55 46.14≥150 42,761 500.00 - 500.00≥152 160,791 - - 1,000.00

Finland 2010

Page 17: Probabilistic Models

Max Probabilityα Stock Bond Gamble Expected

return3 157.84 821.59 20.57 75.784 73.21 914.93 11.86 67.53

4.5 406.31 547.55 46.14 64.174.8 500.00 - 500.00 61.48

4.9 and up - - - 0

Finland 2010

Page 18: Probabilistic Models

Real Stock Data – Student-t fit

Finland 2010

Page 19: Probabilistic Models

Logistic fit

Finland 2010

Page 20: Probabilistic Models

Daily Data: Gains

Ford IBM Pfizer SAP WalMart XOM S&P

Mean 1.00084 1.00033 0.99935 0.99993 1.00021 1.00012 0.99952

Std. Dev 0.03246 0.02257 0.02326 0.03137 0.02102 0.02034 0.01391

Min 0.62822 0.49101 0.34294 0.81797 0.53203 0.51134 0.90965

Max 1.29518 1.13160 1.10172 1.33720 1.11073 1.17191 1.11580

Cov(Ford) 0.00105 0.00019 0.00014 0.00020 0.00016 0.00015 0.00022

Cov(IBM) 0.00051 0.00009 0.00016 0.00013 0.00012 0.00018

Cov(Pfizer) 0.00054 0.00011 0.00014 0.00014 0.00014

Cov(SAP) 0.00098 0.00010 0.00016 0.00016

Cov(WM) 0.00044 0.00011 0.00014

Cov(XOM) 0.00041 0.00015

Cov(S&P) 0.00019

Finland 2010

Page 21: Probabilistic Models

ResultsModel Ford IBM Pfizer SAP WM XOM S&P Return Stdev

Max Return 1000.000

- - - - - - 1000.84 32.404

Min Variance - 45.987 90.869 30.811 127.508 116.004 588.821 999.76 13.156

NormalPr{>970}>.95

398.381 283.785

- - 222.557 95.277 - 1000.49 18.534

t Pr{>970}>.95

607.162 296.818

- - 96.020 - - 1000.63 23.035

t Pr{>970}>.95Pr{>980}>.9

581.627 301.528

- - 116.845 - - 1000.61 22.475

t Pr{>970}>.95Pr{>980}>.9Pr{>990}>.8

438.405 279.287

- - 220.254 62.054 - 1000.51 19.320

Max Pr{>1000}

16.275 109.867

105.586 38.748 174.570 172.244 382.711 999.91 13.310

Finland 2010